Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Mr R4nd0m
Comply Or Die Retribution.
189
|
Posted - 2016.04.29 11:47:37 -
[1] - Quote
Can we inplement coalition standings and membership please. Coalitions are a big thing and have been for a while setting standings to lots of different alliances that can be ever changing is a bit of a pain. i have even heard alliances not allowed entry due to how much of a pain it would be to get standings for everyone.
so can we allow people to set up real coalitions, join it and set standings just like corps join alliances. its long overdue
ta |
Lugh Crow-Slave
2353
|
Posted - 2016.04.29 11:58:31 -
[2] - Quote
there is no need for this if anything the issue you are talking about helps keep coalitions from getting bigger than they already do. anyway if this was implemented you would just see coalitions of coalitions and then ppl asking for those to be implemented.
Citadel worm hole tax
|
Iain Cariaba
2940
|
Posted - 2016.04.29 13:34:21 -
[3] - Quote
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:there is no need for this if anything the issue you are talking about helps keep coalitions from getting bigger than they already do. anyway if this was implemented you would just see coalitions of coalitions and then ppl asking for those to be implemented. This.
There was a time when alliances weren't an in-game thing, but existed outside the game much like coalitions do now. Obviously, things grew to where coalitions became a thing once alliances were put in game. Not much of a stretch of the imagination to figure the same will happen if coalitions become coded into the game.
EvE is hard. It's harder if you're stupid.
I couldn't have said it better.
Hello, Mr Carebear. Would you like some cheese with that whine?
|
Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
1988
|
Posted - 2016.04.29 13:46:48 -
[4] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:Can we inplement coalition standings and membership please. Coalitions are a big thing and have been for a while setting standings to lots of different alliances that can be ever changing is a bit of a pain. i have even heard alliances not allowed entry due to how much of a pain it would be to get standings for everyone.
so can we allow people to set up real coalitions, join it and set standings just like corps join alliances. its long overdue
ta
So you're saying it just too much work to click a few buttons to bring a friend on board? Perhaps that friend does not have sufficient value.
Here's a better idea that is long overdue - An alliance has a 5 corporation limit. You want in, then join one of the provided corporations. An alliance gets the ability to set 1 red, 1 blue and 1 orange (choose wisely). A corp can set 1 red, 1 blue and 1 orange UNLESS it's in an alliance - in which case the 3 entities set by the alliance automatically overwrite any corp settings.
This new better system would accomplish the following:
1. Large coalitions would be a nightmare to maintain and go away. 2. Rental empires would be difficult to maintain. 3. Everyone shooting everyone would be the dawn of a new golden age of EVE. 4. It would just be better.
|
Lugh Crow-Slave
2353
|
Posted - 2016.04.29 14:18:57 -
[5] - Quote
the politics in this game is one of its best features they should not be actively limited. if you feel your group has to many contacts find a different one, but don't force other ppl to have to limit theirs
Citadel worm hole tax
|
Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
1988
|
Posted - 2016.04.29 15:21:58 -
[6] - Quote
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:the politics in this game is one of its best features they should not be actively limited. if you feel your group has to many contacts find a different one, but don't force other ppl to have to limit theirs
I agree with you. I hope you can also agree that my idea is of equivalent badness as the OPs.
I think the Money Badger Coalition is the ultimate in coalitions. It's task oriented so it is mighty. The members sureasshit aren't blues (some actually have years of bad blood just waiting to burst out). A perceived need arose, the coalition is answering the need and its members will go back to shooting each other in the face with both intent and with malice in the next few months. When the task is complete (or bad blood finally breaks free of its bindings) the coalition will despawn. It's a horrible (in a beautiful way) monster that will be short lived and long remembered.
You have to admit, holding that beast together is probably the ultimate in politics as far as EVE politics goes. Much more challenging than adding yet another flock of no-name renters to the 'list'.
|
sci0gon
Kaira Innovations Superior Eve Engineering
48
|
Posted - 2016.04.29 15:33:23 -
[7] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:Can we inplement coalition standings and membership please. Coalitions are a big thing and have been for a while setting standings to lots of different alliances that can be ever changing is a bit of a pain. i have even heard alliances not allowed entry due to how much of a pain it would be to get standings for everyone.
so can we allow people to set up real coalitions, join it and set standings just like corps join alliances. its long overdue
ta
if this follows the same methodology as corps joining alliances i have a question,
corps / alliances under a current war joining an coalition would probably drag all those other alliances into the same war, however to war dec a coalition what do you think would be a good sum of isk to enjoy all those tasty targets? |
Mr R4nd0m
Comply Or Die Retribution.
189
|
Posted - 2016.04.29 16:08:08 -
[8] - Quote
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:there is no need for this if anything the issue you are talking about helps keep coalitions from getting bigger than they already do. anyway if this was implemented you would just see coalitions of coalitions and then ppl asking for those to be implemented.
now your just being silly and negative. you guys really do look yo deeply into things. perhaps you need to calm the paranoia and politics nonsense. coalitions are a big part of eve and there here to stay. get used to it. i mean if your thinking the same then lets just get rid of alliances because its the exact same argument then. its no different. |
Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
1989
|
Posted - 2016.04.29 16:28:04 -
[9] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:there is no need for this if anything the issue you are talking about helps keep coalitions from getting bigger than they already do. anyway if this was implemented you would just see coalitions of coalitions and then ppl asking for those to be implemented. now your just being silly and negative. you guys really do look yo deeply into things. perhaps you need to calm the paranoia and politics nonsense. coalitions are a big part of eve and there here to stay. get used to it. i mean if your thinking the same then lets just get rid of alliances because its the exact same argument then. its no different.
If alliances aren't different than coalitions.... why are they 2 different words?
You're idea is silly and would have a negative impact on the game. If it's too hard to maintain the coalition you are in w/ the current game tools.... join a better coalition.
Do you realize you're basically complaining that it's too difficult to maintain the bigness of your group??? You're one of 2 things: too big or too lazy. Neither n+1 nor lazy should get a buff. |
Laendra
Universalis Imperium The Bastion
84
|
Posted - 2016.05.04 02:36:29 -
[10] - Quote
Most of this will go away once the Citadel profiles system moves to other entities....so, it's already coming. |
|
Lugh Crow-Slave
2401
|
Posted - 2016.05.04 03:20:24 -
[11] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:there is no need for this if anything the issue you are talking about helps keep coalitions from getting bigger than they already do. anyway if this was implemented you would just see coalitions of coalitions and then ppl asking for those to be implemented. now your just being silly and negative. you guys really do look yo deeply into things. perhaps you need to calm the paranoia and politics nonsense. coalitions are a big part of eve and there here to stay. get used to it. i mean if your thinking the same then lets just get rid of alliances because its the exact same argument then. its no different.
what am i paranoid over? that is just the natural progression just like before official alliance corps formed alliances then after official alliances were added ppl made coalitions.
Citadel worm hole tax
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |