Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 32 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |
TigerXtrm
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
1733
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 17:08:01 -
[31] - Quote
Akrasjel Lanate wrote: This after POS removal can lead to monopolization of supercapital producion... in theory.
Isn't that already the case, though? It's not like any large group is currently selling super caps to their enemies. And the small guys get their capitals used through third parties (or the new Keepstar network Lenny is building).
My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things!
My Website - Blogs, Livestreams & Forums
|
Moridin Mandarb
The Executives Executive Outcomes
11
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 17:10:14 -
[32] - Quote
"Standup Supercapital Shipyard I - allows manufacturing supercapital ships and is exclusive for the Sotiyo XL Engineering Complex. This service module also requires capsuleer alliance sovereignty and the GÇ£Supercapital Construction FacilitiesGÇ¥ Infrastructure Hub upgrade"
CCP, please be careful with this. We already have a situation where a smaller entity cannot deploy a Keepstar without prior approval from PL and NC. I imagine these new citadels will fall in the same category. And whereas anyone can put up a POS in a remote system and then quickly put up a SCSAA, the online time for citadels provide lots of time for a scout to spot the citadel and warn PL before it comes online.
You could be creating a situation where the two entities that have the most supers are in a position to be the ONLY ones that have supers. |
Milla Goodpussy
Federal Navy Academy
457
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 17:11:18 -
[33] - Quote
will citadels overall be receiving a balance pass to adjust the current rigs for reprocessing and the reprocessing plant? i believe there was a brief bonus applied up till these things came out.. will that be removed. i really do not like the rig aspect of these structures its like you're throwing away any regard of the current market in turn forcing prices to rise thru the roof on the market for t2 salvage components.
also will defenses be updated so that these things will not be eggshells and actually have some type of good defense system so 29 t3 cruisers cant come in and zap it to RF within a few minutes?
BPO cost? ok you've dropped a carrot today finally posting this long awaited dev blog.. but you avoided mentioning the cost.. or are you waiting for fozzie to shave and wear the same shirt he wears for the o7 show.. to then disclose the price cost for the new structure bpo?...
|
RainReaper
RRN Assembly INC
49
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 17:14:36 -
[34] - Quote
...Hmm...Well... What can I say here... While the new structures look awezome and im really looking forward to them.
I cant help but feel that 20 blocks for each of the medium ones services.. Wich is a total of 60 blocks or 45 blocks if you include the 25% fuel reduction bonuses.
makes these things EXTREMELY expensive to maintain, and the fact that invention and research is 2 difrent services sucks like mad as well.
Heck i cant even fit a refining service on it cause there is only 3 service slots on the Raitaru.
So yeah im not sure about my feelings anymore now... |
CrazzyElk
Big Shadows The Initiative.
1
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 17:15:20 -
[35] - Quote
Any info/numbers on reprocessing with these new structures ? |
Lavayar
Russian SOBR Dream Fleet
299
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 17:16:26 -
[36] - Quote
How many manufacturing lines grants each factory module? Especially supercapital lines. |
Querns
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2526
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 17:17:40 -
[37] - Quote
Lavayar wrote:How many manufacturing lines grants each factory module? Especially supercapital lines. Infinitely many.
This post was crafted by the wormhole expert of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.
|
Anthar Thebess
1651
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 17:19:08 -
[38] - Quote
This docking limitations compared to size are just so funny.
Stop discrimination, help in a fight against terrorists
Show your support to The Cause!
|
CynoNet Two
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
711
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 17:19:24 -
[39] - Quote
Lavayar wrote:How many manufacturing lines grants each factory module? Especially supercapital lines.
Depends on the size of your space balls. |
Jadecca
Massive Dynamic inc. Care Factor
1
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 17:21:39 -
[40] - Quote
Big Question -
How Much Will BPOs Cost? |
|
TigerXtrm
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
1733
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 17:22:26 -
[41] - Quote
One annoying tidbit I'm seeing now... It's impossible to have one structure, even an XL one, have perfect numbers for manufacturing everything. There are only 3 rig slots and a dozen different rig types for efficiency bonuses. So a medium structure could have perfect effeciency for building T1 frigs, T2 frigs, and T1 destroyers but nothing else. That would require ANOTHER structure which could only have three bonuses.
Seems really overly complicated if you ask me, unless I'm missing something.
My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things!
My Website - Blogs, Livestreams & Forums
|
eVRiAL
Annapolis Tactical
16
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 17:23:33 -
[42] - Quote
Titans in WH are reality. |
Bishop Xsi
Blackfriar Bridge
100
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 17:23:57 -
[43] - Quote
TigerXtrm wrote:Requiring a 30b+ structure to even build these ships, with huge vulnerability on top, hopefully means that super caps will become a bit more rare again over time.
That was my first (and only) thought reading this. |
Justine Musk
Space Exploration Technologies Corporation
0
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 17:24:17 -
[44] - Quote
Aren't now the Citadels a bit underwhelming compared to the industrial complexes?
As today citadels in general as not hard targets to destroy, however what make them really shine is the asset safety mechanics, the same mechanics that when you released them was said to make them "unique" (do you remeber the dev blog "I feel safe in citadel city"?)
Now you are giving the same mechanics to the industrial complexes, and that's a bold move, but a move I somehow agree. What forbid people to stop using (or spamming) astrauses and start using industrial complexes considering the share the same docking rights, the same assets safety mechanics and they cost 1/5th of the astrauses?
Does the release of these complexes imply that citadels need an offesive buff, at least in their medium and large counterpart? |
Moridin Mandarb
The Executives Executive Outcomes
11
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 17:25:18 -
[45] - Quote
eVRiAL wrote:Titans in WH are reality.
Nope. Still need sovereignty, even with the new structures. |
Angela Zelin
Scooty Puff Advanced Industries Interstellar Krabbing Enforcement Agency
0
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 17:25:48 -
[46] - Quote
So lowsec is losing the production buff it has in the form of the Thukker array? Is this an oversight or intended? IF not intended, is there anything in the works to keep the current benefits to producing in lowsec? |
Messenger Of Truth
Butlerian Crusade
63
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 17:26:20 -
[47] - Quote
Its quite disappointing that a Large POS replacement (cost 2 bil) will cost 30bil plus.
An 30b structure with outrageous vulnerability window is surely going to be quite a big target.
Courier contracts to these structures will make up for it a little, but moving materials between structures is going to be absolutely disgustingly unfun for anybody who replaces their Large POS with Mediums or Larges.
Trade Hub Price Checker: stop.hammerti.me.uk/pricecheck
Visit "Haulers Channel" in game for all matters courier-related.
Citadel name/system API: stop.hammerti.me.uk/api
|
Ncc 1709
Fusion Enterprises Ltd Badfellas Inc.
306
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 17:27:09 -
[48] - Quote
Justine Musk wrote:Aren't now the Citadels a bit underwhelming compared to the industrial complexes?
As today citadels in general as not hard targets to destroy, however what make them really shine is the asset safety mechanics, the same mechanics that when you released them was said to make them "unique" (do you remeber the dev blog "I feel safe in citadel city"?)
Now you are giving the same mechanics to the industrial complexes, and that's a bold move, but a move I somehow agree. What forbid people to stop using (or spamming) astrauses and start using industrial complexes considering the share the same docking rights, the same assets safety mechanics and they cost 1/5th of the astrauses?
Does the release of these complexes imply that citadels need an offesive buff, at least in their medium and large counterpart? citadels have heavy fighters. these dont |
Messenger Of Truth
Butlerian Crusade
63
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 17:27:36 -
[49] - Quote
Angela Zelin wrote:So lowsec is losing the production buff it has in the form of the Thukker array? Is this an oversight or intended? IF not intended, is there anything in the works to keep the current benefits to producing in lowsec?
There is a big production buff compared to hisec that applies to everything, not just capital components. Before - build capital components in lowsec but nothing else, after - build almost everything in lowsec if you want.
Trade Hub Price Checker: stop.hammerti.me.uk/pricecheck
Visit "Haulers Channel" in game for all matters courier-related.
Citadel name/system API: stop.hammerti.me.uk/api
|
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
6205
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 17:27:36 -
[50] - Quote
Zakarumit CZ wrote:Considering Standup capital shipyard I is allowed only in low/0.0/WH, does it mean it wont be possible anymore to build for example Freighters and JF's in high sec?
You don't need a capital shipyard to build a freighter.
(just like you don't need a CSAA)
Woo! CSM XI!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|
|
CynoNet Two
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
711
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 17:28:48 -
[51] - Quote
Messenger Of Truth wrote:Its quite disappointing that a Large POS replacement (cost 2 bil) will cost 30bil plus.
An 30b structure with outrageous vulnerability window is surely going to be quite a big target.
As opposed to your current 70+2bn structures with 168 hour vulnerability window? |
Justine Musk
Space Exploration Technologies Corporation
0
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 17:30:07 -
[52] - Quote
[/quote] citadels have heavy fighters. these dont[/quote]
Large citadels have heavy fighters, medium citadels have light fighters and as you say you large complexes have light fighters and medium complexes just plain drones.
But I'm not sure the simple presence of drones is enough to justify 5-7 times the cost.
|
Nero Jove
United Wolfs Nations
0
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 17:30:52 -
[53] - Quote
Two thoughts:
1) Do you have a tentative road map for the release of other engineering modules to support other functions like reactors? 2) Consider the idea of making deadsticks that have been offline for a long period savalgeable by capsuleers. It would be a good way to clean up AS PART OF THEM GOING AWAY. |
Maria Checkov
Garoun Investment Bank Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 17:31:10 -
[54] - Quote
Would like some clarification on how bonuses will apply to capital building.
Large gets a max 6 me / 60 te bonus to comps, but the sheets don't seem to mention the actual capital hulls.
Can freighters be built in mediums?
How will a reinforce timer effect the jobs. Will they continue to run, or be stuck until out of reinforced?
Other thoughts. Still no bonuses aimed at refining beyond unbonused rigs. Massive vulnerability timers. Fuel costs are much higher compared to a pos Defences are utter shite compared to a pos
I was both looking forward to these and dreading them. For now i think i'll just stick to my pos.
Does all of the above better, whilst being a cheaper investment and cheaper to maintain.
It is also harder to kill, doesn't need me to baby sit it for most of my life and HAS A FORCEFIELD!.
|
Tow Knee
SOLUS EVOLUTION CORP Bloodline.
0
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 17:31:27 -
[55] - Quote
Just more stuff for PVP'ers to shoot and kill. More costs for indy. Don't see anything about fuel costs to run everything either. Already way out of whack for capabilities especially the market hub. Now we'll have to maintain more structures especially if you want to rig for max results. That means more specific role facilities. Still trying to see the boom for Indy here.
|
Angela Zelin
Scooty Puff Advanced Industries Interstellar Krabbing Enforcement Agency
1
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 17:33:08 -
[56] - Quote
Messenger Of Truth wrote:Angela Zelin wrote:So lowsec is losing the production buff it has in the form of the Thukker array? Is this an oversight or intended? IF not intended, is there anything in the works to keep the current benefits to producing in lowsec? There is a big production buff compared to hisec that applies to everything, not just capital components. Before - build capital components in lowsec but nothing else, after - build almost everything in lowsec if you want.
Yes. However, currently lowsec has a bonus in the thukker array in that you cant anchor it outside of lowsec. That means, right now, you can make ships cheaper in lowsec than you can in null. With the new changes and the bonuses outlined in the blog, that bonus is going away and lowsec is losing one of the few boons that it has at the moment. |
SurrenderMonkey
Space Llama Industries
2409
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 17:33:12 -
[57] - Quote
Justine Musk wrote:Aren't now the Citadels a bit underwhelming compared to the industrial complexes?
As today citadels in general are not hard targets to destroy, however what make them really shine is the asset safety mechanics, the same mechanics that when you released them was said to make them "unique" (do you remeber the dev blog "I feel safe in citadel city"?)
Now you are giving the same mechanics to the industrial complexes, and that's a bold move, but a move I somehow agree. What forbid people to stop using (or spamming) astrauses and start using industrial complexes considering the share the same docking rights, the same assets safety mechanics and they cost 1/5th of the astrauses?
Does the release of these complexes imply that citadels need an offesive buff, at least in their medium and large counterpart?
They cost "1/5" of the astras?
Nonsensical hyperbole is not a very useful rhetorical technique.
Astras probably could use a little something to make them more attractive (especially in high sec) in general, but the market service and capital docking provides plenty of utility the larger citadels.
"Help, I'm bored with missions!"
http://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/
|
Agfro Er
Secret Wormhole Authority Group
6
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 17:33:25 -
[58] - Quote
Not excited to see the longer timer paired with less HP, no fighter bay, and unable to anchor in range of citadel defenses. I'm worried my future weekends will be entirely consumed warping from structure to structure to keep an eye on them instead of enjoying the game.
It makes sense to have these structures more vulnerable than the citadel, but redistributing asset/defense locations across system, when small corps are built around managing a single central defensive point, will break the parity for small corps and severely limit access to areas of the game that are currently available to them.
Any chance to allow indy structures on same grid as citadel? Maybe extend some penalties to the citadel. Such as extended vulnerability window for the citadel, or increased damage applied. |
Zakarumit CZ
Zakarum Industries Exiliar Syndicate
194
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 17:36:37 -
[59] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:Zakarumit CZ wrote:Considering Standup capital shipyard I is allowed only in low/0.0/WH, does it mean it wont be possible anymore to build for example Freighters and JF's in high sec? You don't need a capital shipyard to build a freighter. (just like you don't need a CSAA)
Thx, lets hope it stays that way also with engineering complexes. Got my vote again for CSM
I would also welcome bigger defensive capabilities and shorter vulnerability windows - those structures seem a bit like sitting ducks - and still pretty expensive ducks ...waiting for the rig material requirements and BPO costs... |
Iceseller
The Enclave Frontiers Holesale Operations
3
|
Posted - 2016.10.10 17:37:37 -
[60] - Quote
Will the 25% bonus to engineering rigs also apply to the reprocessing rigs from the original citadel update? |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 32 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |