Search EVE-Online forums for:
  Select Forum  
  All Subforums
  Alliance and Corporation Recruitment Center
  Assembly Hall
  CCG Chat
  CCG Deck Discussions
  CCG Rules Q&A
  CCG Tournaments & Events
  Character Bazaar
  Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions
  Corporations and Alliances Summit
  Crime and Punishment
  EVE Forum Experiments
  EVE General Discussion
  EVE Information Portal
  EVE Fiction
  EVE Localization Development and Discussion
  EVE New Citizens Q&A
  EVE Technology Lab
  Events
  EveTV and the PvP Championships
  Features and Ideas Discussion
  Game Development Forum
  Intergalactic Summit
  Jita Park Speakers Corner
  Known Issues & Workarounds
  Linux
  Macintosh
  Market Discussions
  Missions & Explorations
  Out of Pod Experience
  Player Gatherings and Events
  Price Checks
  Proclamations
  Revelations Testing and Development
  Science and Industry
  Sell Orders
  Ships and Modules
  Skills
  Timecode Bazaar
  Trades, trades and more trades
  Want Ads
  Video Interviews, Documentaries and Films
  Windows
 
 





open All Channels
sepopen EVE Information Portal
    sepopen Concerning the Recent Allegations of Developer Misconduct

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google
 Monitor this thread via RSS [?]
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 :: [one page]
Author Reply to Topic | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s)
kieron
kieron



Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 04:16:00 - [1] - Quote

Our goal is to provide the best possible game, gaming experience and development process possible. In light of that, we would like to address the recent allegations of CCP employee misconduct. CCP has taken these charges very seriously and since they surfaced we have launched a thorough investigation consisting of an examination of character histories ranging back to their creation as well as into any connected characters owned by the developers involved. This examination was performed by the same internal division which is also tasked with standard periodic audits of all developer and volunteer accounts. Areas of investigation include, but are not limited to: messaging history, financial and transactional history, combat and corporation logs, item and cash transfers and IP logs.

As for the allegations themselves, they consist of two parts. The first part involved a case that happened seven months ago when a CCP employeeFs identity became public knowledge within his corporation. Per company policy, the incident was investigated and actions taken where appropriate, including the removal of characters whose identities were compromised.

The second part of the accusations stem from a leak of information pertaining to an in-game event arc. Due to the amount of time that has passed since the planning and execution of the event arc, we have not been able to confirm nor deny the veracity of these allegations.

In both cases, these accusations were recently brought forward when a player revealed the identity of numerous CCP employee characters. Since these play characters are known to belong to CCP employees, they will be removed from the game. Many of them have been around since the creation of EVE and it is most unfortunate that these developers are now forced to end their relationships with their in-game friends, but that is our policy when the anonymity of staff members has been compromised.

Last summer, CCP implemented stricter monitoring procedures and audits on all CCP employeesF EVE accounts. We are confident that our rigid procedures and protocol will prevent any misconduct or, at least, allow us to quickly discover it, should such an unfortunate scenario arise.

As the community knows well, we at CCP enjoy not only playing EVE Online, but improving EVE and interacting with our playerbase. We feel EVE benefits from the developers playing EVE as any other members of the community do, and to impose artificial limitations -- such as no access to Tranquility or special flagging on a developerFs player character -- would greatly hinder the development of EVE.

CCP is very passionate about EVE Online and is committed to its continued growth. We hope that this statement will put this issue behind us once and for all and allow us to continue moving forward with the support of our community.


kieron
Community Manager,
EVE Online
kieron
kieron



Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 04:17:00 - [2] - Quote

I will leave this thread open for discussion. Please keep comments and replies on topic and constructive.


kieron
Community Manager,
EVE Online
arkarsk
arkarsk
Provenance.

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 04:34:00 - [3] - Quote

first post in a kieron thread
-----------------
http://www.eve-provenance.com
Anila's Delight
Anila's Delight

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 04:36:00 - [4] - Quote

Second! FIRST
It is good to see that CCP are taking these allegations seriously and i belive i speak on behalf of the players of eve when i say i hope this investigation is concluded quickly.


The real first poster just posted "first, your the first with content , so your the new first poster, congrats - Ductoris
JForce
JForce
N.W.A
Soldiers of the Forgotten Abyss

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 04:37:00 - [5] - Quote

Thanks K. I'm sure you're aware that no matter what you say or do you probably can't win this one with everyone...that's normal I suppose.Smile

There are a number of allegations about coming from the information revealed by whatshisname, whether real or fabricated, and they extend beyond the "2" you mentioned.

If someone was to take the time to formalise them in a coherent set of statements/questions, would you investigate those? And if so, would you like those sent to you or posted here?

I guess what I'm saying is that did you merely conduct a broad enquiry based on the presence of information, or on the specifics of each piece of info? Did anyone email/post/petition anything specific? Or did you guys just see the stuff and start looking into it?
Rabbitgod
Rabbitgod
Gallente
Celestial Horizon Corp.

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 04:40:00 - [6] - Quote

If this is the official "end of subject move along people" post about what has transpired over the last weeks all I can say is, not sufficient.

The community is owed a lot more detail, and a few more options.



---{24th member of the 23}---

arkarsk
arkarsk
Provenance.

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 04:43:00 - [7] - Quote

Originally by: Anila's Delight
Second! FIRST


I demand CCP launch an investigation into the deletion of my first post.


Anyways, what of the T2 BPO's?
-----------------
http://www.eve-provenance.com
kieron
kieron



Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 04:44:00 - [8] - Quote

Originally by: JForce
If someone was to take the time to formalise them in a coherent set of statements/questions, would you investigate those? And if so, would you like those sent to you or posted here?

I guess what I'm saying is that did you merely conduct a broad enquiry based on the presence of information, or on the specifics of each piece of info? Did anyone email/post/petition anything specific? Or did you guys just see the stuff and start looking into it?


If there are more concerns that have not been addressed, please forward them to me. I will ensure they are thoroughly investigated. As for the recent investigation, I do not know anything more about it than what is in the above statement.


kieron
Community Manager,
EVE Online
Samirol
Samirol
OctoberSnow Corp

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 04:44:00 - [9] - Quote

Edited by: Samirol on 07/02/2007 04:41:25
so were blueprints made and given to bob?

a sabre one comes to mind, not sure about the others but there were a couple ship ones in there



I buy insane sigs, mail me ingame.
Merciless1
Merciless1
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
The Cartel.

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 04:45:00 - [10] - Quote

While I'm sure it's being looked into I see no information on the current situation. In matters such as this openess and honesty are key if you wish the matter be put to rest. Providing examples of past instances along with , basicly, "we're looking into it and doing stuff" will do nothing more than cause more more specualation, accusations, conspiracy theories, and turmoil.

IMHO it needs to be spelled out, what happened, what effect did it have on the game, and whats going to be done about it. I love EVE and CCP is a great company, I'd hate to see it's image tarnished by sweeping things under the rug.





Originally by: Sausage Commandos
A bobbeh titan at the station!, i curse at myself for being in a shuttle, so i head to station, change to ibis, return to find the scumbag had ran...
GankYou
GankYou

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 04:48:00 - [11] - Quote

Rolling Eyes Sure.

Ishos is taking control of our capital fleet - he will control and coordinate all capital ship movements and monitor your skill training to see and confirm when you are ready to fl
101 Reykjavik
Jon Lucien
Jon Lucien
Oberon Incorporated
Prime Orbital Systems

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 04:55:00 - [12] - Quote

I agree with the above posts. You need to open the cans of worms that the rumors have created. An official statement of "we're looking into it" is a good start, but if you don't release information about what happened and how it affected the game then people aren't going to let it rest.
Farrellus Cameron
Farrellus Cameron
Sturmgrenadier Inc
R i s e

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 04:59:00 - [13] - Quote

This post: http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=429130&page=4#112, indicates that this is not "we're done, move along, nothing to see here"-post. It is a post to give us some more information and reassure us that they have not sidelined the issue. Obviously us EVE players are always chomping at the bit for more information and can get impatient when no news is bestowed to us from the Ivory Tower of Iceland. So personally, I am very glad to hear some more from them on this issue. I was initially a little disappointed in the vagueries of the post made in the Corporations & Alliances forum. I had faith that CCP takes such issues very seriously but I am glad to have it explicitly confirmed.
----------------------------------------------------
Pellaeon DuGalle
Pellaeon DuGalle
Caldari
Deep Black Industries

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 05:04:00 - [14] - Quote

Poor Dev. One mistake and he loses everything. I'd shoot somebody if I had to do learning skills again Mad




-------------------
"There is one rule for the industrialist and that is: Make the best quality of goods possible at the lowest cost possible, paying the highest wages possible."
Laendra
Laendra

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 05:07:00 - [15] - Quote

It's a God Damned shame that a couple of *******s feel the need to try and ruin the game for others. That goes for people revealing CCP characters to others, and to CCP employees, if allegations are true (I hope it isn't), cheating.
-------------------
Sinze
Sinze

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 05:13:00 - [16] - Quote

Nobody cared that developers were in Band Of Brothers, kieron. People cared about the free handouts such as the Sabre BPO. Whats the status of those, anyways? Were they removed? Have BoB been fined? Was it a non-issue?

You haven't given us any information aside from "we had an investigation and found stuff." We need specifics. We are, after all, paying customers.
JForce
JForce
N.W.A
Soldiers of the Forgotten Abyss

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 05:13:00 - [17] - Quote

From Kieron's post I'd say the investigation is over. This is not an "update", it's a "we're done and found nothing, but are removing these characters as people now know they're devs".
Merciless1
Merciless1
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
The Cartel.

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 05:16:00 - [18] - Quote

Originally by: Laendra
It's a God Damned shame that a couple of *******s feel the need to try and ruin the game for others. That goes for people revealing CCP characters to others, and to CCP employees, if allegations are true (I hope it isn't), cheating.


I'm speculating here, but there's no way that I'm aware of sombody finding out who a dev is unless the the dev did somthing stupid like telling sombody or using his "dev magic" to the point where it became obvious or suspicious. If thier behaving as they should then they should just blend in with the rest of us mere mortals.





Originally by: Sausage Commandos
A bobbeh titan at the station!, i curse at myself for being in a shuttle, so i head to station, change to ibis, return to find the scumbag had ran...
Par'Gellen
Par'Gellen
Low Grade Ore

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 05:17:00 - [19] - Quote

Thanks for the info. It left a little to be desired though. Mainly, what is being done about the free T2 BPO handouts? Some of us have played the terribly borked lottery game from day 1 and got squat while things like this go on in the shadows. These are the things we want to know about.
---

CCP : Save my mousewheel!
FGxHalsey
FGxHalsey
Freedom Guard
Curse Alliance

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 05:21:00 - [20] - Quote

Please address the blueprint issue.
Also may I suggest that CCP employees should be forbidden from becoming part of the leadership of any major corp or alliance in the game. I think that goes too far into removing their objectivity and tempts them too much to abuse their position.

Thank-you
P.S. CCP, this is still a great game.
mazzilliu
mazzilliu
Caldari
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 05:22:00 - [21] - Quote

ANd what about kugutsumen's(and related accounts, and his coworker's IRL) banning?

GIVE ME BACK MY EXCLAMATION MARK PORTRAIT :( :( :( :( :( :(
Sephiraa
Sephiraa

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 05:23:00 - [22] - Quote

Edited by: Sephiraa on 07/02/2007 05:21:39
I get the feeling we'll all be reading more about this in major gaming magazines soon, considering the real issues here have clearly not been dealt with.

BoB were given 10 T2 BPOs by one person, who worked for CCP, before he was forced to leave. He must have been REALLY REALLY lucky in the BPO lottery. Merely deleting the characters is not enough Kieron.
Iraf Thaiberd
Iraf Thaiberd
GoonFleet
GoonSwarm

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 05:23:00 - [23] - Quote

Originally by: JForce
From Kieron's post I'd say the investigation is over. This is not an "update", it's a "we're done and found nothing, but are removing these characters as people now know they're devs".


To say the least.

1) It's been less than a year and a free mothership from what was admittedly a compromised event remains in game.
2) "We've been caught so the specific people caught will have those specific characters removed, but everything else is fine and don't worry we're policing ourselves absolutely correctly. Devs participating at the highest levels of PvP alliances is fine and dandy and obviously no inappropriate advantage is gained therein, no matter how tangentially."

This is a whitewash of Nixonian proportions, and an insult to the general player base. I shudder to think how many people I have encouraged to play this great game will chose to not do so when they realize the playing field is anything but level.

I'm going to eat a corp fine to post this, and I don't care, because this is simply unacceptable.
JForce
JForce
N.W.A
Soldiers of the Forgotten Abyss

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 05:24:00 - [24] - Quote

Originally by: mazzilliu
ANd what about kugutsumen's(and related accounts, and his coworker's IRL) banning?


That's actually a good point. He seems to have been banned without violating any real rules, while others who have broken rules are left alone.
Samirol
Samirol
OctoberSnow Corp

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 05:26:00 - [25] - Quote

Originally by: JForce
Originally by: mazzilliu
ANd what about kugutsumen's(and related accounts, and his coworker's IRL) banning?


That's actually a good point. He seems to have been banned without violating any real rules, while others who have broken rules are left alone.
ccp reserves the right to ban anyone they want, but they banned him when he was exposing developer corruption.

Thanks, hopefully this isnt the end.



I buy insane sigs, mail me ingame.
Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward
Gallente
Panopticon Citadel

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 05:29:00 - [26] - Quote

Edited by: Anonymous Coward on 07/02/2007 05:25:29
Originally by: Iraf Thaiberd
To say the least.

1) It's been less than a year and a free mothership from what was admittedly a compromised event remains in game.
2) "We've been caught so the specific people caught will have those specific characters removed, but everything else is fine and don't worry we're policing ourselves absolutely correctly. Devs participating at the highest levels of PvP alliances is fine and dandy and obviously no inappropriate advantage is gained therein, no matter how tangentially."

This is a whitewash of Nixonian proportions, and an insult to the general player base. I shudder to think how many people I have encouraged to play this great game will chose to not do so when they realize the playing field is anything but level.

I'm going to eat a corp fine to post this, and I don't care, because this is simply unacceptable.


I completely agree, this is utterly ridiculous. I was really hoping that CCP would actually try to better their policies, but, I guess that's too hard for them.

Quis custodes ipsos custodiet?
Merciless1
Merciless1
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
The Cartel.

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 05:39:00 - [27] - Quote

Originally by: JForce
CCP have not nor will not discuss GM decisions with third parties - Cortes


It's begging to seem like CCP won't discuss anything with anyone.





Originally by: Sausage Commandos
A bobbeh titan at the station!, i curse at myself for being in a shuttle, so i head to station, change to ibis, return to find the scumbag had ran...
XirtamVotf
XirtamVotf
Vengeance of the Fallen
Curse Alliance

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 05:42:00 - [28] - Quote

Can we have a reply from the you about the T2 BPOs?,
the same characters had given those BPOs to BOB , and the same characters have been removed ?

Is BOB going to still hold the T2 BPOs? and a dev having that many T2 BPOs that early in the game ?

I think we should have at least a full answer on what is happening.

Thx Xirt
Ogdru Jahad
Ogdru Jahad
Amarr
Golden Fury
Curse Alliance

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 05:42:00 - [29] - Quote

Edited by: Ogdru Jahad on 07/02/2007 05:39:21
**Edited for readability reasons.**

I was told by a trusted member of bob from the BOB alliance has or had 4 x demios bpo's and my understanding they traded one for a zealot bpo.

IF the Demios bpos were gained from said devs in bob they should be removed from the game like the chrs you have done to.

very least resseded into the r&d agent lottery.

god knows how many more bpos they have of the T2 Kind...

CCP what you going to do about this?
-


Shamis Orzoz
Shamis Orzoz
Sniggerdly

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 05:42:00 - [30] - Quote

Poo-tee-weet?



mazzilliu
mazzilliu
Caldari
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 05:42:00 - [31] - Quote

Originally by: mazzilliu
CCP have not nor will not discuss GM decisions with third parties - Cortes


but it's so relevent, and you know as well as everyone does that whatever happens will be posted publically. ugh

GIVE ME BACK MY EXCLAMATION MARK PORTRAIT :( :( :( :( :( :(
Sinze
Sinze

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 05:44:00 - [32] - Quote

Edited by: Sinze on 07/02/2007 05:40:22
Originally by: Merciless1
Originally by: JForce
CCP have not nor will not discuss GM decisions with third parties - Cortes


It's begging to seem like CCP won't discuss anything with anyone.


If they refuse to answer us, we can just quit. I won't play a game in which the developers of the game cheat so they can let their "favorite alliance" get to the top.

Thanks to Iraf Thaiberd for this sig. I'm sure it will become increasingly popular. Laughing
Please don't use your sig to troll - Ductoris
Cringeley
Cringeley
Caldari
GoonFleet
GoonSwarm

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 05:45:00 - [33] - Quote

Kieron, you seem to think that you're the police, or a dictator, and all you have to do is stave off discovery and keep everyone in the dark, and everything will be ok.

This is customer relations. You can treat us like customers and get our money, or you can treat us like mushrooms and get a big stanky box of rotten mushrooms to eat while you wait for an unemployment cheque. But you can't keep us in the dark and feed us !@#$ and expect us to pay for the privilege.

I have never been a major proponent of this whole dev misconduct outrage. I agree that devs should be allowed to sample the game, both for their benefit and ours. But this answer you have given is just ridiculous. Devs have played with an in-game alliance, and revealed their identity to their allies. They have done so selectively, and they have delivered major financial benefits to their in-game friends. Worst of all, some CCP employees seem to be able to get away with this, while others who have made contact with other alliances have been brought up short for doing so.

Now whether or not there was any formal cheating involved, you have a major conflict of interest problem on your hands, and you haven't even taken the first of a thousand steps towards solving it. When you were investigating I assumed that things would come out for the best, but this answer has struck my faith in CCP really, really low. Now I'm just waiting to see if devs take in-game reprisals against those who brought the issue to public attention.


--------------------------------------------


Thrice is he armed who has his quarrel just,
But four times he who gets his blow in fust.
Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward
Gallente
Panopticon Citadel

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 05:48:00 - [34] - Quote

I used to be able to feel completely fine about recommending this game to my friends to play. Now... well, I really don't think I will unless MAJOR changes are made.
Please don't use your sig to troll - Ductoris
Par'Gellen
Par'Gellen
Low Grade Ore

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 05:50:00 - [35] - Quote

Edited by: Par''Gellen on 07/02/2007 05:49:05
I'll tell you what. I'll consider this topic over and done with if you (CCP) will put T2 BPO's on the market. I don't even care if they cost 500 billion isk. At least they would be ATTAINABLE BY PEOPLE THAT WORK HARD TO GET THEM!

Edit: Or at least make the things needed for invention available on the market.
---

CCP : Save my mousewheel!
Bellum Eternus
Bellum Eternus
Gallente
CRICE Corporation
Lotka Volterra

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 05:56:00 - [36] - Quote

The most disturbing point about all of this:

Most companies like CCP have various security levels with access levels increasing exponentially at the upper levels. I'm sure that 90% or so of CCPs employees have almost no access to the game when compared to a regular 'civilian' player like we are.

What this means is that the people responsible for these infractions (which basically amounts to outright cheating if the rumors are to be belived) are very high up in CCP's infrastructure. The people who have enough access to the game to actually achieve an impact on this scale and level are not some newly hired twenty year old geek junior GM or customer support rep or something. Or even a higher level programmer for that matter.

Of course I'm just guessing and making extrapolations based on other firms I have experience with, but the number of employees that have the level of access to the game that these stunts would require I'm betting is *not* the majority of the employees in the company. More like the other way around: a very limited number of senior employees.

So getting back to the point: if senior employees think it's ok to behave like this, just how much control does CCP's management have on it's other senior employees, and how will it be possible to screen out future problems once junior employees get promoted and their access increased?

Or maybe this type of thing is just ok with CCP's top managment and they simply look the other way and pay us lip service and tell us what we want to hear to make us shut up and go away.

Anyone want to make bets as to how long this post's lifespan is?


If at first you don't succeed, get a bigger hammer.
Anila's Delight
Anila's Delight

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 05:56:00 - [37] - Quote

I wade through corporate BS and doubletalk on a daily bases, so i would like to provide my interpretation of kierons post

Paragraph 1: CCP acknowladge the claims of Dev misconduct and say that they are doing what they can with everything avaliable to them to look into the matter,

Paragraph 2: Defines the issue in CCP's eyes. The first issue is people finding out who dev player accounts are. Previous history of action taken by CCP concerned with the player base finding out about dev player accounts.

Paragraph 3: Deals with the second issue, that there were leaked details about an event arc. Basically, they cant do much about it as too much time has passed

Paragraph 4: A bit about CCP policy with Dev player characters and action that has been taken so far

Paragraph 5: Shows us what CCP have done to help prevent Dev misconduct in the game and says whilst the system isnt 100% (what system is) they are confident they can track down any misconduct that has occured

Paragraph 6: A little about why the devs do have player accounts and a bit about having restrictions placed on them, which would hinder eve's development.

Paragraph 7: Self explanitory

my vies for the reading impaired.
Sephiraa
Sephiraa

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 06:01:00 - [38] - Quote

Originally by: Cringeley
Now I'm just waiting to see if devs take in-game reprisals against those who brought the issue to public attention.


They already have, previous to this announcement.
Kyoko Achura
Kyoko Achura
Black Omega Security

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 06:04:00 - [39] - Quote

Not fired over this and that alliance still keeps all the t2 bpo's and all the isk made off this.... This is a great game, but its run like crap, I am canceling all my accounts and taking my 90 bucks a month to a different game that is Fair to all its player base.
Roland 99
Roland 99
Minmatar
Battlestars
Curse Alliance

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 06:07:00 - [40] - Quote

Problems I have with this:

1. no names were admitted as to the characters involved. This should have been a public execution of the people who knowingly screwed honest eve player.
2. no assurance given that BOB will no longer have access to privilaged information
3. removing the seemingly limited number of characters alluded to will not keep the afortamentioned info out of BOB hands
4. No action alluded to or taken to remove all the T2 BPO's BOB received via GM intervention and/or hacks and exploits
5. such as no access to Tranquility or special flagging on a developerFs player character -- would greatly hinder the development of EVE.
THIS IS BULLCRAP AND WILL ALLOW THIS ACTIVITY TO CONTINUE
6. WHY THE HELL WERE THESE PEOPLE NOT FIRED??!!
7. like an american political candidate, what they said was designed to enrage the fewest number of people and will result in virtually zero constructive action
8. They got away with it and will continue to do so. No one will defeat BOB with this sickening amount of dev intervention(AKA unexplained lag, sploits, and all that rubbish). I am seriously considering removing my eve account due to the fact that no one has or will ever have a level playing field.

_______

Farscape Hw
Farscape Hw
Black Omega Security
Curse Alliance

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 06:07:00 - [41] - Quote

Edited by: Farscape Hw on 07/02/2007 06:10:18
Originally by: Kyoko Achura
Not fired over this and that alliance still keeps all the t2 bpo's and all the isk made off this.... This is a great game, but its run like crap, I am canceling all my accounts and taking my 90 bucks a month to a different game that is Fair to all its player base.


Im gonna keep my account and kill ppl like i always have till this affects me then ill have an opinion Surprised

edit* i have noticed a huge sway of the gms in the direction of certain ppls favor like i frappsed a navy raven kill of a guy named tigertex who is the alt of red lantern in DICE. he said in local he would get it back, the next day he was in another one. his corp mate told me a gm replaced it. i have friends in dice and im not dissing on them, just a fact that i lost a set of slave implants a couple weeks b4 that to the "in que to jump" bug and the gm basically told me to f*ck off.
kinda got my goat so to speak. so ive had my first hand experience with this shyte



my sig got nerfed by serethathetawhatever
Cupdeez
Cupdeez
Vengeance of the Fallen
Curse Alliance

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 06:07:00 - [42] - Quote

That is total BS.. Its about time to cancel my accounts.


Signature filesize exceeds max limit of 24000 bytes. Mail us if you have questions -Eldo Davip
Olea Farstar
Olea Farstar

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 06:11:00 - [43] - Quote

Originally by: kieron

CCP is very passionate about EVE Online and is committed to its continued growth. We hope that this statement will put this issue behind us once and for all and allow us to continue moving forward with the support of our community.



I think that I and a great deal of people want to know about the items a confirmed CCP employee gave to normal players in the game. Either you deny the fact that this occured, or you admit that it occured. What has/ is going to be done about that? We all know now that the outed Dev passed these items to his former alliance. Do you think they should stay in game? If the hackers evidence about the employee was good enough to have him outed, isn't it also good enough to confirm that his alliance members knew what he was as well? In the very same incriminating logs there was a definite knowledge of his true identity by his corpmates.

The items the dev gave away need to be removed from the game.

Until this is done you do not have my support and you are not "providing the best possible game, gaming experience and development process possible."
Uuve Savisaalo
Uuve Savisaalo
Umbra Congregatio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 06:12:00 - [44] - Quote

Originally by: Roland 99
No one will defeat BOB with this sickening amount of dev intervention(AKA unexplained lag, sploits, and all that rubbish).


blimey, i think i just shot hot coffee out of my nostrils.
you're going to pay for this, KHAAAAAAA..err.., i mean, ROLAAAAAAAAND..


Milano II
Milano II
Vengeance of the Fallen
Curse Alliance

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 06:20:00 - [45] - Quote

I agree with the posts here so far, almost all of them, except for the one at the end of page 1 by the gentleman from GoonSwarm. I agree with HIS post. THE MOST.

You've told us all that there was some stuff found in the path of the investigations.
And you've removed a bunch of characters... well, no numbers given, so that could mean 2 characters for all we know. Yet, all you're doing is renaming or moving characters... this isn't a preventive measure at any means.. this is just a slap on the wrist kind of thing, stating to the offenders "Do it again.. but more quietly".

The T2 BPOs? We all know one famous alliance has almost all of them, mostly dev-created/hax0red/handed-out or whatever- because afterall... they're not the carebears they try to come across as.... they dont do agent missions that often to get these things from the faulty lottery system that has been set up anyway.

And..... yes.. prevention is what I'm whole-heartedly interested in.. Prevention. No one has said what'll be done to PREVENT this. All you've said here is that, or hinted to, is that you have a system in place to investigate these matters. INVESTIGATION-- happens AFTER the FACT. Not BEFORE.

May have to cancel my accounts as well, unless we're given some better answer. I'd rather have NO answer, than THIS vague, vague, vague answer.




Anila's Delight
Anila's Delight

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 06:21:00 - [46] - Quote

Originally by: Roland 99
Edited by: Roland 99 on 07/02/2007 06:07:56
Problems I have with this:

1. no names were admitted as to the characters involved. This should have been a public execution of the people who knowingly screwed honest eve players.
2. no assurance given that BOB will no longer have access to privilaged information
3. removing the seemingly limited number of characters alluded to will not keep the afortamentioned info out of BOB hands
4. No action alluded to or taken to remove all the T2 BPO's BOB received via GM intervention and/or hacks and exploits
5. such as no access to Tranquility or special flagging on a developerFs player character -- would greatly hinder the development of EVE.
THIS IS BULLCRAP AND WILL ALLOW THIS ACTIVITY TO CONTINUE
6. WHY THE HELL WERE THESE PEOPLE NOT FIRED??!!
7. like an american political candidate, what they said was designed to enrage the fewest number of people and will result in virtually zero constructive action
8. They got away with it and will continue to do so. No one will defeat BOB with this sickening amount of dev intervention(AKA unexplained lag, sploits, and all that rubbish). I am seriously considering removing my eve account due to the fact that no one has or will ever have a level playing field.



Would you like your bosses to proclaim to the community that you were fired for a gross breach of trust?

Also CCP policy is not to disscuss GM action (IIRC), why should they make an exception to this? Because the some in the comunity ask for it? Where does it end?

Why should they say which characters were involved? That reads a breach of trust to me?

Everyone has their reasons, you dont agree with CCP's reasons for not reavealing their actions, that is your problem. I agree with them not disclosing their actions, as to do so would breach all trust in CCP
Sinze
Sinze

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 06:22:00 - [47] - Quote

Originally by: Kyoko Achura
Not fired over this and that alliance still keeps all the t2 bpo's and all the isk made off this.... This is a great game, but its run like crap, I am canceling all my accounts and taking my 90 bucks a month to a different game that is Fair to all its player base.


Personally I still have a little bit of faith in CCP, and maybe they're just trying to minimize the damage to their company by not giving too many details. But CCP has to realize that the people who are playing this game right now and the people who are posting on these forums love this game, and they'd prefer to hear the truth than a bogus OP like this which explains nothing and leaves people not knowing what to think. ugh

We need to know what happened. Not many of us care if a dev posing as a 'civilian' player joins a corp or alliance and does things with them. We care about those devs abusing their powers to give that corp or alliance an unfair advantage over other corps or alliances.

If CCP refuses to respond to these comments, I suppose I won't want to play this game much longer. Not responding to basic questions that everyone seems to have is pretty damning.
Please don't use your sig to troll - Ductoris
Ab Initio
Ab Initio
Evolution
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 06:23:00 - [48] - Quote

Edited by: Ab Initio on 07/02/2007 06:21:43

Originally by: Milano II
I agree with the posts here so far, almost all of them, except for the one at the end of page 1 by the gentleman from GoonSwarm. I agree with HIS post. THE MOST.

You've told us all that there was some stuff found in the path of the investigations.
And you've removed a bunch of characters... well, no numbers given, so that could mean 2 characters for all we know. Yet, all you're doing is renaming or moving characters... this isn't a preventive measure at any means.. this is just a slap on the wrist kind of thing, stating to the offenders "Do it again.. but more quietly".

The T2 BPOs? We all know one famous alliance has almost all of them, mostly dev-created/hax0red/handed-out or whatever- because afterall... they're not the carebears they try to come across as.... they dont do agent missions that often to get these things from the faulty lottery system that has been set up anyway.

And..... yes.. prevention is what I'm whole-heartedly interested in.. Prevention. No one has said what'll be done to PREVENT this. All you've said here is that, or hinted to, is that you have a system in place to investigate these matters. INVESTIGATION-- happens AFTER the FACT. Not BEFORE.

May have to cancel my accounts as well, unless we're given some better answer. I'd rather have NO answer, than THIS vague, vague, vague answer.


Stop threatening to cancel your accounts and do it already. The rest of the community would be better off without your input.

EDIT: Quoted text dissapeared. ugh



La Tortura
La Tortura
Infinite Style Incorporated
Chorus of Dawn

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 06:24:00 - [49] - Quote

Edited by: La Tortura on 07/02/2007 06:20:55
I think CCP just dont understand all the seriousness of the problem. You think that you still can save your reputation, right?
It is too late to save reputation after all the things happened recently. Public opinion is against you. Now the only thing you can do is regain reputation.

And to get it back you should show to the community that you _actively_ trying to stop all cases of misconduct, and to reveal names and punish those who even remotely related to cases of such misconduct. You shouldn't ask for concerns to forvard to you. What you should do is to find yourself cases that werent known to community before your anouncement and present them to community.
--
ignorance is bliss
Marketing Executive
Marketing Executive

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 06:24:00 - [50] - Quote

I personally think what kieron posted pretty much the appropriate action from the CCP ends. Devs need to be in game to understand how player feels about the game and as the game progress, else there won't be much improvement.

There's no such things in EVE like WoW where there's items (Ships,Mods,BPO) soul-bound to single character and gone when its deleted.

I got to admit, if the CCP dev player were involved and got known (which in this case there is some under CCP investigation), BPO that generated by CCP without going through the T2 lottery system should be withdrawn and place it back to the lottery pools. Is the fair way to do it and place every-single-user content to the investigation result.

But again, on the user end will need to understand this, dev-player accounts are no similar than any other player accounts, if the dev-player got the bpo through the T2 lottery system, there should not be any arguement to force CCP to withdraw the T2 bpo. Its rightfully belongs to the dev-player and its up to the dev-player to decide what to do with it.

Take for example - Company ABC runs 2mil lottery everymonth, and there's 2mil tickets place on pools to be drawn at later date, the company then pass on bout 100 tix for their employee to see if they themself have the luck. One of them won, does that mean the company abc will say "u're staff of company abc... we can't give u 2mil"? Put that on everyone's shoes and think bout it.

I personally would trust CCP in handling this issue properly, if the BPO were CCP generated and pass on to the any alliance via dev-player (and i believe dev-player were not only placed in BOB, but in other alliance as well but not-yet-known), the BPO should be confiscated and withdrawn.

Otherwise, the OP pretty much delivered what's required to the communities
Roland 99
Roland 99
Minmatar
Battlestars
Curse Alliance

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 06:29:00 - [51] - Quote

Quote:

Would you like your bosses to proclaim to the community that you were fired for a gross breach of trust?

Also CCP policy is not to disscuss GM action (IIRC), why should they make an exception to this? Because the some in the comunity ask for it? Where does it end?

Why should they say which characters were involved? That reads a breach of trust to me?

Everyone has their reasons, you dont agree with CCP's reasons for not reavealing their actions, that is your problem. I agree with them not disclosing their actions, as to do so would breach all trust in CCP


bosses do typically admit the who involved with a major scandal that threatens the very foundation of what your organization stands for as a deterrent for future activity.

If they dont admit, it is usually pretty easy to tell who did it when they suddenly go missing.

I am sorry if my feelings on the matter have offended you, but sometimes, a more public resolution is necessary when he very legal (read devs) foundation of a system has been heavily compromised by corruption
_______

Anila's Delight
Anila's Delight

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 06:31:00 - [52] - Quote

Originally by: La Tortura
Edited by: La Tortura on 07/02/2007 06:20:55
I think CCP just dont understand all the seriousness of the problem. You think that you still can save your reputation, right?
It is too late to save reputation after all the things happened recently. Public opinion is against you. Now the only thing you can do is regain reputation.

And to get it back you should show to the community that you _actively_ trying to stop all cases of misconduct, and to reveal names and punish those who even remotely related to cases of such misconduct. You shouldn't ask for concerns to forvard to you. What you should do is to find yourself cases that werent known to community before your anouncement and present them to community.


How large of a percentage of eve players actuallly know of these allegations? I would assume only those who browse the forums.

Does the whole gaming community worldwide know of these allegations? I doubt it.

I belive that CCP would know the seriousness of the allegations and belive that they have and are continuing to take the appropriate actions, these just may not be appropriate for publice anouncement in a 'name and shame' style, which can possibly lead to lawsuits.
Sinze
Sinze

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 06:31:00 - [53] - Quote

Originally by: Ab Initio
Stop threatening to cancel your accounts and do it already. The rest of the community would be better off without your input.

EDIT: Quoted text dissapeared. ugh


I'm willing to bet if LV or D2 or whoever you guys don't like at the moment had all this information posted about them, you would be in every thread threatening to quit EVE and throwing a tantrum. Don't troll in this thread please, this is a serious issue.
Please don't use your sig to troll - Ductoris
Roland 99
Roland 99
Minmatar
Battlestars
Curse Alliance

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 06:31:00 - [54] - Quote

Edited by: Roland 99 on 07/02/2007 06:29:00
Originally by: Ab Initio


Stop threatening to cancel your accounts and do it already. The rest of the community would be better off without your input.




truth stings dont it? too bad this will never go away without *cough* more dev "favors"

EDIT: punctuation
_______

Borgholio
Borgholio
Minmatar
Quantum Industries
Prime Orbital Systems

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 06:32:00 - [55] - Quote

Well Kieron, that was a well-written Public Relations post. You demonstrate an impressive ability to sidestep the most important issues and avoid answering the hardest questions. Trial lawyers and politicians would be proud of you. The general EVE community, on the other hand, is another matter.

The concern being talked about by the vast majority of players is not the identity of certain Dev or GM players, nor is it an in-game event that occured many months ago. The concern is that Band of Brothers (and possibly other large alliances) have received ill-gotten assistance from the Developers or GMs in the form of blueprints, ships, etc. That was the biggest concern, and you made absolutely no mention of it at all. Nobody really cares about the identity of CCP players in player alliances. Nobody really cares about an event that took place months ago. People care about rampant cheating by those whose job it is to STOP cheating. By conveniently ignoring this issue, you are only reinforcing the belief that CCP has something to hide.

Were you to come out and say "Yes, some of our Devs and GMs were cheating. We cannot release their names for privacy reasons, but we can tell you that they've been fired, and all ill-gotten assets have been removed from the game.", then the community would be happy. It would suck that CCP employees have (yet again) been caught cheating, but at least we would know that you're doing something about it. Or you could have said "In regards to the cheating issue, we can't find any evidence of this whatsoever.". That wouldn't make people as happy, but at least you would acknowledge it. Instead, you whitewash it. You really screwed up, CCP. We want clear, straightforward answers, and we want them now.
-----------------------------------
You will be assimilated...bunghole!
Anderson Wes
Anderson Wes
Cattus Ex Pera

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 06:33:00 - [56] - Quote

Quote:

But again, on the user end will need to understand this, dev-player accounts are no similar than any other player accounts, if the dev-player got the bpo through the T2 lottery system, there should not be any arguement to force CCP to withdraw the T2 bpo. Its rightfully belongs to the dev-player and its up to the dev-player to decide what to do with it.



Except for one thing. Dev-player accounts are most likely at a severe discount and/or free.

I mean, *I*'d raise heck if I worked for a game company and a 'perk' wasn't free access to the game I played.
manimani
manimani
Amarr
GoonFleet
GoonSwarm

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 06:34:00 - [57] - Quote

Originally by: kieron
I will leave this thread open for discussion. Please keep comments and replies on topic and constructive.



Originally by: Ab Initio
Stop threatening to cancel your accounts and do it already. The rest of the community would be better off without your input.


Although he talked about canceling his account, Milano II offered some of his own views on the topic.
While you just came in here offering nothing constructive, i hate to do this backseat moderating job, but please stay on topic, Ab Initio.

CCP, needs to let us know more, what did the developer do within said alliance? What did he do that his character to be removed from the game? Why wasn't the damage to the game done by the developer reversed?

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward
Gallente
Panopticon Citadel

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 06:36:00 - [58] - Quote

Originally by: Borgholio
Nobody really cares about an event that took place months ago. People care about rampant cheating by those whose job it is to STOP cheating. By conveniently ignoring this issue, you are only reinforcing the belief that CCP has something to hide.


Actually, that event involved an Aurora leak apparently and so it most definitely did involve cheating.

Please don't use your sig to troll - Ductoris
Shin Ra
Shin Ra
BURN EDEN
GoonSwarm

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 06:37:00 - [59] - Quote

In typical "New Labour" Style, this seems severely lacking in content. I do appreciate your attempt to look into this. I'm not aware if you are aware of the full effect of the allegations. There was multiple evidence by those in question about certain other people breaching various parts of the EULA, including buying/selling character for $$$. Have any of these been investigated and if so what was their results?


Borgholio
Borgholio
Minmatar
Quantum Industries
Prime Orbital Systems

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 06:38:00 - [60] - Quote

Originally by: Anonymous Coward
Originally by: Borgholio
Nobody really cares about an event that took place months ago. People care about rampant cheating by those whose job it is to STOP cheating. By conveniently ignoring this issue, you are only reinforcing the belief that CCP has something to hide.


Actually, that event involved an Aurora leak apparently and so it most definitely did involve cheating.



True, but that was only one event. If the other allegations are true, then CCP gave away ill-gotten items and assets repeatedly over a long period of time. Personally, I feel that is far more serious.
-----------------------------------
You will be assimilated...bunghole!
Anila's Delight
Anila's Delight

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 06:39:00 - [61] - Quote

Originally by: Roland 99
Quote:

Would you like your bosses to proclaim to the community that you were fired for a gross breach of trust?

Also CCP policy is not to disscuss GM action (IIRC), why should they make an exception to this? Because the some in the comunity ask for it? Where does it end?

Why should they say which characters were involved? That reads a breach of trust to me?

Everyone has their reasons, you dont agree with CCP's reasons for not reavealing their actions, that is your problem. I agree with them not disclosing their actions, as to do so would breach all trust in CCP


bosses do typically admit the who involved with a major scandal that threatens the very foundation of what your organization stands for as a deterrent for future activity.

If they dont admit, it is usually pretty easy to tell who did it when they suddenly go missing.

I am sorry if my feelings on the matter have offended you, but sometimes, a more public resolution is necessary when he very legal (read devs) foundation of a system has been heavily compromised by corruption


I agree that bosses do generally admit who was involved with a scandle, but this isn't a general situation. As CCP do not disscuss GM action normally, i would expect them to to keep quiet what they have done as it builds trust in the system that they have in place, no matter what the cercumstances, ccp stand by their privacy policy. Most large companies enforces policy quite harshley and no one is spared, as CCP have a non-discussion policy they are not doing anything that i wouldnt expect from another company.

No offence taken here, i am just trying to have a discussion on this topic (something that is rare on these boards) before the thread is locked from flaming and trolling. No offence intended to anyone here.
MessiahOfLight
MessiahOfLight
Gallente
Black Eclipse Corp
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 06:43:00 - [62] - Quote

hm... are there People here, who actually take the possibility into consideration, that maybe ... just MAYBE there were no T2 BPOs given out to BOB by any DEV GM or whatever?

Dunno ... maybe its just easier to think that whatever someone random posts on EVE-O against bob must be true cause you dont like bob either...

Where did Kieron say, that whatever was found even has something to do with BOB or any other Alliance for that matter?

thats all i gotta say about this

--MOL
Platinum Sapphire
Platinum Sapphire

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 06:46:00 - [63] - Quote

Originally by: Marketing Executive
Take for example - Company ABC runs 2mil lottery everymonth, and there's 2mil tickets place on pools to be drawn at later date, the company then pass on bout 100 tix for their employee to see if they themself have the luck. One of them won, does that mean the company abc will say "u're staff of company abc... we can't give u 2mil"? Put that on everyone's shoes and think bout it.


Actually, if you read the fineprint in the rules about any Lottery, or any other kind of promotional prize give-away, you will see that there is always a note stating that "Employees and their direct families" of the company are barred from entering the competition/lottery. Thus, by your own example, the Dev concerned should not even have to face tghe choice of keeping or giving away the prize.. He should not have been allowed to enter in the first instance.


Also, interesting to note the Band of Developers member's comment. Just another example of the contempt they feel at the rest of us, while they reap the benefits of their "hand-in-glove" relationship with senior CCP staff.
Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward
Gallente
Panopticon Citadel

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 06:47:00 - [64] - Quote

Originally by: MessiahOfLight
hm... are there People here, who actually take the possibility into consideration, that maybe ... just MAYBE there were no T2 BPOs given out to BOB by any DEV GM or whatever?


There were many more issues than just T2 BPOs here, however they seem to all be equally brushed aside by CCP with such a non-answer.
Please don't use your sig to troll - Ductoris
OmegaClone
OmegaClone

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 06:47:00 - [65] - Quote

So why should I even feel ok about developers playing the game at all? Escpecially when the allience they were in seems to hold an unusually high percentage of tech II bpos. They also seem to magically get out of situations using exploits that developers would have intimate knowledge of. I find it hard to be satisified with this hand slap punishment when I have spent 3 years running missions for five Gallente Starship R&D agents spending well over a billion pleasing them and have gotten doggie doo from them. I expected this to be more than an elaborate illusion ment to keep my busy.

If you guys are running a business then you should be worried about making your customers happy and keeping them paying their monthly subscriptions not allowing your employees make us look like fools, building their own egos and wallets in the process. It must be nice to play god.

What would your Viking ancestors say? Shame Shame on all of you.
Merciless1
Merciless1
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
The Cartel.

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 06:47:00 - [66] - Quote

Originally by: Anila's Delight
Originally by: Roland 99
Quote:

Would you like your bosses to proclaim to the community that you were fired for a gross breach of trust?

Also CCP policy is not to disscuss GM action (IIRC), why should they make an exception to this? Because the some in the comunity ask for it? Where does it end?

Why should they say which characters were involved? That reads a breach of trust to me?

Everyone has their reasons, you dont agree with CCP's reasons for not reavealing their actions, that is your problem. I agree with them not disclosing their actions, as to do so would breach all trust in CCP


bosses do typically admit the who involved with a major scandal that threatens the very foundation of what your organization stands for as a deterrent for future activity.

If they dont admit, it is usually pretty easy to tell who did it when they suddenly go missing.

I am sorry if my feelings on the matter have offended you, but sometimes, a more public resolution is necessary when he very legal (read devs) foundation of a system has been heavily compromised by corruption


I agree that bosses do generally admit who was involved with a scandle, but this isn't a general situation. As CCP do not disscuss GM action normally, i would expect them to to keep quiet what they have done as it builds trust in the system that they have in place, no matter what the cercumstances, ccp stand by their privacy policy. Most large companies enforces policy quite harshley and no one is spared, as CCP have a non-discussion policy they are not doing anything that i wouldnt expect from another company.

No offence taken here, i am just trying to have a discussion on this topic (something that is rare on these boards) before the thread is locked from flaming and trolling. No offence intended to anyone here.






Originally by: Sausage Commandos
A bobbeh titan at the station!, i curse at myself for being in a shuttle, so i head to station, change to ibis, return to find the scumbag had ran...
Ab Initio
Ab Initio
Evolution
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 06:48:00 - [67] - Quote

Originally by: manimani
Originally by: kieron
I will leave this thread open for discussion. Please keep comments and replies on topic and constructive.



Originally by: Ab Initio
Stop threatening to cancel your accounts and do it already. The rest of the community would be better off without your input.


Although he talked about canceling his account, Milano II offered some of his own views on the topic.
While you just came in here offering nothing constructive, i hate to do this backseat moderating job, but please stay on topic, Ab Initio.

CCP, needs to let us know more, what did the developer do within said alliance? What did he do that his character to be removed from the game? Why wasn't the damage to the game done by the developer reversed?



I've written pages on the topic, but common sense get thrown out the door when it comes to a good witch hunt.

All that has been accomplished here, is the destruction of legitimate accounts, because they were publicly outed as working for CCP. Congratulations.



Steve Nash
Steve Nash

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 06:48:00 - [68] - Quote

Originally by: MessiahOfLight
hm... are there People here, who actually take the possibility into consideration, that maybe ... just MAYBE there were no T2 BPOs given out to BOB by any DEV GM or whatever?

Dunno ... maybe its just easier to think that whatever someone random posts on EVE-O against bob must be true cause you dont like bob either...

Where did Kieron say, that whatever was found even has something to do with BOB or any other Alliance for that matter?

thats all i gotta say about this

--MOL


If there were no Bpo's given out then that should be said in the statement. "We investigated and found nothing." As it stands the statement given us is void of any informative substance and ammounts to lip service. So of course the community will rightfully think that it is likely that the worst is true.
Merciless1
Merciless1
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
The Cartel.

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 06:52:00 - [69] - Quote

Originally by: Shamis Orzoz
Edited by: Shamis Orzoz on 07/02/2007 06:42:35
Originally by: MessiahOfLight
hm... are there People here, who actually take the possibility into consideration, that maybe ... just MAYBE there were no T2 BPOs given out to BOB by any DEV GM or whatever?


Perhaps he should've mentioned that in his post. Idea

Originally by: MessiahOfLight
Where did Kieron say, that whatever was found even has something to do with BOB or any other Alliance for that matter?


That's just it. He didn't really say a whole lot of anything.




Thats the exact problem, the majority of the community is conviced that Dev's where helping BoB in some way. Now this post was made confirming that somthing did happen but be so vauge that it only served to make the speculation and rumors even worse. CCP needs to be clear about whats going on or it will just lead to more rampant speculation and distrust. To CCP all I ask is to tell everybody whats going on so it can be put to rest.





Originally by: Sausage Commandos
A bobbeh titan at the station!, i curse at myself for being in a shuttle, so i head to station, change to ibis, return to find the scumbag had ran...
Maximillian Pele
Maximillian Pele
Caldari
Jewel Enterprises

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 06:53:00 - [70] - Quote

"We are sorry we got caught. You can trust us now."

I would say that my faith in CCP had been badly damaged by this incident except for the fact that in the 9 months I have been playing there has been:

The GM who created the uber scorpion and was apparently on his way somewhere. When killed by the gate camp the GMs' initial reaction was to ban those who killed the corrupt GM. It took considerable community outrage to get the initial injustice reversed and the real perpetrator removed.

The whole story arch that was abandon due to people leaking information to players.

The bugged 8/10 complex where even once CCP declared it an exploit people kept abusing it until a patch fixed it. To the communities knowledge no one was banned nor was any of the billions of isk wrought by this exploit removed from the game.

And now we have Devs managing capital fleets and training for a major alliance, and handing over 8-10 T2 BPOs after being petitioned as a parting gift.

So my faith was pretty trashed already.

So can we trust CCP? If someone in alliance A suffers lag or the wreck/aggro bug and is podded by alliance B, what happens if the first person petitions and the GM involved plays for alliance B? If a Developer joins an alliance will their knowledge of bugs and other issues mean that they give that alliance an advantage?

What would also help would be if CCP could actually outline what if any guidelines their employees must conform to within the game - all we know is that their ID must not be known.

This isn't a BoB thing: if BoB didn't exist this would problem would just wear another alliance's name. It appears to be a corporate cultural issue.

In the past I was used to seeing posts on other Forums about EvE receive the old "full of griefers" or "takes forever, is like a second job" replies. Now I am seeing "Don't bother unless you are a friend of the Devs - they cheat."

What they don't know can't hurt us - CCP.
Roland 99
Roland 99
Minmatar
Battlestars
Curse Alliance

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 06:53:00 - [71] - Quote

Quote:

All that has been accomplished here, is the destruction of legitimate accounts, because they were publicly outed as working for CCP. Congratulations.


Quite the inflamatory admission there. Not assuming anything, or anything but wow. It was admitted right here that it, in fact, was BOB accounts removed due to this little situation.

/emote Grabs popcorn and a beer
_______

Ab Initio
Ab Initio
Evolution
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 06:56:00 - [72] - Quote

Originally by: Roland 99
Quote:

All that has been accomplished here, is the destruction of legitimate accounts, because they were publicly outed as working for CCP. Congratulations.


Quite the inflamatory admission there. Not assuming anything, or anything but wow. It was admitted right here that it, in fact, was BOB accounts removed due to this little situation.

/emote Grabs popcorn and a beer


Or, you could actually read the OP.

Originally by: kieron
Since these play characters are known to belong to CCP employees, they will be removed from the game. Many of them have been around since the creation of EVE and it is most unfortunate that these developers are now forced to end their relationships with their in-game friends, but that is our policy when the anonymity of staff members has been compromised.




Roland 99
Roland 99
Minmatar
Battlestars
Curse Alliance

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 06:58:00 - [73] - Quote

Originally by: Ab Initio
Originally by: Roland 99
Quote:

All that has been accomplished here, is the destruction of legitimate accounts, because they were publicly outed as working for CCP. Congratulations.


Quite the inflamatory admission there. Not assuming anything, or anything but wow. It was admitted right here that it, in fact, was BOB accounts removed due to this little situation.

/emote Grabs popcorn and a beer


Or, you could actually read the OP.

Originally by: kieron
Since these play characters are known to belong to CCP employees, they will be removed from the game. Many of them have been around since the creation of EVE and it is most unfortunate that these developers are now forced to end their relationships with their in-game friends, but that is our policy when the anonymity of staff members has been compromised.



get mollee in here. Your grasp of propanagda is quite lacking.

-out
_______

Anila's Delight
Anila's Delight

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 06:59:00 - [74] - Quote

Quote:
Areas of investigation include, but are not limited to: messaging history, financial and transactional history, combat and corporation logs, item and cash transfers and IP logs.



That is ALOT of data to go though for those that the allegations were raised against. Think of how many market transactions you make in a day, combat logs you make, items and cash transfered.

I can't see anywhere in keirons post that he said that they have concluded the investigation.
Steve Nash
Steve Nash

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:02:00 - [75] - Quote

Edited by: Steve Nash on 07/02/2007 06:59:41
Originally by: Anila's Delight
Quote:
Areas of investigation include, but are not limited to: messaging history, financial and transactional history, combat and corporation logs, item and cash transfers and IP logs.



That is ALOT of data to go though for those that the allegations were raised against. Think of how many market transactions you make in a day, combat logs you make, items and cash transfered.

I can't see anywhere in keirons post that he said that they have concluded the investigation.


"I apologize for the length of time the investigation has taken. A statement has been made, you may view it by clicking..."

That to me implies that "the investigation is over here is a link to the conclusion."
Evelgrivion
Evelgrivion
Coreli Corporation
Corelum Syndicate

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:03:00 - [76] - Quote

I'm sure you're trying your hardest to alleviate the community's concerns over the matter Kieron, but I, and I assume most everyone else who has read this thread, has been left confused over what exactly has been determined from this investigation. Obviously you have to be careful about what information you decide what to release to make sure you don't violate your own policies or release information to the public that was deemed private. However, I think the concerns of the community can be answered with three simple yes or no questions:

1. Is the investigation over?
2. If so, has it been determined whether or not the alleged parties have acted inappropriately?
3. If so, have the alleged parties been punished for their inappropriate actions?

If CCP could please answer these questions accordingly, I'm certain that a great many people will be satisfied with the results of this. As things stand, I don't think anyone in the public is pleased with the current state of affairs.
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---
This isn't the signature you're looking for.
Ab Initio
Ab Initio
Evolution
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:04:00 - [77] - Quote

Originally by: Roland 99
get mollee in here. Your grasp of propanagda is quite lacking.

-out


You aren't dealing with someone who is trying to put forward "propaganda". You are dealing with someone who is honestly disgusted by the reaction of a large part of the community.

* This IS a subject that needs discussing.
* This post from CCP IS useless.

My problem is with the people that are using a situation which should be dealt with appropriately, as a launching platform for your in game issues. I have no problem with those that put forward their opinions, without all the random haxsploiting BS.

Your posts are pathetic. You're trying to score forum whoring points, while it is apparent from the OP, that veterans are losing there accounts due only to being outed by a hacker.



Merciless1
Merciless1
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
The Cartel.

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:08:00 - [78] - Quote

Originally by: Steve Nash
Edited by: Steve Nash on 07/02/2007 06:59:41
Originally by: Anila's Delight
Quote:
Areas of investigation include, but are not limited to: messaging history, financial and transactional history, combat and corporation logs, item and cash transfers and IP logs.



That is ALOT of data to go though for those that the allegations were raised against. Think of how many market transactions you make in a day, combat logs you make, items and cash transfered.

I can't see anywhere in keirons post that he said that they have concluded the investigation.


"I apologize for the length of time the investigation has taken. A statement has been made, you may view it by clicking..."

That to me implies that "the investigation is over here is a link to the conclusion."


Or this:

Originally by: kieron
We hope that this statement will put this issue behind us once and for all and allow us to continue moving forward with the support of our community.


To me that says that this is all we're going to get.





Originally by: Sausage Commandos
A bobbeh titan at the station!, i curse at myself for being in a shuttle, so i head to station, change to ibis, return to find the scumbag had ran...
Anila's Delight
Anila's Delight

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:08:00 - [79] - Quote

Originally by: Evelgrivion

1. Is the investigation over?
2. If so, has it been determined whether or not the alleged parties have acted inappropriately?
3. If so, have the alleged parties been punished for their inappropriate actions?



He does have a point, you dont have to name anyone or specify the actions taken. Just say something like: Yes the investigation has concluded and appropriate action has been taken against those we have found to be acting inappropriately.

Nothing to specific there.
Lasraik
Lasraik
Minmatar
digital-Underground

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:09:00 - [80] - Quote

I've always been a fan of EVE and praised CCP.

But wow, this is really dissapointing if this is indeed the conclusion of the investigation.

Not how you want to treat paying customers when there are so many questions still to be answered.

Don't side step the issue and just come clean, tell your customers what happened, what was found and what you did to fix it.
Steve Nash
Steve Nash

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:09:00 - [81] - Quote

Originally by: Ab Initio
Originally by: Roland 99
get mollee in here. Your grasp of propanagda is quite lacking.

-out


You aren't dealing with someone who is trying to put forward "propaganda". You are dealing with someone who is honestly disgusted by the reaction of a large part of the community.

* This IS a subject that needs discussing.
* This post from CCP IS useless.

My problem is with the people that are using a situation which should be dealt with appropriately, as a launching platform for your in game issues. I have no problem with those that put forward their opinions, without all the random haxsploiting BS.

Your posts are pathetic. You're trying to score forum whoring points, while it is apparent from the OP, that veterans are losing there accounts due only to being outed by a hacker.


If the OP had made anything at all abundently transparent then noone on these forums would have anything to speculate about. As it stands the OP said nothing and the community feels burned.
Forkumato
Forkumato

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:11:00 - [82] - Quote

Personally I don't see why devs get to play. Particularly anonymously.

If they want to test something they can just create that character with that skill set and try it. At no time should a dev character be in existence for more than 30 days. If it involves a corp or something they should be pretty up front about what they want. I.E. Hi I'm a CCP person and I want to watch your corp fight for this here system, so I'm making this non-interfering low stat character and I'd like to be in the gang, see how it works out for you guys using these new somethings we made. Of course, for that there's beta, inhouse testing etc.

That said, in this game BPOs can be darned rare, darned hard to get, and generally only the most powerful organizations are going to end up with them, maybe not at first, but through some kind of diplomacy. That is not a bad thing. It just means that without continual influx of people, resources, and new trumph stuff, some organization will one day, for all intents be considered a winner, or in control of the game, until they get bored of maintaining that. Again that's not bad. However people are going to feel hopeless about it when it's more than 50% in it's progression.
Anila's Delight
Anila's Delight

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:12:00 - [83] - Quote

Originally by: Merciless1

Originally by: kieron
We hope that this statement will put this issue behind us once and for all and allow us to continue moving forward with the support of our community.




That says to me that CCP have released their official statement and they are not going to discuss any future action taken.

The whole BoB are devs thing has sounded like a conspiracy against a greater PvP force from day one to me.
Niobe Farstar
Niobe Farstar

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:12:00 - [84] - Quote

Originally by: Ab Initio
You aren't dealing with someone who is trying to put forward "propaganda". You are dealing with someone who is honestly disgusted by the reaction of a large part of the community.
We're dealing with someone from BoB, and I think in light of what's happened that is all anyone really needs to know. How the hell do we know that you aren't a dev? How do we know anything when CCP won't talk about this?

I'm not even in an alliance but in the future I would like to be and I would hope that anyone I fought against wouldn't be getting special treatment from CCP.
Rabb Darktide
Rabb Darktide
Independent Fleet
O X I D E

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:13:00 - [85] - Quote

Kieron,

You have created more distrust with this statement, and have cause MUCH more damage to CCP's reputation. Personally, while I may not cancel my accounts over this (until a better MMO comes out), I can promise you that I will not buy another CCP product if this is your company's attitude.

-----
INDF Recruitment
IlIlIlIlIlIlIl
IlIlIlIlIlIlIl
Hos B4 Bros

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:14:00 - [86] - Quote

Originally by: Ab Initio


Stop threatening to cancel your accounts and do it already. The rest of the community would be better off without your input.
ugh


The irony here being that it seems like the community would be better off without you or your friends since your alliance clearly thinks it is above the rules.
DREDD
DREDD
Battlestars
Curse Alliance

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:14:00 - [87] - Quote

Reading all this & completely understanding the feelings of the Eve community, the answer given by Kieron is unacceptable. $14.99 a month, certainly not worth the answer given. I think you need to start slashing your prices in half now.

I see the post by a few BoB here. Your reaching for straws, your credibility is destroyed, personally I'd stop posting & hope, just hope this all goes away. But as for me, you have lost respect forever in my eyes. I know not all of BoB have exploited, but a number of you knew what was going on & did nothing. To say all of BoB shouldn't be held accountable is like saying the holocaust didn't happen.
Xendie
Xendie
Forsaken Empire
The Forsaken Empire

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:18:00 - [88] - Quote


i wonder why they had bob investigating bob/dev stuff?

think about it for a sec, 5 devs in RKK alone, how many more in the rest of bob?
wouldnt it be kinda hard for 2-3 devs to fire the rest of the office?

one thing though, when will molle be banned for putting a persons RL name/adress/workplace on these forums?

when will digitalcommunist be banned for trying to get peoples ip adresses ingame?
when will db preacher be banned for ebaying101
when will bob alliance be disbanded for using information they knew werent allowed?(the leadership were effectively exploiting when they knew that these persons were devs and still accepted advance information)

will CCP ever do anything against bob?
answer is, never as they would ban themselves then.




Quote:
Nertzius > having fun being incompetitent?

Quote:
jake sisko > its f-e's bob dev alt making lag
MessiahOfLight
MessiahOfLight
Gallente
Black Eclipse Corp
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:18:00 - [89] - Quote

Originally by: Anonymous Coward
Originally by: MessiahOfLight
hm... are there People here, who actually take the possibility into consideration, that maybe ... just MAYBE there were no T2 BPOs given out to BOB by any DEV GM or whatever?


There were many more issues than just T2 BPOs here, however they seem to all be equally brushed aside by CCP with such a non-answer.


So we are guilty until prooven otherwise...

Maybe Kieron didnt say anything about that because there is nothing to confirm or deny yet?
And only because he didnt say what you wanted to read, doesnt mean that there is something to hide.

But well my personal advice to you is ... quit the game and move on to somewhere else ... If you see cheating all around you here, there is really no point inm staying.

--MOL
Skelator
Skelator
Stronghold corp
Curse Alliance

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:19:00 - [90] - Quote

Originally by: Ab Initio
Originally by: manimani
Originally by: kieron
I will leave this thread open for discussion. Please keep comments and replies on topic and constructive.



Originally by: Ab Initio
Stop threatening to cancel your accounts and do it already. The rest of the community would be better off without your input.


Although he talked about canceling his account, Milano II offered some of his own views on the topic.
While you just came in here offering nothing constructive, i hate to do this backseat moderating job, but please stay on topic, Ab Initio.

CCP, needs to let us know more, what did the developer do within said alliance? What did he do that his character to be removed from the game? Why wasn't the damage to the game done by the developer reversed?



I've written pages on the topic, but common sense get thrown out the door when it comes to a good witch hunt.

All that has been accomplished here, is the destruction of legitimate accounts, because they were publicly outed as working for CCP. Congratulations.


Fair enough Statement.
Now hear my counterstatement/question.

What PROOF do you have Sir that there Weren't Witches found and not named or that there was a mass coverup OR That there weren't T-II BPO's found and not mentioned?

See the dilemma in your statement.

These folks just want a Real Itemized answer to the Dozen PLUS Charges nothing more nothing less.
As paying customers like yourself they are just seeking reassurance like we all are.
If Paying folks are worried about this please refrain from smacking them.

Skelator

Merciless1
Merciless1
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
The Cartel.

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:23:00 - [91] - Quote

Originally by: Anila's Delight
Originally by: Merciless1

Originally by: kieron
We hope that this statement will put this issue behind us once and for all and allow us to continue moving forward with the support of our community.




That says to me that CCP have released their official statement and they are not going to discuss any future action taken.

The whole BoB are devs thing has sounded like a conspiracy against a greater PvP force from day one to me.



As I said previously, when a GM spawned a faction fitted rattlesnake the investigation and actions taken where made clear to the players. This sin't your normal "We dn't discuss GM actions" situation. When rules are broken on this level there is much more community interest, this is because it may have a signifigant effect on the community. This isn't about BoB or alliance politics, this is about senior CCP employees influencing the game. More importantly, releasing vague statments only adds fuel to the fire, so either be open and honest or expect the situation to get worse.





Originally by: Sausage Commandos
A bobbeh titan at the station!, i curse at myself for being in a shuttle, so i head to station, change to ibis, return to find the scumbag had ran...
Anila's Delight
Anila's Delight

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:23:00 - [92] - Quote

I am inclined to agree with the BoB forum professionals (gah!) on this one, bob have been branded as guilty before any eveidence has been presented to the comunity (which i dont think it will), because these kinds of allegations have been flying around for a while now.

Everyone who has posted anti-bob and bob=dev in this thread are taking the word of a known hacker (by his own admission) without proof to the contrary. Sounds like slandering a superier PvP force to me.

Sore loosers anyone?
Sigmorhair
Sigmorhair
Gallente
Eisenmetal

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:23:00 - [93] - Quote

I am just curious if *anyone* is suprised that since the GMS let the LV cheaters keep their motherships, that this "do nothing" result would be the outcome?

Grats Cheaters you win.

The game of Eve is over.
Anila's Delight
Anila's Delight

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:28:00 - [94] - Quote

Originally by: Merciless1
Originally by: Anila's Delight
Originally by: Merciless1

Originally by: kieron
We hope that this statement will put this issue behind us once and for all and allow us to continue moving forward with the support of our community.




That says to me that CCP have released their official statement and they are not going to discuss any future action taken.

The whole BoB are devs thing has sounded like a conspiracy against a greater PvP force from day one to me.



As I said previously, when a GM spawned a faction fitted rattlesnake the investigation and actions taken where made clear to the players. This sin't your normal "We dn't discuss GM actions" situation. When rules are broken on this level there is much more community interest, this is because it may have a signifigant effect on the community. This isn't about BoB or alliance politics, this is about senior CCP employees influencing the game. More importantly, releasing vague statments only adds fuel to the fire, so either be open and honest or expect the situation to get worse.


Maybe the only action to date has been the removal of the known dev accounts and as such cant provide information on an event that hasnt transpired yet, as they may be waiting for more evidence to come to light.

I'm gonna wait this one out and see what more they may have to say.
Steve Nash
Steve Nash

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:29:00 - [95] - Quote

Originally by: Anila's Delight
I am inclined to agree with the BoB forum professionals (gah!) on this one, bob have been branded as guilty before any eveidence has been presented to the comunity (which i dont think it will), because these kinds of allegations have been flying around for a while now.

Everyone who has posted anti-bob and bob=dev in this thread are taking the word of a known hacker (by his own admission) without proof to the contrary. Sounds like slandering a superier PvP force to me.

Sore loosers anyone?


I don't think you can point a finger at the community here. The fact is that the statement delivered by CCP has served to cast more suspicion on themselves and BoB. I'm not a BoB hater, but somethin dont smell right.
Ab Initio
Ab Initio
Evolution
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:30:00 - [96] - Quote

Originally by: Skelator
Fair enough Statement.
Now hear my counterstatement/question.

What PROOF do you have Sir that there Weren't Witches found and not named or that there was a mass coverup OR That there weren't T-II BPO's found and not mentioned?

See the dilemma in your statement.

These folks just want a Real Itemized answer to the Dozen PLUS Charges nothing more nothing less.
As paying customers like yourself they are just seeking reassurance like we all are.
If Paying folks are worried about this please refrain from smacking them.

Skelator



I said I wouldn't post again, but this is a fair enough point to respond to. I do understand your point of view, but you also need to understand ours.

On one side we have those that have decided to wait for real proof before crucifying us for our alleged trangressions. Innocent until proven guilty. On the other side, we have the hate mongerers that we generally have a history with ingame, who have decided we need to burn no matter what the outcome of the investigation.

You're asking what proof we have that we are innocent, again, guilty until proven innocent. Now due to completely unproven allegations by some random lowlife, and the inability for CCP to make a clear statement about the matter, we won't ever be vindicated. You think you're annoyed about one BoB member getting frustrated, try having a community burning your alliance at the stake because of unproven allegations towards < 5 members.



MessiahOfLight
MessiahOfLight
Gallente
Black Eclipse Corp
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:31:00 - [97] - Quote

Edited by: MessiahOfLight on 07/02/2007 07:29:52
Hm... i still think that only ONE answer would be accepted here, and im fairly shure that is also why no CCP employee reall posted anything about the cheating ****.

Whatever Kieron would say, the only answer that most in here would accept, is that when he would say "yes we have found Dev Characters within BOB who cheated for them" (or whatever else you wanna read).

None other. He could say that there was nothing found, that BOB didnt do anything wrong or whatever. Only that one answer would be accepted. Everything else would be taken as an attempt to cover something up. Wich makes it pretty pointless to post anything.

--MOL
NTRabbit
NTRabbit
Caldari
Guiding Hand Social Club

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:33:00 - [98] - Quote

It is sometimes difficult to believe just how many intellectually deficient people play this game.

Kieron's post is quite clear. People who continue to rant and rave are either incapable of basic reading and comprehension, or will never actually read anything that contradicts their strongly held, and yet completely and ridiculously baseless beliefs regarding Band ofBrothers. My condolences go out to the developers who have lost their much loved characters and ingame identities due to the petulant whining of others.

Oh, and to the slow goon - fairly certain that being a Community Manager does not involve any kind of coding at all, and I would expect Kieron to be about as good at it as I am.

------
Steve Nash
Steve Nash

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:33:00 - [99] - Quote

Originally by: MessiahOfLight
Hm... i still think that only ONE answer would be accepted here, and im fairly shure that is also why no CCP employee reall posted anything about the cheating ****.

Whatever Kieron would say, the only answer that most in here would accept, is that when he would say "yes we have found Dev Characters within BOB who cheated for them".

None other. He could say that there was nothing found, that BOB didnt do anything wrong or whatever. Only that one answer would be accepted. Everything else would be taken as an attempt to cover something up. Wich makes it pretty pointless to post anything.

--MOL


Possibly, but that would be better than no answer.
Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward
Gallente
Panopticon Citadel

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:33:00 - [100] - Quote

Originally by: Ab Initio
I said I wouldn't post again, but this is a fair enough point to respond to. I do understand your point of view, but you also need to understand ours.

On one side we have those that have decided to wait for real proof before crucifying us for our alleged trangressions. Innocent until proven guilty. On the other side, we have the hate mongerers that we generally have a history with ingame, who have decided we need to burn no matter what the outcome of the investigation.

You're asking what proof we have that we are innocent, again, guilty until proven innocent. Now due to completely unproven allegations by some random lowlife, and the inability for CCP to make a clear statement about the matter, we won't ever be vindicated. You think you're annoyed about one BoB member getting frustrated, try having a community burning your alliance at the stake because of unproven allegations towards < 5 members.


How exactly is substantiation supposed to be provided if it's just going to be deleted here anyways?
Please don't use your sig to troll - Ductoris
Adam C
Adam C
0utbreak

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:35:00 - [101] - Quote

Originally by: kieron
Since these play characters are known to belong to CCP employees, they will be removed from the game. Many of them have been around since the creation of EVE and it is most unfortunate that these developers are now forced to end their relationships with their in-game friends, but that is our policy when the anonymity of staff members has been compromised.


Really sorry to read that

One of the saddest tings I have ever read, in these forums.


How will the developers recoup their gaming experience?
Start a new character?
Thats really bad considering eve has been going on for 3yrs. That means not really any developers in Capital Ships / Titans or any of them really able to participate to some of the advanced forms of gameplay in EVE.







Sinze
Sinze

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:36:00 - [102] - Quote

Originally by: MessiahOfLight
So we are guilty until prooven otherwise...


There was some pretty damning evidence produced in relation to BoB getting T2 BPOs. The whole reason this entire investigation started is because people had read the evidence presented and gone "WTF", wanting CCP investigate it. We want to know what the outcome of that evidence was, and if it was verified, if things changed, or if anything happened. People just don't like vague statements that have no content and don't actually answer or address any of the things people wanted this investigation to take place for.

I think I speak for most of us when we say that it isn't BoB we're being angry about, it's the devs, and we'd like a proper response towards that. Nobody is holding every Band Of Brothers member accountable for what some director and some dev did. We just want to know SOMETHING.
Please don't use your sig to troll - Ductoris
bioqaz eylee
bioqaz eylee
Amarr
LifeLine Solutions

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:37:00 - [103] - Quote

Well all this has certainly lowered my view of EVE, but I doubt I will quit anytime soon. EVE is still great. But my point/question is this.

Who watches the watcher??

Does the head of the company, shareholders, director etc (the real top of the company), play EVE?
Surly no one can fire the boss!

bio

Steve Nash
Steve Nash

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:38:00 - [104] - Quote

Edited by: Steve Nash on 07/02/2007 07:35:18
Originally by: Adam C
Originally by: kieron
Since these play characters are known to belong to CCP employees, they will be removed from the game. Many of them have been around since the creation of EVE and it is most unfortunate that these developers are now forced to end their relationships with their in-game friends, but that is our policy when the anonymity of staff members has been compromised.


Really sorry to read that

One of the saddest tings I have ever read, in these forums.


How will the developers recoup their gaming experience?
Start a new character?
Thats really bad considering eve has been going on for 3yrs. That means not really any developers in Capital Ships / Titans or any of them really able to participate to some of the advanced forms of gameplay in EVE.









So you would be ok with a developer as a Titan pilot for an alliance? You see no conflict of interest there? This is not a flame.
MessiahOfLight
MessiahOfLight
Gallente
Black Eclipse Corp
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:41:00 - [105] - Quote

Originally by: Sinze
Originally by: MessiahOfLight
So we are guilty until prooven otherwise...


There was some pretty damning evidence produced in relation to BoB getting T2 BPOs. The whole reason this entire investigation started is because people had read the evidence presented and gone "WTF", wanting CCP investigate it. We want to know what the outcome of that evidence was, and if it was verified, if things changed, or if anything happened. People just don't like vague statements that have no content and don't actually answer or address any of the things people wanted this investigation to take place for.

I think I speak for most of us when we say that it isn't BoB we're being angry about, it's the devs, and we'd like a proper response towards that. Nobody is holding every Band Of Brothers member accountable for what some director and some dev did. We just want to know SOMETHING.


hm... ok so i go onto the Eve Forums and post something like what we are accused of, about your Corp or Alliance (if you have anything like that) with a nice picture or text that i fabricated in an hour or so, and stir some ppl up who will demand an Investigation on that matter... do i need to get further into that?

--MOL
Ab Initio
Ab Initio
Evolution
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:42:00 - [106] - Quote

Originally by: Steve Nash
So you would be ok with a developer as a Titan pilot for an alliance? You see no conflict of interest there? This is not a flame.


No. I don't view a developer using a standard account, any differently to anyone else using a standard account. The only thing I see as being a possible problem is a superior understanding of game mechanics, and tbh I think there are people in the community who know more than the devs :P



Sigmorhair
Sigmorhair
Gallente
Eisenmetal

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:43:00 - [107] - Quote

The best part about this thread as it develops is the same Bob pets and alts are lining up to claim everything is fine with cheating while virtually everyone else is unhappy.

That alone is pretty damning.

Just got back from closing all my accounts. And I know I am far from the only one. I guess when CCP feels it in the pocket, they may finally take the Bob/Dev cheating seriously. But it will probably be way too late by then.

Grats Cheaters.
Adam C
Adam C
0utbreak

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:43:00 - [108] - Quote

Originally by: Sigmorhair
The best part about this thread as it develops is the same Bob pets and alts are lining up to claim everything is fine with cheating while virtually everyone else is unhappy.

That alone is pretty damning.

Just got back from closing all my accounts. And I know I am far from the only one. I guess when CCP feels it in the pocket, they may finally take the Bob/Dev cheating seriously. But it will probably be way too late by then.

Grats Cheaters.


exactly


Sinlare
Sinlare
Gallente
Sinlare Auditorium

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:44:00 - [109] - Quote

It's not so nice to see that even in a community like eve people can sink so low. People won't stop until someone or something burns.
I wonder if people realise how paranoid they've become over a computergame.
Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward
Gallente
Panopticon Citadel

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:44:00 - [110] - Quote

Originally by: Ab Initio
No. I don't view a developer using a standard account, any differently to anyone else using a standard account. The only thing I see as being a possible problem is a superior understanding of game mechanics, and tbh I think there are people in the community who know more than the devs :P


Even when that developer is the manager of your capital ship program and has direct knowledge of your account-sharing cynonet?
Please don't use your sig to troll - Ductoris
jamesw
jamesw
Omniscient Order

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:44:00 - [111] - Quote

Devs are people too Crying or Very sadCrying or Very sadCrying or Very sad
--

Latest Vid: Domination!
Steve Nash
Steve Nash

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:46:00 - [112] - Quote

A developer would have advance knowledge of upcoming events, changes in the game. This would give them and there corps/alliances a decided advantage on many levels. These two examples are the best case scenario as far as advantages go, and that's assuming that over years of gameplay the dev never once slips up and uses his "powers" to gain an advantage "just this once."
Sinlare
Sinlare
Gallente
Sinlare Auditorium

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:46:00 - [113] - Quote

Originally by: jamesw
Devs are people too Crying or Very sadCrying or Very sadCrying or Very sad


Indeed, grats to all paranoid whiners! you've ruined someone's fun in real life. Hope you sleep well at night.
Kuolematon
Kuolematon
Space Perverts and Forum Warriors United

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:47:00 - [114] - Quote

Edited by: Kuolematon on 07/02/2007 07:48:51
Nice post there kieron. Rolling Eyes

You told us so much and yet you didn't tell us anything we wanted to know.

"The second part of the accusations stem from a leak of information pertaining to an in-game event arc. Due to the amount of time that has passed since the planning and execution of the event arc, we have not been able to confirm nor deny the veracity of these allegations."

Niiiiiiice! Laughing

You didn't tell us that was they part of RKK, did they give T2 BPO's and also what happened to those DEV's. We demand public executions and they losing their jobs. Perhaps you should make that there isn't any DEV characters INGAME. Why you need those anyway?

I for once aren't satiated with this answer. Evil or Very Mad

Btw: Those who are settled for deletion of those DEV chars.. think again. They are merely renamed. I talked to ISD person in FF2005 and he said that he was compromised and CCP renamed his character.
Playing Caldari-Online as a Amarr specced is PURE Hardcore


Ab Initio
Ab Initio
Evolution
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:49:00 - [115] - Quote

Originally by: Anonymous Coward
Even when that developer is the manager of your capital ship program and has direct knowledge of your account-sharing cynonet?


Apart from the fact that account sharing is a no no, I wouldnt care what position a Dev was playing on a standard account.

People seem to focus on "devs" so much that they forget that they're actual people. People are cheering because (according to the OP) 3 years vets of the game are being forced to quit, not because they did anything wrong, but because they were named.

Imagine you had been playing EVE for 3 years, and suddenly had to quit the game through no fault of your own. That's the outcome of witch hunts.



Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward
Gallente
Panopticon Citadel

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:49:00 - [116] - Quote

Edited by: Anonymous Coward on 07/02/2007 07:45:44
Originally by: Sinlare
Indeed, grats to all paranoid whiners! you've ruined someone's fun in real life. Hope you sleep well at night.


Yeah, damn those inconsiderate whistleblowers! If only they'd kept their mouths shut!
Please don't use your sig to troll - Ductoris
Niobe Farstar
Niobe Farstar

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:51:00 - [117] - Quote

Originally by: jamesw
Devs are people too Crying or Very sadCrying or Very sadCrying or Very sad
You know if the devs each wanted to pay me $15 per month to do something I love I would be grateful, and if they had a problem with what I was doing with their money I would want to please them.
Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward
Gallente
Panopticon Citadel

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:51:00 - [118] - Quote

Originally by: Ab Initio
People seem to focus on "devs" so much that they forget that they're actual people. People are cheering because (according to the OP) 3 years vets of the game are being forced to quit, not because they did anything wrong, but because they were named.

Imagine you had been playing EVE for 3 years, and suddenly had to quit the game through no fault of your own. That's the outcome of witch hunts.


Please forgive me if I don't break into tears when people who damned well seemed to be cheating and ignoring offenses that people in other alliances get banned for got caught and had to suffer a few consequences.
Please don't use your sig to troll - Ductoris
Steve Nash
Steve Nash

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:55:00 - [119] - Quote

Originally by: Ab Initio
Originally by: Anonymous Coward
Even when that developer is the manager of your capital ship program and has direct knowledge of your account-sharing cynonet?


Apart from the fact that account sharing is a no no, I wouldnt care what position a Dev was playing on a standard account.

People seem to focus on "devs" so much that they forget that they're actual people. People are cheering because (according to the OP) 3 years vets of the game are being forced to quit, not because they did anything wrong, but because they were named.

Imagine you had been playing EVE for 3 years, and suddenly had to quit the game through no fault of your own. That's the outcome of witch hunts.


I suspect that the corps/alliances who know they have devs within their ranks see absolutley no conflict of interest. I also suspect that all the other poor saps feel cheated.
Ab Initio
Ab Initio
Evolution
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:55:00 - [120] - Quote

Originally by: Anonymous Coward
I'm not only a dev, I own all the Vagabond BPOs.


Is that proof enough to ban you from the game? You seem to think it's enough to ban others.



Nelson Vandermark
Nelson Vandermark
Triton Dynamics
Curse Alliance

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 07:57:00 - [121] - Quote

Account is closed, thanks for all the fish.
Isidien Madcap
Isidien Madcap
Minmatar
Provenance.

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 08:01:00 - [122] - Quote

Edited by: Isidien Madcap on 07/02/2007 08:02:23
EVE is the ultimate sandbox; it's why the game is as great as it is. This type of situation wouldn't happen in many of the other popular MMOs today (at least the North American/European ones, anyway), or at least not have as much effect on the game, because there simply isn't as much at stake.

But I think that in EVE, this type of stuff is very dangerous -- it's pretty upsetting when people realize that they're not playing by the same sandbox rules. At the very least, it's a smear campaign that BoB can't effectively defend against. At worst, if there was an unfair advantage due to dev intervention, it cheapens the victories and dedication of hundreds of people. (I've been on that side of the fence before as part of a little group called the Rollin' 30's in Shadowbane; the issue there was hacking, though, not dev intervention -- it only called into question the dev team's competency, not their integrity.) Either of these situations suck, both for CCP and for the corps/alliances who were accused.

The main problem is that the results of the investigation aren't verifiable in any way. It's not at all clear how any actions resulting from the investigation that were taken have affected the EVE world, while it's pretty clear how the actions specified in the allegations would have done so. While the actual identities of the people involved should not be revealed, revealing the names of the characters themselves does not seem unreasonable. I also refuse to believe that kieron does not know anything beyond what was posted -- unless he's been kept in a bubble, that kind of statement is just insulting. "I can't/am not allowed to/don't wish to reveal anything more" would have been fine. This is not a witch hunt, it's damage control: "who did what, when, and how much effect did it have on the world?" The original post claims the answers to these questions are "some people did some things some time ago, and it had no effect other than getting their characters banned".

The other question is -- why was it such a difficult investigation? If the people involved were as high profile as some people would like to believe, then I would expect them to simply confess instead of waiting for the results of whatever investigation was involved. A public apology by those individuals would be appropriate; I think the player community would be harsh but ultimately forgiving, because we still love the damn game. This stuff only hurts the game that both the developers and the players feel so strongly about.

Edit: it's pretty ridiculous to ask that CCP employees either not play the game, or not hold positions in high profile corps, etc. As was pointed out, they're real people. They should not reveal that they are CCP employees; that's pretty straightforward. But if they stick to that, who cares what position they have? If someone offers a director position to them, do they decline, what, due to "personal reasons"? EVE is unique in that the game can be enjoyed by the people who develop it; there's magic in the game that's not directly in the code and content that make up the game. Denying them that would hurt the game immensely.

The more difficult issue is the players inadvertently revealing themselves, e.g. through forum IP logs and the like. That sounds like a policy/technology issue that they need to be aware of, but not much beyond that.
Isidien
Provenance.
www.eve-provenance.com -- looking for more pilots!
Sinlare
Sinlare
Gallente
Sinlare Auditorium

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 08:04:00 - [123] - Quote

Originally by: Anonymous Coward
Edited by: Anonymous Coward on 07/02/2007 07:45:44
Originally by: Sinlare
Indeed, grats to all paranoid whiners! you've ruined someone's fun in real life. Hope you sleep well at night.


Yeah, damn those inconsiderate whistleblowers! If only they'd kept their mouths shut!


What about proof or stfu? You really want to ruin someone's real life over accusations (random) based on some internet game?
Please give me your personal data and i'll go accuse you of things i think are true, let's see how your boss likes that.
If he has any sense in him he'll kick me out, and i hope ccp does the same with paranoid people like you.
31i73
31i73
BGG

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 08:05:00 - [124] - Quote

Alrgiht, I'm angry about this as anyone, boo BoD and that, but hey, lets face it, We are all so hooked on this, theres no way we could quit. Its like stopping breathing after seeing news on pollution.

Celero Incendium
Celero Incendium
Sniggerdly

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 08:05:00 - [125] - Quote

Originally by: Ab Initio
People seem to focus on "devs" so much that they forget that they're actual people. People are cheering because (according to the OP) 3 years vets of the game are being forced to quit, not because they did anything wrong, but because they were named.

Imagine you had been playing EVE for 3 years, and suddenly had to quit the game through no fault of your own. That's the outcome of witch hunts.


Your logic is flawed. By CCP publicly stating that the dev accounts were named, and characters deleted, they are in fact confirming that at least that part of kugot's "evidence" was true. This leads to the conclusion that he didn't just "fabricate" the conversations in question between BoB directors that he got a hold of, at least in regards to the identities of the CCP characters.

So in effect, if the CCP employees had not let the BoB director's know that they were in fact CCP employees, they wouldn't be losing their characters.

I have no sympathy for people that break their own rules and then cry about the consequences.
--ci
Azerrad InExile
Azerrad InExile

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 08:07:00 - [126] - Quote

Originally by: Isidien Madcap
The main problem is that the results of the investigation aren't verifiable in any way.


I would argue that the main problem is that the investigation seemed to completely ignore the main concerns people had.
Dr Felonius
Dr Felonius
Caldari
Civilian Purposes Limited

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 08:08:00 - [127] - Quote

Edited by: Dr Felonius on 07/02/2007 08:06:21
To me, this entire mess demonstrates the limitations of CCP's extremely closed-off communications policy. I'm completely convinced that the game would be better served by a 90 degree about face.

CCP should require devs to tell everyone who their characters are. They should publish the protocols for monitoring dev activity and let the community at large criticize them. Bare all to the community and say, "Yes, there are developers running CIPUL and many other corps. Here are all the ways you and other players can trust that those developers are playing by the same rules as anyone else." As long as CCP insists on concealing the facts, people will always assume there is something worth concealing.

Edit: CIPUL is not run by devs. I was just using my own corp as an example.
jamesw
jamesw
Omniscient Order

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 08:09:00 - [128] - Quote

Originally by: Celero Incendium
Originally by: Ab Initio
People seem to focus on "devs" so much that they forget that they're actual people. People are cheering because (according to the OP) 3 years vets of the game are being forced to quit, not because they did anything wrong, but because they were named.

Imagine you had been playing EVE for 3 years, and suddenly had to quit the game through no fault of your own. That's the outcome of witch hunts.


Your logic is flawed. By CCP publicly stating that the dev accounts were named, and characters deleted, they are in fact confirming that at least that part of kugot's "evidence" was true. This leads to the conclusion that he didn't just "fabricate" the conversations in question between BoB directors that he got a hold of, at least in regards to the identities of the CCP characters.

So in effect, if the CCP employees had not let the BoB director's know that they were in fact CCP employees, they wouldn't be losing their characters.

I have no sympathy for people that break their own rules and then cry about the consequences.


afaik his proof they were from ccp was by the ip they used to post to that forum, not by reading conversations with bob leaders.
--

Latest Vid: Domination!
Steve Nash
Steve Nash

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 08:11:00 - [129] - Quote

Originally by: Ab Initio
Edited by: Ab Initio on 07/02/2007 07:57:33
Originally by: Anonymous Coward
I'm not only a dev, I own all the Vagabond BPOs.


Is that proof enough to ban you from the game? You seem to think it's enough to ban others.

Originally by: Steve Nash
I suspect that the corps/alliances who know they have devs within their ranks see absolutley no conflict of interest. I also suspect that all the other poor saps feel cheated.


I still don't know whether we do or not. If we do, I'm glad they get to experience all the things we do, because it will make for better development of the game. If not, I could care less.

My real life job revolves around computer security, the day I take the word of someone who spends his life breaking into the machines I try to secure, over long standing members of a community I'm part of.. Well, thats the day I stop playing EVE.


A more apt example would be that of a stockbroker who had inside information. It's illegal.

I was not making a personal attack on you, I don't know you, but my point stands.
Merciless1
Merciless1
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
The Cartel.

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 08:11:00 - [130] - Quote

Edited by: Merciless1 on 07/02/2007 08:13:41






Originally by: Sausage Commandos
A bobbeh titan at the station!, i curse at myself for being in a shuttle, so i head to station, change to ibis, return to find the scumbag had ran...
Masochistic Cannibal
Masochistic Cannibal
Amarr
The Ring of Fire

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 08:12:00 - [131] - Quote

CCP I dought you will ever answer these questions but it's worth a try. Will you ever give us answers on the following ?

# Why did a Dev ignore the fact that BoB where benefitting from macro-miners in their space ?

# Why did Dev's ignore account sharing and character sales for $$$ within BoB ?

# Where the BPO's donated to bob from a Dev aquired in a legitimate way ?


Obviously I dont expect an answer now, but after these investigations are finished will you ever release the honest info. I somehow dought it, the truth would tarnish your reputation ever further than it allready has been.


I eat babies ! [Hauling services available~ Contact ingame]
Azerrad InExile
Azerrad InExile

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 08:15:00 - [132] - Quote

Originally by: Masochistic Cannibal
# Where the BPO's donated to bob from a Dev aquired in a legitimate way?


And for that matter, why were they given to BoB in the first place?
Sinlare
Sinlare
Gallente
Sinlare Auditorium

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 08:15:00 - [133] - Quote

Originally by: Merciless1

Well said, That about sums everything up, although I must say I'm much more interested about who, what, and what affectis did it have than what charecters and public apologies.


Ditto, i think CCP would be much more inclined to give that information if people would act in a normal way. Now people just want to see something burn, no matter if it's justified or not. It's a sad thing.
Milano II
Milano II
Vengeance of the Fallen
Curse Alliance

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 08:17:00 - [134] - Quote

Originally by: Celero Incendium
Originally by: Ab Initio
People seem to focus on "devs" so much that they forget that they're actual people. People are cheering because (according to the OP) 3 years vets of the game are being forced to quit, not because they did anything wrong, but because they were named.

Imagine you had been playing EVE for 3 years, and suddenly had to quit the game through no fault of your own. That's the outcome of witch hunts.


Your logic is flawed. By CCP publicly stating that the dev accounts were named, and characters deleted, they are in fact confirming that at least that part of kugot's "evidence" was true. This leads to the conclusion that he didn't just "fabricate" the conversations in question between BoB directors that he got a hold of, at least in regards to the identities of the CCP characters.

So in effect, if the CCP employees had not let the BoB director's know that they were in fact CCP employees, they wouldn't be losing their characters.

I have no sympathy for people that break their own rules and then cry about the consequences.


LOL I knew You'd be posting. I was waiting for it.
Why dont you just let Shamis handle these things?
Anyway. thanks for posting :)




Merciless1
Merciless1
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
The Cartel.

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 08:17:00 - [135] - Quote

Ok my last post quoted the wrong thread for some reason and now I can't edit or delet itEvil or Very Mad





Originally by: Sausage Commandos
A bobbeh titan at the station!, i curse at myself for being in a shuttle, so i head to station, change to ibis, return to find the scumbag had ran...
Masochistic Cannibal
Masochistic Cannibal
Amarr
The Ring of Fire

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 08:20:00 - [136] - Quote

Originally by: Sinlare
Originally by: Merciless1

Well said, That about sums everything up, although I must say I'm much more interested about who, what, and what affectis did it have than what charecters and public apologies.


Ditto, i think CCP would be much more inclined to give that information if people would act in a normal way. Now people just want to see something burn, no matter if it's justified or not. It's a sad thing.


Well thats kind of a mute point, If I was forced to leave the corporation I was with by my employer than I would still want to wish them all the best. And yes I would hand over everything I had to them! Dev's make friends in-game just the same as the rest of us.

Whats important is HOW the BPO's where obtained.






I eat babies ! [Hauling services available~ Contact ingame]
IntegralHellsing
IntegralHellsing
Gallente
The Raven Warriors

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 08:21:00 - [137] - Quote

Edited by: IntegralHellsing on 07/02/2007 08:20:46
Deletion of char is a bit upsetting even to me.
poor devs, have to delete their beloved chars.Crying or Very sad

Quote:
Due to the amount of time that has passed since the planning and execution of the event arc, we have not been able to confirm nor deny the veracity of these allegations.


I am sure CCP has all the logs from the event, and also have the ability evaluate whether the info was leaked before the event or not. Don't say that CCP doesn't even keep the files/logs of how the planning went everyday, and how the event was executed. I would be quite surprised if a company (even CCP) planning an event doesn't keep files of daily plan, preparation and procedures of a big event (that gave player alliance a free mothership) doesn't even keep a single file on what they planned and executed.

Why am i going on about files/logs? because CCP wrote that long time has passed since the planning and execution of event. don't think ccp deletes/trashes the files and logs just because it happened a long time ago.

What I'm saying is, merely saying 'sorry, no log, no trace. can't really make a nasty decision. please move along for a while.' isn't enough.
Not that i would want to see the reward from event removed, but at least show a trace of having done an investigation into this matter.

It just looks plain stupid when CCP goes 'it happened ages ago, can't make a decision.' because it just gives other people (who doesn't know much about eve-online) the impression that CCP can't even manage its internal issue.


Well i'm going to stop writing before this becomes an accusation + troll. I'm just asking CCP to be more thorough in their investigation. I am sure CCP HAS abilities to lead their internal investigations into leak on the information of event.
If CCP doesn't, I would be very surprised, so would everyone else.


ps. YES my English sucks a lot more than you native speakers, so if you don't understand what i wrote, please just move on.
------------------------------
Merciless1
Merciless1
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
The Cartel.

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 08:27:00 - [138] - Quote

Edited by: Merciless1 on 07/02/2007 08:27:26
nvm, my eyes are playing tricks on me, time for sleep





Originally by: Sausage Commandos
A bobbeh titan at the station!, i curse at myself for being in a shuttle, so i head to station, change to ibis, return to find the scumbag had ran...
Xoria Krint
Xoria Krint
The Movement

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 08:28:00 - [139] - Quote

More information about the bpo thing and im happy.
---

My Movies
Nifel
Nifel
Caldari
Reikoku
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 08:30:00 - [140] - Quote

Originally by: Merciless1
Originally by: Masochistic Cannibal
Originally by: Sinlare
Originally by: Merciless1

Well said, That about sums everything up, although I must say I'm much more interested about who, what, and what affectis did it have than what charecters and public apologies.


Ditto, i think CCP would be much more inclined to give that information if people would act in a normal way. Now people just want to see something burn, no matter if it's justified or not. It's a sad thing.


Well thats kind of a mute point, If I was forced to leave the corporation I was with by my employer than I would still want to wish them all the best. And yes I would hand over everything I had to them! Dev's make friends in-game just the same as the rest of us.

Whats important is HOW the BPO's where obtained.




Are you serious? Do you not see a difference between someone winning/buying them and spawning them out of nowhere? I'm not saying it did or didn't happen, just saying your crazy for thinking like this, it's basicly the definition of cheating.


Erm... that's kinda what he's saying. What he said was that what's important is if the BPOs were aquired through the same ingame means that everyone else can aquire them. Ie, lottery, buying them or being given them. If it was aquired by those means then people should care less about what he did with them.


"When I die I want to die peacefully in my sleep like my grandpa. Not yelling and screaming like the passengers in his car."
RKK Ranking: Sama
Angrona
Angrona

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 08:31:00 - [141] - Quote

Let me preface this by saying I never have or ever had any intention to play in the metagame on the level of the organzations or the operations they run. I log in, I mine, I rat a little, and run missions every once in a while. I'm content with that. I played maybe a couple hours a week, but with the way training works I never "fell behind" like I would have in other MMO's. I've kept up a subsription for over a year soley to support a game system I liked and thought was innovative.

But because of the events/allegations involved here and the subsequent lack of any attempt to "set things right" I'm cancelling my account and will never, ever consider playing another multiplayer by CCP. The level of corruption on the part of CCP staff and the perks enjoyed by players that have absolutely no need for them disgusts me. And it doesn't even sound like a single person was fired - they just need to reroll and probably just edit a spreadsheet record and they're back in business again.

Completely disgusting.
Samirol
Samirol
OctoberSnow Corp

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 08:31:00 - [142] - Quote

The reason that the eve community wants to know what happened with the BoB betrayal is that there was some pretty damning evidence. Innocent until proven guilty right? The defendent didnt even show up on this one.

There is nothing that says that BoB is innocent of receiving BPOs that were made from thin air. Kieron doesn't even mention it.

Being straight up with the community will help things, instead of it blowing up more when the next Kugutsumen comes along and exposes more corruption.



I buy insane sigs, mail me ingame.
Slayton Ford
Slayton Ford
Caldari
Kudzu Collective

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 08:33:00 - [143] - Quote

As a long time EQ player, it is commonly known that the devs play in regular guilds. Additionally, those guilds know that they have a member who is a dev. How does that benefit them? They probably end up beta testing expansions as a guild on the beta server but on live, it doesnt help them in the slightest. EvE is a bit different though. There is a enticement for devs to cheat (as has been done) and give their corps a unfair advantage. Now devs need to understand that they must be above all that. That means no devs should not be allowed to access t2 BPs in the game. If they want t2 items, they need to get it. They may play the game, but they need to understand that due to previous dev actions, the game can be corrupted.

As to the existing BPOs and ebaying 10/10 complexes. A simple but radical solution that would **** everyone off but fix things is to convert every t2 BPO to a BPC (number of runs determined by type, more for ammo, less for ships). Then as a BPC leaves the game due to use, seed in t2 BPOs again. For ebaying complexes, well one solution is to make them more roving through the region so every few weeks they move.

At the minimum though, I would think every t2 BP that was owned by a dev and is no longer in that devs hands should be destroyed AND every item created from those BPs needs to be either destroyed (ill gotten gains from a poisoned fruit) or at the least converted to the best Tech 1 alternative (so a T2 launcher becomes a Arbalest).

Now excuse me while I duck from the flames that will come at me.
Kedryn Caitin
Kedryn Caitin

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 08:36:00 - [144] - Quote

Originally by: OmegaClone
What would your Viking ancestors say? Shame Shame on all of you.


They would say, "This one is still a lively ride, brother. Have a hump while I carry this sack of loot back to the longboat. If she is worth anything when you are done, bring her too."
Casper Ozymandias
Casper Ozymandias

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 08:40:00 - [145] - Quote

Am I the only one who has noticed posts speaking out against CCPs corruption in this thread being outright deleted?

This whole investigation was a joke, Not only was there no real answer for a well deserved question, but the real question itself was entirely ignored and substituted with one no one really cared about.

The only good thing to come out of this thread is that now everyone has a nice new nickname for BoB.
Captain Thunk
Captain Thunk
Explode. Now. Please.

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 08:42:00 - [146] - Quote

What happened to the 10+ T2 BPOs that the dev left behind with rkk when he was outed and left? Is it standard procedure for all T2 BPOs lost out of the loop to be moved to a BoB corp? Now Kugutsumen is banned does this mean BoB now own his T2 BPOs too?

Why is the blame being put onto other people for the outing of the devs when it was the devs freely informing bob members of their position that allowed the information to become public. Did they not out themselves?

Does this mean we can freely transfer characters for whichever currency we choose now?

Does this ruling mean we can profit from macro operations so long as we leave sufficient deniability? Most of us would appreciate a few billion extra per month.

What's CCPs opinion on "escalation" - Sir Molle brought us Social Engineering by installing his members in other corporations and alliances like Goonfleet, 0utbreak, CCP and D2. With limited tools to fight this kind of thing are we not surprised that the ante is being raised? It doesn't take a genius to buy a character (easier for parts of the community than the rest) and enroll with another corp - trick is to remember not to say things like "yeah I do that on my main" or "damn! I only have the skills for that on my other char"

To the hard workers of CCP - why is it that the "star wars" signatures have never been deemed offensive, when they so clearly are and made specifically to inflame. One quickly gains the impression that moderation on CAOD can be a one sided affair.

CAPTAIN THUNK



If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find them, maybe you can hire...The ENP-Team.
Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward
Gallente
Panopticon Citadel

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 08:42:00 - [147] - Quote

Originally by: Sinlare
*snip* - Cortes You really want to ruin someone's real life over accusations (random) based on some internet game?
*snip* - Cortes


Well, if I see anyone's life get ruined here, I'll be sure to let you know.
Originally by: Dianabolic
I was sworn to secrecy by CCP.
Johnathan Roark
Johnathan Roark
Caldari
Quantum Industries
Prime Orbital Systems

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 08:43:00 - [148] - Quote

Personally, I do not care if the devs play in player corps. I actually hope they do. I do care if they have abused inside information. Any BPOS or other items received not from normal means should be removed from the game. If the allegations are all lies, I would be happy with a statement saying so. This is not the time to keep the community in the dark.

On another note, the censorship in this thread looks bad.

Corporation Management Improvement
Platinum Sapphire
Platinum Sapphire
Minmatar
Republic Military School

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 08:44:00 - [149] - Quote

Quote:
Quote:
Originally by: Anonymous Coward
Edited by: Anonymous Coward on 07/02/2007 07:45:44

Quote:
Originally by: Sinlare

Indeed, grats to all paranoid whiners! you've ruined someone's fun in real life. Hope you sleep well at night.




Yeah, damn those inconsiderate whistleblowers! If only they'd kept their mouths shut!





What about proof or stfu? You really want to ruin someone's real life over accusations (random) based on some internet game?


Proof? Well gee, I don't know... but I think Kieron's admission that Dev characters are being removed from the game might be some kind of admission that there was at least SOME truth to the accusations... There's your proof right there.


All that people here are calling for is that Kieron release more details of that proof so we can be assured that the investigation was conducted fairly and thoroughly... A little transperency to the process, if you will.
Niaski Zalani
Niaski Zalani
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 08:46:00 - [150] - Quote

What I find interesting is that Kugutsumen got hit with the ultra-banstick-of-doom, whilst people that are guilty of the same sort of actions are still merrily in-game, including someone who posted Kugutsumen's personal information on these forums.

Smells slightly double-standard like if you ask me.
yarr.
mazzilliu
mazzilliu
Caldari
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 08:46:00 - [151] - Quote

I tried posting something and it got deleted like 10 seconds after. theyre deleting whole posts to even hide the appearance of censorship.

chribba needs to make his eve search spider index threads like this more often. it seems all the interesting and logical questions/posts have been deleted or censored. i really can't stand it tbh.

seriously, ccp should just own up that something went wrong and they ought to fix it. you did it in the past, and reading old devblogs where devs admitted mistakes and such really attracted me to this game, and i kind of respected that. but theyre censoring everything right now, banning kugutsumen and refusing to even consider that there might be something wrong, as if the mostly unenforced consequences are enough. i'm not a rash person and threaten to quit, i still love the game but im dissapointed in the company.

signed, 5 accounts

GIVE ME BACK MY EXCLAMATION MARK PORTRAIT :( :( :( :( :( :(
Luna Liandri
Luna Liandri
PPN United
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 08:46:00 - [152] - Quote

i really didnt care much about isks or BPOs, this is a secondary issue in my eyes.

information is what this game fuels, at least in the 0.0 alliance game.

and therefore its unacceptable that devs are part of this game and have "in-game friends" - regardless which alliance they play in, what position they have and what they do. human nature as a social animal just doesnt allow to stay uninvolved and fair to the rest of your customers.

devs, gms, etc, all employees - they shouldnt be allowed to fraternize in the slightest sense.

all questions concerning that matter are left unresolved.
we see no link to the policy for employees, no information how its controlled and enforced.
quite the contrary, blurr statements.

my conclusions:
- CCP isnt aware that this is a problem for your customers - or CCP is but couldnt care less
- alliance game is not level, all your big "player-based content is our goal"-blogs are not worth a dime
- this game has lost its USP and is not recommendable

sad day indeed.
Evil or Very MadCrying or Very sadConfused
Sephiraa
Sephiraa

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 08:48:00 - [153] - Quote

Edited by: Sephiraa on 07/02/2007 08:48:30
Originally by: IntegralHellsing
Edited by: IntegralHellsing on 07/02/2007 08:20:46
Deletion of char is a bit upsetting even to me.
poor devs, have to delete their beloved chars.Crying or Very sad

Quote:
Due to the amount of time that has passed since the planning and execution of the event arc, we have not been able to confirm nor deny the veracity of these allegations.


I am sure CCP has all the logs from the event, and also have the ability evaluate whether the info was leaked before the event or not. Don't say that CCP doesn't even keep the files/logs of how the planning went everyday, and how the event was executed.


According to what Oveur posted, they seem to have logs dating back to each character's creation. If that is true, and I believe Oveur, then something is clearly not right in all of this, and the explanation we have been given rings very hollow.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oveur
Regarding the investigation, there will be a conclusion to it published, but it's going to be done when there is a conclusion, not before. This investigation, like others, isn't going to be rushed. And yes, it does take days. We are effectively re-auditing all the player accounts, all the time the account has been played, since he started. But more on that later. As pointed out, the process is sometimes as important as the conclusion.


This is what gets me though.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kieron
As for diffusing the situation by mentioning this at the start of the thread, unfortunately, it wouldn't have. There are too many people who are willing to believe any tale where there are allegations of people abusing positions of authority. A few pages back, I made a post mentioning the wide range of play styles and organizations the Devs participate in, including the presence of Devs in alliances other than BoB. That has done little to stop the anti-BoB sentiments running rampant in the thread.



Personally, I'm still wondering why CCP seems more concerned about what the community thinks of BoB, instead of the actual reasons behind such sentiments. The very fact that the people out as CCP employees have had their characters removed lends a significant amount of credibility to the other claims that accompanied those names being revealed.

This response effectively verified the community concerns by letting us know that the names revealed were in fact CCP employees. If those names were not made up, and were not in fact part of a fictional smear campaign, then it seems all too likely that the rest of the claims made are equally true.

This looks very, very bad.
Rod Blaine
Rod Blaine
Evolution
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 08:50:00 - [154] - Quote

I'm as disgusted by this post by Kieron as any of you, and actually for the same reason as many of you.

I'd like to see CCP give us the infomration they can find out about any and all accusations against us and them item by item.

Quite dissapoitning to see Kieron unable to communicate clearly again.

As for the witchhunt, well, i've made my pov known.


Old blog
Originally by: Vriezuh
Naz: John is a realist
FireFoxx80
FireFoxx80
Caldari
E X O D U S
Imperial Republic Of the North

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 08:52:00 - [155] - Quote

Just to reinforce the above constructive arguments really.

I think for CCP's sake and the comminuty's sake, a full breakdown of what has happened and what step have been taken, needs to be made public.

It sounds like a substantial portion of the accusations you have, either proved correct, or have been completely unable to detect; which is pretty worrying.

It's good to say that CCP employees have had their characters removed, but what about secondary effects on the players of the information/equipment that has been passed on?

Can we please have more information about what has happened?


What I do the rest of the time - Vote for a Jita bypass!
Sun Ra
Sun Ra
Godspeed You Black Emperor

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 08:52:00 - [156] - Quote

Originally by: Milano II
The T2 BPOs? We all know one famous alliance has almost all of them, mostly dev-created/hax0red/handed-out or whatever- because afterall... they're not the carebears they try to come across as.... they dont do agent missions that often to get these things from the faulty lottery system that has been set up anyway.


LOL even ive had 3 t2 bpo and had a further 3 i turnt down and im no 'carebear' and theres plnety in BoB

Your hate for Bob is the only 'proof' you have, you ever considered he bought some of those via auctions? alot of those ammo bpo hardly sell for much

If your friend kugutswhatever wants to rid of bob why hasnt he posted anything really useful like a post of bob members telling other bout the haxs they used to shoot you behind the pos bubble??

dont let your hate for BoB f**k over ccp


Arcane Frankologies - 'plz stop guys it's xmas'
SirMolle
SirMolle
Evolution
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 08:53:00 - [157] - Quote

Kieron,

Since people fail to have reading comprehension 101, could you please state, if ANY wrongdoings at all were found?


As for the rest of you lot,

We play the game on a high level, we have a high profile, this isnt the first accusations of cheat, hax, and god knows what else that has been flung at us. The tinfoil hattery is amazing, i know that you would love for us all to be framed for some conspiracy. Since we are all still here, all the accusations are totally baseless.

There will be devs in every alliance in the game, and i for one, do not wanna know who is a dev or not, i want them to be in the middle of everything, from lowlevel gaming, to highlevel gaming, so that they see the issues we all face, from day to day.

Face it, you love the drama and the conspiracy theories, and thats all there is, drama and conspiracy theories.


Kai Gaivuuri
Kai Gaivuuri
Caldari
GalacTECH Unlimited
Gunboat Diplomacy

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 08:55:00 - [158] - Quote

There is no excuse to to this mess...

How is it possible that the ones involved in the actual development of the game play?

How it is even REMOTELY POSSIBLE that those devs playing would have revealed their real command level.

It is inexcusable and impossible to control. There are always ways to get around even the heaviest control. I have been a MMORPG GM myself and I know how goddamn easy it is to cheat even when every item, every change you make is logged. I have busted those cheaters myself and where I was the things were always informed to the community. A MMORPG shouldn't be a totalitarian system where the guys running the show are quiet and don't act by the book themselves

What kind of example do you want to set? If cheating happens even among the staff what authority do you have on anyone? It is the most hypocritical thing ever.

Being open and telling what happened, why it happened and what are we gonna do in the future would help a lot. At the moment I can't believe what I am seeing. This is meant to be a game that is handled in a professional way. What the heck am I paying for? I pay for the devs so that they can develop the game and at the same time force me to bend over... thank you.

Being honest and straightforward would help the company the most. Otherwise people will whine, whine and continue to whine. Answering to every question is impossible but doing the best thing possible is a lot better than trying to ban those who ask for answers and want the honesty. Treat the players and especially yourselves by the rules.

I really thought I would never see this in a MMORPG that I pay for.
Anila's Delight
Anila's Delight

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:02:00 - [159] - Quote

Originally by: Steve Nash
Originally by: Anila's Delight
I am inclined to agree with the BoB forum professionals (gah!) on this one, bob have been branded as guilty before any eveidence has been presented to the comunity (which i dont think it will), because these kinds of allegations have been flying around for a while now.

Everyone who has posted anti-bob and bob=dev in this thread are taking the word of a known hacker (by his own admission) without proof to the contrary. Sounds like slandering a superier PvP force to me.

Sore loosers anyone?


I don't think you can point a finger at the community here. The fact is that the statement delivered by CCP has served to cast more suspicion on themselves and BoB. I'm not a BoB hater, but somethin dont smell right.


I am not pointing at the comunity as a whole, just those who belived the word of a self admitted hacker (who's data can not be verified by anyone non-ccp) without waiting for proof. I think that it is wrong to belive someone is guilty untill proven innocent. You cant trust a hacker, and how can you verify what he said is the truth and not just a part of a smear campaign.

I have seen in a bob=dev sig "quis custodiet ipsos custodies" i ask, who will guard the guards against a comminity who is intent on drawing blood from ccp in this witch hunt
Sinlare
Sinlare
Gallente
Sinlare Auditorium

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:06:00 - [160] - Quote

Originally by: Kai Gaivuuri
T
Being open and telling what happened, why it happened and what are we gonna do in the future would help a lot. At the moment I can't believe what I am seeing. This is meant to be a game that is handled in a professional way. What the heck am I paying for? I pay for the devs so that they can develop the game and at the same time force me to bend over... thank you.

Being honest and straightforward would help the company the most. Otherwise people will whine, whine and continue to whine. Answering to every question is impossible but doing the best thing possible is a lot better than trying to ban those who ask for answers and want the honesty. Treat the players and especially yourselves by the rules.

I really thought I would never see this in a MMORPG that I pay for.


You know why you're seeing it? Not because the MMORPG or it's developers made it so. It probably never even happened at all.
It's because of the rotten part of the community that make it so. Look at yourself first before blaming someone else. The players are ruining the game, not the devs.
Niaski Zalani
Niaski Zalani
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:07:00 - [161] - Quote

Originally by: SirMolle

We play the game on a high level, we have a high profile, this isnt the first accusations of cheat, hax, and god knows what else that has been flung at us.



Does that "high level" also include some of your membership threatening to DDoS the kugutsumen.com site? Because someone did threaten with it, and there have been a few attempts at it so far.

Could've been anyone really, so consider this one public notice; a) it won't work, b) if it works, it won't work for long, c) it'll have to involve law enforcement at some point, although that's not something I'd like to do, or d) I'll just handle it myself in which case the results won't be pretty.

(No, I'm not Kugutsumen, I'm just the guy that hosts his site. Guess I'll get ready for the thwack upside the head with the banstick now...)
yarr.
Jane Spondogolo
Jane Spondogolo

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:07:00 - [162] - Quote

I can see CCP are stuck somewhere between a rock and a hard place on the issue. I'd highly doubt it possible to 'fire' or substantially 'discipline' an employee based on the claims of a hacker. A court would not accept it on the grounds that if it was 'dishonestly' obtained info, then its *legally* dishonest info, and if said employee appealed to a court on unfair dismissal, he'd win hands down.

HOWEVER.

There seems little evidence to suggest that the evidence is actually incorrect. Off the cuff remarks by certain higher level BOB players, and GM's indicate that at least a 'balance of odds' reading of the evidence favors its accuracy.

It seems fair to suggest that the average Bobbit is entirely innocent of the charges laid out by the community. For op-sec reasons most rank and file alliance members DONT get told full storys. This holds true for any smart alliance, particularly in a game that values cloak and daggery as an integral part of its role play and game play. So folks probably ought hold back on that.

And likewise the other allegations that other alliances have directly encouraged or sponsored the hacker to do his thing are equally unfair.

I'll also add finally that its almost certain the vast majority of CCP devs , volenteers and agents should be assumed to be beyond reproach regarding ethics.

So where does this leave us?

First off the allegations are serious ones. Thousands of eve players have invested thousands of hours and hundreds of RL dollars into playing this game based on the presumption that the advertised rules of the universe will favor and punish all equally, particularly in the case of the (frankly broken) T2 bpo system.

A lucky strike on the lottery will earn a player vast wealth (Think hulk bpos for example) and influence in the broad meta-game of eve politics.

So when the allegation that a team, already favored by strategic success and being held to be the #1 hegemon in the game, is being directly aided against other players in the T2 game, its something that must be taken seriously.

Perhaps its too late. Perhaps removing the BPOs will unfairly punish too many players who already believe that such fortune was obtained fairly.

Perhaps its not even true.

But the community *DOES* have a right to know if this is happened. Obviously CCP can not reveal names, its honor bound to its EULA and probably workplace agreements, that this it wont. But a simple nod of "yes it appears something is awry with the bpos and we will negotiate a withdrawal of these assets", or even a "the system is automated, and the number in the game precisely matches the number seeded into the automatic system, thus no corruption has occured" would suffice.

Then from there we'd like to hear of a policy. Perhaps the policy should be put to the community. Its a clever bunch in here, and Im sure something could be concocted that would allow CCP the rights to what it wants from its assets, whilst allowing its customers to know it can get what it pays for.

I'd make some opening suggestions: First off I keep hearing that "devs should remain covert about being in alliances". Nonsense. This doesnt protect the game from corruption, only from corruption being detected. I'd suggest devs actually DONT belong in big alliances at all. Perhaps CCP could look into instituting something like "Concord special police" or something like a real player branch of the factions that can be interacted with (for instance if a empire person is being suicide attacked he can call "the cops" or something). Or maybe something else. Maybe serpentis needs some pilots that cant be beaten by just going "look at the drones! now you are hypnotised!". Imagination is key here.

I'd also like to suggest that perhaps in game governance be made a little more transparent. Justice shouldnt just be done, it needs to be seen to be done.

And finally Un-nerf ECM Mad This is most important.
Sephiraa
Sephiraa

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:09:00 - [163] - Quote

Originally by: Anila's Delight
You cant trust a hacker, and how can you verify what he said is the truth and not just a part of a smear campaign.


If it was all simply fiction, and just a part of a smear campaign, then no actual CCP characters names would have been revealed, and Kieron wouldn't have posted this:

Quote:
these accusations were recently brought forward when a player revealed the identity of numerous CCP employee characters. Since these play characters are known to belong to CCP employees, they will be removed from the game.


How would anyone have known those numerous characters were CCP employee characters? It seems to me, if that part of the accusations is true, then Occam's Razor strongly suggests the other claims made in the accusations are equally true.
James Potkukelkka
James Potkukelkka
Karjala Inc.
Imperial Republic Of the North

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:10:00 - [164] - Quote

Somehow a certain South Park episode comes into my mind. "We must find a way to stop the reports about priests"

--
Always trust the devs



Brute Helmet
Brute Helmet
Minmatar
J.H.E.N.R
Pure.

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:10:00 - [165] - Quote

The problem remains that we have no idea what really happened and BoB and CCP will be living with this smear, deserved or not, as long as you dont come clean with what happened.

The problem with CCP devs playing the game is that if they are known as such to their alliance/corp there is a big risk that information about upcoming changes or "hidden" game mechanics leaks to their friends. Whether such a leak is intentional or not doesnt matter.


_____________________________

Support the MGRL - uncover your six
Sinlare
Sinlare
Gallente
Sinlare Auditorium

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:10:00 - [166] - Quote

Edited by: Sinlare on 07/02/2007 09:09:40
Edited by: Sinlare on 07/02/2007 09:07:09
Originally by: Niaski Zalani
Originally by: SirMolle

We play the game on a high level, we have a high profile, this isnt the first accusations of cheat, hax, and god knows what else that has been flung at us.



Does that "high level" also include some of your membership threatening to DDoS the kugutsumen.com site? Because someone did threaten with it, and there have been a few attempts at it so far.

Could've been anyone really, so consider this one public notice; a) it won't work, b) if it works, it won't work for long, c) it'll have to involve law enforcement at some point, although that's not something I'd like to do, or d) I'll just handle it myself in which case the results won't be pretty.

(No, I'm not Kugutsumen, I'm just the guy that hosts his site. Guess I'll get ready for the thwack upside the head with the banstick now...)


So, sni.ggerdly hosts a hacker huh? good to know Confused It does explain why shamis responds the way he does. interesting.
Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward
Gallente
Panopticon Citadel

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:12:00 - [167] - Quote

Originally by: Jane Spondogolo
I can see CCP are stuck somewhere between a rock and a hard place on the issue. I'd highly doubt it possible to 'fire' or substantially 'discipline' an employee based on the claims of a hacker. A court would not accept it on the grounds that if it was 'dishonestly' obtained info, then its *legally* dishonest info, and if said employee appealed to a court on unfair dismissal, he'd win hands down.


I am admittedly unfamiliar with Icelandic law but that is absolutely not true where I live.

Originally by: Dianabolic
I was sworn to secrecy by CCP.

Sun Ra
Sun Ra
Godspeed You Black Emperor

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:19:00 - [168] - Quote

Originally by: Niaski Zalani
Originally by: SirMolle

We play the game on a high level, we have a high profile, this isnt the first accusations of cheat, hax, and god knows what else that has been flung at us.



Does that "high level" also include some of your membership threatening to DDoS the kugutsumen.com site? Because someone did threaten with it, and there have been a few attempts at it so far.

Could've been anyone really, so consider this one public notice; a) it won't work, b) if it works, it won't work for long, c) it'll have to involve law enforcement at some point, although that's not something I'd like to do, or d) I'll just handle it myself in which case the results won't be pretty.

(No, I'm not Kugutsumen, I'm just the guy that hosts his site. Guess I'll get ready for the thwack upside the head with the banstick now...)


Erm so its bad for peopel to DDoS your site but its ok for your mate to go aroudn hacking peoples forums? Laughing


Arcane Frankologies - 'plz stop guys it's xmas'
Platinum Sapphire
Platinum Sapphire
Minmatar
Republic Military School

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:26:00 - [169] - Quote

Originally by: SirMolle
Kieron,

Since people fail to have reading comprehension 101, could you please state, if ANY wrongdoings at all were found?


Well gee, maybe the admission that some developers have had their characters deleted because they were publiclly known might be the proof you're looking for. After all, CCP's own rules state that dev character's are to be anonymous, not publiclly known. Since they have been removed from the game, then obviously there must have been some wrongdoing there for the names to have been able to be found publiclly. After all, even if your forums were hacked, the information was found out that these people were devs. This is information that should not have been known by ANYONE outside of CCP... even among a small group of "trusted people/friends". The rules are absolute.. they don't apply only now and then.


You're the leader of the Alliance in question... How about YOU confirm or deny if any of the removed characters held high level positions within BoB, and whether you or any of your directors were aware that they were CCP staff?

Captain Thunk
Captain Thunk
Explode. Now. Please.

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:30:00 - [170] - Quote

Originally by: SirMolle
Kieron,

Since people fail to have reading comprehension 101, could you please state, if ANY wrongdoings at all were found?


As for the rest of you lot,

We play the game on a high level, we have a high profile, this isnt the first accusations of cheat, hax, and god knows what else that has been flung at us. The tinfoil hattery is amazing, i know that you would love for us all to be framed for some conspiracy. Since we are all still here, all the accusations are totally baseless.

There will be devs in every alliance in the game, and i for one, do not wanna know who is a dev or not, i want them to be in the middle of everything, from lowlevel gaming, to highlevel gaming, so that they see the issues we all face, from day to day.

Face it, you love the drama and the conspiracy theories, and thats all there is, drama and conspiracy theories.




You've been caught red-handed with information that has been verified regardless of how "highlevel gaming" it was obtained.

You accept the profits of macro operations with full knowledge.
You're well aware that characters are traded by your directors for cash.
You know that your members engage in the same activities as kugutsumen but lack the balls to go public.

This is hardly baseless accusations.

What you've done with your highlevel gaming is forced everyone to use the same methods in order to compete on a level playing field, which means there's a lot of EULA's that are going to be torn up and ignored on the proviso that all such activities and transactions are conducted out of game and don't leave an ingame trail - you've afterall proven that it's easy to get away with it.

Nice one mate. Rolling Eyes

CAPTAIN THUNK

If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find them, maybe you can hire...The ENP-Team.
Ab Initio
Ab Initio
Evolution
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:32:00 - [171] - Quote

Edited by: Ab Initio on 07/02/2007 09:31:10

Originally by: Platinum Sapphire
Well gee, maybe the admission that some developers have had their characters deleted because they were publiclly known might be the proof you're looking for. After all, CCP's own rules state that dev character's are to be anonymous, not publiclly known. Since they have been removed from the game, then obviously there must have been some wrongdoing there for the names to have been able to be found publiclly. After all, even if your forums were hacked, the information was found out that these people were devs. This is information that should not have been known by ANYONE outside of CCP... even among a small group of "trusted people/friends". The rules are absolute.. they don't apply only now and then.


If you actually knew what you were talking about, and weren't just running around with a pitchfork, you would realise why that doesn't make any sense.

Originally by: Captain Thunk
You accept the profits of macro operations with full knowledge.

CAPTAIN THUNK


If you knew what you were talking about, you would have already seen the replies noting that Bob petitioned the group, and they were not found to be macroers or anything else (see the posts in other threads).



Casper Ozymandias
Casper Ozymandias

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:32:00 - [172] - Quote

This post has been swept under the rug 3 times already.

Am I the only one who has noticed posts speaking out against CCPs corruption in this thread being outright deleted?

This whole investigation was a joke, Not only was there no real answer for a well deserved question, but the real question itself was entirely ignored and substituted with one no one really cared about.

What did you actually expect would happen after making this announcement? That everyone would be happy and content. Please don't tell me that you are that naive- Well, Considering that you permit devs to take part of the 0.0 game i wouldn't be surprised if you were.

Also, It's hilarious that you are more concerned about everyone picking on BoB (Gee i wonder why?!) rather than trying appease your paying customers.

Blatant favouritism, if there weren't enough evidence already.
Cyrus Ildemar
Cyrus Ildemar
GoonSwarm

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:33:00 - [173] - Quote

I hope the people who outright delete this post immediately along with all the others feels really, really good about what they're doing.
Ashail
Ashail

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:34:00 - [174] - Quote

Guys, I think we can turn our focus away from BoB.
Their reputation is so ridiculously soiled now anything and everything that comes from one of their members is just laughable.


Wizzkidy
Wizzkidy

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:34:00 - [175] - Quote

I think it's absolutly terrible that this even needed to happen and I lose faith in CCP being able to make a fair game tbh.

If this thing did happen which they could well of then I am desgusted with CCP.

I do not care what "logging" they put on any of the Dev player char's it should not happen full stop.

If this means dev player char's cannot go into big alliances then so be it I don't mind them playing the game but as for joining alliances that can be abused is a no go

This really does hurt my playing of EVE-Online and tbh with this allagations I cannot help thinking that it might make me think twice about logging on and playing as much.

Also Kieron you say "Our goal is to provide the best possible game" but tbh what you have stated about you not able to find any evidence then how are you providing the best possible game?

I call BS tbh. I said 7 months ago that there where things not right about the way bob played the game and how things "happened" while they came to take over certain space yet people laughed and said it could never happen, yet now we see a HUGE investigation and STILL you cannot confirm or deny the fact that something happened. I am absolutly desgusted with the way this has happened.
Logan Feynman
Logan Feynman
Constructive Influence

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:35:00 - [176] - Quote

Originally by: Platinum Sapphire
Originally by: SirMolle
Kieron,

Since people fail to have reading comprehension 101, could you please state, if ANY wrongdoings at all were found?


Well gee, maybe the admission that some developers have had their characters deleted because they were publiclly known might be the proof you're looking for. After all, CCP's own rules state that dev character's are to be anonymous, not publiclly known. Since they have been removed from the game, then obviously there must have been some wrongdoing there for the names to have been able to be found publiclly. After all, even if your forums were hacked, the information was found out that these people were devs. This is information that should not have been known by ANYONE outside of CCP... even among a small group of "trusted people/friends". The rules are absolute.. they don't apply only now and then.


You're the leader of the Alliance in question... How about YOU confirm or deny if any of the removed characters held high level positions within BoB, and whether you or any of your directors were aware that they were CCP staff?



The second bolded part makes absolutely no sense at all. The first one does, though. There was no "evidence" in any of Kugutsumen's blogs, only conjectures and vague innuendos.

As far as BPOs are concerned, there was a limited amount of t2 BPOs seeded, with the exact number precisely known. It is impossible to "spawn" additional ones without gathering attention. There was no proof the BPOs were spawned. The only thing proven from the Kugutsumen's blogs is that there were devs in BoB. They are there no more, whether they deserve it, or not.

To any and all of you that feel that CCP has wronged you in any way, please feel free to vote with your wallet and leave this game. Perhaps that would make CCP rethink their handling of the situation. Perhaps. But it certainly will make me a happy puppy. So happy that someone else can have your stuff, as far as I'm concerned.
.

"Life is no way to treat an animal."
~Tombstone of Kilgore Trout
Stahlregen
Stahlregen
GoonFleet
GoonSwarm

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:36:00 - [177] - Quote

Hey CCP, Why don't you just delete this thread seeing as your obviously going mad trimming it like a freaking bonsai tree.
Casper Ozymandias
Casper Ozymandias

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:46:00 - [178] - Quote

Quote this if you hate censorship.
Eelifea
Eelifea

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:46:00 - [179] - Quote

Originally by: Casper Ozymandias
Quote this if you hate censorship.

Cyrus Ildemar
Cyrus Ildemar
GoonSwarm

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:46:00 - [180] - Quote

Edited by: Cyrus Ildemar on 07/02/2007 09:43:14
Originally by: Eelifea
Originally by: Casper Ozymandias
Quote this if you hate censorship.


Ashail
Ashail

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:47:00 - [181] - Quote

Originally by: Eelifea
Originally by: Casper Ozymandias
Quote this if you hate censorship.


Raphael Scoria
Raphael Scoria

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:47:00 - [182] - Quote

It's a shame: I was really enjoying Eve. But now that I see that the bias allegations were founded in truth, and that nothing is to be done, I'll make the only, small gesture I can in order to display my opinion: this and my other account are cancelled, and I'm giong to find a less fun but less corrupted game to play.

Oh, and I have never been in BoB nor in a corp that has ever been in conflict with BoB: I don't care about the corp involved in this cheating and cover-up. I just care that it has happened.
Ilidanis
Ilidanis

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:48:00 - [183] - Quote

Originally by: Ab Initio


If you actually knew what you were talking about, and weren't just running around with a pitchfork, you would realise why that doesn't make any sense.


I think what they were trying to say might have been obfuscated by eagerness and inexperience. Allow me to make me a humble effort to salvage her post.

I believe what she was trying to 'one-up' SirMolle and claim that the removal of the dev characters that were outed as being members of BoB was a sure-sign of mischief, etc.
Of course, you and I both know that's not true. The characters in question were removed because as we all know, while it is not illegal for a dev to play with the rest of us, he should keep his affiliation with CCP a secret. I guess she probably wasn't aware of that, go figure.

However, what I'd like to know is, since the information Kugutsumen provided claiming that certain characters in BoB were actually CCP employees (devs or not, it's not relevant) proved to be spot-on, how do you feel about his other claims and inferences, Ab? Allow me to re-state them for you, in case you forgot them or were not aware of them:

1) Certain BoB members in high-ranking positions were actively promoting the sharing of dread-capable pilot accounts, and the person in charge of this group was reportedly a CCP employee, which was eventually forced out prior to this particular incident. Note that account sharing is a violation of the EULA, yet nothing reportedly happened to these players.

2) The same character that was in charge of the cynonet left 8 or 10 T2 BPOs with BoB upon his departure. While some dispute that these BPOs are not very valuable, any T2 BPO has an intrinsic value due to its rarity (it's a veritable isk printer). What are the chances of a single character played by a CCP staff member obtaining 8 or 10 T2 BPOs legitimaly, uhm?

3) And lastly (but possibly not least), the allegations that DB Preacher purchased at least one player account for cold, hard, real-life cash, which is a bannable offense. Last I checked, nothing happened to him, though.


So, do you have any comments or wagers on how much of the above statements are partially or entirely true? Do you understand that as of right now, regardless of the valiant efforts by the BoB Forum Interceptor Squadron, you guys are looking pretty weak when it comes to honesty, and CCP is definitely trying to bring this embarrassing situation to a swift and silent demise?
Lyticus
Lyticus
Veto.
Veto Corp

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:48:00 - [184] - Quote

Edited by: Lyticus on 07/02/2007 09:44:59
I dont frequent the EVE-O message boards very often, usually because the standard of intelligent conversation is generally quite low. However, this situation calls for my comment and input since it affects me directly.

Kugutsumen was a friend of mine, and he's now had all his accounts banned. I understand that CCP reserves the right to do this under their TOS agreements. However, if EVE is truly the open-ended sandbox the developers claim it is, where you can scam, lie and cheat your way to the top, and as many do, then why has Kugutsumen been singled out in this case?

Did CCP need a scapegoat to blame this event on? Why not blame this fellow? He has ties to all the right corporations, he's been known for causing a bit of a forum uproar in the past, the perfect one to take the fall. Lets ignore the fact that it was in fact the developers fault for distributing sensitive information to their corpmates in the first place. If one of the BOB members who was in the know had leaked the information, would this situation have been treated differently?

Subversion and corp theft are commonplace in EVE, it makes sense that someone would create an intelligence based website where those who pay can obtain this kind of information from those who specialise in its retrieval.

So, I ask CCP, is this the beginning of a new wave?
Should I remove my alts from corporations which are there only to benefit myself?
Should my IPO scam be cancelled lest I risk a ban?

The other day, my alt was scammed by a new player for 5 million isk. I knew he was scamming me at the time, but it was an interesting experience and I taught him a few things on how to improve his tactics. In hindsight, should I have petitioned him? Will you give me my isk back, and give him a warning?

My viewpoint may of course be skewed since I know the person involved here, and all my facts may not be correct as I am not the forum warrior I once was, however, I hope that my points will be considered in the discussion.

In conclusion, is this turning into another World of Warcraft, CCP?

Make sure you let us know, so I can hang up my space boots in advance, I won't be coming along for that ride, thanks.

- Lyticus



Luna Liandri
Luna Liandri
PPN United
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:49:00 - [185] - Quote

kieron:
on a sidenote i'm curious why the names of said characters need to stay top-secret ?
Kcel Chim
Kcel Chim
Caldari
Arcane Technologies
The Five

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:50:00 - [186] - Quote

Originally by: Captain Thunk


You've been caught red-handed with information that has been verified regardless of how "highlevel gaming" it was obtained.

You accept the profits of macro operations with full knowledge.
You're well aware that characters are traded by your directors for cash.
You know that your members engage in the same activities as kugutsumen but lack the balls to go public.

This is hardly baseless accusations.

What you've done with your highlevel gaming is forced everyone to use the same methods in order to compete on a level playing field, which means there's a lot of EULA's that are going to be torn up and ignored on the proviso that all such activities and transactions are conducted out of game and don't leave an ingame trail - you've afterall proven that it's easy to get away with it.

Nice one mate. Rolling Eyes

CAPTAIN THUNK


Maybe you should question the information you got since all the "proof" you name here is either a) collected via illegal means b) presented by a banned (hence himself eula/TOS violating) character and c) simply wrong.

It was shown that dbps char was NOT transfered for cash, even if you wish to believe that.
It was shown that a guy in bob macromined and WAS banned for it by ccp. However the ban was only temporary and after it exspiered he came to terms and was let back in.
It is widely known that BoB members will use ingame mechanics and social engineering to their advantage in a game. Mr.K however used illegal out-of-game methods. One is playing a spy character the other is brute forcing his way into ppls webservers.

In short all of the above might have at one point or the other a grain of truth in it however you twist the situations accordingly to suit your anti bob bull.

Im glad the hacker got banned and to the snigg guy, i would be very carefull about threatening ppl with illegal means such as dos attacks or your inet kungfu. Im not a fan of this stuff in any way or form, whoever does it but ure clearly not helping the situation by a new wave of baseless accusations.

If you got solid proof of some BoB member commiting illegal stuff on the net contact his ceo instead of doing another twist of hatemongering.
Sinlare
Sinlare
Gallente
Sinlare Auditorium

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:51:00 - [187] - Quote

Originally by: Lyticus
Edited by: Lyticus on 07/02/2007 09:44:59
I dont frequent the EVE-O message boards very often, usually because the standard of intelligent conversation is generally quite low. However, this situation calls for my comment and input since it affects me directly.

Kugutsumen was a friend of mine, and he's now had all his accounts banned. I understand that CCP reserves the right to do this under their TOS agreements. However, if EVE is truly the open-ended sandbox the developers claim it is, where you can scam, lie and cheat your way to the top, and as many do, then why has Kugutsumen been singled out in this case?

Did CCP need a scapegoat to blame this event on? Why not blame this fellow? He has ties to all the right corporations, he's been known for causing a bit of a forum uproar in the past, the perfect one to take the fall. Lets ignore the fact that it was in fact the developers fault for distributing sensitive information to their corpmates in the first place. If one of the BOB members who was in the know had leaked the information, would this situation have been treated differently?

Subversion and corp theft are commonplace in EVE, it makes sense that someone would create an intelligence based website where those who pay can obtain this kind of information from those who specialise in its retrieval.

So, I ask CCP, is this the beginning of a new wave?
Should I remove my alts from corporations which are there only to benefit myself?
Should my IPO scam be cancelled lest I risk a ban?

The other day, my alt was scammed by a new player for 5 million isk. I knew he was scamming me at the time, but it was an interesting experience and I taught him a few things on how to improve his tactics. In hindsight, should I have petitioned him? Will you give me my isk back, and give him a warning?

My viewpoint may of course be skewed since I know the person involved here, and all my facts may not be correct as I am not the forum warrior I once was, however, I hope that my points will be considered in the discussion.

In conclusion, is this turning into another World of Warcraft, CCP?

Make sure you let us know, so I can hang up my space boots in advance, I won't be coming along for that ride, thanks.

- Lyticus



What about no, he's a known hacker, and you're defending him? Go you! Why are you even trying to compare real life illegal actions with legit in-game mechanics?
Niaski Zalani
Niaski Zalani
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:52:00 - [188] - Quote

Originally by: Sinlare
Edited by: Sinlare on 07/02/2007 09:09:40
Edited by: Sinlare on 07/02/2007 09:07:09
Originally by: Niaski Zalani
Originally by: SirMolle

We play the game on a high level, we have a high profile, this isnt the first accusations of cheat, hax, and god knows what else that has been flung at us.



Does that "high level" also include some of your membership threatening to DDoS the kugutsumen.com site? Because someone did threaten with it, and there have been a few attempts at it so far.

Could've been anyone really, so consider this one public notice; a) it won't work, b) if it works, it won't work for long, c) it'll have to involve law enforcement at some point, although that's not something I'd like to do, or d) I'll just handle it myself in which case the results won't be pretty.

(No, I'm not Kugutsumen, I'm just the guy that hosts his site. Guess I'll get ready for the thwack upside the head with the banstick now...)


So, sni.ggerdly hosts a hacker huh? good to know Confused It does explain why shamis responds the way he does. interesting.


Actually I host a paying customer. My work is quite separate from my in-game associations, but think what you will :D
yarr.
Sinlare
Sinlare
Gallente
Sinlare Auditorium

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:54:00 - [189] - Quote

Originally by: Niaski Zalani

Actually I host a paying customer. My work is quite separate from my in-game associations, but think what you will :D


Good to know that even in real life you support criminals.
Niaski Zalani
Niaski Zalani
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:54:00 - [190] - Quote

Originally by: Sun Ra
Originally by: Niaski Zalani
Originally by: SirMolle

We play the game on a high level, we have a high profile, this isnt the first accusations of cheat, hax, and god knows what else that has been flung at us.



Does that "high level" also include some of your membership threatening to DDoS the kugutsumen.com site? Because someone did threaten with it, and there have been a few attempts at it so far.

Could've been anyone really, so consider this one public notice; a) it won't work, b) if it works, it won't work for long, c) it'll have to involve law enforcement at some point, although that's not something I'd like to do, or d) I'll just handle it myself in which case the results won't be pretty.

(No, I'm not Kugutsumen, I'm just the guy that hosts his site. Guess I'll get ready for the thwack upside the head with the banstick now...)


Erm so its bad for peopel to DDoS your site but its ok for your mate to go aroudn hacking peoples forums? Laughing


Yes. A DDoS against Kugutsumen's site will not only take out that site, but another 300 along with it. As well as e-mail, and streaming media services. Kugutsumen's alledged hacking seems to only target a single site, and seems to never disable any sites.

*shrug*
yarr.
Avon
Avon
Caldari
Black Nova Corp
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:55:00 - [191] - Quote

This thread is a fine example of what is wrong with mob mentality.
It doesn't matter what the facts are, or how they are phrased, people will believe what they want to believe.

CCP: "CCP have players in many alliances"
Witch Hunters: Yeah, but we are only interested in BoB withches. Clearly a Dev in BoB must be corrupt. It is obvious.

Hacker: A character who I think is a dev have BoB some T2 BPO's.
Witch Hunters: Yeah, well, obviously the Dev cheated to create the BPO's, or coded the lottery in shuch a way that he would win. Stands to reason. I mean, we all know that the lottery is unfair because *I* have never had a BPO, so it is obvious the Devs cheat.

Hypothetical CCP announcement: "We looked in to the BPO thingy, and nothing unfair happened. The Dev in question legitimately aquired the BPO's on his player account."
Witch Hunters: Yeah, well, you would say that. It is a cover-up. We know that it was all cheating and h4x. Ban BoB, fire the Devs, turn the servers off!!

Hypothetical CCP announcement: "We looked in to the BPO thingy, and a Dev was a naughty boy."
Witch Hunters: Ah-ha! We knew it. BoB can't be trusted. The CCP can't be trusted. Ban BoB, fire the Devs, turn the servers off!

Meanwhile, back in the real world:
Devs are losing player characters because they got IP matched on a third party website.
CCP are losing reputation because people want to believe a conspiracy.
The playerbase becomes increasingly paranoid.

The whole community is going to hell, and for what?

If you believe all this stuff, fine.
I know nothing I say will change that.
Just leave.


This whole thing has saddened me to be honest.
Not the accusations, they are nothing unusual; but the community reaction to them.

This whole episode tarnishes the image of CCP, of BoB (not that we didn't have a bad image anyway), but mostly of the community.

Sad times.



The Battleships is not and should not be a solo pwnmobile - Oveur

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward
Gallente
Panopticon Citadel

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:55:00 - [192] - Quote

Originally by: Sinlare
Good to know that even in real life you support criminals.


Ever heard of xs4all.nl? Same philosophy.

Originally by: Dianabolic
I was sworn to secrecy by CCP.

Kerdrak
Kerdrak
Amarr
3B Legio IX
Freelancer Alliance

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:56:00 - [193] - Quote

Sorry to say but I don't like to see CCP plays in tranquility...
________________________________________
First atheist amarr on EVE
Avon
Avon
Caldari
Black Nova Corp
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:56:00 - [194] - Quote

Originally by: Avon
This thread is a fine example of what is wrong with mob mentality.
It doesn't matter what the facts are, or how they are phrased, people will believe what they want to believe.

CCP: "CCP have players in many alliances"
Witch Hunters: Yeah, but we are only interested in BoB witches. Clearly a Dev in BoB must be corrupt. It is obvious.

Hacker: A character who I think is a dev gave BoB some T2 BPO's.
Witch Hunters: Yeah, well, obviously the Dev cheated to create the BPO's, or coded the lottery in shuch a way that he would win. Stands to reason. I mean, we all know that the lottery is unfair because *I* have never had a BPO, so it is obvious the Devs cheat.

Hypothetical CCP announcement: "We looked in to the BPO thingy, and nothing unfair happened. The Dev in question legitimately aquired the BPO's on his player account."
Witch Hunters: Yeah, well, you would say that. It is a cover-up. We know that it was all cheating and h4x. Ban BoB, fire the Devs, turn the servers off!!

Hypothetical CCP announcement: "We looked in to the BPO thingy, and a Dev was a naughty boy."
Witch Hunters: Ah-ha! We knew it. BoB can't be trusted. The CCP can't be trusted. Ban BoB, fire the Devs, turn the servers off!

Meanwhile, back in the real world:
Devs are losing player characters because they got IP matched on a third party website.
CCP are losing reputation because people want to believe a conspiracy.
The playerbase becomes increasingly paranoid.

The whole community is going to hell, and for what?

If you believe all this stuff, fine.
I know nothing I say will change that.
Just leave.


This whole thing has saddened me to be honest.
Not the accusations, they are nothing unusual; but the community reaction to them.

This whole episode tarnishes the image of CCP, of BoB (not that we didn't have a bad image anyway), but mostly of the community.

Sad times.




The Battleships is not and should not be a solo pwnmobile - Oveur

Avon
Avon
Caldari
Black Nova Corp
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:57:00 - [195] - Quote

.


The Battleships is not and should not be a solo pwnmobile - Oveur

Logan Feynman
Logan Feynman
Constructive Influence

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:57:00 - [196] - Quote

Originally by: Lyticus
Edited by: Lyticus on 07/02/2007 09:44:59
Kugutsumen was a friend of mine, and he's now had all his accounts banned.



Good riddance.

There is solid evidence he broke the law, and that no legal enforcement agencies would pursue him as he did not do enough financial damage by his actions.

He did not provide any solid evidence for anything, but instead raised the paranoid side of the community to their feet by providing them with dressed-up tidbits.

If any developer lost his 3-year old account over his posts and blogs only because they were outed as developers, he was banned too late.


.

"Life is no way to treat an animal."
~Tombstone of Kilgore Trout
Casper Ozymandias
Casper Ozymandias

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:57:00 - [197] - Quote

So how many pages do you think this thread would be up to without the hard work of those diligent mods? Keep up the good work guys, I'm sure if you delete enough posts you're going to eventually make sure an unbiased view is provided.

Sup Cortes ^_____________________^
Kcel Chim
Kcel Chim
Caldari
Arcane Technologies
The Five

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:57:00 - [198] - Quote

Originally by: Lyticus
Edited by: Lyticus on 07/02/2007 09:44:59
I dont frequent the EVE-O message boards very often, usually because the standard of intelligent conversation is generally quite low. However, this situation calls for my comment and input since it affects me directly.

Kugutsumen was a friend of mine, and he's now had all his accounts banned. I understand that CCP reserves the right to do this under their TOS agreements. However, if EVE is truly the open-ended sandbox the developers claim it is, where you can scam, lie and cheat your way to the top, and as many do, then why has Kugutsumen been singled out in this case?

Did CCP need a scapegoat to blame this event on? Why not blame this fellow? He has ties to all the right corporations, he's been known for causing a bit of a forum uproar in the past, the perfect one to take the fall. Lets ignore the fact that it was in fact the developers fault for distributing sensitive information to their corpmates in the first place. If one of the BOB members who was in the know had leaked the information, would this situation have been treated differently?

Subversion and corp theft are commonplace in EVE, it makes sense that someone would create an intelligence based website where those who pay can obtain this kind of information from those who specialise in its retrieval.

So, I ask CCP, is this the beginning of a new wave?
Should I remove my alts from corporations which are there only to benefit myself?
Should my IPO scam be cancelled lest I risk a ban?

The other day, my alt was scammed by a new player for 5 million isk. I knew he was scamming me at the time, but it was an interesting experience and I taught him a few things on how to improve his tactics. In hindsight, should I have petitioned him? Will you give me my isk back, and give him a warning?

My viewpoint may of course be skewed since I know the person involved here, and all my facts may not be correct as I am not the forum warrior I once was, however, I hope that my points will be considered in the discussion.

In conclusion, is this turning into another World of Warcraft, CCP?

Make sure you let us know, so I can hang up my space boots in advance, I won't be coming along for that ride, thanks.

- Lyticus



Dont forget that ccp only condones "illegal behaviour" within the gamerules. Ccp, similar to any other mmporg gaming company, wasnt too happy about someone going around hacking their client / customer / fansites. They might have not been their possession, however they belong to the community.

Imagine a group of bullies showing up at the next fanfest beating up all invited evegamers. Now imagine further them escaping legal punishment for similar reasons as in this case. Bullying / beating up ppl ingame is very much encouraged by the devs. Irl it is a crime.
Im sure in such a case ccp also would terminate the service because they dont want THEIR community (since its their game and without a game no community) to get the negative image and to suffer from ppl who apparently cant be grabbed by the balls through legal means.
Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward
Gallente
Panopticon Citadel

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:57:00 - [199] - Quote

Originally by: Avon
Originally by: Avon
This thread is a fine example of what is wrong with mob mentality.
It doesn't matter what the facts are, or how they are phrased, people will believe what they want to believe.

CCP: "CCP have players in many alliances"
Witch Hunters: Yeah, but we are only interested in BoB witches. Clearly a Dev in BoB must be corrupt. It is obvious.

Hacker: A character who I think is a dev gave BoB some T2 BPO's.
Witch Hunters: Yeah, well, obviously the Dev cheated to create the BPO's, or coded the lottery in shuch a way that he would win. Stands to reason. I mean, we all know that the lottery is unfair because *I* have never had a BPO, so it is obvious the Devs cheat.

Hypothetical CCP announcement: "We looked in to the BPO thingy, and nothing unfair happened. The Dev in question legitimately aquired the BPO's on his player account."
Witch Hunters: Yeah, well, you would say that. It is a cover-up. We know that it was all cheating and h4x. Ban BoB, fire the Devs, turn the servers off!!

Hypothetical CCP announcement: "We looked in to the BPO thingy, and a Dev was a naughty boy."
Witch Hunters: Ah-ha! We knew it. BoB can't be trusted. The CCP can't be trusted. Ban BoB, fire the Devs, turn the servers off!

Meanwhile, back in the real world:
Devs are losing player characters because they got IP matched on a third party website.
CCP are losing reputation because people want to believe a conspiracy.
The playerbase becomes increasingly paranoid.

The whole community is going to hell, and for what?

If you believe all this stuff, fine.
I know nothing I say will change that.
Just leave.


This whole thing has saddened me to be honest.
Not the accusations, they are nothing unusual; but the community reaction to them.

This whole episode tarnishes the image of CCP, of BoB (not that we didn't have a bad image anyway), but mostly of the community.

Sad times.




Did you mean to quote and reply to this post with your Sinlare alt, but selected the wrong dropdown option?

Originally by: Dianabolic
I was sworn to secrecy by CCP.

Avon
Avon
Caldari
Black Nova Corp
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 09:58:00 - [200] - Quote

Originally by: Anonymous Coward
Did you mean to quote and reply to this post with your Sinlare alt, but selected the wrong dropdown option?

No, I meant to fix the spelling, but it all went very strange.
Wink


The Battleships is not and should not be a solo pwnmobile - Oveur

Dragutinovic
Dragutinovic
Caldari
Bladerunners
Mordus Angels

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:00:00 - [201] - Quote

Originally by: Xendie

i wonder why they had bob investigating bob/dev stuff?

think about it for a sec, 5 devs in RKK alone, how many more in the rest of bob?
wouldnt it be kinda hard for 2-3 devs to fire the rest of the office?

one thing though, when will molle be banned for putting a persons RL name/adress/workplace on these forums?

when will digitalcommunist be banned for trying to get peoples ip adresses ingame?
when will db preacher be banned for ebaying101
when will bob alliance be disbanded for using information they knew werent allowed?(the leadership were effectively exploiting when they knew that these persons were devs and still accepted advance information)

will CCP ever do anything against bob?
answer is, never as they would ban themselves then.



Indeed , as in the past as now they seem to get away with everything , whiel some others get insta banned from forums by just posting a bit to much of [insert stuff].

The griefing of a player out of the game wasnt even punished , teh abuse of RL intel wasnt punished ...

GG hypocrites & CCP .
_____________




Im back !
Captain Thunk
Captain Thunk
Explode. Now. Please.

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:02:00 - [202] - Quote

Originally by: Kcel Chim
Originally by: Captain Thunk


You've been caught red-handed with information that has been verified regardless of how "highlevel gaming" it was obtained.

You accept the profits of macro operations with full knowledge.
You're well aware that characters are traded by your directors for cash.
You know that your members engage in the same activities as kugutsumen but lack the balls to go public.

This is hardly baseless accusations.

What you've done with your highlevel gaming is forced everyone to use the same methods in order to compete on a level playing field, which means there's a lot of EULA's that are going to be torn up and ignored on the proviso that all such activities and transactions are conducted out of game and don't leave an ingame trail - you've afterall proven that it's easy to get away with it.

Nice one mate. Rolling Eyes

CAPTAIN THUNK


Maybe you should question the information you got since all the "proof" you name here is either a) collected via illegal means b) presented by a banned (hence himself eula/TOS violating) character and c) simply wrong.

It was shown that dbps char was NOT transfered for cash, even if you wish to believe that.
It was shown that a guy in bob macromined and WAS banned for it by ccp. However the ban was only temporary and after it exspiered he came to terms and was let back in.
It is widely known that BoB members will use ingame mechanics and social engineering to their advantage in a game. Mr.K however used illegal out-of-game methods. One is playing a spy character the other is brute forcing his way into ppls webservers.

In short all of the above might have at one point or the other a grain of truth in it however you twist the situations accordingly to suit your anti bob bull.

Im glad the hacker got banned and to the snigg guy, i would be very carefull about threatening ppl with illegal means such as dos attacks or your inet kungfu. Im not a fan of this stuff in any way or form, whoever does it but ure clearly not helping the situation by a new wave of baseless accusations.

If you got solid proof of some BoB member commiting illegal stuff on the net contact his ceo instead of doing another twist of hatemongering.


Cheers for the BoB spin bud, but I don't think it'll be working this time.

I wasn't referring to the BoB guy who got banned for the 0isk macro (which I believe requires python injection code, if CCP think that's only worth 2 weeks thats up to them) - he was never kicked from the corp though, he just waited out the ban - no need to "let him back in" as he never actually left. I was actually referring to the 10/10 complex BoB rent to macroers for a large slice of ISK.

As I said, in order to compete on the same level with BoB those that continue to pay their subscription will certainly consider ignoring their EULA as so long as nothing written ingame leaves a trail you will get off scot free, plead ignorance or claim it's a massive conspiracy because people are jealous.

Like it or not, BoBs killing Eve - apathy won't save it.

CAPTAIN THUNK

If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find them, maybe you can hire...The ENP-Team.
Sinlare
Sinlare
Gallente
Sinlare Auditorium

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:02:00 - [203] - Quote

Originally by: Anonymous Coward
Originally by: Sinlare
Good to know that even in real life you support criminals.


Ever heard of xs4all.nl? Same philosophy.


The philosophy of both entities doesn't even come close.
Lyticus
Lyticus
Veto.
Veto Corp

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:03:00 - [204] - Quote

Originally by: Sinlare
Originally by: Lyticus
my post



What about no, he's a known hacker, and you're defending him? Go you! Why are you even trying to compare real life illegal actions with legit in-game mechanics?


I ask you and other EVE players, since when does CCP have the right to enforce real-life laws?

If I contact the CEO of a corporation over MSN and convince him to give me a billion isk, is that not a real-life action?

If you have a problem with someone breaking into your forums, you need to either improve your security or involve the law. CCP should not be dealing with out of game matters via the game. Kugutsumen having his accounts banned does not un-hack your forums, nor does it solve the problem. While I do not condone the method in which he obtains his information, the fact is that CCP dont have any TOS based upon out of game actions.

This means they have no right to ban a character because of what he does out of game. What if next they start banning players from rival games companies? Or perhaps racial judgement?

Bans should be administered based upon in-game action and that alone, out of game information which CCP have no way of verifying via logs etc that cannot be substantiated should be voided as evidence.

- Lyticus



qrac
qrac
Caldari
Shiva
Morsus Mihi

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:05:00 - [205] - Quote

Originally by: Kcel Chim

It was shown that dbps char was NOT transfered for cash, even if you wish to believe that.


You can't prove that but dbp can't be banned either because the so called proof could've been tampered with.

To CCP: I hope you create a new policy where browsing non-CCP sites connected to the game using CCP's connection is NOT allowed.
-------------------------------------------
Niaski Zalani
Niaski Zalani
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:05:00 - [206] - Quote

Originally by: Sinlare
Originally by: Niaski Zalani

Actually I host a paying customer. My work is quite separate from my in-game associations, but think what you will :D


Good to know that even in real life you support criminals.


Alledged hacker != criminal.


yarr.
Ashail
Ashail

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:06:00 - [207] - Quote

Hey cortes, delete this.
Luna Liandri
Luna Liandri
PPN United
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:06:00 - [208] - Quote

Originally by: Lyticus
Bans should be administered based upon in-game action and that alone, out of game information which CCP have no way of verifying via logs etc that cannot be substantiated should be voided as evidence

Amen.
Rod Blaine
Rod Blaine
Evolution
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:06:00 - [209] - Quote

Originally by: Alakazam

- How many devs were in BoB?


Who knows, it doesn't matter much. I believe it was like 3 or 5 or something that were named.
Quote:

- Did BoB know they were devs?


Not relevant. A good ethical player that finds out about the player identity of a dev shuts the **** up and lets the dev get one with his gameplay. Yes it creates an awkward situation because you don't want a dev to be put in a position where his interests collide. It's when the retards get hold of dev identities and use it to further their omgh4x crusades that things start stinking and characters get deleted. Serves noone.
Quote:

- Why did they chose BoB, why not any other alliance?


Silly question, we are the most advanced of the bunch. If they want to see what the BoB formula is that gets half the game in seizures for all kinds of reasons then you go and check it out. On the other hand, who says this was the only alliance ?
Quote:

To me it seems like there were more devs in BoB than in any other alliance? Is this a wrong assumption?


Yes. CCP has over 200 employees now, 5 wre in BoB and 195 are still in d2. Noone knows, people just yell stupid stuff because they feel something unfair must be happening if they're not winning.
Quote:

- Did BoB gain anything from this except good friends?


No, and I doubt the friendships extend to improper use of authority if that's what epople would read into that.
Quote:

- Does BoB understand that their sarcasm works against them when they state that they do have buttons for node crashing, cheating and have devs in their alliance?


I doubt we care. People that cannot see the obvious sarcasm in those statements are rather dimwitted. If they believe them and as a consequence stop playing eve then you won;t see us cry about it.
Quote:

Everything would've been so much easier if devs was not allowed to play against paying customers.

You can't play Eve with someone yet notagainst someone else. Yes it would be easier, it would mimo also be disastrous and rather unfair on the devs who you have to thank for being here in the first place. Easy is not always good, in this case, being smart and not signing into witchhunts is good, and smart as well since it saves you from killing your own braincells in frustration.

Eve sees alot of devsploitha4xfavouritsm idiocy yes. That's what comes with a competitive ffa pvp game with serious loss built in and one big server with umpteen thousand players. That's because people get emotional about their gameplay, and because some of them aren't able to keep that in check. It's quite normal for games like this to see this, and it's equally normal for there being no truth to any of it bar some very rare cases mostly involving gm's or voluneers, but hardly ever developers.

And yes I'm in BoB. But this post would have looked exactly the same if I'd been in D2 or whatever.


Old blog
Originally by: Vriezuh
Naz: John is a realist
Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward
Gallente
Panopticon Citadel

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:07:00 - [210] - Quote

Originally by: Sinlare
The philosophy of both entities doesn't even come close.


I know what you are--an idiot. I also know what you aren't--Niaski Zalani's spokesman. You're putting out some really, really weak trolling here.

Originally by: Dianabolic
I was sworn to secrecy by CCP.

Alakazam
Alakazam
Bob The Builder
Breidablik

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:14:00 - [211] - Quote

Originally by: Avon
Edited by: Avon on 07/02/2007 09:55:42
This thread is a fine example of what is wrong with mob mentality.
It doesn't matter what the facts are, or how they are phrased, people will believe what they want to believe.
[..]
Sad times.



What do you expect the community to think?

In the beginning I was just laughing at the BoB postings where you said you had to use node-crash buttons, having devs in your team, ofcourse you were cheating etc- I knew you were playing the same rules as the rest of us.

But then this thing happened and I thought, hang on a second?! what if there is something to it? _what if_?

And still BoB members have this top-down approach to the rest of the community regarding this issue. Still stating you have more access then the rest of us. There is no empathy with the rest of the community. That saddens me.

No smoke without fire, it makes me think twice now and I wish I wouldn't do that...


Kcel Chim
Kcel Chim
Caldari
Arcane Technologies
The Five

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:16:00 - [212] - Quote

Originally by: Avon
Edited by: Avon on 07/02/2007 10:07:00
Originally by: Lyticus

Bans should be administered based upon in-game action and that alone, out of game information which CCP have no way of verifying via logs etc that cannot be substantiated should be voided as evidence.

- Lyticus



So, if I (for example), set up a community website that would phish for browser cookies to try and obtain your e-o forum (and thus account) login details, CCP should take no action against me?
The should allow me to potentially compromise the security of users simply because I haven't actually done anything wrong "ingame" until I actually use the stolen account details?


Added: Post above nails the rest.


good example avon. Just go one step further imagine that fansite not just phish for your login details, in which case ccp could take steps due to an eula violation but instead of other passwords. Passwords which are maybe connected to your work or bank and hence wouldnt really fall under ccps jurisdiction since technically they are not related to eve, eventho the "binding elemet" of all the cases would be the game....
Lyticus
Lyticus
Veto.
Veto Corp

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:17:00 - [213] - Quote

Originally by: Avon
Originally by: Lyticus

Bans should be administered based upon in-game action and that alone, out of game information which CCP have no way of verifying via logs etc that cannot be substantiated should be voided as evidence.

- Lyticus



So, if I (for example), set up a community website that would phish for browser cookies to try and obtain your e-o forum (and thus account) login details, CCP should take no action against me?
The should allow me to potentially compromise the security of users simply because I haven't actually done anything wrong "ingame" until I actually use the stolen account details?



No, you are missing my point.

I explained that the devs were telling others that they were devs, releasing the information onto their forums and generally behaving in an illicit manner.

What everyone seems to be focusing on is the manner in which kugutsumen obtained the information, which was by entering into the BOB forums and browsing their sensitive areas.

The point is that it was the devs who shared their sensitive information with others, so it is they who are at fault from the very beginning. If the devs had been discreet as they are supposed to be, none of this would have happened. Its not like Kugutsumen went deliberately looking for devs information, he was likely gathering intelligence on other in-game matters and stumbled upon this.

So I ask you, who should be punished, the devs for their failure to remain candid in their relationship to CCP and the power which they weild, or the fellow who bumped into this information?

I put it to you that the devs are originally to blame for this entire situation, and thus the fallout should not affect members of the community which had no control over the informations initial distrubution.

If someone else had discovered this and had not presented it to all the EVE community via the forums, it would have been discovered through the g*****vine in due time.

EVE isn't as big as everyone thinks.

- Lyticus



FireFoxx80
FireFoxx80
Caldari
E X O D U S
Imperial Republic Of the North

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:19:00 - [214] - Quote

Originally by: Avon
Edited by: Avon on 07/02/2007 09:55:42
This thread is a fine example of what is wrong with mob mentality.
It doesn't matter what the facts are, or how they are phrased, people will believe what they want to believe.

Stuff


Avon, I think most rational people in Eve would like to simply see a thorough and public investigation. Even if it incriminated people in their own corporation/alliances.

I know I certainly would.



What I do the rest of the time - Vote for a Jita bypass!
Kcel Chim
Kcel Chim
Caldari
Arcane Technologies
The Five

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:21:00 - [215] - Quote

Originally by: Luna Liandri
Originally by: Logan Feynman
Originally by: Luna Liandri
Originally by: Lyticus
Bans should be administered based upon in-game action and that alone, out of game information which CCP have no way of verifying via logs etc that cannot be substantiated should be voided as evidence

Amen.

Originally by: Suspension and Ban policy, section 7

e. Publishes private communications from CCP, Siminn, their agents or representatives, including members of the EVE volunteer program, within the game world, official web site, or other venues without authorization.


ah they devs were playing as CCP representatives ?
BoB are CCP representatives ?

interesting new twist...


no he was threatening ccp staff members not once but multiple times. Which is covered in another paragraph as a bannable offence. Furthermore he posted rl information about some devs which is and always was enough for a ban.
The policy was and is "if you uncover a dev/ccp employee or find one whos cover is blown mail kieron" and not "try to blackmail for isk and damage ccps reputation on the forums".
Rod Blaine
Rod Blaine
Evolution
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:21:00 - [216] - Quote

Edited by: Rod Blaine on 07/02/2007 10:18:15
Are you for real Luticus ?

He broke the law and caused indirect financial damage to CCP by doing it. He should be glad he has no legal action taken by CCP.

How can you even defend such an idiot ?


Old blog
Originally by: Vriezuh
Naz: John is a realist
Sinlare
Sinlare
Gallente
Sinlare Auditorium

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:21:00 - [217] - Quote

Originally by: Lyticus

The point is that it was the devs who shared their sensitive information with others, so it is they who are at fault from the very beginning. If the devs had been discreet as they are supposed to be, none of this would have happened. Its not like Kugutsumen went deliberately looking for devs information, he was likely gathering intelligence on other in-game matters and stumbled upon this.

So I ask you, who should be punished, the devs for their failure to remain candid in their relationship to CCP and the power which they weild, or the fellow who bumped into this information?




Yes it's the devs fault Rolling Eyes
Kugutsumen will always be more in the wrong then any dev, since he's the one sporting illegal methods.
Niaski Zalani
Niaski Zalani
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:22:00 - [218] - Quote

Originally by: Sinlare
Originally by: Anonymous Coward
Originally by: Sinlare
The philosophy of both entities doesn't even come close.


I know what you are--an idiot. I also know what you aren't--Niaski Zalani's spokesman. You're putting out some really, really weak trolling here.


I like what you're doing, keep it up :)


A customer is a customer is a customer until a court order says otherwise. I think most hosters in NL share that same mindset.


yarr.
Avon
Avon
Caldari
Black Nova Corp
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:22:00 - [219] - Quote

Originally by: FireFoxx80
Originally by: Avon
Edited by: Avon on 07/02/2007 09:55:42
This thread is a fine example of what is wrong with mob mentality.
It doesn't matter what the facts are, or how they are phrased, people will believe what they want to believe.

Stuff


Avon, I think most rational people in Eve would like to simply see a thorough and public investigation. Even if it incriminated people in their own corporation/alliances.

I know I certainly would.



As would I.


The Battleships is not and should not be a solo pwnmobile - Oveur

Drakma
Drakma
Gekidoku
Koroshiya Buntai

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:22:00 - [220] - Quote

OMG WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!

-----------------

Gekidoku is recruiting
Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward
Gallente
Panopticon Citadel

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:23:00 - [221] - Quote

Originally by: Sinlare
Kugutsumen will always be more in the wrong then any dev, since he's the one sporting illegal methods.


What he does is not illegal where he lives, and pretexting is also illegal in many parts of the world.

Originally by: Dianabolic
I was sworn to secrecy by CCP.

Lyticus
Lyticus
Veto.
Veto Corp

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:23:00 - [222] - Quote

Edited by: Lyticus on 07/02/2007 10:20:59
Originally by: Sinlare
Originally by: Lyticus

The point is that it was the devs who shared their sensitive information with others, so it is they who are at fault from the very beginning. If the devs had been discreet as they are supposed to be, none of this would have happened. Its not like Kugutsumen went deliberately looking for devs information, he was likely gathering intelligence on other in-game matters and stumbled upon this.

So I ask you, who should be punished, the devs for their failure to remain candid in their relationship to CCP and the power which they weild, or the fellow who bumped into this information?




Yes it's the devs fault Rolling Eyes
Kugutsumen will always be more in the wrong then any dev, since he's the one sporting illegal methods.


More wrong eh?
Rolling Eyes

EDIT: Post above has a good point, its only be alleged, not proved.



Logan Feynman
Logan Feynman
Constructive Influence

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:24:00 - [223] - Quote

Originally by: Lyticus
Originally by: Avon
Originally by: Lyticus

Bans should be administered based upon in-game action and that alone, out of game information which CCP have no way of verifying via logs etc that cannot be substantiated should be voided as evidence.

- Lyticus



So, if I (for example), set up a community website that would phish for browser cookies to try and obtain your e-o forum (and thus account) login details, CCP should take no action against me?
The should allow me to potentially compromise the security of users simply because I haven't actually done anything wrong "ingame" until I actually use the stolen account details?



No, you are missing my point.

I explained that the devs were telling others that they were devs, releasing the information onto their forums and generally behaving in an illicit manner.

What everyone seems to be focusing on is the manner in which kugutsumen obtained the information, which was by entering into the BOB forums and browsing their sensitive areas.

The point is that it was the devs who shared their sensitive information with others, so it is they who are at fault from the very beginning. If the devs had been discreet as they are supposed to be, none of this would have happened. Its not like Kugutsumen went deliberately looking for devs information, he was likely gathering intelligence on other in-game matters and stumbled upon this.

So I ask you, who should be punished, the devs for their failure to remain candid in their relationship to CCP and the power which they weild, or the fellow who bumped into this information?

I put it to you that the devs are originally to blame for this entire situation, and thus the fallout should not affect members of the community which had no control over the informations initial distrubution.

If someone else had discovered this and had not presented it to all the EVE community via the forums, it would have been discovered through the g*****vine in due time.

EVE isn't as big as everyone thinks.

- Lyticus



First of all, he did not bump into that information. He hacked into forums with the specific intent to find anything that could be interpreted as unacceptable behaviour. He posted snippets from there, and we have no means to discern how much is true and how much was fabricated on the spot.

The argument "parts are true, therefore all the other parts must be true" is a very weak one, if you know your logic. And this is the way most yellow press works ... part true, part fabrication. The only ones that will know the entire story are CCP, and you can either:

a) trust them and STFU
b) not trust them and leave the game

Pick one, act on it. While it would be peachy to hear more from Kieron on this, I highly doubt it. This is all there is. This is whyt you get to make your choice on.
.

"Life is no way to treat an animal."
~Tombstone of Kilgore Trout
Sinlare
Sinlare
Gallente
Sinlare Auditorium

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:24:00 - [224] - Quote

Originally by: FireFoxx80

Avon, I think most rational people in Eve would like to simply see a thorough and public investigation. Even if it incriminated people in their own corporation/alliances.

I know I certainly would.



I think everyone does and hopefully ccp will see that too. It just so sad to see people defending a really bad person and taking so much joy out of developers getting fired in real life.
Myz Toyou
Myz Toyou
the Organ Grinder and Company
Tactical Narcotics Team

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:24:00 - [225] - Quote

Poor, poor show CCP !
First banning all accounts from that guy who brought the mud into the light to shut his mouth.
Now that statement that sounds like Rumsfeld asked about chemical stuff in Iraq !
Looks to me very fishy !!!



CYVOK > All you station jockies better get out their and start killing these idiots
Luna Liandri
Luna Liandri
PPN United
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:25:00 - [226] - Quote

Originally by: Rod Blaine
Edited by: Rod Blaine on 07/02/2007 10:18:15
Are you for real Luticus ?

He broke the law and caused indirect financial damage to CCP by doing it. He should be glad he has no legal action taken by CCP.

How can you even defend such an idiot ?

always the same game - shoot the messenger, sidestep the topic ...

boring, and i may add i've seen better quality posts from RB.
Avon
Avon
Caldari
Black Nova Corp
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:25:00 - [227] - Quote

Edited by: Avon on 07/02/2007 10:23:50
Originally by: Alakazam

What do you expect the community to think?


I don't care what they community actually think, just so long as they *DO* actually think.

The problem is that many aren't thinking, they are happy to be swept along on a wave of popular hysteria.


The Battleships is not and should not be a solo pwnmobile - Oveur

Sephiraa
Sephiraa

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:29:00 - [228] - Quote

Originally by: Avon
This thread is a fine example of what is wrong with mob mentality.
It doesn't matter what the facts are, or how they are phrased, people will believe what they want to believe.


Your post was a terrible example of effective propoganda. There are few facts here that we can be certain of, but, we can be certain of them.

1. K. named several characters in the BoB alliance exclusively, as being employees of CCP.
2. K. made some other rather damning claims about actions by specific and named members of the BoB alliance.
3. In response, Kieron and Oveur made posts regarding an investigation being made into these claims.
4. Kieron posted "a player revealed the identity of numerous CCP employee characters. Since these play characters are known to belong to CCP employees, they will be removed from the game."

These are all FACTS. There is no tinfoil hattery in the above. There is no smear campaign that can be debated about these points.

This is not a witch hunt, but yes, these are truly sad times indeed. Especially so, considering that since #1 has been shown to be true, then #2 is quite likely equally true. Ultimately, it doesn't really matter how that truth was obtained, and all the "witch hunt" and "but... but.. he's an evil bad hacker" cries in the world will be unable to obfuscate the grim reality the EVE community is now facing.









Sinlare
Sinlare
Gallente
Sinlare Auditorium

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:29:00 - [229] - Quote

Originally by: Luna Liandri

always the same game - shoot the messenger, sidestep the topic ...

boring, and i may add i've seen better quality posts from RB.


Shoot the messenger that used illegal action to obtain his message. Yes, please do shoot and don't miss.
Kcel Chim
Kcel Chim
Caldari
Arcane Technologies
The Five

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:33:00 - [230] - Quote

Originally by: Anonymous Coward
Originally by: Sinlare
Kugutsumen will always be more in the wrong then any dev, since he's the one sporting illegal methods.


What he does is not illegal where he lives, and pretexting is also illegal in many parts of the world.


thank god ccp is an icelandic company and the servers he hacked are in the uk/us so all the semi legal rambling of how it is legal for him to hack and phish is bollox.
Btw not beeing illegal doesnt mean encouraging in a legal way.

As for poor Kungu stumbeling over this evidence, he hacked into forums and mailboxes with the intent to find something interesting in a taboloid way. The info about the dev was -Not- posted in a regular thread for everyone to read but it was found in the inbox of one of the board users. So hardly "known amongst BoB".

Last but not least the trustworthyness of the information.
The "finder" as in Mr.K. admitted on the goonforum to be a hacker, Mr.K was already filed a punishment for hacking, Mr. K more or less openly admitted to hack, either himself or one of his companions, forums. Trustworthy over Kieron ? Not in my book.
Rod Blaine
Rod Blaine
Evolution
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:34:00 - [231] - Quote

Edited by: Rod Blaine on 07/02/2007 10:32:25
Originally by: Luna Liandri
Originally by: Rod Blaine
Edited by: Rod Blaine on 07/02/2007 10:18:15
Are you for real Luticus ?

He broke the law and caused indirect financial damage to CCP by doing it. He should be glad he has no legal action taken by CCP.

How can you even defend such an idiot ?

always the same game - shoot the messenger, sidestep the topic ...

boring, and i may add i've seen better quality posts from RB.


Logic, sidestep ?

I didn't see any logic that I havent adressed earlier already.

Normal healthy and respectfull players stfu when they connect a dev with a player account. The CCP rule on recycling those character when thay are made public isn't there to protect you, but to protect them from being harrased by people with questions, statements and utterly idiotic accusations.

What protects you is the auditing and the ethos of CCP employees, and that's quite enough.


Old blog
Originally by: Vriezuh
Naz: John is a realist
bioqaz eylee
bioqaz eylee
Amarr
LifeLine Solutions

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:35:00 - [232] - Quote

who cares where the information came from, whether it be BOB, a hacker, the press, off the back of a crisp packet, my wife mumbling in her sleep or even picked up via shot wave radio.

Surly all that matters is what is being done about it. and that seems not a lot from what we are being told.

bio




Captain Thunk
Captain Thunk
Explode. Now. Please.

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:36:00 - [233] - Quote

Originally by: Kcel Chim
Originally by: Captain Thunk


Cheers for the BoB spin bud, but I don't think it'll be working this time.

I wasn't referring to the BoB guy who got banned for the 0isk macro (which I believe requires python injection code, if CCP think that's only worth 2 weeks thats up to them) - he was never kicked from the corp though, he just waited out the ban - no need to "let him back in" as he never actually left. I was actually referring to the 10/10 complex BoB rent to macroers for a large slice of ISK.

As I said, in order to compete on the same level with BoB those that continue to pay their subscription will certainly consider ignoring their EULA as so long as nothing written ingame leaves a trail you will get off scot free, plead ignorance or claim it's a massive conspiracy because people are jealous.

Like it or not, BoBs killing Eve - apathy won't save it.

CAPTAIN THUNK


Its no spin to have a different view then you have.
As for the macroer "let back in". The case was discussed with him and there was an option he would be kicked when it got known that his acc was temp banned. To let him back in might be morally wrong in the worst case but its up to the bob leadership to decide not up to you. It would be equally morally wrong to let in a guy with a forumban, since technically he also violated the rules ccp setup for this community.

As for the whole "known macroers" mumbojumbo, BoB rented a plex to a corp. Any corp can rent a plex with BoB. If you have doubts about a corp doing "macroing" file a petition.
As much as you would love to believe it BoB is not ccp and hence cant deal with ingame eula issues and wont believe every wild accusation you or the other fanboys fire off.
If the corp in question was caught cheating the bob leadership would terminate the plex contract. Not guilty until proven otherwise, a saying you might wanna think about before you push the reply button once again because i highly doubt uve understood it.


As I said, I was never talking about the macroer - thanks for yet another paragraph on him anyway.

The macroing "mumbo-jumbo" is a reference to the conversation Sir Molle and DBP had regarding renting that complex to a particular corp where they both stated that they were macroing and considering how much of the profit they could squeeze out of him...but admidst all this confirmed evidence that's the one Kugu made up isn't it? Rolling Eyes

As I said - plausible deniability - Because the BoB leadership are getting away with blatant cheating, others are now going to follow suit knowing full well that so long as they don't use ingame chat or evemails to discuss it they have a guaranteed chance of getting away with it - how else are they expected to compete against "the best"?

You may call it "highlevel gaming" I call it the end.

CAPTAIN THUNK

If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find them, maybe you can hire...The ENP-Team.
Dragutinovic
Dragutinovic
Caldari
Bladerunners
Mordus Angels

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:37:00 - [234] - Quote

Originally by: Rod Blaine
Edited by: Rod Blaine on 07/02/2007 10:18:15
Are you for real Luticus ?

He broke the law and caused indirect financial damage to CCP by doing it. He should be glad he has no legal action taken by CCP.

How can you even defend such an idiot ?



Then some of you lot should get a ban as well tbh .
You gotta agree with me that some of you get away on teh forums andingame with a lot more then others .

Rockduiveltje incident : -> No actions taken
****uko -Yaeko (sp) incident : -> No actions taken
Goonswarm incident : -> No actions taken

You lot demanded the " ebayers " and " macroers "of PA to get slapped and kicked , yet some of you are guilty to that as well .

As for the dev/gm/bpo thingy i leave that to the " wichhunters " however after teh Goon incident and now this i do demand some of BoB due get their asses kicked .


_____________




Im back !
Mr Bananas
Mr Bananas
Minmatar
Republic Military School

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:38:00 - [235] - Quote

Perhaps that fellow would like to out some forum mod identities? I doubt anybody would be much surprised, though.
I am consistently unhappy with the quality of moderation in these forums.
31i73
31i73
BGG

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:44:00 - [236] - Quote

Originally by: Avon

CCP: "CCP have players in many alliances"
Witch Hunters: Yeah, but we are only interested in BoB witches. Clearly a Dev in BoB must be corrupt. It is obvious.



I think you are missing the point here. Its not about how devs shouldn't play the game being in bob. Its about giving unfair advantage via ingame items, or knowledge of events.

Besides, you should be happy, you won. The guy that dared to oppose you can't play his chars anymore, and now this: CCP just deletes the chars that got revealed, you can still continue playing as you have.


Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward
Gallente
Panopticon Citadel

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:45:00 - [237] - Quote

So we're back to the "yes he hacked our forums but didn't actually post anything from them, just lies" arguments again.

Originally by: Dianabolic
I was sworn to secrecy by CCP.

Sinlare
Sinlare
Gallente
Sinlare Auditorium

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:46:00 - [238] - Quote

Originally by: Niaski Zalani


Alledged illegal action.


You're right, but no need to defend it so much, especially from a professional point of view. And yes, i know dutch hosters have that policy :)
Sephiraa
Sephiraa

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:46:00 - [239] - Quote

Originally by: Avon

I don't really see where you are trying to go with your post.


I don't feel I was being obtuse. You said "witch hunt" about 3427567 times, and I pointed that it doesn't appear to be a witch hunt at all. Keep spinning though. Perhaps people will be able to somehow stop noticing the gigantic elephant in the living room.


Rod Blaine
Rod Blaine
Evolution
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:49:00 - [240] - Quote

Edited by: Rod Blaine on 07/02/2007 10:46:25
Originally by: Dragutinovic
Then some of you lot should get a ban as well tbh .
You gotta agree with me that some of you get away on teh forums andingame with a lot more then others .


If we do it's because we mostly excalate in reaction to trolling. It's also a fact that most BoB active posters are good at treading the line.
Quote:

Rockduiveltje incident : -> No actions taken
****uko -Yaeko (sp) incident : -> No actions taken
Goonswarm incident : -> No actions taken


Please explain these. I know that rockduiveltje was more or less insulted quite heavily back then. Not that she was any better as far as I remember, but I forget what exactly happened there.

Quote:

You lot demanded the " ebayers " and " macroers "of PA to get slapped and kicked , yet some of you are guilty to that as well .


We are ? And we did ?

Quote:
i do demand some of BoB due get their asses kicked .


Quote:

Makes you wonder if its worth keep fighting teh good fight in this game as so to speak .


The good fight ?
Beam, eye, pot, kettle, black, whatever ?

During the PA war things got out of hand as well o teh smack/propaganda front. They always do. I personally find that a bit sad, but it's mostly due to the same thigns that make this game great so you take it in your stride.

Things become rather different once immediate wars are over tho. What i cannot understand and never have udnerstood is that alot of people don't seem able to let the tension level lower again after a war has been decided ingame, and continue to not just smack and spread lies, but also seem to actually believe wha they say.

If anything, it's fanboyism that's killing Eve.


Old blog
Originally by: Vriezuh
Naz: John is a realist
Zzleeper
Zzleeper
Amarr
levisomnus spectatrix

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:50:00 - [241] - Quote

Originally by: Kcel Chim
Last but not least ask yourself about Mr.K and his dubious ways. You think a criminal, albeit one who cant be persecuted due to his homecountry, is the most reliable source of information, especially if you PAY him for it ? What keeps him from pulling a huge scam on you to just get to your isk ? You have no way to verify the info he is presenting and you keep paying for beyond the point that some of it -might- or -could- be true. True as saying a hurricane is also just some wind...


Mr. K only came out with what half the alliance's knew or suspected anyway... Speak to the hand!!!Laughing
Luna Liandri
Luna Liandri
PPN United
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:50:00 - [242] - Quote

Originally by: Rod Blaine
Logic, sidestep ?

I didn't see any logic that I havent adressed earlier already.

Normal healthy and respectfull players stfu when they connect a dev with a player account. The CCP rule on recycling those character when thay are made public isn't there to protect you, but to protect them from being harrased by people with questions, statements and utterly idiotic accusations.

What protects you is the auditing and the ethos of CCP employees, and that's quite enough.

your faith in the ethos of CCP employees sure is a fine thing.
and i cant blame it - as they were your ingame friends.

unfortunatly it negates human nature on both sides - be it your & your friends (quoted kieron) side or of all others who are not "friends with devs".
i for myself dont trust devs that are connected to 0.0 alliances and it seems EvE minus BoB share my point of view. even if there would be complete transparency and openness of the how/who/who not/enforcement of such policies i would prefer to have them not in alliance politics.

which brings me back to my initial statement in this thread ...
Ogul
Ogul
Caldari
ZiTek Deepspace Explorations
Prime Orbital Systems

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:50:00 - [243] - Quote

The magnitude of this discussion is the best indication as to why devs should not play the game.
Bertram Russel
Bertram Russel

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:50:00 - [244] - Quote

Devs play eve in alliances? sure! ofc they should.
Dev misconduct when they play in alliances? Well it follows from above statement that there will be a conflict of interest between helping your friends and stay true to ccp policy (if there is any?!).

I think well have to live with this problem as long as devs are human and need to play the game in this way. As long as someone think theyll get away with something theyll do it. Thats why I don't think anyone will find much proof exept on bob forums :P

A workaround for me would be to have firm rules for devs posted publicly so anyone can see what and whatnot there supposed to do with their ordinary accounts, like "dont tell anyone your a dev". And somekind of transparancy of any misconduct. Afaik anything that we know about thats transpired is discovered by the likes of K and not any ccp investigation. That leaves alot to be desired for me anyway. Suffice to say my trust in ccp is damaged hopefully not beyond repair and the fun factor in eve is lovered by about 8347829348923. :(
Silmas
Silmas
Gallente
hirr
Morsus Mihi

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:50:00 - [245] - Quote

I thank you for the information posted kieron, but I find it lacking.

So I hope there is more to come.
Jonaaz Dsz
Jonaaz Dsz
Gallente

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:51:00 - [246] - Quote

Those BPOs, were they all legit, all 10 of them.

Those "proofs" being supplied, where they proofs or were they inventions of a single person.

Yes there is a witch hunt going right now, and that it itself is spiraling .. but the hard case evidence.

The only thing I've seen sofar is

- some devs were named and hence deleted.

end of story ...

So the only wrong doing of this entire case is - some devs were named. Yes and ...

but they do anything wrong? Did they do any misconduct?

"magnibit lenibit ulteribit" Oberon Inc, incl Oberon Tech II sales
Dragutinovic
Dragutinovic
Caldari
Bladerunners
Mordus Angels

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 10:54:00 - [247] - Quote

Originally by: Rod Blaine
Edited by: Rod Blaine on 07/02/2007 10:46:25
Originally by: Dragutinovic
Then some of you lot should get a ban as well tbh .
You gotta agree with me that some of you get away on teh forums andingame with a lot more then others .


If we do it's because we mostly excalate in reaction to trolling. It's also a fact that most BoB active posters are good at treading the line.
Quote:

Rockduiveltje incident : -> No actions taken
****uko -Yaeko (sp) incident : -> No actions taken
Goonswarm incident : -> No actions taken


Please explain these. I know that rockduiveltje was more or less insulted quite heavily back then. Not that she was any better as far as I remember, but I forget what exactly happened there.

Quote:

You lot demanded the " ebayers " and " macroers "of PA to get slapped and kicked , yet some of you are guilty to that as well .


We are ? And we did ?

Quote:
i do demand some of BoB due get their asses kicked .


Quote:

Makes you wonder if its worth keep fighting teh good fight in this game as so to speak .


The good fight ?
Beam, eye, pot, kettle, black, whatever ?

During the PA war things got out of hand as well o teh smack/propaganda front. They always do. I personally find that a bit sad, but it's mostly due to the same thigns that make this game great so you take it in your stride.

Things become rather different once immediate wars are over tho. What i cannot understand and never have udnerstood is that alot of people don't seem able to let the tension level lower again after a war has been decided ingame, and continue to not just smack and spread lies, but also seem to actually believe wha they say.

If anything, it's fanboyism that's killing Eve.



That time is wel beyond me and i wasnt active at all on teh forums .

Ive posted during the Goonincident about Rockduiveltje to prevent what has happend before , not because your BoB , not becaus they were Goons but for teh person behind that avatar .

Im all for drama etc etc its what makes this game so good but some stuff are a no-go in case of certain members of yer alliance they got away with it even tho back then proof washanded to CCP on a silver plate .

All i ask for is an even threatment , not dismantling BoB cuz K.man says you cheat .
_____________




Im back !
SNeAkYbRiT
SNeAkYbRiT
Black Lance
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:00:00 - [248] - Quote

All I'm going to say on this "Devs and BoB" is now we know that BoB need and have to CHEAT and that the Devs themselves have to cheat at the game they help produce, sorry guys u suck...do the right thing and remove all BPO's that was seeded to BoB and sort out the T2 lottery. Sorry CCP it just shows everybody that pays your wages you cant step up and be fair, you screw us for cash and then ask us to beta test this game for you and then you CHEAT!

In my eyes BoB are now the biggest joke because they need to have help compared to everyone else that work hard in the game.

So when i see a BoB in space i will laugh and call them a cheat, I don't care if they are a normal player but to me all of BoB are CHEATS cause they need the help of the DEVS to play this game...i know if i die to one my loss mail if allowed by my CEO will not be posted

Heard that you are even making a monument of Cyvoks Titan wreck...you have time to do this but fix nothing else? and to make a monument for BoB lol your are taking the p***

I SAY TO ALL, IF THIS DOESNT GET SORTED all paying customers that see this unfair should stop paying and close their accounts for 1 month to show CCP we are the ones that PAY them and should show a little respect to its paying customers!!!!!!!!!!
Rod Blaine
Rod Blaine
Evolution
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:02:00 - [249] - Quote

Edited by: Rod Blaine on 07/02/2007 11:01:57
Even treatment is fine with me, but I do wonder wether people don't sit too close to their monitors to even discern what is true and what is reasonable these days.

A great pity imo.

edit: see example above.Rolling Eyes


Old blog
Originally by: Vriezuh
Naz: John is a realist
Kcel Chim
Kcel Chim
Caldari
Arcane Technologies
The Five

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:04:00 - [250] - Quote

Originally by: SNeAkYbRiT

I SAY TO ALL, IF THIS DOESNT GET SORTED all paying customers that see this unfair should stop paying and close their accounts for 1 month to show CCP we are the ones that PAY them and should show a little respect to its paying customers!!!!!!!!!!


can i have your stuff and could you please as a gesture of superiority and defiance not reactivate your account after that phase? Im sure that will show them their wrongdoings and force ccp to bow to your demands.

Silly argument dude and stay of the pills youre coming across way to aggressive.
Niaski Zalani
Niaski Zalani
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:07:00 - [251] - Quote

Originally by: Avon
Originally by: Niaski Zalani
Originally by: Sinlare
Originally by: Luna Liandri

always the same game - shoot the messenger, sidestep the topic ...

boring, and i may add i've seen better quality posts from RB.


Shoot the messenger that used illegal action to obtain his message. Yes, please do shoot and don't miss.



Alledged illegal action.


Aren't we meant to presume guilt and get him to prove otherwise?


I thought the idea was innocent until proven guilty?

So it's alledged. Proof or STFU :)
yarr.
Sinlare
Sinlare
Gallente
Sinlare Auditorium

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:08:00 - [252] - Quote

Originally by: SNeAkYbRiT
All I'm going to say on this "Devs and BoB" is now we know that BoB need and have to CHEAT and that the Devs themselves have to cheat at the game they help produce, sorry guys u suck...do the right thing and remove all BPO's that was seeded to BoB and sort out the T2 lottery. Sorry CCP it just shows everybody that pays your wages you cant step up and be fair, you screw us for cash and then ask us to beta test this game for you and then you CHEAT!

In my eyes BoB are now the biggest joke because they need to have help compared to everyone else that work hard in the game.

So when i see a BoB in space i will laugh and call them a cheat, I don't care if they are a normal player but to me all of BoB are CHEATS cause they need the help of the DEVS to play this game...i know if i die to one my loss mail if allowed by my CEO will not be posted

Heard that you are even making a monument of Cyvoks Titan wreck...you have time to do this but fix nothing else? and to make a monument for BoB lol your are taking the p***

I SAY TO ALL, IF THIS DOESNT GET SORTED all paying customers that see this unfair should stop paying and close their accounts for 1 month to show CCP we are the ones that PAY them and should show a little respect to its paying customers!!!!!!!!!!



lol, can someone please return SNeAkYbRiT's braincells, he seems to have misplaced them.
Zzleeper
Zzleeper
Amarr
levisomnus spectatrix

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:08:00 - [253] - Quote

Originally by: SNeAkYbRiT
I SAY TO ALL, IF THIS DOESNT GET SORTED all paying customers that see this unfair should stop paying and close their accounts for 1 month to show CCP we are the ones that PAY them and should show a little respect to its paying customers!!!!!!!!!!


I agree, the community needs to do something about this, BOB wouldnt be where they are now, without the knowledge/T2 BPO/Faction stuff aquired from these rouge dev's.

BTW.. Did they cheat during the championships? Rolling Eyes
Cheaters never prosper!
SNeAkYbRiT
SNeAkYbRiT
Black Lance
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:09:00 - [254] - Quote

lol Kcel Chim a DICE alt well what did we expect from you ROFLMAO
Avon
Avon
Caldari
Black Nova Corp
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:09:00 - [255] - Quote

Originally by: Niaski Zalani
Originally by: Avon
Originally by: Niaski Zalani

Alledged illegal action.


Aren't we meant to presume guilt and get him to prove otherwise?


I thought the idea was innocent until proven guilty?

So it's alledged. Proof or STFU :)


Oh, so CCP and BoB are innocent then?
Glad we cleared that up.


The Battleships is not and should not be a solo pwnmobile - Oveur

Captain Thunk
Captain Thunk
Explode. Now. Please.

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:09:00 - [256] - Quote

I'm only seeing Avon, Rod Blaine and Kcel whathisnamefromfive posting here in support of BoB - can anyone really imagine a situation where any of these 3 wouldn't?

If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find them, maybe you can hire...The ENP-Team.
Fi T'Zeh
Fi T'Zeh
Evolution
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:09:00 - [257] - Quote

I am disappointed as most of the rest of the posters in this thread that Kieron will not or cannot be more equivocable in his statement. The character, and i'm not talking about toons here, of some of my very closest friends has been grossley besmirched, and there is nothing here that confirms or denys whether those claims were justified.

I don't care about our in game "reputation", in fact I revel in it. We're the "bad guys" we know, and we deal with it. Infact it's a change for me, because if you asked any of my mates (bob or otherwise) they'd tell you I was a "nice bloke". (Unlike Avon who's actually an arse irl Laughing)

What disappoints me in this statement is a lack of, well, anything. I can't defend my friends or conversely accept that they did anything wrong because there's nothing stated.
....


Playing EVE on easy mode since May 2003.
Niaski Zalani
Niaski Zalani
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:10:00 - [258] - Quote

Originally by: Sinlare
Originally by: Niaski Zalani


Alledged illegal action.


You're right, but no need to defend it so much, especially from a professional point of view. And yes, i know dutch hosters have that policy :)


I'm defending it because I think he's got just as much rights as anyone else to have his site hosted, irregardless of the content of said site. That and on a personal level I'm tired of the "omg he's a hax0r! kill! kill! kill!" mentality. He might've hacked a few forums, and gotten his information off it, but the forums are still there, and nothing apparently got deleted, or we would've heard the whining in here about it by now.

Be glad that it might've been Kugutsumen, it could just as well have been a script kiddie that would've wiped your db's and replaced your forum with a goatse.cx picture.


yarr.
Sathynos
Sathynos
Caldari
Pink Bunnies
C0VEN

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:12:00 - [259] - Quote

Edited by: Sathynos on 07/02/2007 11:29:55
Edited by: Sathynos on 07/02/2007 11:14:23
So CCP, you have banned the guy who passe the info and no update if there was a case of misconduct or not? Let me tell you, you have really lost a lot of my trust because of that. A response telling me that you are passionate about the game is nothing - I already knew that. But what about the logs on this guy's website:
- chat logs between dev char and bob ceos stating about telling inside info
- BPOs stuff
- early event infos
- the whole rest of what's there
You have nothing to say about that? Close your eyes, nothing happened?
And banning this guy to shut him up? What kind of "we are passionate" is that!

ugh
--
"Say yes to pron on Concord billboards" campaing.
Eve mercenaries portal: http://www.eve-mercs.com
Danny Hawk
Danny Hawk
Black Lance
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:15:00 - [260] - Quote

Edited by: Danny Hawk on 07/02/2007 11:12:42
tbh the answer is just not enough in this, and it just makes it look more like ccp are biased in this matter.

*snip* - Cortes
dj lightning
dj lightning
Caldari
Black Lance
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:17:00 - [261] - Quote

Just shows u are only where u are b/c u are CHEATS.

I also remeber a CNR and Nighthawk take down 5 IAC ships in the championships the CNR was not even taking any shield damage 1 word HAX.

As for the tech 2 BPO`s u have HAXED that has got u important isk for Mothership/Titan BPO`s + more tech 2 BPO`s in my book u will always be CHEATS.

1 more thing as for the Titan wreak where is the 1`st dread wreak in game CCP or was it b/c we was NBSI and not BOB that u have not put this in.

DJ
Stalert Balakos
Stalert Balakos
The Syndicate Inc
INVICTUS.

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:22:00 - [262] - Quote

Dear kieron,
Do you really think this statement "will put this issue behind us once and for all and allow us to continue moving forward with the support of our community"? If so, I think you'll be sorely disappointed.

At the time these allegations first arose you promised us a full investigation. Many of us hoped that you would share the results of that investigation with us but you have not.

You have stated that certain dev characters have been deleted because it had become known that they were used by CCP employees. As I understand it this would have to have happened anyway - whether the allegations were true or not - so this doesn't shed any light on the results of the investigations.

You say that the deletion of these characters is unfortunate, from which we can only infer that they had done nothing wrong, so why not say that? If the investigation revealed that nothing untoward had happened why isn't that written in bold in paragraph one?

It may not satisfy the BoB haters or even (for different reasons) their opposite numbers in the BoB forum squad but for the 90 per cent of us (a pure guesstimate) in the middle it would have been enough.

The fact that you won't share the results of your investigations with us just leads everyone to jump to conclusions and hence you get the resulting flame-filled thread rehashing the same issues all over again.

I'm not interested in seeing anyone's name dragged through the mud, I just want you to tell us straightforwardly what the investigation revealed.

I think you've missed a very good opportunity to once again prove that CCP is the best MMORPG developer out there.

Yours, disillusioned

Stal

FireFoxx80
FireFoxx80
Caldari
E X O D U S
Imperial Republic Of the North

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:27:00 - [263] - Quote

Originally by: Stalert Balakos
You say that the deletion of these characters is unfortunate, from which we can only infer that they had done nothing wrong, so why not say that? If the investigation revealed that nothing untoward had happened why isn't that written in bold in paragraph one?


Agreed.

Your witch hunt either has to have someone publicly burnt at the stake; or has to have the people accused completely pardoned.


What I do the rest of the time - Vote for a Jita bypass!
Kcel Chim
Kcel Chim
Caldari
Arcane Technologies
The Five

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:30:00 - [264] - Quote

Edited by: Kcel Chim on 07/02/2007 11:28:24
Originally by: dj lightning
Just shows u are only where u are b/c u are CHEATS.

I also remeber a CNR and Nighthawk take down 5 IAC ships in the championships the CNR was not even taking any shield damage 1 word HAX.

As for the tech 2 BPO`s u have HAXED that has got u important isk for Mothership/Titan BPO`s + more tech 2 BPO`s in my book u will always be CHEATS.

1 more thing as for the Titan wreak where is the 1`st dread wreak in game CCP or was it b/c we was NBSI and not BOB that u have not put this in.

DJ


I hope ure not serious with that post....

If you are i recommend you
a) check the Tournament Video again since ure lacking abit of info or remmeber it abit different then the rest of us.
b) reconsider / recalculate the amount of isk those ammo bpos + the 2 ship bpos can produce and compare it to the amount needed for the capitals you named.
c) Ask yourself what kind of real proof you have that someone actually rigged the t2 lottery from another account for BoB chars and if or how that is even possible (sorry i lack the dev skills to know how all gamemechanics work)
d) reconsider and compare the importance of the first dread kill - worth 1.5 bln isk, very common ship, for everyone and his dog affordable and flyable to the first titan kill - worth 150 bln isk, 3-5 ingame, highly unlikely to ever reach common status due to the nature and work it requires till its build.
Starblizz
Starblizz
Caldari
Black Lance
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:31:00 - [265] - Quote

Originally by: Stalert Balakos
Dear kieron,
Do you really think this statement "will put this issue behind us once and for all and allow us to continue moving forward with the support of our community"? If so, I think you'll be sorely disappointed.

At the time these allegations first arose you promised us a full investigation. Many of us hoped that you would share the results of that investigation with us but you have not.

You have stated that certain dev characters have been deleted because it had become known that they were used by CCP employees. As I understand it this would have to have happened anyway - whether the allegations were true or not - so this doesn't shed any light on the results of the investigations.

You say that the deletion of these characters is unfortunate, from which we can only infer that they had done nothing wrong, so why not say that? If the investigation revealed that nothing untoward had happened why isn't that written in bold in paragraph one?

It may not satisfy the BoB haters or even (for different reasons) their opposite numbers in the BoB forum squad but for the 90 per cent of us (a pure guesstimate) in the middle it would have been enough.

The fact that you won't share the results of your investigations with us just leads everyone to jump to conclusions and hence you get the resulting flame-filled thread rehashing the same issues all over again.

I'm not interested in seeing anyone's name dragged through the mud, I just want you to tell us straightforwardly what the investigation revealed.

I think you've missed a very good opportunity to once again prove that CCP is the best MMORPG developer out there.

Yours, disillusioned

Stal



i fully agree with this, it just like CCP not conferming that there were any dev's/gms/dev's dog in any IGA. There's more that needs to be said. People have put alot into this game, on both dev and player side. don't let eve go this way...
Ander
Ander
Gallente
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:31:00 - [266] - Quote

Edited by: Ander on 07/02/2007 11:28:11
To summarize what has been posted in this thread...

Fact(?): CCP do give BOB a lot of time in the spotlight.
Question: Does all Alliances get the same amount of time in the spotlight?

Fact(?): The CCP dev player had 10 t2 bpo's which he left to BoB.
Question: What's the chance of accumulating 10 t2 bpo's on a few characters? How many characters did he have? Did he pay for all "player" accounts/characters which got bpos through R&D?

Fact(?): CCP dev player lead the BoB capital fleet.
Question: Did BoB favor from forhand info about how gamemechanics work?

Allegations: Appearently BoB moves their dread fleets very quickly, are there any "hints" given out which other players don't know about?

Fact: Kugutsumen got all of his accounts banned for revealing which characters a dev was playing and accused him of having inflicted monetary loss to CCP or.. "higher maintenance costs".
Question: Why does CCP use the banstick and solving these issues by:
1. Posting dev-post which says "we've looked very seriously into all of this, we monitor our employees who play the game - we love eve.*kisses* ooh and we banned the guy that revealed who a dev was but ignored to ban the guys who posted his personal info in return"
2. lock threads

EVE Online - Pirates
Cyrus Ildemar
Cyrus Ildemar
GoonSwarm

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:31:00 - [267] - Quote

Originally by: Stalert Balakos
I think you've missed a very good opportunity to once again prove that CCP is the best MMORPG developer out there.


They do have one hell of a mod team though.

Those guys are fast.
Danny Hawk
Danny Hawk
Black Lance
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:33:00 - [268] - Quote

proof or go away {is that better?} is a stupid answer in my opinion
Palmtree
Palmtree

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:34:00 - [269] - Quote

Originally by: Mar vel
Iraf and Gringeley got it spot-on. Not a ton to add to those very, very effective arguments.

Kieron (CCP) - political double-talk is not your forte. Stick to coding games. You're dealing with an highly-advanced player base here - and there are vast numbers of us who navigate and negotiate situations like these for snacks.

CCP's answers do little to assuage the festering hostility felt by your community - why? Well let's re-state the issue for the learning impaired:

1. Manipulating the T2 lottery system to provide BPO's to an alliance - for a *random* lottery it sure does smack of impropriety that one individual could get 10 BPO's, let alone one player who is a Dev AND playing for the most wealthy, unchallenged alliance in the game.

2. Lying about playing in Bob.

3. Ignoring the need to act with responsible behaviour in terms of maintaining a level playing field for ALL customers.

For my money - your *findings statement* says very little and does even less.

You guys got bagged red handed and did zero about it. What that tells me is that the persons involved are too high up to fire or censor.

And I really question your seriousness when you are fishing for sympathy votes by telling us you'll have to retire characters. Why do I care if you have to retire your characters? -not my problem, or anyone else's - and if you guys had been stand-up guys about the whole thing from the very begining, it would have never been an issue. All you had to do was play fairly, not play favorites, keep attention away from yourselves and keep your mouths shut. You can hardly complain to the community because you have to sack your character due to your own ignorance and corruption. So sad. - and anyway, you guys will slap a new name / face on them and call it good, so big deal. So you won't have the coolest character name in your Dev area anymore. Bah. Get real, man.

The issue(s) at hand involve customer confidence; innappropriately loading the game in favor of your own player/corp/alliance and at the expense of everyone else is hardly a noble endeavour - regardless or the original intent. There's an existing venue for that - it's SiSi, not TQ.

Will I quit? Probably not. Would CCP really care? Definitely not. Thanks for allowing us to see what we're really worth to you - $14.99 a month and "oh well, minus one won't kill the company" - "now where did I put that Cap Recharger II BPO...".

Not Impressed. Not one bit. Sad


Good post.

I'd just like to add that we players deserve more of an explanation than this. I am very dissapointed by this reply and I look forward to further contact from the DEV's clarifying the situation. Trust is an integral part of a game like this, and I think that I am not the only one that does not trust CCP's handling of the issue at the moment.

I think the statment "Not Impressed. Not one bit." sums up my opinion of the situation.

I hope that we get another post on the subject. This issue has not been resolved in my (and many other players') opinions.
Drakma
Drakma
Gekidoku
Koroshiya Buntai

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:37:00 - [270] - Quote

What I find more disturbing than the lack of "meat" in Kieron's OP is the verbal dhiarrea spewed forth by some members of this community. This is not the thread to discuss allegiances to one "side" or the other, but rather a conduit to discuss said allegations and the apparent conclusion of the investigate.

If you can't put forth your thoughts without the use of name-calling and personal attacks, then you need to back up and rethink what you're trying to say.

As "normal' paying members of this community, we're not privy to the internal discussions within CCP or (for that matter) those they may be on contact with regarding these allegations. For all we know, the reasons behind this investigation could reach much further than Kugutsumen's allegations and "evidence."

Personally, I could care less which alliance this happened to or in. What I DO care about is if all members are afforded the same level playing field. That is the crux (or at least what I understood it to be) of the investigation.

Clearly, the explanation within the OP wasn't enough to even distinguish if all of the allegations that were put forth were investigated.

Maybe we just need to simmer it down and wait for an additional (ad much clearer) statement from CCP that can put all if this to rest. Obviously if it doesn't come within a reasonable timeframe then maybe there's something more to it. But until then all this name-calling and bickering does nothing but lower the community's attractiveness to many current and would-be players.



-----------------

Gekidoku is recruiting
Xoria Krint
Xoria Krint
The Movement

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:39:00 - [271] - Quote

If you knew you had a dev in your corp and he traded you a tech II bpo and said he spawned it for you, Would you accept it?

If you where hauling expensive **** and needed information about the route, would you ask the dev to scout it for you?

Have you ever seen/heard that someone broke the EULA without sending a petition?
Account Sharing/IRL money sales/third party programs?

Some of us might say yes. Some of us no.
Would love to see some honest answerers on these question. But the guys that say yes to any of this question would probably not admit it. In my opinion its not the player that cheat if they say yes to a spawned tech II bpo, its the dev.

Banning Kugusuhblaha was wrong in my opinion, I would like to see the vise versa. Facing court but not banned.

Don't hate the player, hate the dev.

Im not from a English speaking country so there might be some grammatic/spelling wrong.
---

My Movies
Kcel Chim
Kcel Chim
Caldari
Arcane Technologies
The Five

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:40:00 - [272] - Quote

Edited by: Kcel Chim on 07/02/2007 11:39:09
Originally by: Ander


Fact(?): The CCP dev player had 10 t2 bpo's which he left to BoB.
Question: What's the chance of accumulating 10 t2 bpo's on a few characters? How many characters did he have? Did he pay for all "player" accounts/characters which got bpos through R&D?



of those 10 bpos 8 were ammo bpos as far as im aware. Those 8 bpos would be worth about 10-15 bln isk in total. Not a huge sum if you buy them over time.
The other 2 Bpos which i remember were a malediction and a sabre. Both no items which cant be afforded.

I myself bought in the early days of eve an interceptor bpo for 1 bln isk and i know of a few non BoB guys selling their t2 cruiser bpos for 30bln isk so ask yourself how likely it is to gain enough wealth to be in the possession of 10 (minor) t2 bpos, even with just a single agent (who drops a t2 cruiser bpo of a ship in demand).

The questions of how many bpos he got is really pointless. I got a m8 who got 3 bpos from 5 agents while one of my char got 1 and the other got 0. The lottery system was always borked.
SNeAkYbRiT
SNeAkYbRiT
Black Lance
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:44:00 - [273] - Quote

Originally by: Kcel Chim
Edited by: Kcel Chim on 07/02/2007 11:39:09
Originally by: Ander


Fact(?): The CCP dev player had 10 t2 bpo's which he left to BoB.
Question: What's the chance of accumulating 10 t2 bpo's on a few characters? How many characters did he have? Did he pay for all "player" accounts/characters which got bpos through R&D?



of those 10 bpos 8 were ammo bpos as far as im aware. Those 8 bpos would be worth about 10-15 bln isk in total. Not a huge sum if you buy them over time.
The other 2 Bpos which i remember were a malediction and a sabre. Both no items which cant be afforded.

I myself bought in the early days of eve an interceptor bpo for 1 bln isk and i know of a few non BoB guys selling their t2 cruiser bpos for 30bln isk so ask yourself how likely it is to gain enough wealth to be in the possession of 10 (minor) t2 bpos, even with just a single agent (who drops a t2 cruiser bpo of a ship in demand).

The questions of how many bpos he got is really pointless. I got a m8 who got 3 bpos from 5 agents while one of my char got 1 and the other got 0. The lottery system was always borked.


so can i have them BPO's as well plz????

I guess not so wake up bud this is CHEATING if we all cant have these BPO's why should BoB.
Starblizz
Starblizz
Caldari
Black Lance
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:45:00 - [274] - Quote

Originally by: Kcel Chim
Edited by: Kcel Chim on 07/02/2007 11:39:09
Originally by: Ander


Fact(?): The CCP dev player had 10 t2 bpo's which he left to BoB.
Question: What's the chance of accumulating 10 t2 bpo's on a few characters? How many characters did he have? Did he pay for all "player" accounts/characters which got bpos through R&D?



of those 10 bpos 8 were ammo bpos as far as im aware. Those 8 bpos would be worth about 10-15 bln isk in total. Not a huge sum if you buy them over time.
The other 2 Bpos which i remember were a malediction and a sabre. Both no items which cant be afforded.

I myself bought in the early days of eve an interceptor bpo for 1 bln isk and i know of a few non BoB guys selling their t2 cruiser bpos for 30bln isk so ask yourself how likely it is to gain enough wealth to be in the possession of 10 (minor) t2 bpos, even with just a single agent (who drops a t2 cruiser bpo of a ship in demand).

The questions of how many bpos he got is really pointless. I got a m8 who got 3 bpos from 5 agents while one of my char got 1 and the other got 0. The lottery system was always borked.


btw, thanks for conferming what everyone has being saying about bob for ages Rolling Eyes
Avon
Avon
Caldari
Black Nova Corp
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:47:00 - [275] - Quote

Originally by: SNeAkYbRiT

so can i have them BPO's as well plz????

I guess not so wake up bud this is CHEATING if we all cant have these BPO's why should BoB.


Huh?
Winning or buying T2 BPO's is cheating?


The Battleships is not and should not be a solo pwnmobile - Oveur

Rod Blaine
Rod Blaine
Evolution
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:47:00 - [276] - Quote

Confirming what ?

He said that the fact one guy had ten bpo's isn't that strange at all.

The real question is wether he spawned them or bought/won them. That's what he meant. The number of them indicates nothing in itself.


Old blog
Originally by: Vriezuh
Naz: John is a realist
dj lightning
dj lightning
Caldari
Black Lance
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:49:00 - [277] - Quote

Edited by: dj lightning on 07/02/2007 11:45:55
Originally by: Kcel Chim
Edited by: Kcel Chim on 07/02/2007 11:28:24
Originally by: dj lightning
Just shows u are only where u are b/c u are CHEATS.

I also remeber a CNR and Nighthawk take down 5 IAC ships in the championships the CNR was not even taking any shield damage 1 word HAX.

As for the tech 2 BPO`s u have HAXED that has got u important isk for Mothership/Titan BPO`s + more tech 2 BPO`s in my book u will always be CHEATS.

1 more thing as for the Titan wreak where is the 1`st dread wreak in game CCP or was it b/c we was NBSI and not BOB that u have not put this in.

DJ


I hope ure not serious with that post....

If you are i recommend you
a) check the Tournament Video again since ure lacking abit of info or remmeber it abit different then the rest of us.
b) reconsider / recalculate the amount of isk those ammo bpos + the 2 ship bpos can produce and compare it to the amount needed for the capitals you named.
c) Ask yourself what kind of real proof you have that someone actually rigged the t2 lottery from another account for BoB chars and if or how that is even possible (sorry i lack the dev skills to know how all gamemechanics work)
d) reconsider and compare the importance of the first dread kill - worth 1.5 bln isk, very common ship, for everyone and his dog affordable and flyable to the first titan kill - worth 150 bln isk, 3-5 ingame, highly unlikely to ever reach common status due to the nature and work it requires till its build.
It was the 1st ever CAPITAL SHIP to be killed and the biggest ingame at that time when they was few dreads ingame its not about isk value its about eve history but b/c we are not in BOB that it does not matter.

As your point about the tech 2 BPO`s u sure know alot about what was given out.
Kcel Chim
Kcel Chim
Caldari
Arcane Technologies
The Five

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:49:00 - [278] - Quote

Originally by: Starblizz


btw, thanks for conferming what everyone has being saying about bob for ages Rolling Eyes


confirming what you believe anyways ?

Im not part of the investigation, im not even part of the BoB IGA. I guess we all have to wait on kieron to clear up the t2 bpo thing for the slow kids amongst us.

However my post above gave enough food for thought to ask yourself how awesome those supposed to be haxed t2 bpos really were.
Wouldnt u think a dev cheating, risking his rl job and additionally his 3 years gaming past / future for some iskies would atleast spawn large t2 weapons, hacs, commandships and not ammo + small ships?

I guess this kind of thought never dawned for the hatemongers and forumkids....
SNeAkYbRiT
SNeAkYbRiT
Black Lance
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:49:00 - [279] - Quote

Edited by: SNeAkYbRiT on 07/02/2007 11:49:16
ummm you've taken my post out of context and trying to twist it...CHEATS!

ever thought that spawning the lower T2 BPO's wouldnt be noticed as much but still give an advantage...guess not, but continue with the put downs cos ya making ya self look pretty slow.
Kldraina
Kldraina

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:50:00 - [280] - Quote

People keep complaining about how kieron's post doesn't ease the suspicions of CCP bias. Maybe the real reason kieron's post is so vapid, is because he is secretly trying to make all of EVE rise up against BoB. Laughing
Kcel Chim
Kcel Chim
Caldari
Arcane Technologies
The Five

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:52:00 - [281] - Quote

Edited by: Kcel Chim on 07/02/2007 11:51:00
Originally by: dj lightning


As your point about the tech 2 BPO`s u sure know alot about what was given out.


I do know what Mr.K presented to the public. Hey mentioned the bpos i refered to. If true or not i cant, similar to anyone else not prove. Ill take, like its the fashion of the day, his word for it on this occasion and just put his blog as a reference for their kind and nature.

As for the first capital ship kill, where is the first Bs, the first hac, the first faction cruiser, the first carrier or the first minging barge (they are ORE ships so special too) ?

A titan was both from background and from the dev blogs always a special, a mystical ship.
Back in 2003 Tomb made statements about titans already and how they would be flying monuments only huge alliances could be afford to fly. A statement which would be nicely backed up by a monument for the first destroyed one.
However i dont remember him talking about dreads or commandships or mining barges.
Sally Va
Sally Va

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:53:00 - [282] - Quote

So this is CCP's official final statement on the matter ?

I cannot even begin to describe how much you've disappointed me.

If my company had built a new car, say a prototype and wants to test how it performs, they take it to a test-track, put it in windtunnels, and undergoes crash-tests with dummies.

Saying 'no it has to be out in the streets of real everyday traffic from day 1' is plain criminal and accidents are bound to happen !

If DEV's need testing to be done, do it in controlled TEST environments, end of story.
DEV's playing EVE and mingling in corporation/alliances/decisionmaking is undermining your company credibility and your game.
Ishmael Hansen
Ishmael Hansen
No Quarter.
C0VEN

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:53:00 - [283] - Quote

If CCP had any will at all to fix the tech 2 problem this wouldn't bother the community so much. BoB still has a collection of bpo's longer then my arm, so for all it cares they still have the i-win eve button.

In the end most of the eve fun imo is flying nice toys and blowing things up, Bobbits can do it 95% of the time they are online due to not having to carebear like every other player to fly those toys.


Danny Hawk
Danny Hawk
Black Lance
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:54:00 - [284] - Quote

Originally by: Sinlare
Originally by: SNeAkYbRiT
ummm you've taken my post out of context and trying to twist it...CHEATS!


God cheated by putting you all in one corporation. Never knew he could be so sadistical.


sry i guess only multiple bob and alts can post there opinions on here
ollymac
ollymac

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:55:00 - [285] - Quote

as so say mentioned the bpo's that where spawned or given is irrelevent due to the fact the there small makes them less conspicuous at the time. but there value is also in that catergry,but the value after making and selling the produced so said items is in the billions.
all i can say is bob are Cheats !!!!

ollymac
Starblizz
Starblizz
Caldari
Black Lance
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:55:00 - [286] - Quote

Originally by: Kcel Chim
Originally by: Starblizz


btw, thanks for conferming what everyone has being saying about bob for ages Rolling Eyes


confirming what you believe anyways ?

Im not part of the investigation, im not even part of the BoB IGA. I guess we all have to wait on kieron to clear up the t2 bpo thing for the slow kids amongst us.

However my post above gave enough food for thought to ask yourself how awesome those supposed to be haxed t2 bpos really were.
Wouldnt u think a dev cheating, risking his rl job and additionally his 3 years gaming past / future for some iskies would atleast spawn large t2 weapons, hacs, commandships and not ammo + small ships?

I guess this kind of thought never dawned for the hatemongers and forumkids....


if you wanted to draw attention to your self then yes, as a dev you would spawn those bpos. however you your self have pointed out that this would be a great risk.

the simple fact remains: that a dev can/has done this. this alone makes people belive that there is an unbalance.
Kerdrak
Kerdrak
Amarr
3B Legio IX
Freelancer Alliance

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:56:00 - [287] - Quote

CCP must remove all TechII BPO from game.
CCP must stop playing this game. This game is their source of income not their source of leisure... The game is for the players.

If CCP doesn't do that 2 points, corruption will continue...

________________________________________
First atheist amarr on EVE
UKM Thorgrim
UKM Thorgrim
Caldari
Black Lance
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:57:00 - [288] - Quote

CHEATS .. BAN THE THEM ALL for Cheating

but if the Devs and GM's only favour one side, corp, alliance is there really any point in contuining to play, this game. as it's all a little one sided, as to the best moons, systems, BPO's, you name it,

i beleive that it's not just bob that are to blame,

This looks like the End to a very good game..






Honour & Steel.
Aleric Vikyz
Aleric Vikyz

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:58:00 - [289] - Quote

I am both disgusted and dissatisfied with CCP's reactions to these claims. It's unfortunate that I need be so cynical and disillusioned about a game whose idea is actually rather grand.

Your paying customer,
Anton (AKA: Aleric)
Starblizz
Starblizz
Caldari
Black Lance
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 11:58:00 - [290] - Quote

Originally by: Kcel Chim
Edited by: Kcel Chim on 07/02/2007 11:51:00
Originally by: dj lightning


As your point about the tech 2 BPO`s u sure know alot about what was given out.


I do know what Mr.K presented to the public. Hey mentioned the bpos i refered to. If true or not i cant, similar to anyone else not prove. Ill take, like its the fashion of the day, his word for it on this occasion and just put his blog as a reference for their kind and nature.

As for the first capital ship kill, where is the first Bs, the first hac, the first faction cruiser, the first carrier or the first minging barge (they are ORE ships so special too) ?

A titan was both from background and from the dev blogs always a special, a mystical ship.
Back in 2003 Tomb made statements about titans already and how they would be flying monuments only huge alliances could be afford to fly. A statement which would be nicely backed up by a monument for the first destroyed one.
However i dont remember him talking about dreads or commandships or mining barges.


in that day and age dreads were titans, or maybe you've forgoten those days... how convient
Kcel Chim
Kcel Chim
Caldari
Arcane Technologies
The Five

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:00:00 - [291] - Quote

Originally by: SNeAkYbRiT
Edited by: SNeAkYbRiT on 07/02/2007 11:49:16
ummm you've taken my post out of context and trying to twist it...CHEATS!

ever thought that spawning the lower T2 BPO's wouldnt be noticed as much but still give an advantage...guess not, but continue with the put downs cos ya making ya self look pretty slow.


technically a flagging system doesnt make a difference between spawning a low level item and a high level one since ingame value is very subjective. To rig the lottery in the fashion you describe would require alot of work i guess and alot of hassle for very small profit. If someone would want to cheat it would be far more convenient to spawn -1- high or medium value bpo. Instead of risking to create -10- possible points where things could go wrong.

As you said yourself, 1 time lucky possible without a doubt. 10 times without further explination would surely make ppl raise eyebrows.
Logan Feynman
Logan Feynman
Constructive Influence

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:00:00 - [292] - Quote

Edited by: Logan Feynman on 07/02/2007 11:57:24
Originally by: SNeAkYbRiT
ummm you've taken my post out of context and trying to twist it...CHEATS!


This is not about "you", "me", "them", or anything else. This is about allegations of dev misconduct, regardless of the alliance they were in.

Incident with faction-fitted scorpion gave reasons to believe that, if any miscondut was found, it would be stated so (which happened then). It was not.

The only thing Kieron stated was that some people unfortunately lost their accounts.

Either Kieron is BoB, CCP heads are all BoB, or this whole matter was blown out of proportion by some conspiracy fanatics.

Say "screw you CCP and BoD" and leave or think it through and STFU. Or wait a bit more in case Kieron decides to post a clarification for the thinking-impaired.

Edit: Which I doubt anyone would believe that doesn't already believe CCP anyway.
.

"Life is no way to treat an animal."
~Tombstone of Kilgore Trout
Captain Thunk
Captain Thunk
Explode. Now. Please.

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:00:00 - [293] - Quote

Originally by: Rod Blaine
Confirming what ?

He said that the fact one guy had ten bpo's isn't that strange at all.

The real question is wether he spawned them or bought/won them. That's what he meant. The number of them indicates nothing in itself.



No, The dev in question was outed months ago and as a result had to leave RKK - presumably to go to the biomass and be reborn elsewhere per CCPs stance on dev outings. This had nothing to do with Kugu or his site as it happened long before by the way, I think the guy who petitioned this dev for "fixing the t2 lottery" was actually in RKK, his main was never identified. If you know who he is contact Dianabolic as I think he's still looking for him.

The problem here is that when he left he donated his T2 BPOs to RKK rather than taking them with him. Rolling Eyes

I believe Kugu said he owns(owned) a hulk BPO amongst others - wonder where that is now he's banned.

CAPTAIN THUNK.

If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find them, maybe you can hire...The ENP-Team.
Sinlare
Sinlare
Gallente
Sinlare Auditorium

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:00:00 - [294] - Quote

Originally by: Ishmael Hansen
If CCP had any will at all to fix the tech 2 problem this wouldn't bother the community so much. BoB still has a collection of bpo's longer then my arm, so for all it cares they still have the i-win eve button.

In the end most of the eve fun imo is flying nice toys and blowing things up, Bobbits can do it 95% of the time they are online due to not having to carebear like every other player to fly those toys.




Your post is a perfect example of hidden agenda's of the posters in this thread. You find a good scapegoat (BoB) and accuse them of all that is wrong with your petpeeve (in this case the t2 lottery) and hope CCP will change it by claiming this is the thing that bothers the community.
Kcel Chim
Kcel Chim
Caldari
Arcane Technologies
The Five

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:02:00 - [295] - Quote

Originally by: Starblizz

in that day and age dreads were titans, or maybe you've forgoten those days... how convient


Dreads were never titans.
Tomb talked in his early blogs about flying stations. The concept of a titan and the ship already existed ingame since 2003 / 2004. Dreads were at no point anywhere close to that concept. They were a byproduct of the Structure / Station implementation which required a new superpower siegeweapon.

The titan as a flying station however is part of the history and the story arc of eve ever since its creation and has been in the dreams of many ppl for as long.
DB Preacher
DB Preacher
Reikoku
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:03:00 - [296] - Quote

Edited by: DB Preacher on 07/02/2007 12:01:58
Originally by: Shin Ra
In typical "New Labour" Style, this seems severely lacking in content. I do appreciate your attempt to look into this. I'm not aware if you are aware of the full effect of the allegations. There was multiple evidence by those in question about certain other people breaching various parts of the EULA, including buying/selling character for $$$. Have any of these been investigated and if so what was their results?


Originally by: Xendie

when will db preacher be banned for ebaying101



Originally by: Masochistic Cannibal
# Why did Dev's ignore account sharing and character sales for $$$ within BoB ?


A very simple check by CCP will confirm that there is no dodginess on any of my accounts.

I would happily allow CCP to release information pertaining that investigation because I have nothing to hide.

However, the very fact that I remain in the game in the light of those serious allegations should prove that no part of the EULA was broken by myself.

Quite frankly, and I did say so at the time, the dude was full of crap but it's far easier to smell the stench of deciept regardless of what is said.

I was targetted specifically. First with the "allegations" of character sales, then with the demand that I quit or future potential CCP players names would be released. I guess some people forgot where the game stopped and real life started for a little bit.

Either way, it's the last time I'll comment on this point and any further comments in any other threads about this (exluding this one ofc) will simply be petitioned.

Cheers,
dbp


Caldari Alliance PVP Championship Winner
Current RKK Ranking: (PSCAL6) Proficient Short Tanto
Starblizz
Starblizz
Caldari
Black Lance
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:05:00 - [297] - Quote

Originally by: Kcel Chim
Originally by: Starblizz

in that day and age dreads were titans, or maybe you've forgoten those days... how convient


Dreads were never titans.
Tomb talked in his early blogs about flying stations. The concept of a titan and the ship already existed ingame since 2003 / 2004. Dreads were at no point anywhere close to that concept. They were a byproduct of the Structure / Station implementation which required a new superpower siegeweapon.

The titan as a flying station however is part of the history and the story arc of eve ever since its creation and has been in the dreams of many ppl for as long.


does the whole first cap ship kill and the largest ship in the game being killed (at that time) mean nothing?

sorry to me the whole killing a logged off titan means nothing to me as well Rolling Eyes
Kcel Chim
Kcel Chim
Caldari
Arcane Technologies
The Five

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:09:00 - [298] - Quote

Originally by: Starblizz
Originally by: Kcel Chim
Originally by: Starblizz

in that day and age dreads were titans, or maybe you've forgoten those days... how convient


Dreads were never titans.
Tomb talked in his early blogs about flying stations. The concept of a titan and the ship already existed ingame since 2003 / 2004. Dreads were at no point anywhere close to that concept. They were a byproduct of the Structure / Station implementation which required a new superpower siegeweapon.

The titan as a flying station however is part of the history and the story arc of eve ever since its creation and has been in the dreams of many ppl for as long.


does the whole first cap ship kill and the largest ship in the game being killed (at that time) mean nothing?

sorry to me the whole killing a logged off titan means nothing to me as well Rolling Eyes


youre right killing the biggest ship at a time means nothing.
The titan, regardless of how it was killed, was always supposed to be the uberendgame ship and since it requires a whole alliance and alot of manhours to fly its just natural that its considered a major achievement. Far above the first dread which took 1 person 2 hauls in a freighter, a bpo and back then a 1.0 empire station to build. A freighter which btw was the first capital ship ingame not the dread class. Which also means that the first dread kill wasnt even the first kill of "a new class of ships".
Comstr
Comstr
Technology Acquisition Collective
Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:09:00 - [299] - Quote

So apart from deleting a couple of comprasmised characters, nothing else was done.

CCP, this is a stain on your honor. One you don't seem to really care about, or something would have been done. You belive nothing was wrong really, the dev's breaking the rules was a bad call, but nothing that deserves punishment.

People are closing accounts, and the stain on your honor will cost you far far more, than the cost of hiring a new developer or two.
Danny Hawk
Danny Hawk
Black Lance
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:11:00 - [300] - Quote

ok then if thats ure stance the first freighter kill was by rat via a loggin trap the olny one theve ever used so weres the rat monument?
dj lightning
dj lightning
Caldari
Black Lance
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:11:00 - [301] - Quote

Originally by: Kcel Chim
Originally by: Starblizz
Originally by: Kcel Chim
Originally by: Starblizz

in that day and age dreads were titans, or maybe you've forgoten those days... how convient


Dreads were never titans.
Tomb talked in his early blogs about flying stations. The concept of a titan and the ship already existed ingame since 2003 / 2004. Dreads were at no point anywhere close to that concept. They were a byproduct of the Structure / Station implementation which required a new superpower siegeweapon.

The titan as a flying station however is part of the history and the story arc of eve ever since its creation and has been in the dreams of many ppl for as long.


does the whole first cap ship kill and the largest ship in the game being killed (at that time) mean nothing?

sorry to me the whole killing a logged off titan means nothing to me as well Rolling Eyes


youre right killing the biggest ship at a time means nothing.
The titan, regardless of how it was killed, was always supposed to be the uberendgame ship and since it requires a whole alliance and alot of manhours to fly its just natural that its considered a major achievement. Far above the first dread which took 1 person 2 hauls in a freighter, a bpo and back then a 1.0 empire station to build. A freighter which btw was the first capital ship ingame not the dread class. Which also means that the first dread kill wasnt even the first kill of "a new class of ships".
The Freighter that was killed was a log on trap and was given back so it was not the 1st capital.
SNeAkYbRiT
SNeAkYbRiT
Black Lance
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:12:00 - [302] - Quote

Originally by: DB Preacher
Edited by: DB Preacher on 07/02/2007 12:01:58
Originally by: Shin Ra
In typical "New Labour" Style, this seems severely lacking in content. I do appreciate your attempt to look into this. I'm not aware if you are aware of the full effect of the allegations. There was multiple evidence by those in question about certain other people breaching various parts of the EULA, including buying/selling character for $$$. Have any of these been investigated and if so what was their results?


Originally by: Xendie

when will db preacher be banned for ebaying101



Originally by: Masochistic Cannibal
# Why did Dev's ignore account sharing and character sales for $$$ within BoB ?


A very simple check by CCP will confirm that there is no dodginess on any of my accounts.

I would happily allow CCP to release information pertaining that investigation because I have nothing to hide.

However, the very fact that I remain in the game in the light of those serious allegations should prove that no part of the EULA was broken by myself.

Quite frankly, and I did say so at the time, the dude was full of crap but it's far easier to smell the stench of deciept regardless of what is said.

I was targetted specifically. First with the "allegations" of character sales, then with the demand that I quit or future potential CCP players names would be released. I guess some people forgot where the game stopped and real life started for a little bit.

Either way, it's the last time I'll comment on this point and any further comments in any other threads about this (exluding this one ofc) will simply be petitioned.

Cheers,
dbp


petition it bud ya never what you'll get from it Laughing
Danny Hawk
Danny Hawk
Black Lance
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:14:00 - [303] - Quote

Originally by: DB Preacher
Edited by: DB Preacher on 07/02/2007 12:01:58
Originally by: Shin Ra
In typical "New Labour" Style, this seems severely lacking in content. I do appreciate your attempt to look into this. I'm not aware if you are aware of the full effect of the allegations. There was multiple evidence by those in question about certain other people breaching various parts of the EULA, including buying/selling character for $$$. Have any of these been investigated and if so what was their results?


Originally by: Xendie

when will db preacher be banned for ebaying101



Originally by: Masochistic Cannibal
# Why did Dev's ignore account sharing and character sales for $$$ within BoB ?


A very simple check by CCP will confirm that there is no dodginess on any of my accounts.

I would happily allow CCP to release information pertaining that investigation because I have nothing to hide.

However, the very fact that I remain in the game in the light of those serious allegations should prove that no part of the EULA was broken by myself.

Quite frankly, and I did say so at the time, the dude was full of crap but it's far easier to smell the stench of deciept regardless of what is said.

I was targetted specifically. First with the "allegations" of character sales, then with the demand that I quit or future potential CCP players names would be released. I guess some people forgot where the game stopped and real life started for a little bit.

Either way, it's the last time I'll comment on this point and any further comments in any other threads about this (exluding this one ofc) will simply be petitioned.

Cheers,
dbp


by petitioned u mean corp mailed? Very HappyVery HappyVery Happy
Starblizz
Starblizz
Caldari
Black Lance
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:15:00 - [304] - Quote

Originally by: Kcel Chim
Originally by: Starblizz
Originally by: Kcel Chim
Originally by: Starblizz

in that day and age dreads were titans, or maybe you've forgoten those days... how convient


Dreads were never titans.
Tomb talked in his early blogs about flying stations. The concept of a titan and the ship already existed ingame since 2003 / 2004. Dreads were at no point anywhere close to that concept. They were a byproduct of the Structure / Station implementation which required a new superpower siegeweapon.

The titan as a flying station however is part of the history and the story arc of eve ever since its creation and has been in the dreams of many ppl for as long.


does the whole first cap ship kill and the largest ship in the game being killed (at that time) mean nothing?

sorry to me the whole killing a logged off titan means nothing to me as well Rolling Eyes


youre right killing the biggest ship at a time means nothing.
The titan, regardless of how it was killed, was always supposed to be the uberendgame ship and since it requires a whole alliance and alot of manhours to fly its just natural that its considered a major achievement. Far above the first dread which took 1 person 2 hauls in a freighter, a bpo and back then a 1.0 empire station to build. A freighter which btw was the first capital ship ingame not the dread class. Which also means that the first dread kill wasnt even the first kill of "a new class of ships".


if you want to count the first freighter (which was renbursed as it was classed as an login trap (btw i have both sides of that little story in my corp and allience to conferm my facts from)), to try and show your version of the truth is correct - even though it's not - go right ahead. selective memory 4tw i guess...
Zzleeper
Zzleeper
Amarr
levisomnus spectatrix

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:15:00 - [305] - Quote

Edited by: Zzleeper on 07/02/2007 12:11:33
Originally by: DB Preacher
Edited by: DB Preacher on 07/02/2007 12:01:58
Originally by: Shin Ra
In typical "New Labour" Style, this seems severely lacking in content. I do appreciate your attempt to look into this. I'm not aware if you are aware of the full effect of the allegations. There was multiple evidence by those in question about certain other people breaching various parts of the EULA, including buying/selling character for $$$. Have any of these been investigated and if so what was their results?


Originally by: Xendie

when will db preacher be banned for ebaying101






Originally by: Masochistic Cannibal
# Why did Dev's ignore account sharing and character sales for $$$ within BoB ?


A very simple check by CCP will confirm that there is no dodginess on any of my accounts.

I would happily allow CCP to release information pertaining that investigation because I have nothing to hide.

However, the very fact that I remain in the game in the light of those serious allegations should prove that no part of the EULA was broken by myself.

Quite frankly, and I did say so at the time, the dude was full of crap but it's far easier to smell the stench of deciept regardless of what is said.

I was targetted specifically. First with the "allegations" of character sales, then with the demand that I quit or future potential CCP players names would be released. I guess some people forgot where the game stopped and real life started for a little bit.

Either way, it's the last time I'll comment on this point and any further comments in any other threads about this (exluding this one ofc) will simply be petitioned.

Cheers,
dbp


STFU.. Cheater!!


Cheaters never prosper!
Fry Star
Fry Star

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:16:00 - [306] - Quote

The whiners can't win. If ccp is corrupt, it's not only 1 rogue dev, it's the whole culture and company. New players to the game get such a rude shock, when CCP advertises the skill and courage of Band of Brothers, and thats what all alliances should look up to, and when people actually start playing the game, they find themselves treated as nothing, flamed to hell and back on the forums, and with a huge uphill struggle because of certain mechanics, like t2 bpo's.


UKM Thorgrim
UKM Thorgrim
Caldari
Black Lance
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:17:00 - [307] - Quote

Edited by: UKM Thorgrim on 07/02/2007 12:15:25
Originally by: SNeAkYbRiT
Originally by: DB Preacher
Edited by: DB Preacher on 07/02/2007 12:01:58
Originally by: Shin Ra
In typical "New Labour" Style, this seems severely lacking in content. I do appreciate your attempt to look into this. I'm not aware if you are aware of the full effect of the allegations. There was multiple evidence by those in question about certain other people breaching various parts of the EULA, including buying/selling character for $$$. Have any of these been investigated and if so what was their results?


Originally by: Xendie

when will db preacher be banned for ebaying101



Originally by: Masochistic Cannibal
# Why did Dev's ignore account sharing and character sales for $$$ within BoB ?


A very simple check by CCP will confirm that there is no dodginess on any of my accounts.

I would happily allow CCP to release information pertaining that investigation because I have nothing to hide.

However, the very fact that I remain in the game in the light of those serious allegations should prove that no part of the EULA was broken by myself.

Quite frankly, and I did say so at the time, the dude was full of crap but it's far easier to smell the stench of deciept regardless of what is said.

I was targetted specifically. First with the "allegations" of character sales, then with the demand that I quit or future potential CCP players names would be released. I guess some people forgot where the game stopped and real life started for a little bit.

Either way, it's the last time I'll comment on this point and any further comments in any other threads about this (exluding this one ofc) will simply be petitioned.

Cheers,
dbp


petition it bud ya never what you'll get from it Laughing



YOU Might GET A DREAD BPO For you Petitions. as the DEv's & GM's Love ya DB Preacher..

mod THIS for the truth hurts..


Honour & Steel.
Sinlare
Sinlare
Gallente
Sinlare Auditorium

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:17:00 - [308] - Quote

Originally by: Zzleeper


STFU.. Cheater!!




Mature Rolling Eyes
Danny Hawk
Danny Hawk
Black Lance
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:18:00 - [309] - Quote

Originally by: Zzleeper
Edited by: Zzleeper on 07/02/2007 12:11:33
Originally by: DB Preacher
Edited by: DB Preacher on 07/02/2007 12:01:58
Originally by: Shin Ra
In typical "New Labour" Style, this seems severely lacking in content. I do appreciate your attempt to look into this. I'm not aware if you are aware of the full effect of the allegations. There was multiple evidence by those in question about certain other people breaching various parts of the EULA, including buying/selling character for $$$. Have any of these been investigated and if so what was their results?


Originally by: Xendie

when will db preacher be banned for ebaying101






Originally by: Masochistic Cannibal
# Why did Dev's ignore account sharing and character sales for $$$ within BoB ?


A very simple check by CCP will confirm that there is no dodginess on any of my accounts.

I would happily allow CCP to release information pertaining that investigation because I have nothing to hide.

However, the very fact that I remain in the game in the light of those serious allegations should prove that no part of the EULA was broken by myself.

Quite frankly, and I did say so at the time, the dude was full of crap but it's far easier to smell the stench of deciept regardless of what is said.

I was targetted specifically. First with the "allegations" of character sales, then with the demand that I quit or future potential CCP players names would be released. I guess some people forgot where the game stopped and real life started for a little bit.

Either way, it's the last time I'll comment on this point and any further comments in any other threads about this (exluding this one ofc) will simply be petitioned.

Cheers,
dbp


STFU.. Cheater!!




quoted for truth
Zzleeper
Zzleeper
Amarr
levisomnus spectatrix

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:18:00 - [310] - Quote

Originally by: Sinlare
Originally by: Zzleeper


STFU.. Cheater!!




Mature Rolling Eyes


BOB alt?
Cheaters never prosper!
Sinlare
Sinlare
Gallente
Sinlare Auditorium

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:20:00 - [311] - Quote

Originally by: Zzleeper
Originally by: Sinlare
Originally by: Zzleeper


STFU.. Cheater!!




Mature Rolling Eyes


BOB alt?


No, someone who thinks you should grow up. Shouting 'shut he **** up cheater' doesnt really make you look good you know?
Maze La'Zie
Maze La'Zie
Caldari
Technology La'Zie

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:21:00 - [312] - Quote

I count myself as neutral in this. It wasn't hard to track down Kugutsumen's forums from the allegations posted on these forums, and his allegations were very interesting.

We need a categoric statement on whether CCP employees cheated or not.

If CCP employees cheated, then we need to know that they were suitably punished.

Thanks.



___________________
Chief Scientific Officer
Technology La'Zie
Author of The End
Sinlare
Sinlare
Gallente
Sinlare Auditorium

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:23:00 - [313] - Quote

Originally by: Maze La'Zie
I count myself as neutral in this. It wasn't hard to track down Kugutsumen's forums from the allegations posted on these forums, and his allegations were very interesting.

We need a categoric statement on whether CCP employees cheated or not.

If CCP employees cheated, then we need to know that they were suitably punished.

Thanks.





Atleast someone gets it right Smile
SNeAkYbRiT
SNeAkYbRiT
Black Lance
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:23:00 - [314] - Quote

Originally by: Sinlare
Originally by: Zzleeper
Originally by: Sinlare
Originally by: Zzleeper


STFU.. Cheater!!




Mature Rolling Eyes


BOB alt?



well you've called me and you go on about growing up...think u need to take a spoon full of ya own medicine.

No, someone who thinks you should grow up. Shouting 'shut he **** up cheater' doesnt really make you look good you know?

Kcel Chim
Kcel Chim
Caldari
Arcane Technologies
The Five

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:23:00 - [315] - Quote

Originally by: Starblizz

if you want to count the first freighter (which was renbursed as it was classed as an login trap (btw i have both sides of that little story in my corp and allience to conferm my facts from)), to try and show your version of the truth is correct - even though it's not - go right ahead. selective memory 4tw i guess...


you my friend have the ability of selective reading. I told you a few posts above already that it is NOT about the size of the ship AT ALL. Neither if it was the biggest ship at one time.

I gave you 2 reasons why a Titan should get a momument and a dread not.

a) the uniqueness and manhours / efford it requires to be build by an alliance.
b) the storyarc in which titans were always mentioned as flying stations - superships.

Dreads or any other capital ship are just regular ships which every pilot will one day fly. If any ship deaths apart from the titan, atleast to my personal opinion, would require a monument it would be the gold magnate, the silvermangates and the impocs/impageddons. Since most of them are unique and unlikely to spread and die in a daily fashion. Like dreads do these days.

Losing or killing the first dread just means killing the first ship of a newly implemented class while killing a titan will be not a day to day event like killing 10 dreads or capitals these days is.
As far as im concerned every titan kill should get a monument since it will always mark and outstanding event regardless of who did it.

Keep trolling tho.
Wizzkidy
Wizzkidy

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:24:00 - [316] - Quote

It's kinda true though is it not

All these months people have laughed at the fact BOB cheat and now although it aint be "proved" it's looking more and more likly that it DID happen.

Do you really think CCP would turn around and say "Oh yes we have checked the logs and one of the devs (or 2) cheated?"

Of course there not going too, it seems all too simple for them to turn around and say "it was too long ago we don't take logs that far back"

That is BS, I do not beleave that for a second and as ar as I am concerned they are either lying or they maybe didn't set them up to go that far back which is no excuse.

Something DID happen and CCP are unwilling to find otu what DID happen.

CCP you are a disgrace tbh and it proves that BOB DID need help in there wars and those thigns that happened, i.e POS's going offline or whatever at the time where ALL down to CHEATING and i'm FED up with it.

and there was people laughing 7 months ago about it lol well tbh its terrible.
Captain Thunk
Captain Thunk
Explode. Now. Please.

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:24:00 - [317] - Quote

This thread is going downhill fast Sad

I would quote this guy who posted something a few pages back which was calm and considered and hit the nail on the head, but I've lost where it was and it's a lot of effort to go find - chances are everyone's read it and can guess which one I'm thinking off.

I remain optimistic that in this dark hour, CCP will act to restore faith and credibility to the greatest MMORPG ever made (something I'm sure we can all actually agree on).

It'd be nice if people can try to post constructively no matter how angry they are, under the circumstances it's understandable to be angry but unconstructive posts could possibly just make the situation worse.

CAPTAIN THUNK

If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find them, maybe you can hire...The ENP-Team.
UKM Thorgrim
UKM Thorgrim
Caldari
Black Lance
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:24:00 - [318] - Quote

Originally by: Maze La'Zie
I count myself as neutral in this. It wasn't hard to track down Kugutsumen's forums from the allegations posted on these forums, and his allegations were very interesting.

We need a categoric statement on whether CCP employees cheated or not.

If CCP employees cheated, then we need to know that they were suitably punished.

Thanks.


NO Compensation for all That have Worked hard in this game to get the Stuff they wanted not Given to them....







Honour & Steel.
shimmyckus
shimmyckus
Minmatar
Black Omega Security
Curse Alliance

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:24:00 - [319] - Quote

This statement is joke, right? Rolling Eyes
31i73
31i73
BGG

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:24:00 - [320] - Quote

I missed the part what does first [insert shiptype] kill monument[s] have to do with dev misconduct?

Sinlare
Sinlare
Gallente
Sinlare Auditorium

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:25:00 - [321] - Quote

Originally by: SNeAkYbRiT

well you've called me and you go on about growing up...think u need to take a spoon full of ya own medicine.



You know, the way your whole corp seems to act you're the last person who should give that advice.
krystal eyes
krystal eyes

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:26:00 - [322] - Quote

29 Jun 2005, Thryr Merim register with the e-mail address vincent@ccpgames.com

He rejoined as Ishos on Tue Dec 13, 2005 3:03 pm

Quote:

Pilot: Ishos Rerajan (main / RKK)
Specialisation: Amarr
Licenced: Amarr BS, Amarr BC, Amarr Command Ships, Amarr Interdictors, Amarr Cloakers, Amarr HAC, Amarr Interceptors
Notes: Maxed out Armored Warfare + Command ships + mindlink

Pilot: Thryr Merim (main / RKK)
Specialisation: Caldari
Licenced: Caldari BS, Caldari BC, Caldari Interdictors, Caldari HAC, Caldari Freighters, Caldari Transport Ships, Caldari Interceptors
Notes: Maxed Out Missile Operation Skills



The below posted on RKK internal forum: Thryr Merim announces he is a dev:
(re. conversation about anew killboard)
Quote:
Originally posted by:haze


I have thought about this a lot and not been able to come up with any solution.

Its the same problem with the game lots, as CCP dont do any kind of auth on the logs there is no way to authenticat them.

A simple md5 like hash on each log/killmail would be a nice and simple way for ccp to auth the logs, would make pettitions a lot dam simpler as well.

as it stands though I guess we are just going to have to deal with it the best we can.


Originally Posted by Thryr Merim
the system as it is today is a bit obsolete, it's a generated text and the logs only store the one that did most damage as a killer ... we've got plans to store everything in the logs ... more on that later ... low priority atm




Now if you search for vincent@ccpgames.com you find posts on french forums as t20.



t20 was Ishos
t20 was in charge of RKK Capital Ship Command
t20 when forced to leave RKK, left 10 T2 BPO behind him.
t20 witness all the RKK EULA abuse, char resale, etc. (alleged)
t20 is really close to Oveur and they are often seen together on Sisi in local.

Shinoobie
Shinoobie

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:26:00 - [323] - Quote

Originally by: DB Preacher


Blah...

Either way, it's the last time I'll comment on this point and any further comments in any other threads about this (exluding this one ofc) will simply be petitioned.

Cheers,
dbp


Is that what you do for all your problems? Petition it?

You see if we got a clearer message from CCP what has found/not found things like this wouldn't crop up anymore.

Thats all these guys in this thread are asking for, and all I see is the accused trying to defend themselves AND ccp. Makes it look worse imho.

Reveal the truth, and stop allegations.

Elite Scouting
Ather Ialeas
Ather Ialeas
Amarr
Karjala Inc.
Imperial Republic Of the North

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:33:00 - [324] - Quote

To say what I think as simply as I can: Not enough.
---
Mandatory disclaimer: These are my thoughts, not my corps/alliances.
---



FireFoxx80
FireFoxx80
Caldari
E X O D U S
Imperial Republic Of the North

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:33:00 - [325] - Quote

Originally by: Shinoobie
Originally by: DB Preacher


Blah...

Either way, it's the last time I'll comment on this point and any further comments in any other threads about this (exluding this one ofc) will simply be petitioned.

Cheers,
dbp


Is that what you do for all your problems? Petition it?

You see if we got a clearer message from CCP what has found/not found things like this wouldn't crop up anymore.

Thats all these guys in this thread are asking for, and all I see is the accused trying to defend themselves AND ccp. Makes it look worse imho.

Reveal the truth, and stop allegations.


/signed.

Jessep: You want answers?
Kaffee: I think I'm entitled to them.
Jessep: You want answers?
Kaffee: I want the truth!
Jessep: You can't handle the truth!


What I do the rest of the time - Vote for a Jita bypass!
bioqaz eylee
bioqaz eylee
Amarr
LifeLine Solutions

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:33:00 - [326] - Quote

Originally by: Hedgie
Originally by: krystal eyes
Edited by: krystal eyes on 07/02/2007 12:26:15
29 Jun 2005, Thryr Merim registered with RKK [BoB] with the e-mail address vincent@ccpgames.com

He rejoined as Ishos on Tue Dec 13, 2005 3:03 pm

Quote:

Pilot: Ishos Rerajan (main / RKK)
Specialisation: Amarr
Licenced: Amarr BS, Amarr BC, Amarr Command Ships, Amarr Interdictors, Amarr Cloakers, Amarr HAC, Amarr Interceptors
Notes: Maxed out Armored Warfare + Command ships + mindlink

Pilot: Thryr Merim (main / RKK)
Specialisation: Caldari
Licenced: Caldari BS, Caldari BC, Caldari Interdictors, Caldari HAC, Caldari Freighters, Caldari Transport Ships, Caldari Interceptors
Notes: Maxed Out Missile Operation Skills



The below posted on RKK internal forum: Thryr Merim announces he is a dev:
(re. conversation about anew killboard)
Quote:
Originally posted by:haze


I have thought about this a lot and not been able to come up with any solution.

Its the same problem with the game lots, as CCP dont do any kind of auth on the logs there is no way to authenticat them.

A simple md5 like hash on each log/killmail would be a nice and simple way for ccp to auth the logs, would make pettitions a lot dam simpler as well.

as it stands though I guess we are just going to have to deal with it the best we can.


Originally Posted by Thryr Merim
the system as it is today is a bit obsolete, it's a generated text and the logs only store the one that did most damage as a killer ... we've got plans to store everything in the logs ... more on that later ... low priority atm




Now if you search for vincent@ccpgames.com you find posts on french forums as t20.



t20 was Ishos
t20 was in charge of RKK Capital Ship Command
t20 when forced to leave RKK, left 10 T2 BPO behind him.
t20 witness all the RKK EULA abuse, char resale, etc. (alleged)
t20 is really close to Oveur and they are often seen together on Sisi in local.



quotin dis


omg, this makes me cry Crying or Very sad its a sad day in eve if this is true. Crying or Very sadCrying or Very sadCrying or Very sad
SNeAkYbRiT
SNeAkYbRiT
Black Lance
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:33:00 - [327] - Quote

Originally by: krystal eyes
Edited by: krystal eyes on 07/02/2007 12:26:15
29 Jun 2005, Thryr Merim registered with RKK [BoB] with the e-mail address vincent@ccpgames.com

He rejoined as Ishos on Tue Dec 13, 2005 3:03 pm

Quote:

Pilot: Ishos Rerajan (main / RKK)
Specialisation: Amarr
Licenced: Amarr BS, Amarr BC, Amarr Command Ships, Amarr Interdictors, Amarr Cloakers, Amarr HAC, Amarr Interceptors
Notes: Maxed out Armored Warfare + Command ships + mindlink

Pilot: Thryr Merim (main / RKK)
Specialisation: Caldari
Licenced: Caldari BS, Caldari BC, Caldari Interdictors, Caldari HAC, Caldari Freighters, Caldari Transport Ships, Caldari Interceptors
Notes: Maxed Out Missile Operation Skills



The below posted on RKK internal forum: Thryr Merim announces he is a dev:
(re. conversation about anew killboard)
Quote:
Originally posted by:haze


I have thought about this a lot and not been able to come up with any solution.

Its the same problem with the game lots, as CCP dont do any kind of auth on the logs there is no way to authenticat them.

A simple md5 like hash on each log/killmail would be a nice and simple way for ccp to auth the logs, would make pettitions a lot dam simpler as well.

as it stands though I guess we are just going to have to deal with it the best we can.


Originally Posted by Thryr Merim
the system as it is today is a bit obsolete, it's a generated text and the logs only store the one that did most damage as a killer ... we've got plans to store everything in the logs ... more on that later ... low priority atm




Now if you search for vincent@ccpgames.com you find posts on french forums as t20.



t20 was Ishos
t20 was in charge of RKK Capital Ship Command
t20 when forced to leave RKK, left 10 T2 BPO behind him.
t20 witness all the RKK EULA abuse, char resale, etc. (alleged)
t20 is really close to Oveur and they are often seen together on Sisi in local.



ShockedShockedShockedShockedShocked
Masochistic Cannibal
Masochistic Cannibal
Amarr
The Ring of Fire

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:36:00 - [328] - Quote

Originally by: DB Preacher
Edited by: DB Preacher on 07/02/2007 12:18:26
Originally by: Shin Ra
In typical "New Labour" Style, this seems severely lacking in content. I do appreciate your attempt to look into this. I'm not aware if you are aware of the full effect of the allegations. There was multiple evidence by those in question about certain other people breaching various parts of the EULA, including buying/selling character for $$$. Have any of these been investigated and if so what was their results?


Originally by: Xendie

when will db preacher be banned for ebaying101



Originally by: Masochistic Cannibal
# Why did Dev's ignore account sharing and character sales for $$$ within BoB ?


A very simple check by CCP will confirm that there is no dodginess on any of my accounts.

I would happily allow CCP to release information pertaining that investigation because I have nothing to hide.

However, the very fact that I remain in the game in the light of those serious allegations should prove that no part of the EULA was broken by myself.

Quite frankly, and I did say so at the time, the dude was full of crap but it's far easier to smell the stench of deciept regardless of what is said.

I was targetted specifically. First with the "allegations" of character sales, then with the demand that I quit or future potential CCP players names would be released. I guess some people forgot where the game stopped and real life started for a little bit.

Either way, it's the last time I'll comment on this point.

Cheers,
dbp


I think it's more likely that it's impossible to prove if you sold the account/character or not. And the fact that you are still here is testiment to their being something fishy as CCP's current practice regarding illegal character sales is simply to ban the offending party immidiatly.

Do I know this for a fact ? Why yes I do and would be happy to explain somewhere it wont get moderated.

Your character was sold to you by a friend, it's the easiest thing in the world to make a change of hands look 100% Legit, The fact your still here is no proof of innocence at all. There's certainly enough proof in Mr K's blogs for CCP to launch investigations and silence certain parties. I think most of us that are not half blinded by ignorance can assume that there is also proof in the allegations regarding your character!



As a side note why was DigitalCommunist given the IP address's BY A GM regarding to a character that was hacked allegedly by Mr K ?

Cannibal


I eat babies ! [Hauling services available~ Contact ingame]
Severian Maura
Severian Maura

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:37:00 - [329] - Quote

This is a fairly sad statement. You did not adress whether there was any wrond doing with T2 Equipement. Or misuse of there positions to create favorable out comes for bob.

Most importantly if the Developers want to play the game there should be a developer only corp located in empire. Leave 0.0 to paying players.

This is a competive game and what assurances that a developer wont abuse his power. Power Corupts and there is always that tugging on someone to cheat whether there a developer or not. CCP should not allow itslelf to put in a position where me the paying custumer goes oh this is a crock, the game developers help out one Alliance over the other.

This shows a clear biased towards BoB. Thanks CCP for helping and showing favortism to one alliance while penalizing everyone else. Becuase thats what you do when you all join that alliancee. In sports team players are not allowed to bet on there games and thats exactly what your doing in this case.
SNeAkYbRiT
SNeAkYbRiT
Black Lance
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:39:00 - [330] - Quote

Edited by: SNeAkYbRiT on 07/02/2007 12:37:42
Originally by: krystal eyes
Edited by: krystal eyes on 07/02/2007 12:29:40
Can a dev/anyone confirm that it was t20 who designed/implemented the t2 BPO lottery?



well if did this will really bugger things up for CCP, i can see the posts rolling in on this one.
Xendie
Xendie
Forsaken Empire
The Forsaken Empire

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:41:00 - [331] - Quote

CCP has done nothing except to ban kugutsumens accounts.

the so called dev just had his characters renamed.

CCP havent done anything at all to get a grip on the cheating done by some devs and the leaders of the bob alliance.





Quote:
Nertzius > having fun being incompetitent?

Quote:
jake sisko > its f-e's bob dev alt making lag
UKM Thorgrim
UKM Thorgrim
Caldari
Black Lance
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:42:00 - [332] - Quote

Originally by: SNeAkYbRiT
Originally by: krystal eyes
Edited by: krystal eyes on 07/02/2007 12:29:40
Can a dev/anyone confirm that it was t20 who designed/implemented the t2 BPO lottery?



well if did this will really bugger things up for CCP, i can see the allocations now.


Alligations do they really need more ..

Ban all that have been Cought cheating..




Honour & Steel.
Fi T'Zeh
Fi T'Zeh
Evolution
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:44:00 - [333] - Quote

Originally by: UKM Thorgrim
Originally by: SNeAkYbRiT
Originally by: krystal eyes
Edited by: krystal eyes on 07/02/2007 12:29:40
Can a dev/anyone confirm that it was t20 who designed/implemented the t2 BPO lottery?



well if did this will really bugger things up for CCP, i can see the allocations now.


Alligations do they really need more ..

Ban all that have been Cought cheating..




I agree, anyone who has been caught cheating should be banned.
....


Playing EVE on easy mode since May 2003.
Shadowsword
Shadowsword
COLSUP
Tau Ceti Federation

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:45:00 - [334] - Quote

My view on the whole thing:

- Devs playing in secret: Perfectly normal. CCP loves their game, so they want to play it, and they damned have the right to enjoy it. If CCP wasn't passionated by Eve, Eve would be a Wow in space by now...

- Devs playing in Bob: Bother me a bit. Bob is already so powerfull, so full of hardore gamers that it tend to attract still more veterans, from other alliances. The health of political balance in 0.0 certainly doesn't need CCP helping to it, if only by their presence in Bob.

- Bob's denials: They repeated over and over that ALL the allegations were false. And some of them turn out to be true. This makes everyone wonder about wether the others are indeed true, whatever Bob say, or not. I'm won't throw those allegations at Bob's face, until they're proved, one way or another, but the doubts remains...

I think CCP need to give a more complete answer, of those doubts will plague Eve's future. Even if it's only a "about this particular BPO allegation, we can't prove it was or wasn't done".
------------------------------------------
Every ship has a base 60-70% resist against the primary damage type of the race that is the least able to vary it's damage types.
Liet Traep
Liet Traep
Minmatar
Black Lance
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:45:00 - [335] - Quote

For a long time allegations have been made over and over again about BoB getting special favours and treatment from CCP. I remember hearing complaints as far back as when Xelas got kicked out of the north. Now a 3rd party reveals that Devs have alts in Bob and reveals who they are. He also reveals (allegedly) that higher ups in BoB were in the know about which devs where in their alliance. He also alleges that they benefitted materially from free t2 bpos and inside knowledge about upcoming events.

CCP needs to open about everything they find. Politics and passions in this game run extremely high. Just having a dev playing as such a high level character in Bob is damaging enough. If they don't honestlyand openlyaddress these rumours and release all the results of their investigation in a timelyfashion their reputation is going to suffer mightily for it.

I want to know.

1. Did this Dev give BoB t2 bpos. If he did what's going to happen to them. Even if they were acquired legitamately it seems unseemly. I suggest if they did receive them from the dev that they be taken away and reseeded even if they were acquired legitamately. To protect CCP's reputation and to show that they take the community's concerns seriously. Sucks for BoB but they can polish the free motherships and corvus' and storms' they got from the Alliance tourney's to console themselves.

2. Did any Bob members know he was a dev? Did they get information about upcoming events and changes from him. Did they profit through their connection with a dev?

3. How long was this dev in BoB? Where any questionable decisions made where BoB benefitted from having a Dev buddy ease things over?

4. If BoB players are proven to have benefitted from a Dev's cheating on behalf. If they knewa dev was cheating on their behalf what happens to them. Do they get banned or do they get a slap on the wrist and are told not to get caught again?

CCP you have a problem. You've been accused of favortism when it comes to BoB and now Dev characters have been found in BoB. You need to respond and respond fast. Your customers are losing faith in your impartiality and I don't think the forum mods can keep up with the posts you're getting on this.

BoB, everything you've accomplished since this dev has joined alliance is now suspect. People accuse you of cheating in the alliance tourneys. Guess what? You can't prove you didn't. You cheated in turning off ASCN's pos. You say you didn't you had the capability of doing so. It'd be simple for a dev to do. Cyvok claims you cheated in killing Steve. Guess what? You can't prove that you didn't cheat there either. You are screwed. Everything you have accomplished is tainted by this.

CCP needs to be open and honest with it's player otherwise you risk losing them. If BoB players benefitted by cheating you better drop the hammer on them just to clear yourselves of any favoritism. Honestly I believe you do favor BoB. They have a very large percentage of long term characters in their alliance. I think they probably have the highest concentration of CCP employees playing amongst them as a result of that. I think BoB has gotten more than their fair share of lucky breaks. These are things I felt before. I didn't know but I felt that this was true. Now I see there might be some truth to these feelings. That maybe I wasn't wrong in thinking you liked BoB more than the rest of us. And I doubt i'm the only one who feels this way now.

If I feel you haven't done an honest investigation. If I feel you're covering up and hoping this will go away. if I feel that I can't trust you. If I feel that anything I do in this game doesn't matter because I'm not in the elite Band of Brothers alliance then why should I play? if you say you investigated and found no impropriety, that no wrong doing was done I'll believe you. But you better outline EVERY STEP YOU TOOK. Your ball.
ceaon
ceaon
Gallente
Porandor

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:47:00 - [336] - Quote

i was expecting more clue like if the accusation was true SadSad
dear CCP you have failed to me
u needed the "help" of one hacker to get the alarm on. sad that u don't detect that earlier
+
@@@@@@@@@
@@@@@@@@@
@@@@@@@@@
@@@@@@@@@

Kcel Chim
Kcel Chim
Caldari
Arcane Technologies
The Five

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:49:00 - [337] - Quote

Originally by: Shadowsword

- Bob's denials: They repeated over and over that ALL the allegations were false. And some of them turn out to be true. This makes everyone wonder about wether the others are indeed true, whatever Bob say, or not. I'm won't throw those allegations at Bob's face, until they're proved, one way or another, but the doubts remains...

I think CCP need to give a more complete answer, of those doubts will plague Eve's future. Even if it's only a "about this particular BPO allegation, we can't prove it was or wasn't done".


Good and well thought out reply.
However one minor thing i would like you to think about:
The allegations cant turn true because the only trustworthy source of information is ccp and they havent unclosed anything (yet).

I hope kieron adds another statement to clear up all the other allegations because it damages gameplay for a good bunch of ppl however as you can see in some of the replies its obvious that no matter of who says what in the longrun the hatemongers will not believe it anyways. We can only hope for the majority of the public that another statement is issued.
jeffb
jeffb

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:50:00 - [338] - Quote

Edited by: jeffb on 07/02/2007 12:48:09
Unban AnthonyZ, if it wasnt for him we would still all be in the dark.
Harpr Shodokai
Harpr Shodokai
Gallente
Scientific Muppets.

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:54:00 - [339] - Quote

Originally by: krystal eyes
Edited by: krystal eyes on 07/02/2007 12:26:15
29 Jun 2005, Thryr Merim registered with RKK [BoB] with the e-mail address vincent@ccpgames.com

He rejoined as Ishos on Tue Dec 13, 2005 3:03 pm

Quote:

Pilot: Ishos Rerajan (main / RKK)
Specialisation: Amarr
Licenced: Amarr BS, Amarr BC, Amarr Command Ships, Amarr Interdictors, Amarr Cloakers, Amarr HAC, Amarr Interceptors
Notes: Maxed out Armored Warfare + Command ships + mindlink

Pilot: Thryr Merim (main / RKK)
Specialisation: Caldari
Licenced: Caldari BS, Caldari BC, Caldari Interdictors, Caldari HAC, Caldari Freighters, Caldari Transport Ships, Caldari Interceptors
Notes: Maxed Out Missile Operation Skills



The below posted on RKK internal forum: Thryr Merim announces he is a dev:
(re. conversation about anew killboard)
Quote:
Originally posted by:haze


I have thought about this a lot and not been able to come up with any solution.

Its the same problem with the game lots, as CCP dont do any kind of auth on the logs there is no way to authenticat them.

A simple md5 like hash on each log/killmail would be a nice and simple way for ccp to auth the logs, would make pettitions a lot dam simpler as well.

as it stands though I guess we are just going to have to deal with it the best we can.


Originally Posted by Thryr Merim
the system as it is today is a bit obsolete, it's a generated text and the logs only store the one that did most damage as a killer ... we've got plans to store everything in the logs ... more on that later ... low priority atm




Now if you search for vincent@ccpgames.com you find posts on french forums as t20.



t20 was Ishos
t20 was in charge of RKK Capital Ship Command
t20 when forced to leave RKK, left 10 T2 BPO behind him.
t20 witness all the RKK EULA abuse, char resale, etc. (alleged)
t20 is really close to Oveur and they are often seen together on Sisi in local.



Oh my.

I hope CCP seriously change their ways or this could really affect their actual business (journalists getting involved).
<3
Sinlare
Sinlare
Gallente
Sinlare Auditorium

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 12:55:00 - [340] - Quote

Edited by: Sinlare on 07/02/2007 12:52:35
Originally by: Harpr Shodokai


Oh my.

I hope CCP seriously change their ways or this could really affect their actual business (journalists getting involved).


Noooo not the journalists! OMGRUNFORTEHHILLS~!!111

If you threaten someone make it less obvious ;)
James Snowscoran
James Snowscoran
Coreli Corporation
Corelum Syndicate

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 13:05:00 - [341] - Quote

Would be nice with a more comprehensive explanation providing more details and leaving less room for speculation.

Apart from that, barring a few select posters the quality of EVE-O posting has dropped to an all-new low. It remains a mystery to me why modding policies allow this to occur while they insist on cracking down hard on minor oversights and profanity.
-----

Danny Hawk
Danny Hawk
Black Lance
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 13:05:00 - [342] - Quote

this is already news on other mmorg sites, they need to sort this yesturday
Zzleeper
Zzleeper
Amarr
levisomnus spectatrix

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 13:05:00 - [343] - Quote

Originally by: Sinlare
Edited by: Sinlare on 07/02/2007 12:52:35
Originally by: Harpr Shodokai


Oh my.

I hope CCP seriously change their ways or this could really affect their actual business (journalists getting involved).


Noooo not the journalists! OMGRUNFORTEHHILLS~!!111

If you threaten someone make it less obvious ;)


haha "threaten someone make it less obvious"

what like this threat?

Just an extract from an earlier dev post on these eve information portal (Dec 2006)

Originally by: CCP t20
(I hope for your sake it's an accidental figuring-out of, otherwise if you're actively hunting dev identities, i can only speak for myself, but you'd be on my alts' sh*tlist till the day I die ... )





The last part,"i can only speak for myself, but you'd be on my alts' sh*tlist till the day I die"

nice threat by a CCP Developer, dont you think?

BTW.. i like the pic, BOB mentality ugh

Cheaters never prosper!
Captain Thunk
Captain Thunk
Explode. Now. Please.

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 13:09:00 - [344] - Quote

I can't find any google match for "vincent@ccpgames.com"

But if those conversations are legitimate then it underscores the point. Devs are supposed to keep their identity secret, not just secret from the general public. It highlights the on tap info that people think is giving BoB the edge, particularly when the server is understrain and BoB seem to know how to act best to alleviate for themselves.

All alliances may have devs in them, but how many of those devs are incharge of the capital fleet? If I had my personal dev I'd put him in charge of the capitals too - can't think of safer hands to be honest.

CAPTAIN THUNK

If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find them, maybe you can hire...The ENP-Team.
Liet Traep
Liet Traep
Minmatar
Black Lance
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 13:11:00 - [345] - Quote

Originally by: Harpr Shodokai



I hope CCP seriously change their ways or this could really affect their actual business (journalists getting involved).
At this point i'm half hoping that journalist do get involved. I'm not sure i trust CCP to do an honest job of this without someone holding their feet to the fire.
Ifni
Ifni
Developmental Neogenics Amalgamated

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 13:12:00 - [346] - Quote

Originally by: kieron
Areas of investigation include, but are not limited to: messaging history, financial and transactional history, combat and corporation logs, item and cash transfers and IP logs.

For those wanting to know whether the BPO's were gathered legitimately or otherwise, reread the above quote.

For a character to give an item to someone else an item transfer would be conducted through a trade window (transactional history). If you drop it into a hangar, it would be in the corporation logs, and if you leave it in a tin in space for someone else to loot that would also come under a transaction log.

Since the BPO's were part of the original accusation, I'm sure they were examined in the course of the investigation.

It sickens me to see so many people harping on about them; get off your high horses and realise that in your quest for "justice" and "truth" you've successfully destroyed the ingame lives of some of the people that work to improve the game that you're all addicted to. I hope you're pleased with yourselves.


You take what is offered. And that must sometimes be enough.
Ather Ialeas
Ather Ialeas
Amarr
Karjala Inc.
Imperial Republic Of the North

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 13:14:00 - [347] - Quote

Edited by: Ather Ialeas on 07/02/2007 13:10:36
Originally by: Captain Thunk
I can't find any google match for "vincent@ccpgames.com"

But if those conversations are legitimate then it underscores the point. Devs are supposed to keep their identity secret, not just secret from the general public. It highlights the on tap info that people think is giving BoB the edge, particularly when the server is understrain and BoB seem to know how to act best to alleviate for themselves.

All alliances may have devs in them, but how many of those devs are incharge of the capital fleet? If I had my personal dev I'd put him in charge of the capitals too - can't think of safer hands to be honest.

CAPTAIN THUNK


I tried another method; http://staff.ccpgames.com/vincent/ Says "t20" in several places there.
---
Mandatory disclaimer: These are my thoughts, not my corps/alliances.
---



bioqaz eylee
bioqaz eylee
Amarr
LifeLine Solutions

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 13:15:00 - [348] - Quote

Edited by: bioqaz eylee on 07/02/2007 13:13:05
Originally by: Captain Thunk
I can't find any google match for "vincent@ccpgames.com"

But if those conversations are legitimate then it underscores the point. Devs are supposed to keep their identity secret, not just secret from the general public. It highlights the on tap info that people think is giving BoB the edge, particularly when the server is understrain and BoB seem to know how to act best to alleviate for themselves.

All alliances may have devs in them, but how many of those devs are incharge of the capital fleet? If I had my personal dev I'd put him in charge of the capitals too - can't think of safer hands to be honest.

CAPTAIN THUNK


try searching without the .com, i see one link on a french site. but not lots Confused
UKM Thorgrim
UKM Thorgrim
Caldari
Black Lance
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 13:18:00 - [349] - Quote

Originally by: Ifni
Originally by: kieron
Areas of investigation include, but are not limited to: messaging history, financial and transactional history, combat and corporation logs, item and cash transfers and IP logs.

For those wanting to know whether the BPO's were gathered legitimately or otherwise, reread the above quote.

For a character to give an item to someone else an item transfer would be conducted through a trade window (transactional history). If you drop it into a hangar, it would be in the corporation logs, and if you leave it in a tin in space for someone else to loot that would also come under a transaction log.

Since the BPO's were part of the original accusation, I'm sure they were examined in the course of the investigation.

It sickens me to see so many people harping on about them; get off your high horses and realise that in your quest for "justice" and "truth" you've successfully destroyed the ingame lives of some of the people that work to improve the game that you're all addicted to. I hope you're pleased with yourselves.



MMMMM not that a DEV or a GM could change the logs in anyway form or manner..

SORRY But it now comes down to Not what who or Where but how long left till the GAME Dies..


Honour & Steel.
Sinlare
Sinlare
Gallente
Sinlare Auditorium

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 13:21:00 - [350] - Quote

Edited by: Sinlare on 07/02/2007 13:18:58
Originally by: UKM Thorgrim

MMMMM not that a DEV or a GM could change the logs in anyway form or manner..

SORRY But it now comes down to Not what who or Where but how long left till the GAME Dies..


You have a seriously skewed sense of reality. Just wait until Kieron makes an update and hopefully he will give us a Yes or No on the allegations.
Frogzuk
Frogzuk
Dragonian Freelancers
Curse Alliance

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 13:22:00 - [351] - Quote

TBH the whole thing is a joke.

Sounding like a 'kangaroo court' of sorts

CCP will lose a fair percentage of the player base over this issue. The point is this, whilst any alliance has a dev/gm within the ranks there is always going to be a area of concern regarding 'fairness' across the board. And any confidence/reassurance to the paying consumer who pay to play a transparent, fair and balanced game has been thrown out of the window.

I wonder if the boot had been on the other foot would bob sit quietly as a result of the response from K & CCP - i doubt it tbh.

I suggest that any alliance who received things as a result of gm/dev wrong doing should be penalized - e.g. have bpos taken away. Any character in game caught in the involvement of these matters should receive perma bans.

None of this slap on the wrist stuff, it sends out the wrong message to the community, it would also be useful to actually notify us the paying customer that X person / X alliance has had x removed or has had character x perma banned as a result of x investigation. You get to read about investigations in the tabloids, see it in the news why shouldn't the same apply to EVE ? I bet this would restore a hell a lot of confidence in the paying customer. This should also apply to those using exploits in game x alliance/player has been warned re use of x exploit. Future use of x exploit will result in perma ban across all of the eve community.

Thats my 2 cents, i will continue to play eve albeit not with the same confidence as before, but i will watch closely on any developments - i will cancel my account if CCP dont do something to address the real issues and answer the questions and implement the punishments accordingly where due.

Froggy

p.s. sad day for eve Sad





spurious signal
spurious signal
Caldari
Brainiacs

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 13:23:00 - [352] - Quote

Since I first read about these allegations I've found myself with no desire to play EVE any more. I've been logging on to change skills but that's it.

This response from Kieron hasn't changed that. EVE feels pointless to me now. I can't see the point in playing when I feel that people like BoB are always going to get all the goodies. T2BPOs in the lotteries, rigged events that give them motherships, whatever.

This response smacks of coverup and does nothing to make me want to play any more.

Bye.

Shadowsword
Shadowsword
COLSUP
Tau Ceti Federation

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 13:24:00 - [353] - Quote

Originally by: Danny Hawk
this is already news on other mmorg sites, they need to sort this yesturday


Link?
------------------------------------------
Every ship has a base 60-70% resist against the primary damage type of the race that is the least able to vary it's damage types.
Evil Thug
Evil Thug
Rage and Terror
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 13:25:00 - [354] - Quote

Not enough.

Betonela
Betonela
Caldari
School of Applied Knowledge

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 13:27:00 - [355] - Quote

Originally by: Shadowsword
Originally by: Danny Hawk
this is already news on other mmorg sites, they need to sort this yesturday


Link?

Linkage

---------
join on New Movement of Market Traders
Luna Liandri
Luna Liandri
PPN United
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 13:28:00 - [356] - Quote

Originally by: Ifni
It sickens me to see so many people harping on about them; get off your high horses and realise that in your quest for "justice" and "truth" you've successfully destroyed the ingame lives of some of the people that work to improve the game that you're all addicted to. I hope you're pleased with yourselves.

i cant hear it anymore !!!

the "paying customers" want open investigations and demand the proof of a level playfield and get - nothing.
and some guys tell me that i have to care about "ingame lives" of devs on my payroll ?
just put on your customer-boots and forget for a second that you know that guy and that other guy personally !
is it so hard to see the non-dev-friend-but-just-ordinary-customer perspective ?

sure i like(ed) what they've created - i wouldnt post here if not.
sure i like them to have fun at work as this will improve my experience.
sure i like them to know about the game as it helps developing.

still, the game must be fair and now there are reasons for doubt.

CCP has to go forward and play open information politics - its the only way to sort this mess !
Apocryphai
Apocryphai
Caldari

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 13:34:00 - [357] - Quote

Originally by: Ather Ialeas
I tried another method; http://staff.ccpgames.com/vincent/ Says "t20" in several places there.


So all those months we went without working character portraits because t20 was too busy playing with BoB and his illegal T2BPOs?

Says it all really.

Welcome to BoB-Online.



Originally by: Victor Valka
What the skull-chick said.
Astasia Orian
Astasia Orian
Black Eclipse Corp
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 13:36:00 - [358] - Quote

Can I have your stuff (all of you)?
Semtex'o
Semtex'o
Minmatar
eXceed Inc.
INVICTUS.

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 13:37:00 - [359] - Quote

Too many questions remain unanswered.
Like others I am also not that pleased with kieron's statement.

Madelchai
Madelchai
Clandestine Vector
Freelancer Alliance

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 13:38:00 - [360] - Quote

All I know is, I've already fashioned a tin foil hat from a Minmatar ship after reading this thread.
Ifni
Ifni
Developmental Neogenics Amalgamated

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 13:38:00 - [361] - Quote

Edited by: Ifni on 07/02/2007 13:35:52
Originally by: spurious signal
...I feel that people like BoB are always going to get all the goodies. T2BPOs in the lotteries, rigged events that give them motherships, whatever.

FYI, that wasn't BOB, supposedly. But its nice to see Chinese whispers at work.


You take what is offered. And that must sometimes be enough.
SNeAkYbRiT
SNeAkYbRiT
Black Lance
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 13:40:00 - [362] - Quote

Originally by: Astasia Orian
Can I have your stuff (all of you)?


Just ask a DEV for anything u want, u dont need our stuff
31i73
31i73
BGG

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 13:41:00 - [363] - Quote

Originally by: Ifni
Edited by: Ifni on 07/02/2007 13:35:52
Originally by: spurious signal
...I feel that people like BoB are always going to get all the goodies. T2BPOs in the lotteries, rigged events that give them motherships, whatever.

FYI, that wasn't BOB, supposedly. But its nice to see Chinese whispers at work.


well, actually, there was one yesterday Laughing Sister of eve or something, and just happened to go right were bob were.

Shin Ra
Shin Ra
BURN EDEN
GoonSwarm

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 13:41:00 - [364] - Quote

Originally by: Ifni

For those wanting to know whether the BPO's were gathered legitimately or otherwise, reread the above quote.

For a character to give an item to someone else an item transfer would be conducted through a trade window (transactional history). If you drop it into a hangar, it would be in the corporation logs, and if you leave it in a tin in space for someone else to loot that would also come under a transaction log.

Since the BPO's were part of the original accusation, I'm sure they were examined in the course of the investigation.

It sickens me to see so many people harping on about them; get off your high horses and realise that in your quest for "justice" and "truth" you've successfully destroyed the ingame lives of some of the people that work to improve the game that you're all addicted to. I hope you're pleased with yourselves.


The "GMs spawned t2 bpos" was never likely to be true. There was never any evidence that it happened. The accusations spawned as a result of chinese whispers.

The accusation that the GM/DEV/whatever gave his legit t2 bpos to RKK when he deleted/renamed his char was not answered.

So get off the horse.
Ifni
Ifni
Developmental Neogenics Amalgamated

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 13:43:00 - [365] - Quote

Originally by: Shin Ra
Originally by: Ifni

For those wanting to know whether the BPO's were gathered legitimately or otherwise, reread the above quote.

For a character to give an item to someone else an item transfer would be conducted through a trade window (transactional history). If you drop it into a hangar, it would be in the corporation logs, and if you leave it in a tin in space for someone else to loot that would also come under a transaction log.

Since the BPO's were part of the original accusation, I'm sure they were examined in the course of the investigation.

It sickens me to see so many people harping on about them; get off your high horses and realise that in your quest for "justice" and "truth" you've successfully destroyed the ingame lives of some of the people that work to improve the game that you're all addicted to. I hope you're pleased with yourselves.


The "GMs spawned t2 bpos" was never likely to be true. There was never any evidence that it happened. The accusations spawned as a result of chinese whispers.

The accusation that the GM/DEV/whatever gave his legit t2 bpos to RKK when he deleted/renamed his char was not answered.

So get off the horse.

If they're legit, what does it matter?


You take what is offered. And that must sometimes be enough.
spurious signal
spurious signal
Caldari
Brainiacs

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 13:44:00 - [366] - Quote

Originally by: Ifni
Originally by: spurious signal
...I feel that people like BoB are always going to get all the goodies. T2BPOs in the lotteries, rigged events that give them motherships, whatever.

FYI, that wasn't BOB. But its nice to see Chinese whispers at work.


Well, given that Kugutsumens blog is now private and that nobody is able to discuss the specifics on the EVE forums without getting moderated is it any wonder that the information flow isn't clean & clear?

What I'd been told was that it was RKK who had the T2 BPOs given to them by a dev. RKK are part of BoB yes? If it wasn't RKK then who was it? I don't want to be misinformed but with such limited access to information those of us who aren't in big alliances are left scratching around for the truth.

Shin Ra
Shin Ra
BURN EDEN
GoonSwarm

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 13:46:00 - [367] - Quote

Also, to those of you unaware, BOB in no way benefitted from any alleged rigged events.

The story here related to an event held in Curse in which players were required to bring around 4-5 freighter loads worth of various items to a station in that region. The winning team, who recieved a Hel mothership for their troubles, allegedly only needed one freighter to transport all these goods, or so the story goes. Around that time, Nebulai, leader of Aurora was talking about some ISD Aurora member leaking information about an unspecified event that took "6 months of planning". Whether these are related or someone just put 2+3 together and came up with 4 is another story, but it was not BOB that were involed.
Sadao
Sadao
Minmatar
Delictum 23216

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 13:49:00 - [368] - Quote

Seriously CCPShockedConfusedSadCrying or Very sadEmbarassedRolling EyesEvil or Very Mad

All of the above

Masochistic Cannibal
Masochistic Cannibal
Amarr
The Ring of Fire

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 13:52:00 - [369] - Quote

Originally by: spurious signal
Originally by: Ifni
Originally by: spurious signal
...I feel that people like BoB are always going to get all the goodies. T2BPOs in the lotteries, rigged events that give them motherships, whatever.

FYI, that wasn't BOB. But its nice to see Chinese whispers at work.


Well, given that Kugutsumens blog is now private and that nobody is able to discuss the specifics on the EVE forums without getting moderated is it any wonder that the information flow isn't clean & clear?

What I'd been told was that it was RKK who had the T2 BPOs given to them by a dev. RKK are part of BoB yes? If it wasn't RKK then who was it? I don't want to be misinformed but with such limited access to information those of us who aren't in big alliances are left scratching around for the truth.


The accusations regarding that Event where not aimed at BoB, It was another alliance that mysteriously knew to move thier ships and equipment to a certain area before the event even took place. I cant remember which alliance and I cant be bothered to check Very Happy But it wasn't BoB!

And you can still view Mr K's site you just need to have registered an account (at your own risk) before registrations where suspended which he did at CCP's request.

I still want to know as we know KNOW that T20 was in BoB why was account sharing and violations of the EULA ignored/swept under the mat ? Guesse we will never know, this will turn into the RA complex issue all over again. CCP will release a load of bullocks such as "we banned 2000 accounts last month"

Ie a vague comment open to interpritation. Where 2000 RA members banned ?

Or where 2000 Ebay spamming trial accounts / macro miners etc banned in that month.... oh I wonder Rolling EyesWink







I eat babies ! [Hauling services available~ Contact ingame]
Br0wn 0ps
Br0wn 0ps

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 13:53:00 - [370] - Quote

Originally by: Merciless1

I'm speculating here, but there's no way that I'm aware of that would allow sombody to find out who a dev is unless the the dev did somthing stupid like tell sombody or use thier "dev magic" to the point where it became obvious or suspicious. If thier behaving as they should then they should just blend in with the rest of us mere mortals.


I'm guessing that it would be easy enough if a dev logged onto a corp/alliance forum from the office, and an underhanded forum admin looked up the IP addresses of everyone to see which ones belonged to CCP...or if you had ever heard a dev speak, and then heard him on TS/Vent
Dianabolic
Dianabolic
Reikoku
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 13:53:00 - [371] - Quote

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Sign up to your local witch hunta >>>>>>>>>>>> THATTAWAY!!!

:D

Must make a new sig now, laughing my sweet ass off at all of you haters.

muahahahahahahahaha
Quote:
2006.12.18 23:46:04 Notify Phoenix belonging to nOrAb self-destructs.
Travis Raven
Travis Raven

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 13:53:00 - [372] - Quote

By Christ you lot, listen to yourselves - this is a GAME!

You realise that you pay thousands in taxes to governments that $*&% you over day in, day out, don't you? If you put half as much effort into moaning about them as you do moaning about this game then democracy might not be as wholly screwed up as it's become.

Shin Ra
Shin Ra
BURN EDEN
GoonSwarm

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 13:54:00 - [373] - Quote

Originally by: Ifni
Originally by: Shin Ra
Originally by: Ifni

For those wanting to know whether the BPO's were gathered legitimately or otherwise, reread the above quote.

For a character to give an item to someone else an item transfer would be conducted through a trade window (transactional history). If you drop it into a hangar, it would be in the corporation logs, and if you leave it in a tin in space for someone else to loot that would also come under a transaction log.

Since the BPO's were part of the original accusation, I'm sure they were examined in the course of the investigation.

It sickens me to see so many people harping on about them; get off your high horses and realise that in your quest for "justice" and "truth" you've successfully destroyed the ingame lives of some of the people that work to improve the game that you're all addicted to. I hope you're pleased with yourselves.


The "GMs spawned t2 bpos" was never likely to be true. There was never any evidence that it happened. The accusations spawned as a result of chinese whispers.

The accusation that the GM/DEV/whatever gave his legit t2 bpos to RKK when he deleted/renamed his char was not answered.

So get off the horse.

If they're legit, what does it matter?


Its a grey area. AFAIK there are no rules regarding the specifics of such an occurance. You or I might not care, but plenty of people do. There are various ways to look at it. For example, lets say Khatred was a dev in burn eden. He gets caught and leaves us 1 trillion isk worth of t2 bpos. We then buy 10 titans. Fair? Not really. The case with BOB is clearly on a much lower scale but its arguable that the same principal could apply.
Masochistic Cannibal
Masochistic Cannibal
Amarr
The Ring of Fire

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 13:54:00 - [374] - Quote

Edited by: Masochistic Cannibal on 07/02/2007 13:51:22
Originally by: Dianabolic
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Sign up to your local witch hunta >>>>>>>>>>>> THATTAWAY!!!

:D

Must make a new sig now, laughing my sweet ass off at all of you haters.

muahahahahahahahaha


<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< THAT WAY TO THE SPECIAL BUS!

Dont dribble on the seats Rolling Eyes

Cannibal


I eat babies ! [Hauling services available~ Contact ingame]
Phoenix Pryde
Phoenix Pryde
Caldari
Infinite Improbability Inc
Dusk and Dawn

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 13:59:00 - [375] - Quote

LOL @ all these dimwitted BoB haters and other slightly biased folk ...

The one issue were most of you guys cling on is that some Char who was seemingly played by a dev handed his BPOs to his former corp before leaving. If anybody would try to look objectively at that he d know that having 10 BPOs (even gaining them from lottery) is by far no single event, i know plenty of people to who that applies. If one reads Kieron's statement one sees that everything is logged and can be checked upon.

Naturally, if one isnt interested in truth or fact, but simply cares about making somebody (BoB seems to be the target of choice here) look bad then this a perfect opportunity for one hell of a flamefest, isnt it ? :P


Who in his right mind trying to be somewhat objective and using his brain could not assume that CCP as a rather serious company, and by now also not so small anymore, has the measures and means to prevent and/or verify any misconduct.


The sheer biased-ness and hypocricy of many posters is quite obvious and anything but productive. You guys only ruin your own gameplay if you actually start to believe what you write.


The statement isnt all-encompassing nor giving too many details. Quite right. But thats not needed. One has the choice to actually read it and take it as it is. Or to ignore it a ramble about what one would have liked to see. From what i read here most ppl's choice was the latter. I for one am content with it ugh


I guess i might be called a BoB alt now, but well, i ve been called a G alt before too, and i can assure you neither is true :P


TRUST Shop // Infinite Improbability Inc [3-I]
Callistus
Callistus
Gallente
Coreli Corporation
Corelum Syndicate

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 14:01:00 - [376] - Quote

Originally by: Apocryphai
http://staff.ccpgames.com/vincent/ Says "t20" in several places there.

Hmm when I first clicked that link it just showed a white page with the CCP logo and the words "Under Construction"

Then it showed a big poster for an old film called "Clue". Beneath it was written in small print "Get one." (lol btwLaughing)

Now its just a black page with an exclamation mark. Neutral
--------------

[Coreli Corporation Mainfrane]
Bertram Russel
Bertram Russel

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 14:01:00 - [377] - Quote

Originally by: Madelchai
Can I have your stuff (all of you)?
quote]

Why? You guys don't seem to need it. Ask a dev for some if your in need YARRRR!!
Rod Blaine
Rod Blaine
Evolution
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 14:01:00 - [378] - Quote

Shin Ra.

I'd look at this (bpo) issue from the following viewpoint:

Would things have been any different if the character in question had been a regular normal non-dev guy ?

Answer in this case: most likely not, it's fairly customary within certain BoB corps that t2 bpo's end up corp property, especially when people quit or take breaks.

So, assuming ths guy in question would have been any regular trusted longtime member, things would have ended up the same, hence I see no issue.

People that distuinguish dev-owned player chars from paying cutomer chars and assert that only the latter should be allowed to own tech2 bpo's need to scratch themselves behind their ears and wonder if that would then need to go for being allowed to run 10/10 complexes, own outposts, motherships or titans, be ceo or director or whatever else we have in Eve that is available in limited quantity and thus can only exist in so and so large numbers.

Honestly, that's going way too far, and as Kieron stated CCP are not about to stop their devs from playing or limiting what they can do. So ...


Old blog
Originally by: Vriezuh
Naz: John is a realist
Wodanonline
Wodanonline
Pringles Inc.
YouWhat

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 14:02:00 - [379] - Quote

Ban them and end their relations to their in game friends/relations because their identity as a ccp employee is discovered?
Because they abused their position thats why they got discovered.

how about fire them since they abused their position as dev or gm or whoever got that access to "help" their ingame relations ?
such a person cant REALLY like this game if he has to do such stuff.

And it has a great impact to the ppl who DO like this game and pay MONEY for this game.

grtz
Fubear
Fubear
Vogon Heavy Industries

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 14:04:00 - [380] - Quote

Originally by: Shin Ra
For example, lets say Khatred was a dev in burn eden. He gets caught and leaves us 1 trillion isk worth of t2 bpos. We then buy 10 titans. Fair? Not really. The case with BOB is clearly on a much lower scale but its arguable that the same principal could apply.


If Khatred obtained the T2 BPO's fairly through the lottery or market as any other player can, then yes it would be completely fair.
Hoshi
Hoshi
Blackguard Brigade

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 14:04:00 - [381] - Quote

Originally by: Rod Blaine

Quote:

- Did BoB know they were devs?


Not relevant. A good ethical player that finds out about the player identity of a dev shuts the **** up and lets the dev get one with his gameplay. Yes it creates an awkward situation because you don't want a dev to be put in a position where his interests collide. It's when the retards get hold of dev identities and use it to further their omgh4x crusades that things start stinking and characters get deleted. Serves noone.


This not irrelevant, it's the only really relevant thing in this case. The rules for Dev chars exist because players can not be expected to be good and ethical. And if the the logs posted are true the RKK leadership have not been good and ethical as they have passed on the knowledge of who these devs are among them selfs.

If one RKK member found out who was a dev and kept it to himself this would never have happened but the member that found these devs where not ethical enough to do so and spread the knowledge to others in RKK and so here we are.
----------------------------------------
A Guide to Scan Probing in Revelations
Auman
Auman
Black Nova Corp
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 14:05:00 - [382] - Quote

Presumerbly all the Black Lance members going mental over the last few pages have cancelled their subscriptions? I mean you'd have to have zero morals to continue playing if you truly believed these allegations and that a cover up was going on...

Dianabolic
Dianabolic
Reikoku
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 14:05:00 - [383] - Quote

Originally by: Hoshi
If one RKK member found out who was a dev and kept it to himself this would never have happened but the member that found these devs where not ethical enough to do so and spread the knowledge to others in RKK and so here we are.


Actually, it would still have happened, as much of the supposed correspondence was between the accused dev characters and non-dev characters, so your point is moot, and rod is right - it's irrelevant.
Quote:
2006.12.18 23:46:04 Notify Phoenix belonging to nOrAb self-destructs.
Br0wn 0ps
Br0wn 0ps

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 14:06:00 - [384] - Quote

Originally by: Kyoko Achura
Not fired over this and that alliance still keeps all the t2 bpo's and all the isk made off this.... This is a great game, but its run like crap, I am canceling all my accounts and taking my 90 bucks a month to a different game that is Fair to all its player base.


Can I have your stuff?
bioqaz eylee
bioqaz eylee
Amarr
LifeLine Solutions

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 14:07:00 - [385] - Quote

Originally by: Callistus
Originally by: Apocryphai
http://staff.ccpgames.com/vincent/ Says "t20" in several places there.

Hmm when I first clicked that link it just showed a white page with the CCP logo and the words "Under Construction"

Then it showed a big poster for an old film called "Clue". Beneath it was written in small print "Get one." (lol btwLaughing)

Now its just a black page with an exclamation mark. Neutral


when i looked, when it was first posted, it was a blog that just had a link to someone's bf2 score card. hehe they edited that quickly.
Shin Ra
Shin Ra
BURN EDEN
GoonSwarm

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 14:09:00 - [386] - Quote

Originally by: Rod Blaine
Shin Ra.

I'd look at this (bpo) issue from the following viewpoint:

Would things have been any different if the character in question had been a regular normal non-dev guy ?

Answer in this case: most likely not, it's fairly customary within certain BoB corps that t2 bpo's end up corp property, especially when people quit or take breaks.

So, assuming ths guy in question would have been any regular trusted longtime member, things would have ended up the same, hence I see no issue.

People that distuinguish dev-owned player chars from paying cutomer chars and assert that only the latter should be allowed to own tech2 bpo's need to scratch themselves behind their ears and wonder if that would then need to go for being allowed to run 10/10 complexes, own outposts, motherships or titans, be ceo or director or whatever else we have in Eve that is available in limited quantity and thus can only exist in so and so large numbers.

Honestly, that's going way too far, and as Kieron stated CCP are not about to stop their devs from playing or limiting what they can do. So ...



Your assesment depends on knowing whether or not RKK got 100% of the bpo profits beforehands? If the dev kept some of the profits for himself to buy stuff or whatever, then RKK would still not be recieveing 100% of the bpo profits, as I assume they are doing now. So no, in that sense things are not equal. Of course, you can add things like if we had another pilot here we would have done xyz, but thats apples and oranges.
Rod Blaine
Rod Blaine
Evolution
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 14:10:00 - [387] - Quote

"others", if it happened at all btw, consists of maybe 3 people in this case. I don't think it happened at all tbh, but even if, that's the extent of it right there.

If RKK keeping that info to themselves shows anything, it is that they, as opposed to alot of people, can actually be considerate and ethical enough to stfu about it. Why, what a surprise, thought they were all cheating lying lowlifes...


Old blog
Originally by: Vriezuh
Naz: John is a realist
Tomic
Tomic
Gekidoku
Koroshiya Buntai

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 14:10:00 - [388] - Quote

Originally by: Dianabolic
Actually, it would still have happened, as much of the supposed correspondence was between the accused dev characters and non-dev characters, so your point is moot, and rod is right - it's irrelevant.


Keep digging guys :)
Betonela
Betonela
Caldari
School of Applied Knowledge

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 14:12:00 - [389] - Quote

Originally by: bioqaz eylee
Originally by: Callistus
Originally by: Apocryphai
http://staff.ccpgames.com/vincent/ Says "t20" in several places there.

Hmm when I first clicked that link it just showed a white page with the CCP logo and the words "Under Construction"

Then it showed a big poster for an old film called "Clue". Beneath it was written in small print "Get one." (lol btwLaughing)

Now its just a black page with an exclamation mark. Neutral


when i looked, when it was first posted, it was a blog that just had a link to someone's bf2 score card. hehe they edited that quickly.




saved this http://bf2s.com/player/43339543/

---------
join on New Movement of Market Traders
Rod Blaine
Rod Blaine
Evolution
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 14:12:00 - [390] - Quote

Edited by: Rod Blaine on 07/02/2007 14:10:18
Shin Ra, RKK are alot like Evol, they're maybe not as extreme as we are with our 100% corptax, but they're definately in the "filthy commie" category. So my guess would be that your question would be answered affirmatively.


Old blog
Originally by: Vriezuh
Naz: John is a realist
R'adeh
R'adeh
Gallente
Gekidoku
Koroshiya Buntai

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 14:13:00 - [391] - Quote

Edited by: R''adeh on 07/02/2007 14:09:24
Disappointing Confused
_______________________________________________



My views are my own and I don't represent my corp.
Tomic
Tomic
Gekidoku
Koroshiya Buntai

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 14:14:00 - [392] - Quote

Originally by: Rod Blaine
If RKK keeping that info to themselves shows anything, it is that they, as opposed to alot of people, can actually be considerate and ethical enough to stfu about it. Why, what a surprise, thought they were all cheating lying lowlifes...



Or they knew having a dev in their corp was a major advantage and giving that info out would remove that advantage and they decided they enjoyed having the advantage.
Kristanna
Kristanna

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 14:15:00 - [393] - Quote

Originally by: Ather Ialeas
To say what I think as simply as I can: Not enough.


Signed
Pellaeon DuGalle
Pellaeon DuGalle
Caldari
Deep Black Industries

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 14:15:00 - [394] - Quote

Edited by: Pellaeon DuGalle on 07/02/2007 14:12:28
Shocked I blink and we're up to 12 pages already.

Personally I wish that if T2 BPOs were not spawned by a Dev, then they would spawn a couple more ASAP. More BPOs will hopefully mean cheaper goods, and even better, one day one of those BPOs will end up in *my* hands. Yum. Wink

edit: grammar




-------------------
"There is one rule for the industrialist and that is: Make the best quality of goods possible at the lowest cost possible, paying the highest wages possible."
Kcel Chim
Kcel Chim
Caldari
Arcane Technologies
The Five

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 14:15:00 - [395] - Quote

Originally by: Shin Ra


Your assesment depends on knowing whether or not RKK got 100% of the bpo profits beforehands? If the dev kept some of the profits for himself to buy stuff or whatever, then RKK would still not be recieveing 100% of the bpo profits, as I assume they are doing now. So no, in that sense things are not equal. Of course, you can add things like if we had another pilot here we would have done xyz, but thats apples and oranges.


Its not unlikely that a guy who spends x months in an alliance donates his stuff to them if he knows he has to leave and will never return.

It doesnt matter if its t2 prints like in this case or just ships, mods, chars or other possessions.
If i would leave the game and know i would never return why would i care what happens to my stuff, best give it to the close friends and m8s.

So if the bpos, like you argued above, are legit its also legit to threat them like regular bpos of a quitting customer. Especially since a dev player account is in no way different from a regular player account when it comes to terms of iskies, lootchances, r&d or clientfunctions.
SNeAkYbRiT
SNeAkYbRiT
Black Lance
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 14:18:00 - [396] - Quote

Originally by: Auman
Presumerbly all the Black Lance members going mental over the last few pages have cancelled their subscriptions? I mean you'd have to have zero morals to continue playing if you truly believed these allegations and that a cover up was going on...



U said morals LMAO a BoB said morals that *****s me up...so u would like us all to cancel out subscriptions??? who would pay your wages??? cheating isnt enough for u so u want everyone to quit so u can say we won? is that it? u make me laugh.
Gandolf
Gandolf
Gallente
Black Omega Security
Curse Alliance

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 14:18:00 - [397] - Quote

the statment was poor in my opinion and asking for this witch hunt of a thread it has turned out to be i would have prefered to wait longer for a better responce from CCP
Susan Acid
Susan Acid
Gallente

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 14:21:00 - [398] - Quote

I genuinely feel sorry for the Dev/GM involved but most of the questions raised by Kugu seem to have been sidestepped.Allegations were made against an Alliance and a Dev/GM.The only thing CCP seem to have investigated or commented on is the Dev/GM.They have not adressed the issues brought up by Kugu.
I'm sure that all the Bob members would have preferred a statement absolving them of any wrong doing but CCP never supplied it.The OP does not say that there was no wrong doing by the Dev/GM only that he lost his char because his account was disclosed(which is standard practice)For the sake of the community CCP need to say "Nobody broke the EULA and nobody gained an advantage".
Until they do this will hang around Bobs neck until the servers close.Which imo is unfair to them.
Juan Andalusian
Juan Andalusian
TAOSP
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 14:21:00 - [399] - Quote

Originally by: Shin Ra
Its a grey area. AFAIK there are no rules regarding the specifics of such an occurance. You or I might not care, but plenty of people do. There are various ways to look at it. For example, lets say Khatred was a dev in burn eden. He gets caught and leaves us 1 trillion isk worth of t2 bpos. We then buy 10 titans. Fair? Not really. The case with BOB is clearly on a much lower scale but its arguable that the same principal could apply.


Not quite.

To carry on with your example:

You mean all this time from the point Khatred joined BE to the point he was exposed as a dev, since caught would imply he did something wrong, that BE wouldnt have benefited from his bpos?

Well maybe in your corp members dont help each other in any way, but what if it was a commie corp? would it matter? The corp or alliance would have benefited from that trilion isk either way wether the dev identity had been compromised or not.

The issues are the legality of the isk and assets, which you yourself didnt doubt, and the question of whether the corp or alliance benefited exclusively from communication with the dev which Kieron's reply didnt clarify much unfortunately.

**Pain is meant to be felt**
Stahlregen
Stahlregen
GoonFleet
GoonSwarm

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author employment history View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.02.07 14:22:00 - [