Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 .. 16 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Lady Ayeipsia
Perkone Caldari State
1294
|
Posted - 2017.01.04 19:51:40 -
[421] - Quote
One point, many people seem to be assuming that the mining fleets are the end result instead of the initial stages of new NPC behavior. In addition, people seem to forget or not know of the past history of NPCs in eve nor the systems in place to help deal with this already.
For example, the NPC haulers of old. They would travel from station to station in system. If killed you would take a sec hit and standing loss. You gain some random loot that at one point was valuable. They did not have defense fleets but of your empire faction Standing fell you had faction police around. The new mining fleets are an extension of this.
Also, the Diplomacy skill would solve many problems here. Unless you killed a lot of DCM players, you can train Diplomacy to improve negative standings. Heck at level 5, Diplomacy turns my -10 Gurista standing to -6. I believe you would need DCM standing below -8 to not have Diplomacy eliminate this problem. |
Teckos Pech
The Executives Executive Outcomes
5666
|
Posted - 2017.01.04 19:57:57 -
[422] - Quote
Okay, after going back and reading the thread I see Remiel as having two issues with this change. I have quoted them below.
Remiel Pollard wrote:I'm not asking to not be attacked by rats. I'm asking that the reason they attack makes sense. Now in my OP, I did take issue with these new NPCs interfering in PVP, but reading your comments and others, I've since changed my position on this. Yes, it adds a new dynamic that I can, and already have, adapted to. But the big problem I'm having is how those negative standings came about to cause me to be KOS to DCM. linkOn that note, I'm going to stand my ground on this: NPCs need to be boring and dull. The challenge of EVE needs to be the other players. The new AI was fun to play with, but it's just one of those PVE distractions that detracts from the PVP of the game. link
I agree with Remiel that the method of getting bad standings is a bit questionable. IGÇÖve read SalvosGÇÖ view and I donGÇÖt entirely agree with it. If I do something dumb and suffer a loss, even a substantial loss, my corp mates will likely poke fun at me over it and have little to no interest in GÇ£avenging meGÇ¥. Will they kill the person who imposed this loss on me if the opportunity presents itself? Sure, but not because of my earlier foolishness.
Similarly, if I am attacked by a DCM player and defeat him, losing standings with DCM seems out of place. Second of all it seems that if DCM is the only mining corporation that allows this it is indeed something of an advantage, admittedly a slight one, for those players. Preferential treatment in a game is not good. So, this should probably be addressed.
Simplest solution: everyone in DCM is moved to another NPC corp that does not have mining fleet. There RemielGÇÖs first issue is solved and nobody gets preferential treatment.
As for RemielGÇÖs second issue I get his argument. We donGÇÖt want the NPCs in game to be too interesting becauseGǪwellGǪwe want them to interact with other players. Yeah, thatGÇÖs nice, but seems that not everyone wants to do that, and well it is as sandbox.
So here is my counter argument to Remiel. These new and better NPCs will keep some players engaged with the gameGǪand those players are kind of like antelopeGÇöi.e. they are food for the predators. Let them be entertained by these new NPCs, but if they are doing this in LS or NS and I happen to be in localGǪgood chance IGÇÖm hunting them. That is, whether they intended it or notGǪthey will be my content.
"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek
|
Teckos Pech
The Executives Executive Outcomes
5666
|
Posted - 2017.01.04 20:01:19 -
[423] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
The objective/subjective side issue was moot and immaterial. It is a philosophical issue whether any individual can be objective, or whether any body of science can be truly objective. I am as "subjective" or "objective" as any other human being, but that again is neither here nor there in relation to the issues discussed in this thread.
Ha!
"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek
|
Lady Ayeipsia
Perkone Caldari State
1296
|
Posted - 2017.01.04 20:16:07 -
[424] - Quote
http://massivelyop.com/2015/10/28/eve-vegas-2015-what-to-expect-from-eve-vegas-2015-2/
Again, the idea of more dynamic NPCs in eve is old and a goal of CCP. It may not roll out perfectly and it may mess up some things.
Still, to play in a world that is more alive be it NPC life or not, i am happy to watch. Yeah it will be interesting. Yeah there may be oddities. But still to see more active consequences for our actions is great. |
Etain Darklightner Agittain
Aliastra Gallente Federation
7
|
Posted - 2017.01.04 21:29:43 -
[425] - Quote
Omar Alharazaad wrote:Personally, the part that interests me is that a minority of the player populace can game this mechanic to provide them with NPC aid in PVP in high security space. I'm talking deliberately, not incidentally. Granted, setting the circumstances up to make it happen requires both work and luck. However, if you do pull it off you get a hotdrop of a friendly NPC fleet repping you without fear of losing their neutral logi... because they have the rest of their kill fleet present to defend said logi.
Mind you, it doesn't trouble me that this can be used as a trap. What concerns me is that it is limited only to special snowflakes such as myself, or others who've ground like bloody murder to be deemed almost as awesome by DCM. It's almost like CCP has decided that anyone who's not Deities is a scrub or something.
Here is what I expected to see. Not the whining but rather the exploitation of mechanics in game, purposefully and articulately placed by the Denveloperst. Make use of what is possible, don't bother with what isn't.
Then again I don't see myself as a snowflake who deserves a participation trophy. Get in or GTFO, understand your environment and adapt or don't and get podded. I don't care which you choose remi, get on with it. I'm done with your empty rhetoric and your targeted metaphorical descriptions you have of posters on this thread. |
Brylan Grey
Concordia Inc.
72
|
Posted - 2017.01.04 21:44:05 -
[426] - Quote
OP: Can I have your stuff? |
Teckos Pech
The Executives Executive Outcomes
5666
|
Posted - 2017.01.04 21:45:53 -
[427] - Quote
Brylan Grey wrote:OP: Can I have your stuff?
"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek
|
Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
1365
|
Posted - 2017.01.04 22:01:33 -
[428] - Quote
Brylan Grey wrote:OP: Can I have your stuff? Sure you can. Go take it off him. He's pretty easy to find in lowsec based on his killboard.
Of course, you wouldn't just be a gutless sperg would you?
Dracvlad - "...Your intel is free intel, all you do is pay for it..." && "...If you warp on the same path as a cloaked ship, you'll make a bookmark at exactly the same spot as the cloaky camper..."
|
Syn Shi
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
213
|
Posted - 2017.01.04 23:14:15 -
[429] - Quote
Bring friends Git good Risk/Reward Consequences
Maybe some cheese with that wine |
Remiel Pollard
Shock Treatment Ministries
8657
|
Posted - 2017.01.05 00:37:53 -
[430] - Quote
Brylan Grey wrote:OP: Can I have your stuff?
You know, I can still count the number of ships I've lost to solo PVP'ers on one hand. Every other time I've lost something, It's required three or more people.
So bring friends.
GÇ£Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'.
Jam those ones first, and kill them last.GÇ¥
- Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104
|
|
Remiel Pollard
Shock Treatment Ministries
8657
|
Posted - 2017.01.05 05:07:07 -
[431] - Quote
Etain Darklightner Agittain wrote:Omar Alharazaad wrote:Personally, the part that interests me is that a minority of the player populace can game this mechanic to provide them with NPC aid in PVP in high security space. I'm talking deliberately, not incidentally. Granted, setting the circumstances up to make it happen requires both work and luck. However, if you do pull it off you get a hotdrop of a friendly NPC fleet repping you without fear of losing their neutral logi... because they have the rest of their kill fleet present to defend said logi.
Mind you, it doesn't trouble me that this can be used as a trap. What concerns me is that it is limited only to special snowflakes such as myself, or others who've ground like bloody murder to be deemed almost as awesome by DCM. It's almost like CCP has decided that anyone who's not Deities is a scrub or something. Here is what I expected to see. Not the whining but rather the exploitation of mechanics in game, purposefully and articulately placed by the Denveloperst. Make use of what is possible, don't bother with what isn't. Then again I don't see myself as a snowflake who deserves a participation trophy. Get in or GTFO, understand your environment and adapt or don't and get podded. I don't care which you choose remi, get on with it. I'm done with your empty rhetoric and your targeted metaphorical descriptions you have of posters on this thread.
Criticism of, and raising awareness of flaws in new mechanics =/= whining. Referring to it as 'whining' tells me exactly where you stand, hence why you and your opinions are as worthless as that NPC corp you're in. What you 'expect' of me, and what I can do, are two completely unrelated things. Who the actual **** are you that I should care what you expect?
GÇ£Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'.
Jam those ones first, and kill them last.GÇ¥
- Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104
|
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
8156
|
Posted - 2017.01.05 05:46:06 -
[432] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:Railyn Quisqueya wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:Etain Darklightner Agittain wrote:
Restating the obvious thing we should be doing in lowsec, while informative as to your position, is unnecessarily redundent.
The consequences are obvious, pop a pc in an npc mining Corp, get shot back at. Ganking shouldn't be easy for anyone, or in this case, as you put it, killing spies and scouts in system shouldn't be easy. CCP doesn't look like they're going to change the mechanics of this so maybe bring your friends along for all to get their kill mails?
You attack people in their posts for reading comprehension as they respond to you, as if, you're better than they are somehow. You're not, you look dodgy at best putting people down instead of taking into consideration that maybe they might have something to offer you. I just see you as trolling.
Sorry, but restating the same carebear crap that's already been argued against in this thread isn't a point. I suggest you try reading it. And if I'm vitriolic, it's because I'm getting sick and tired of the so far wilful ignorance that leads to posts like yours. You know, Remiel? For someone who claims to be autistic, you sure like to insult people's intelligence just by them simply disagreeing with you. I don't know if it's some kind of defense mechanism. I suspect it is. People have brought up very valid points in this thread that do not necessarily align with your views. It doesn't mean they're automatically inferior to your intelligence. You need to learn to accept that other people's opinions may be just as valid as yours. Or, if you feel it isn't valid, address the opinion, not the person. If you already have, then move on. No need for the snarky intelligence remarks. Just some thoughts to live by. You have also demonstrated a refusal/inability to read and keep up and subsequently form any kind of educated opinion on the topic at hand, so why the **** should I care what you have to say or think about me? Maybe you should read more of the posts that these two have posted in open hostility to me BEFORE I became hostile to them. Oh, wait, you don't want to, because you'd rather be hostile to me as well, as you were in your own first post on this thread. GG.
Remiel. You Ok? B4R is ^
Bring back DEEEEP Space!
|
Remiel Pollard
Shock Treatment Ministries
8657
|
Posted - 2017.01.05 05:53:41 -
[433] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
Remiel. You Ok? B4R is ^
I hope you're not belittling real life emotional anxiety by comparing it to a difference of opinion over a video game. That would be incredibly trashy of you.
GÇ£Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'.
Jam those ones first, and kill them last.GÇ¥
- Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104
|
Teckos Pech
The Executives Executive Outcomes
5666
|
Posted - 2017.01.05 06:13:58 -
[434] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
Remiel. You Ok? B4R is ^
I hope you were being sincere otherwise you are noting but a complete and giant douche.
"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek
|
Salvos Rhoska
1871
|
Posted - 2017.01.05 07:18:15 -
[435] - Quote
1) That there is currently only one joinable NPC corp to which this system applies, is a balance problem.
2) The system itself, however, is not a balance problem.
PvE v PvP
<>
Old School Exploration
<>
CODE Licenses
<>
CODE Special Agent
|
Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
1365
|
Posted - 2017.01.05 07:20:59 -
[436] - Quote
Teckos Pech wrote:Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
Remiel. You Ok? B4R is ^
I hope you were being sincere otherwise you are noting but a complete and giant douche. I know what I'd be putting my money on.
Herzog being a bot aligned lying douche.
Dracvlad - "...Your intel is free intel, all you do is pay for it..." && "...If you warp on the same path as a cloaked ship, you'll make a bookmark at exactly the same spot as the cloaky camper..."
|
Salvos Rhoska
1871
|
Posted - 2017.01.05 07:33:29 -
[437] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:I hope you're not belittling real life emotional anxiety by comparing it to a difference of opinion over a video game. That would be incredibly trashy of you.
Teckos Pech wrote:I hope you were being sincere otherwise you are nothing but a complete and giant douche.
Shae Tadaruwa wrote:Herzog being a bot aligned lying douche.
And the ad-hominem insult brigade continues.
Whilst ignoring the dozens of incidents of personal abuse, insults and disrespect Remiel and these others continue to lay on those that disagree with them.
Its liked you learned nothing.
PvE v PvP
<>
Old School Exploration
<>
CODE Licenses
<>
CODE Special Agent
|
Remiel Pollard
Shock Treatment Ministries
8657
|
Posted - 2017.01.05 07:59:38 -
[438] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:I hope you're not belittling real life emotional anxiety by comparing it to a difference of opinion over a video game. That would be incredibly trashy of you. Teckos Pech wrote:I hope you were being sincere otherwise you are nothing but a complete and giant douche. Shae Tadaruwa wrote:Herzog being a bot aligned lying douche. And the ad-hominem insult brigade continues. Whilst ignoring the dozens of incidents of personal abuse, insults and disrespect Remiel and these others continue to lay on those that disagree with them. Its like you learned nothing. You went right back to self-destructing your own thread and exhibiting exactly the behavior for which you have already been called out on and criticized.
No, I was criticising someone's use of real-world emotional struggles as an attempt to throw me off balance. It is, actually, a very trashy thing to do. I have no delusion that he has genuine concern for my well-being, so you can take that ad-hom projection of yours, and shove it up your arse.
GÇ£Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'.
Jam those ones first, and kill them last.GÇ¥
- Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104
|
Teckos Pech
The Executives Executive Outcomes
5667
|
Posted - 2017.01.05 08:00:39 -
[439] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:I hope you're not belittling real life emotional anxiety by comparing it to a difference of opinion over a video game. That would be incredibly trashy of you. Teckos Pech wrote:I hope you were being sincere otherwise you are nothing but a complete and giant douche. Shae Tadaruwa wrote:Herzog being a bot aligned lying douche. And the ad-hominem insult brigade continues. Whilst ignoring the dozens of incidents of personal abuse, insults and disrespect Remiel and these others continue to lay on those that disagree with them. Its like you learned nothing. You went right back to self-destructing your own thread and exhibiting exactly the behavior for which you have already been called out on and criticized.
Making a joke out of depression and people suffering psychiatric emergencies is not funny at all. Now maybe Herzog was being serious, but I don't see anything in Remiel's posts to indicate he is in psychiatric distress so my first thought is that Herzog was being a douche, but I thought I'd give him the benefit of the doubt and made it a conditional statement.
Since I have a loved one who has suffered through major depression I have to say, if Herzog was making a joke I think a permanent forum ban would be in order as it is no laughing matter.
"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek
|
Salvos Rhoska
1874
|
Posted - 2017.01.05 08:06:50 -
[440] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:you can take that ad-hom projection of yours, and shove it up your arse.
Teckos Pech wrote:Since I have a loved one who has suffered through major depression I have to say, if Herzog was making a joke I think a permanent forum ban would be in order as it is no laughing matter.
I refer you to the dozens of incidents of Remiel, yourself and others being abusive, insulting and disrespectful of people that may infact be suffering from severe clinical depressions, autism or any number of conditions without you knowing it.
That is part of the reason such behavior is not allowed, in addition to it obviously being uncivil, dragging down the quality of the community and the board.
I have, and will continue to list all insults, abuse and disrespect you continue to lay on participants you disagree with and wish to denigrate.
You have no ground to stand on. Look at the list in my post above which constitutes not even 1/10 of the totality of what you and others listed have said throughout this thread.
Herzog asked if Remiel is ok. There is nothing wrong with asking someone if they are OK. Its a perfectly normal colloquial term used around the world millions of times a day.
The very fact you attempt to twist that and insinuate that to mean something you do not know it to mean, is insulting and disrespectful in and of itself.
You are continuing to exhibit, constantly, exactly the kind of behavior you have already been called out on many times. You are continuing to destroy your own thread, and avoiding ontop discussion in preference of attempting to force out participants with insults and abuse.
PvE v PvP
<>
Old School Exploration
<>
CODE Licenses
<>
CODE Special Agent
|
|
Teckos Pech
The Executives Executive Outcomes
5667
|
Posted - 2017.01.05 08:12:53 -
[441] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:you can take that ad-hom projection of yours, and shove it up your arse. Teckos Pech wrote:Since I have a loved one who has suffered through major depression I have to say, if Herzog was making a joke I think a permanent forum ban would be in order as it is no laughing matter. I refer you to the dozens of incidents of Remiel, yourself and others being abusive, insulting and disrespectful of people that may infact be suffering from serious clinical depressions, autism or any number of conditions without you knowing it. I have, and will continue to list all insults, abuse and disrespect you continue to lay on participants you disagree with and wish to denigrate. You have no ground to stand on. Look at the list in my post above which constitutes not even 1/10 of the totality of what you and others listed have said throughout this thread.
Herzog asked if Remiel is ok. There is nothing wrong with asking someone if they are OK. Its a perfectly normal colloquial term used around the world millions of times a day. The very fact you attempt to twist that and insinuate that to mean something you do not know it to mean, is insulting and disrespectful in and of itself.
Please learn to read douche.
"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek
|
Teckos Pech
The Executives Executive Outcomes
5667
|
Posted - 2017.01.05 08:15:30 -
[442] - Quote
BTW, why don't you let Herzog defend himself.
And learn what a conditional statement means.
"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek
|
Remiel Pollard
Shock Treatment Ministries
8657
|
Posted - 2017.01.05 08:21:15 -
[443] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:you can take that ad-hom projection of yours, and shove it up your arse. Teckos Pech wrote:Since I have a loved one who has suffered through major depression I have to say, if Herzog was making a joke I think a permanent forum ban would be in order as it is no laughing matter. I refer you to the dozens of incidents of Remiel, yourself and others being abusive, insulting and disrespectful of people that may infact be suffering from serious clinical depressions, autism or any number of conditions without you knowing it.
I'm going to stop you right there and remind you that this is not a psychology forum, nor are you a professional psychologist. I know this because, as I stated before, if you were, you would know that unsolicited advice is actually illegal, as is sharing private information such as diagnoses. I treat you like crap, and others, when they are worth crap. Less than crap. And I simply have no tolerance for your bullshit anymore. You can call it whatever you want, but if you're going to use serious mental conditions to 'other' people just because they don't behave in a way that you find acceptable, then you are actually incredibly disgusting. People are different, and not everyone is going to either agree with you, or like you, regardless of what you think of their behaviour, and that does not indicate a mental condition. In fact, you are also required, by law, to provide a client with a very specific minimum number of hours of analyses prior to issuing a formal diagnosis of any kind, a formal diagnosis being the only legal one that matters.
I know all this because I am, in fact, autistic. Twenty years ago, I did CBT and a full range of professional treatments. These days, I know who I am, what I am, and I have no insecurities about myself. It's why it's so easy for me to make real friends that matter, because I feel no obligation to impress anyone, or give a **** what they think of me. Autism, however, does not indicate anything, because it is a spectrum, with a range of comorbidities that have as much chance of occuring as not occuring in any given person with autism. I'm afraid, though, that I'm not depressed, nor do I feel like killing myself, which is what B4R is really all about, and for Herzog to direct me there as if my criticism was little more than the result of depression-driven rage is not just dismissive to the point of being ad-hominem, but it's also dismissive of people with the real deal, as if that's the way we expect them to behave.
Let me tell you how someone with depression would actually behave here. They would probably break down and give up the moment someone said anything negative to them, and would be much more unlikely to stand up for themselves as I have in this thread, because depression causes massive drops in self-esteem due to insecurities, insecurities that result from people like you and Herzog being pretentious snobs with your heads so far up your own arses you can probably pleasure your own colons.
GÇ£Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'.
Jam those ones first, and kill them last.GÇ¥
- Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104
|
Salvos Rhoska
1876
|
Posted - 2017.01.05 08:21:51 -
[444] - Quote
Teckos Pech wrote:BTW, why don't you let Herzog defend himself.
And learn what a conditional statement means.
Your question has been answered.
You directed an insult at me by calling me a douche. And I have already linked where you have insulted others too. You have mo moral ground to stand on and this makes your presumption of innocence clearly false.
Your conditional clause is implicative, and loaded.
PvE v PvP
<>
Old School Exploration
<>
CODE Licenses
<>
CODE Special Agent
|
Diane Persis
7
|
Posted - 2017.01.05 08:23:16 -
[445] - Quote
You're trying to reason with people who love to argue and who love for problems and issues to exist and continue to exist, because they love to argue. |
Teckos Pech
The Executives Executive Outcomes
5667
|
Posted - 2017.01.05 08:26:45 -
[446] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Teckos Pech wrote:BTW, why don't you let Herzog defend himself.
And learn what a conditional statement means. Your question has been answered. You directed an insult at me by calling me a douche. And I have already linked where you have insulted others too. You have mo moral ground to stand on and this makes your presumption of innocence clearly false. Your conditional clause is implicative, and loaded.
Yes, because you accused me of something I did not do. And why is Herzog not defending himself while here you are his zealot advocate. Let him answer for himself and stop defending him.
Either Herzog:
A. Made a very tasteless joke. B. Honestly felt that Remiel was in psychiatric distress, but for the life of me why he would think this is beyond me.
Stop doubling down on stupid.
Edit: Oh and the Goddamn irony of you complaining about a loaded statement. You just broke my irony meter.
"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek
|
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
8159
|
Posted - 2017.01.05 08:28:20 -
[447] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
Remiel. You Ok? B4R is ^
I hope you're not belittling real life emotional anxiety by comparing it to a difference of opinion over a video game. That would be incredibly trashy of you.
You just contradicted yourself to such an extent I'm going to sit back and marvel at it.
Bring back DEEEEP Space!
|
Teckos Pech
The Executives Executive Outcomes
5667
|
Posted - 2017.01.05 08:29:11 -
[448] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
Remiel. You Ok? B4R is ^
I hope you're not belittling real life emotional anxiety by comparing it to a difference of opinion over a video game. That would be incredibly trashy of you. You just contradicted yourself to such an extent I'm going to sit back and marvel at it.
Seriously?
Okay then.
"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek
|
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
8159
|
Posted - 2017.01.05 08:29:39 -
[449] - Quote
Teckos Pech wrote:Salvos Rhoska wrote:Teckos Pech wrote:BTW, why don't you let Herzog defend himself.
And learn what a conditional statement means. Your question has been answered. You directed an insult at me by calling me a douche. And I have already linked where you have insulted others too. You have mo moral ground to stand on and this makes your presumption of innocence clearly false. Your conditional clause is implicative, and loaded. Yes, because you accused me of something I did not do. And why is Herzog not defending himself while here you are his zealot advocate. Let him answer for himself and stop defending him. Either Herzog: A. Made a very tasteless joke. B. Honestly felt that Remiel was in psychiatric distress, but for the life of me why he would think this is beyond me. Stop doubling down on stupid. Edit: Oh and the Goddamn irony of you complaining about a loaded statement. You just broke my irony meter.
Hmmm
Concern trolling Pearl clutching Virtue signaling
Very SJW of you. I'm still seeing you at the keyboard, purple hair, 5 genders and a virgin in all of them.
Bring back DEEEEP Space!
|
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
8159
|
Posted - 2017.01.05 08:33:52 -
[450] - Quote
Shae Tadaruwa wrote:Teckos Pech wrote:Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
Remiel. You Ok? B4R is ^
I hope you were being sincere otherwise you are noting but a complete and giant douche. I know what I'd be putting my money on. Herzog being a bot aligned lying douche.
Awwww Shae. I have yet to call you names. I will silently laugh at the mental picture I have of you. When are you going to learn that nobody cares how you feel about anything?
Bring back DEEEEP Space!
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 .. 16 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |