Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Destoya
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
574
|
Posted - 2016.05.19 08:16:41 -
[121] - Quote
A: 98% F: 96% |
Unconspicous Alt
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
17
|
Posted - 2016.05.19 09:07:46 -
[122] - Quote
wow, i somehow expected CCP to address the already too often signaled problem of the lack of efficiency of the citadel defenses against sub-caps before they start playing "guess the number" games...
|
Michael Umangiar
The Graduates Get Off My Lawn
0
|
Posted - 2016.05.19 11:25:18 -
[123] - Quote
A 93.5 F 99.3 |
NoobMan
Hard Knocks Inc. Hard Knocks Citizens
247
|
Posted - 2016.05.19 11:36:46 -
[124] - Quote
XL: 100%
Operations Director of Hard K(n)ocks Inc.
|
Frunje Elbris
Bovine Ltd.
12
|
Posted - 2016.05.19 12:03:28 -
[125] - Quote
Astrahus: 92.5 Fortizar: 96.7 |
Gideon Goldenbelly
The Exit Plan Test Alliance Please Ignore
2
|
Posted - 2016.05.19 14:08:45 -
[126] - Quote
Fortizar: 96.85% Astrahus: 89.41% |
|
CCP Fozzie
C C P C C P Alliance
14168
|
Posted - 2016.05.19 17:56:11 -
[127] - Quote
Thanks for the guesses folks! This will be the cutoff point for responses, we'll reveal the winner on the o7 Show tonight!
Game Designer | Team Five-0
https://twitter.com/CCP_Fozzie
http://www.twitch.tv/ccp_fozzie/
|
|
PhatController
Waking Dreams
59
|
Posted - 2016.05.19 21:44:05 -
[128] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:Thanks for the guesses folks! This will be the cutoff point for responses, we'll reveal the winner on the o7 Show tonight!
Oh the suspense, what is the answer :P |
nezroy
Nice Clan
6
|
Posted - 2016.05.20 02:43:00 -
[129] - Quote
What was in the box?! |
Nana Skalski
Poseidaon
10831
|
Posted - 2016.05.20 09:25:47 -
[130] - Quote
Survivability was: Astrahus 90 % Fortizar 93 %
and out of competition - Keepstar 100%
Almost Finished wrote:89.546% Astrahaus 94.428% Fortizar
Congratulations.
( -á° -ƒ-û -í°)/ =ƒÅ¦ - my sandcastle
Every part of a game helps to tell a story. =ƒôò
Planetary Interaction 2.1
|
|
PhatController
Waking Dreams
60
|
Posted - 2016.05.20 09:41:24 -
[131] - Quote
Nana Skalski wrote:Survivability was: Astrahus 90 % Fortizar 93 % and out of competition - Keepstar 100% Almost Finished wrote:89.546% Astrahaus 94.428% Fortizar Congratulations.
Thanks, surprised the Larges are that low. Is the show available to watch if you missed it live?
|
Aaron Honk
Distributed Denial of Service
121
|
Posted - 2016.05.20 12:51:53 -
[132] - Quote
So there was 28 Fortizars and 1390 Astrahus anchored |
Almost Finished
Almost Finished...
1
|
Posted - 2016.05.20 12:57:39 -
[133] - Quote
PhatController wrote:Nana Skalski wrote:Survivability was: Astrahus 90 % Fortizar 93 % and out of competition - Keepstar 100% Almost Finished wrote:89.546% Astrahaus 94.428% Fortizar Congratulations. Thanks, surprised the Larges are that low. Is the show available to watch if you missed it live?
Got me out of bed at 1 in the morning had to make sure it was true |
Nana Skalski
Poseidaon
10847
|
Posted - 2016.05.20 13:33:29 -
[134] - Quote
Almost Finished wrote:PhatController wrote:Nana Skalski wrote:Survivability was: Astrahus 90 % Fortizar 93 % and out of competition - Keepstar 100% Almost Finished wrote:89.546% Astrahaus 94.428% Fortizar Congratulations. Thanks, surprised the Larges are that low. Is the show available to watch if you missed it live? Its up at the Eve online YouTube channel and if you want to skip Fozzie aiding a plant with its drinking habits go to 0:45 Got me out of bed at 1 in the morning had to make sure it was true Its Guard. Fozzie looks like this.
( -á° -ƒ-û -í°)/ =ƒÅ¦ - my sandcastle
Every part of a game helps to tell a story. =ƒôò
Planetary Interaction 2.1
|
Natheniel
Mostly Sober The Bastard Cartel
104
|
Posted - 2016.05.20 17:50:35 -
[135] - Quote
This is an accurate representation of Fozzie.
"Life is as a storm, one must be prepared for the hardship and scorn. But with in this is a light, one for which we must fight. For hope is our weapon and our dreams are our shield. When fully armed we can not be felled from the field."
|
Tairon Usaro
ZERO T0LERANCE RAZOR Alliance
38
|
Posted - 2016.05.20 18:44:14 -
[136] - Quote
Strange question. Shouldn't it be: what is the projected half life of the structure? That would be a meaningful parameter independently of the time of measures... |
Almost Finished
Almost Finished...
1
|
Posted - 2016.05.21 00:40:26 -
[137] - Quote
Nana Skalski wrote:Almost Finished wrote:PhatController wrote:Nana Skalski wrote:Survivability was: Astrahus 90 % Fortizar 93 % and out of competition - Keepstar 100% Almost Finished wrote:89.546% Astrahaus 94.428% Fortizar Congratulations. Thanks, surprised the Larges are that low. Is the show available to watch if you missed it live? Its up at the Eve online YouTube channel and if you want to skip Fozzie aiding a plant with its drinking habits go to 0:45 Got me out of bed at 1 in the morning had to make sure it was true Its Guard. Fozzie looks like this.
Was 1 am but still feel bad |
|
CCP Fozzie
C C P C C P Alliance
14168
|
Posted - 2016.05.23 10:27:22 -
[138] - Quote
Tairon Usaro wrote:Strange question. Shouldn't it be: what is the projected half life of the structure? That would be a meaningful parameter independently of the time of measures...
We don't have the data to estimate half life yet.
Game Designer | Team Five-0
https://twitter.com/CCP_Fozzie
http://www.twitch.tv/ccp_fozzie/
|
|
Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
3845
|
Posted - 2016.05.23 13:02:27 -
[139] - Quote
Tairon Usaro wrote:Strange question. Shouldn't it be: what is the projected half life of the structure? That would be a meaningful parameter independently of the time of measures... At the time of the contest, the expansion had been active for 22 days. Assuming a constant rate of Citadel anchoring, the average Citadel has been up for 11 days. We have:
Astrahus 90 % Fortizar 93 %
10% of the Astrahus' have gone away, giving a decay time of 11/10% = 110 days, and a half life of 76 days (because ln(2) = 0.69 ) 7% of the Fortizar's have gone away, giving a half life of 109 days.
Know a Frozen fan? Check this out
Frozen fanfiction
|
Dictateur Imperator
Ab origine fidelis Southern Sitizens
29
|
Posted - 2016.05.23 15:48:47 -
[140] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:Tairon Usaro wrote:Strange question. Shouldn't it be: what is the projected half life of the structure? That would be a meaningful parameter independently of the time of measures... At the time of the contest, the expansion had been active for 22 days. Assuming a constant rate of Citadel anchoring, the average Citadel has been up for 11 days. We have: Astrahus 90 % Fortizar 93 % 10% of the Astrahus' have gone away, giving a decay time of 11/10% = 110 days, and a half life of 76 days (because ln(2) = 0.69 ) 7% of the Fortizar's have gone away, giving a half life of 109 days. Only if you have comportement like nuclear degradation... Other case no.
See human: half life time is not correlated to this law :p
|
|
Duo Roman
Warp Nomads
13
|
Posted - 2016.05.23 16:01:09 -
[141] - Quote
Hi @CCP Fozzie.
Is it possible to let us know the break down of that number by security region (Highsec, Lowsec, Nullsec and Wormholes) please?
Thanks! |
Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
3845
|
Posted - 2016.05.23 17:36:50 -
[142] - Quote
Citadels most likely go away unlike either humans or nuclei. But my guess is they are close to nuclei. Its not like they are going to wear out. They go away when someone happens across one and decides to destroy them, a sort of random occurrence.
But the entire issue of the thread is
1) Players: Citadels are tissue paper and go away too easily. 2) CCP: No they are not. Look at the low rate of loss; just 7% to 10%. 3) Players: But but but.... how many have been attacked?
So CCP, what is that statistic? How often does a Citadel actually drive off the attackers and survive? The issue is that they are tissue paper in that if someone wants to take it out, its easy to do so, and they cannot defend themselves in any meaningful way.
Care to share those numbers with us?
Know a Frozen fan? Check this out
Frozen fanfiction
|
Sean Parisi
Blackrise Vanguard
731
|
Posted - 2016.05.24 13:24:59 -
[143] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:Citadels most likely go away unlike either humans or nuclei. But my guess is they are close to nuclei. Its not like they are going to wear out. They go away when someone happens across one and decides to destroy them, a sort of random occurrence. But the entire issue of the thread is 1) Players: Citadels are tissue paper and go away too easily. 2) CCP: No they are not. Look at the low rate of loss; just 7% to 10%. 3) Players: But but but.... how many have been attacked? So CCP, what is that statistic? How often does a Citadel actually drive off the attackers and survive? The issue is that they are tissue paper in that if someone wants to take it out, its easy to do so, and they cannot defend themselves in any meaningful way. We hardly have this case: CCP Ytterbium wrote:Or you would use the defenses fitted to kill them all while laughing like a maniac. Care to share those numbers with us?
Yeah assuming it doesnt get aborted asap on its first placement. Tons probably float around highsec and owned null. But the true test is how many are owned by amall organizations in lowsec. The giant pawn me sign going up and giving people a 24 hour hour for larger groups to kick you up. |
Shayla Etherodyne
Delta Laroth Industries
65
|
Posted - 2016.05.24 17:29:30 -
[144] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote: You're trying to guess two seperate numbers: the survival rate (from 0% to 100%) of Astrahus Citadels and the survival rate (from 0% to 100%) of Fortizar citadels.
Astrahus 62%
Fortizar 38% |
Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
12115
|
Posted - 2016.05.24 18:04:12 -
[145] - Quote
Assfort
I like myself a good Assfort
Assfort
Perfection is a dish best served like wasabi .
Bumble's Space Log
|
helana Tsero
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
494
|
Posted - 2016.05.24 23:07:31 -
[146] - Quote
I would be more interested in the statistic :
How many citadels have successfully fought off a serious assault....
My bet.. under 5%
Citadels only have the current survival rate because people haven't got around to blowing them up yet.
"... ppl need to get out of caves and they will see something new... thats where eve is placed... not in cave..." | zoonr-Korsairs | QFT !
|
helana Tsero
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
494
|
Posted - 2016.05.24 23:13:38 -
[147] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:Citadels most likely go away unlike either humans or nuclei. But my guess is they are close to nuclei. Its not like they are going to wear out. They go away when someone happens across one and decides to destroy them, a sort of random occurrence. But the entire issue of the thread is 1) Players: Citadels are tissue paper and go away too easily. 2) CCP: No they are not. Look at the low rate of loss; just 7% to 10%. 3) Players: But but but.... how many have been attacked? So CCP, what is that statistic? How often does a Citadel actually drive off the attackers and survive? The issue is that they are tissue paper in that if someone wants to take it out, its easy to do so, and they cannot defend themselves in any meaningful way. We hardly have this case: CCP Ytterbium wrote:Or you would use the defenses fitted to kill them all while laughing like a maniac. Care to share those numbers with us?
ROFL of course they wont... that would bring the entire charade tumbling down..
I RF one just for lols the other day with a attacking force that would have died to a decently fit POS. The defenders had a defense fleet (of sorts). Our Fleet RF the medium in 25-30mins with no losses or danger. We didn't even use a kite fleet.
GG... what a joke citadels are.
"... ppl need to get out of caves and they will see something new... thats where eve is placed... not in cave..." | zoonr-Korsairs | QFT !
|
Zathra Narazi
Caldari Colonial Defense Ministry Templis CALSF
33
|
Posted - 2016.05.25 00:13:05 -
[148] - Quote
I've only seen 1 citadel and we were there to blow it up. The survival rate is 0% from my perspective. No idea for Eve in general. 30% maybe? I hear they're really popular targets right now. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |