Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
commander aze
313
|
Posted - 2017.03.01 17:17:15 -
[61] - Quote
Live reddit AMA right now https://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/5wx0zk/ama_commander_aze_npsi_candidate_for_csmxii
Commander Aze For CSM XII
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=506400
Support the Community #Broadcast4Reps
|
DeMichael Crimson
Republic University Minmatar Republic
59666
|
Posted - 2017.03.02 09:52:38 -
[62] - Quote
Hello,
My question - what is your viewpoint regarding Faction standings and as a CSM member, what changes will you propose to CCP pertaining to game mechanics for Faction standings ?
Good luck to you in the upcoming CSM election.
DMC
'The Plan' | California Eve Players | Proposal - The Endless Battle
|
commander aze
313
|
Posted - 2017.03.02 13:50:11 -
[63] - Quote
DeMichael Crimson wrote:Hello,
My question - what is your viewpoint regarding Faction standings and as a CSM member, what changes will you propose to CCP pertaining to game mechanics for Faction standings ?
Good luck to you in the upcoming CSM election.
DMC
So this has been on of my fears specifically with regards to the npe dumping people off in faction warfare. Faction standings can seriously screw up a players long term game. Its to hard to alter these standings back to a balanced level for experienced players and consodering a new player wont understand the significance of the standinga till its too late and the damage will be done.
I think like sec statu there should be a buy this and exchange for favorwith a faction allowing people to get back to possitive standingswith the faction they need to.
Though I'm game to see other approachs and ideas.
Commander Aze For CSM XII
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=506400
Support the Community #Broadcast4Reps
|
DeMichael Crimson
Republic University Minmatar Republic
59671
|
Posted - 2017.03.02 15:06:57 -
[64] - Quote
commander aze wrote:DeMichael Crimson wrote:Hello,
My question - what is your viewpoint regarding Faction standings and as a CSM member, what changes will you propose to CCP pertaining to game mechanics for Faction standings ?
Good luck to you in the upcoming CSM election.
DMC So this has been on of my fears specifically with regards to the npe dumping people off in faction warfare. Faction standings can seriously screw up a players long term game. Its to hard to alter these standings back to a balanced level for experienced players and consodering a new player wont understand the significance of the standinga till its too late and the damage will be done. I think like sec statu there should be a buy this and exchange for favorwith a faction allowing people to get back to possitive standingswith the faction they need to. Though I'm game to see other approachs and ideas. Thanks for the reply.
This game was founded on the premise of having a balance on 'Risk vs Reward' and 'Actions vs Consequences'. It takes time for players to ruin Faction standings and as such it should also take some time to repair those standings. I know it's tough on new players who haven't learned the game yet. I use to be one of those players who was victimized by Negative Faction standings until I decided to do something about it. After 3 months of research in 2010, I created and shared the 'Faction Standing Repair Plan' with the Eve Online community.
I agree there should be more options available for characters to repair negative Faction standings but I don't like the idea of having Tags for Standings. Just like Tags for Security, I think those are nothing more than a 'Get Out Of Jail Free Card' for actions that should merit some consequences. In the past Characters use to be accountable for their actions in-game, now most everything has been dumbed down and turned into easy mode for the instant gratification crowd.
In my opinion Anti-Empire missions should have a warning to alert players that accepting and completing those mission will affect their Faction standings in a negative aspect. Also the process of standings repair should be implemented in-game to be more intuitive instead of being so obscure. Lastly CCP could add another group of NPC Agents strictly for Faction standing repair, sorta like the proposal I have listed in my forum signature.
Anyway, thanks again for the reply and good luck in the upcoming election.
DMC
'The Plan' | California Eve Players | Proposal - The Endless Battle
|
Claevyan
The Suicide Express Rejection Of Sovereignty
13
|
Posted - 2017.03.02 18:26:41 -
[65] - Quote
commander aze wrote:
So this has been on of my fears specifically with regards to the npe dumping people off in faction warfare. Faction standings can seriously screw up a players long term game. Its to hard to alter these standings back to a balanced level for experienced players and consodering a new player wont understand the significance of the standinga till its too late and the damage will be done.
I think like sec statu there should be a buy this and exchange for favorwith a faction allowing people to get back to possitive standingswith the faction they need to.
Though I'm game to see other approachs and ideas.
I caution against a full Faction Status buy-back system on the grounds that would cause further problems with other in game systems. We might solve the problem of "Oops! I blapped my standings when I blapped them ships" but we'd devalue the use of faction standings overall.
It might be better to try and increase the visibility of faction standings and the changes your actions can have as well as increase the in-game awareness of faction standings through warnings and NPE education.
I wouldn't mind seeing CCP add value to faction standings overall, through reworking the use of standings in some way. It might help to improve life for those who seek a more PvE play style in EvE.
CSM 12: No Sov. No Agenda. No Promises.
|
commander aze
316
|
Posted - 2017.03.02 18:49:22 -
[66] - Quote
Couod scale it have a max that can be bought back (enough not to get shot at in their space. Obviously not pump to +10. Im just spitballing ideas i dk t really have a firm opinion on it
Commander Aze For CSM XII
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=506400
Support the Community #Broadcast4Reps
|
Claevyan
The Suicide Express Rejection Of Sovereignty
13
|
Posted - 2017.03.02 18:51:22 -
[67] - Quote
I agree there. Added a concession edit to my response before i saw yours.
CSM 12: No Sov. No Agenda. No Promises.
|
commander aze
318
|
Posted - 2017.03.03 03:45:31 -
[68] - Quote
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8yozqN6lDYUjvi82sVu-UA
Going live soon! Talking in stations Roundtable
Commander Aze For CSM XII
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=506400
Support the Community #Broadcast4Reps
|
commander aze
318
|
Posted - 2017.03.03 13:32:10 -
[69] - Quote
Possitive mention again last night on Eve Prosper hosted by lockefox https://youtu.be/hYWqFmd5ews
Commander Aze For CSM XII
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=506400
Support the Community #Broadcast4Reps
|
commander aze
318
|
Posted - 2017.03.03 20:17:36 -
[70] - Quote
https://eve-nt.uk/article/2017-03-03-201255-CSM12-Candidate-commander-aze/
Commander Aze For CSM XII
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=506400
Support the Community #Broadcast4Reps
|
|
commander aze
320
|
Posted - 2017.03.04 02:51:32 -
[71] - Quote
https://www.twitch.tv/imperiumnews live now
Commander Aze For CSM XII
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=506400
Support the Community #Broadcast4Reps
|
commander aze
320
|
Posted - 2017.03.04 18:57:56 -
[72] - Quote
Stay tuned for CSM roundtablet on Declarations of war Podcast
Commander Aze For CSM XII
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=506400
Support the Community #Broadcast4Reps
|
commander aze
320
|
Posted - 2017.03.05 00:55:39 -
[73] - Quote
http://nevillesmit.com/blog/2017/3/4/a-high-sec-coalition
Positive mention my community member Neville Smit
Commander Aze For CSM XII
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=506400
Support the Community #Broadcast4Reps
|
commander aze
320
|
Posted - 2017.03.05 00:58:23 -
[74] - Quote
http://declarationsofwar.com/csm-xii-candidate-roundtable-1/
Declarations of War Roundtable From Today!
Commander Aze For CSM XII
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=506400
Support the Community #Broadcast4Reps
|
TheSmokingHertog
Julia's Interstellar Trade Emperium
456
|
Posted - 2017.03.05 04:54:27 -
[75] - Quote
Ow, another thing in little things, Contract Notifications on entering new Eden, not on opening contract node.
"Dogma is kind of like quantum physics, observing the dogma state will change it." ~ CCP Prism X
"Schrödinger's Missile. I dig it." ~ Makari Aeron
-= "Brain in a Box on Singularity" - April 2015 =-
|
commander aze
337
|
Posted - 2017.03.05 23:13:27 -
[76] - Quote
Double Whammy today for Press release news
https://mikeazariah.wordpress.com/2017/03/05/eight-by-eight/ Mike Azariah for those that don't know is Easily the coolest guy in highsec and someone I have really looked up to in the Eve community. Also a former CSM https://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/2017/03/05/csm-voting-suggestions/ Fuzzysteve "Steve Ronuken" a Multiyear elected CSM widely considered the Savior of high sec and a keystone to DevFleet (3rd party application development) and All around Classy Guy, For the love of God Make sure this guy gets 1 of the 10 seats on the CSM
Commander Aze For CSM XII
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=506400
Support the Community #Broadcast4Reps
|
Hr Mesetas
Domain Trade Corp
89
|
Posted - 2017.03.06 15:45:23 -
[77] - Quote
Hi,
What is your view on an option to put corpshares on the market ? |
commander aze
339
|
Posted - 2017.03.06 22:53:57 -
[78] - Quote
Hr Mesetas wrote:Hi,
What is your view on an option to put corpshares on the market ? id be for a investment fund and stock exchange, I think that could be fun and meaningful gameplay
Commander Aze For CSM XII
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=506400
Support the Community #Broadcast4Reps
|
commander aze
340
|
Posted - 2017.03.07 13:25:57 -
[79] - Quote
Special thanks to mindclash for having me on the show last night wuth suitonia.
Commander Aze For CSM XII
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=506400
Support the Community #Broadcast4Reps
|
commander aze
342
|
Posted - 2017.03.08 01:53:50 -
[80] - Quote
http://declarationsofwar.com/csm-xii-dow-ballot/#.WL8hvf8YAT0.twitter
Declarations of War Endorsement
Commander Aze For CSM XII
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=506400
Support the Community #Broadcast4Reps
|
|
commander aze
342
|
Posted - 2017.03.08 05:35:51 -
[81] - Quote
https://youtu.be/crgleGaFpOU another endorcement 8:15 ish from Asherothi
Commander Aze For CSM XII
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=506400
Support the Community #Broadcast4Reps
|
commander aze
342
|
Posted - 2017.03.08 05:42:26 -
[82] - Quote
https://secure-hwcdn.libsyn.com/p/0/5/2/0520160ea6a82149/Mind_Clash_CSM_Picks.mp3?c_id=14442675&expiration=1488952445&hwt=b69d837ee3e017b4ac79b24253570a6b
Mindclash podcast endorcement
Commander Aze For CSM XII
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=506400
Support the Community #Broadcast4Reps
|
commander aze
342
|
Posted - 2017.03.08 05:47:52 -
[83] - Quote
I can no longer fit any more links in my original post in this thread. The Press tour is too strong compaired to forum character limit.
Commander Aze For CSM XII
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=506400
Support the Community #Broadcast4Reps
|
Cochise Chiricahua
The Scope Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2017.03.08 12:53:07 -
[84] - Quote
07 Candidate!
First, thank you for your time and effort (both present and future) in representing the capsuleers of New Eden! TheyGÇÖre much appreciated.
IGÇÖm preparing to cast my vote in the CSM12 elections. After reading the information you submitted, though, I still have a question.
By way of background, I started in Eve as a hauler, moving freight in T1 industrials and gradually working my way up in both ships and cargo. However, I repeatedly found my progress impeded by gankers who would destroy my ship and steal my cargo. In low- and null-sec space, thatGÇÖs to be expected. You place your bet and take your chances. In high-sec space, however, this is very frustrating. Why have high-sec space at all then? This frustration drove me into anti-ganking, and IGÇÖve been a proud member of Thomas en Chasteaux's High-Sec Militia for several months now.
So, my question. Where do you stand on high-sec ganking? IGÇÖll concede that ganking is a legitimate style of game play, as CCP has ruled. But I also feel that it should be difficult and dangerous (for the ganker) in the 30% of New Eden designated as high-sec space. In particular, IGÇÖd like to see CCP tweak the game mechanics so that the criminal flag generated by looting a ganked freighter in high-sec space follows all players who handle that loot, and otherwise make looting more realistic. (Thomas en Chasteaux's ideas, not mine.)
As a member of the CSM, would you present such an idea to CCP? Would you push for its adoption? What other game changes might you consider to make high-sec ganking more difficult and less profitable?
Regards, Cochise Chiricahua. |
TheSmokingHertog
Julia's Interstellar Trade Emperium
457
|
Posted - 2017.03.08 13:30:05 -
[85] - Quote
Cochise Chiricahua wrote:So, my question. Where do you stand on high-sec ganking? IGÇÖll concede that ganking is a legitimate style of game play, as CCP has ruled. But I also feel that it should be difficult and dangerous (for the ganker) in the 30% of New Eden designated as high-sec space. In particular, IGÇÖd like to see CCP tweak the game mechanics so that the criminal flag generated by looting a ganked freighter in high-sec space follows all players who handle that loot, and otherwise make looting more realistic. ( Thomas en Chasteaux's ideas, not mine.)
Let me sneak in here for a bit.
/rant
As someone who ships billions a month, I would like the warzones between empires to be extended, no continues highsec between the major trade hubs. At least 1/2 low sec hops on each high way.
Then the highsec ganking on traderoutes would be a whole other discussion and local tradehubs would be booming.
As for mining, the bulk of mining volumes is centered in certain systems in EVE (see the regional economical reports by CCP Quant). The people mining there ask to be ganked.
In a game where everything is based on risk vs reward, people should understand that it is stupid to mine in systems with huge number of people with mining equipment. Go mine in Khanid, or Kor-Azor and you are the king of the Ore belts (saying you want to mine in Highsec in the first place). No gankers in the whole constellation.
Please mine smarter, not more political correct.
/end rant
"Dogma is kind of like quantum physics, observing the dogma state will change it." ~ CCP Prism X
"Schrödinger's Missile. I dig it." ~ Makari Aeron
-= "Brain in a Box on Singularity" - April 2015 =-
|
commander aze
342
|
Posted - 2017.03.08 13:52:05 -
[86] - Quote
So here is my thoughts..
So keep in mind Ive been ganked my fair share.
Ganking is mostly preventable in a few ways. 1. Move less value at 1 time 2. Webbing alts 3. Mining in scarcely populated systems 4. Other ways possible.
Now is it particularly engaging gameplay when it happens. No. Is it fun .... for the aggressor yes. For defence its more or less a suprize colonoscopy and has and does cause people to quit eve.
Thats the scope in which my opionion is formed. Now its been nerfed several times and I think freighters are roughly where they need to be. On the risk vs reward balance.
The existance of counter play is nessesary. And I think it would be better to look at unlimited bumping and setting a limit to it vs making a major change again to ganking.
Commander Aze For CSM XII
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=506400
Support the Community #Broadcast4Reps
|
commander aze
343
|
Posted - 2017.03.09 01:49:40 -
[87] - Quote
Open for Questions / Press events throughout the voting period and after
Commander Aze For CSM XII
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=506400
Support the Community #Broadcast4Reps
|
Tasspool Harp
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
50
|
Posted - 2017.03.09 05:47:23 -
[88] - Quote
Hello Commander Aze
I read your AMA and agree that PI needs an overhaul so you have my vote.
As a someone who identifies as a high sec candidate, what are your thoughts on keeping time-poor and casual players operating in high-sec engaged and retained ? |
Alderson Point
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
37
|
Posted - 2017.03.09 12:21:51 -
[89] - Quote
commander aze wrote:Couod scale it have a max that can be bought back (enough not to get shot at in their space. Obviously not pump to +10. Im just spitballing ideas i dk t really have a firm opinion on it I agree with much of what DMC has to say, and your suggestion of tags for faction repair has value to corrrect seriously negative faction standings.
However, standings, are still important to PVE play over and above just not getting shot by the navies.
In addition to tags for standings repair, Can you push for Agents where you can run missions or do tasks to gain positive faction standings without negative standings for the other factions. Other than L4 Epic arcs.
These may require more effort or lower rewards to be balanced, but it would save situations (IE Thukker) where it is near impossible to ever pull back from an early mistake as they have a negative relationship to just about everyone.
Thanks, PS You have my vote. |
Wiera Yezalel
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2017.03.09 13:04:47 -
[90] - Quote
Make Eve Great Again - you got my vote! |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |