Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Siigari Kitawa
Waking Dreams
430
|
Posted - 2016.11.18 07:00:09 -
[1] - Quote
The last time I deployed a citadel this was not the case. Now I must have the system name with a dash in front of it?
I am all for immersion and what not, but I was honestly going to name it Sysname III - Blah blah blah. Now it's working against me to do what I wanted to do, and I can't even do that.
Why not!?
Need stuff moved? Push Industries will handle it.
Serving highsec, lowsec and nullsec - and we do it faster and more reliably than anyone else.
Ingame channel: PUSHX
|
Arcelian
Metentis
205
|
Posted - 2016.11.18 08:29:14 -
[2] - Quote
Yeah I don't like it either, especially wormhole citadels. J176524373273463 - "Your Name" Stupid. |
Cristl
511
|
Posted - 2016.11.18 12:51:45 -
[3] - Quote
What about Sysname - III Blah blah blah? |
Memphis Baas
2276
|
Posted - 2016.11.18 13:00:23 -
[4] - Quote
Siigari Kitawa wrote:Why not!?
CCP changed it after a slew of "0 tax here" citadels that were within market trading range of Jita but nobody knew where the hell they were. |
Khan Wrenth
Ore Oppression Prevention and Salvation
724
|
Posted - 2016.11.18 14:00:55 -
[5] - Quote
Memphis Baas wrote:CCP changed it after a slew of "0 tax here" citadels that were within market trading range of Jita but nobody knew where the hell they were. Is that true? Because it's freaking hilarious if it is. But, this sounds exactly like the sort of thing that CCP probably should have let players sort out themselves, rather than making a change.
Let's discuss overhauling the way we get intel in EvE.
|
Memphis Baas
2277
|
Posted - 2016.11.18 14:30:50 -
[6] - Quote
Before the forced name, finding a citadel's location involved trying to look it up in the Starbase Finder and coordinate where it may be with the map. Needless to say it was an annoyance for people trying to buy stuff on the market, not knowing where their stuff was, and we complained and CCP made the change shortly.
Yes there were citadels named Elysium or "0 tax" or "10% off this Friday only" and other such non-helpful names. |
Siigari Kitawa
Waking Dreams
430
|
Posted - 2016.11.18 15:51:50 -
[7] - Quote
CCP, may we have this changed back please?
Need stuff moved? Push Industries will handle it.
Serving highsec, lowsec and nullsec - and we do it faster and more reliably than anyone else.
Ingame channel: PUSHX
|
Elenahina
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
1437
|
Posted - 2016.11.18 17:25:59 -
[8] - Quote
I'm going to go with no
Eve is like an addiction; you can't quit it until it quits you.
Also, iderno
|
Maekchu
Gunpoint Diplomacy
471
|
Posted - 2016.11.18 17:29:31 -
[9] - Quote
What part of Memphis' explanation didn't you get? |
Zappity
Horde Vanguard. Pandemic Horde
3061
|
Posted - 2016.11.18 23:42:40 -
[10] - Quote
Khan Wrenth wrote:Memphis Baas wrote:CCP changed it after a slew of "0 tax here" citadels that were within market trading range of Jita but nobody knew where the hell they were. Is that true? Because it's freaking hilarious if it is. But, this sounds exactly like the sort of thing that CCP probably should have let players sort out themselves, rather than making a change. Yes, it is true. And it was a good decision. Citadel locations are not an API endpoint so it would be extremely difficult to come up with a player-driven solution.
Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec and nullsec.
|
|
PopeUrban
El Expedicion Flames of Exile
220
|
Posted - 2016.11.19 01:04:55 -
[11] - Quote
Only way to remove it, really, is to make sure there's an API/destination integration so players can reliably find the destination regardless of the name. |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |