Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
PartyPrincess
Aliastra Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2016.03.15 08:41:51 -
[1] - Quote
Hello,
Since some topic's by ccp are not going to happen or they wont give update to theses ideas. Back in the summer CCP posted a topic which they would give group sites to IHUB as upgrades. Here are my ideas to help along of what we could run as sites. I for one would like to see three different level of sites of which you can run togetherness on...
Level one sites are built like Missions... 2-3 ships to run them... many rooms to run... Level two sites are built like Wormholes... 6-9 ships to run them... fast you kill stuff the more you can tiger .. bring capitals in you can tiger the capital spawn.... Level three sites are built like Incursions.... 13-15 ships to run them... one room... |
Wimzy Chent-Shi
Unkindness Incorporated Who Dares Wins.
44
|
Posted - 2016.03.17 13:56:57 -
[2] - Quote
Null not OP enough? But yes indeed, everyone soloing their own is boring, togetherness is fun, lvl 5 missions is a way - their spawn rate is limitless and you can make it as efficient as possible but incursions still pay better for togetherness. Depending on how fast can you go I suppose you could do the sites in as many ships as you can field but then the spawn rate is a problem. So the possibility is there already, just not as enriching.
Please advocate why people should make more ISK in null.
I came here in peace to find tears and misguided hatred. I don't mind to make my spaghetti little salty.
|
Rowells
ANZAC ALLIANCE Fidelas Constans
2997
|
Posted - 2016.03.17 17:07:36 -
[3] - Quote
Wimzy Chent-Shi wrote:Null not OP enough? But yes indeed, everyone soloing their own is boring, togetherness is fun, lvl 5 missions is a way - their spawn rate is limitless and you can make it as efficient as possible but incursions still pay better for togetherness. Depending on how fast can you go I suppose you could do the sites in as many ships as you can field but then the spawn rate is a problem. So the possibility is there already, just not as enriching.
Please advocate why people should make more ISK in null. I didn't hear anything about more isk in that idea. |
Frostys Virpio
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
2694
|
Posted - 2016.03.17 18:07:42 -
[4] - Quote
Rowells wrote:Wimzy Chent-Shi wrote:Null not OP enough? But yes indeed, everyone soloing their own is boring, togetherness is fun, lvl 5 missions is a way - their spawn rate is limitless and you can make it as efficient as possible but incursions still pay better for togetherness. Depending on how fast can you go I suppose you could do the sites in as many ships as you can field but then the spawn rate is a problem. So the possibility is there already, just not as enriching.
Please advocate why people should make more ISK in null. I didn't hear anything about more isk in that idea.
If there isn't more ISK into it, people will keep doing what the are doing now. It's the EVE reality. |
Rowells
ANZAC ALLIANCE Fidelas Constans
2998
|
Posted - 2016.03.17 18:54:55 -
[5] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:Rowells wrote:Wimzy Chent-Shi wrote:Null not OP enough? But yes indeed, everyone soloing their own is boring, togetherness is fun, lvl 5 missions is a way - their spawn rate is limitless and you can make it as efficient as possible but incursions still pay better for togetherness. Depending on how fast can you go I suppose you could do the sites in as many ships as you can field but then the spawn rate is a problem. So the possibility is there already, just not as enriching.
Please advocate why people should make more ISK in null. I didn't hear anything about more isk in that idea. If there isn't more ISK into it, people will keep doing what the are doing now. It's the EVE reality. That depends. If it's roughly the same payout per person, the added security of buddies and engagement might entice players who prefer that. Group PVE activities tend to lend themselves to fleet comps that are better at dealing with pvp than solo PVE fits
Of course not everyone would do it, but that wouldn't be surprising. |
Wimzy Chent-Shi
Unkindness Incorporated Who Dares Wins.
46
|
Posted - 2016.03.18 09:50:38 -
[6] - Quote
Rowells wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:Rowells wrote:Wimzy Chent-Shi wrote:Null not OP enough? But yes indeed, everyone soloing their own is boring, togetherness is fun, lvl 5 missions is a way - their spawn rate is limitless and you can make it as efficient as possible but incursions still pay better for togetherness. Depending on how fast can you go I suppose you could do the sites in as many ships as you can field but then the spawn rate is a problem. So the possibility is there already, just not as enriching.
Please advocate why people should make more ISK in null. I didn't hear anything about more isk in that idea. If there isn't more ISK into it, people will keep doing what the are doing now. It's the EVE reality. That depends. If it's roughly the same payout per person, the added security of buddies and engagement might entice players who prefer that. Group PVE activities tend to lend themselves to fleet comps that are better at dealing with pvp than solo PVE fits. Currently, if you try to shove more people in typical anoms, the reduced time doesn't match the reduction in the payout (with some rare cases like smartbomb havens). Of course not everyone would do it, but that wouldn't be surprising.
I came here in peace to find tears and misguided hatred. I don't mind to make my spaghetti little salty.
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |