Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Xander Lehman
Asuna Silica Corporation The Serenity Initiative
0
|
Posted - 2015.08.24 19:06:01 -
[1] - Quote
We need these =) it would also open up pirate factions for eventual t2's and etc plus give sub cap tiers a few more choices in ships |
Omnathious Deninard
Novis Initiis
3050
|
Posted - 2015.08.24 19:08:58 -
[2] - Quote
What would they do that is not already covered by existing pirate ships?
Roleplaying Trinkets for Explorers and Collectors
|
ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors Snuffed Out
8532
|
Posted - 2015.08.24 19:18:13 -
[3] - Quote
Because Faction Battlecruisers worked out so well. *eye roll*
Also... Tech 2 Pirate ships are limited to Alliance Tournament prizes... because they are grossly overpowered (even if you brought their bonuses down to "sane levels" they would still be overpowered). Hell... some the current "Tech 1" Pirate ship lineup is kinda on-par with the current "normal" Tech 2 lineup.
How did you Veterans start?
The Skillpoint System and You
|
Frostys Virpio
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
2130
|
Posted - 2015.08.24 21:15:29 -
[4] - Quote
ShahFluffers wrote:Because Faction Battlecruisers worked out so well. *eye roll*
This.
Can we get a use for what we already have before adding more on top of it? |
Celthric Kanerian
Ascendance Of New Eden Workers Trade Federation
409
|
Posted - 2015.08.24 21:17:13 -
[5] - Quote
Xander Lehman wrote:We need these =)
No, we don't. Also you didn't say a single sentence about why we need this. So absolutely no. |
Xackattack Avianson
You are a Pirate
3
|
Posted - 2015.08.24 22:15:53 -
[6] - Quote
I'd be terrified of whatever is between an ashimmu and a bhaalgorn.
Or a cynabal / Machariel hybrid. |
Tiddle Jr
Galvanized Inc.
421
|
Posted - 2015.08.24 22:54:59 -
[7] - Quote
Xander Lehman wrote:We need these =) it would also open up pirate factions for eventual t2's and etc plus give sub cap tiers a few more choices in ships
CAM alt? |
Reaver Glitterstim
Dromedaworks inc Test Alliance Please Ignore
2588
|
Posted - 2015.08.25 00:02:42 -
[8] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:ShahFluffers wrote:Because Faction Battlecruisers worked out so well. *eye roll*
This. Can we get a use for what we already have before adding more on top of it? I see a lot of people flying faction BCs, like me. I don't fly a lot of navy ships, but when I do, I fly navy battlecruiser.
I'd like to see pirate battlecruisers exploring new design philosophies other than the command or large attack style.
Pirate ship Nightmare, can you fathom
Larger but with smaller spikes than Phantasm
The Succubus looks meaner
But the Revenant cleaner
Seems as they get bigger, the smaller spikes they has'm
|
Stitch Kaneland
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
470
|
Posted - 2015.08.25 03:10:52 -
[9] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:ShahFluffers wrote:Because Faction Battlecruisers worked out so well. *eye roll*
This. Can we get a use for what we already have before adding more on top of it?
Rise/Fozzie mentioned BC/BS tweak in the upcoming patch (not Galatea). I also remember them specifically mentioning faction BC's getting tweaks as well. So we can only hope they do something meaningful for the HFI and DNI. I'd like to see the faction ones turned into big destroyers. High tracking/damage bonuses with projection bonus (optimal of falloff). Good for taking out cruisers. Or at least making it difficult to kite around them.
Give Battlecruisers range to fullfil their Anti-Cruiser role
|
Juan Mileghere
Incident Command Spooky Scary Skeletons.
35
|
Posted - 2015.08.25 04:15:55 -
[10] - Quote
ShahFluffers wrote:Because Faction Battlecruisers worked out so well. *eye roll*
Also... Tech 2 Pirate ships are limited to Alliance Tournament prizes... because they are grossly overpowered (even if you brought their bonuses down to "sane levels" they would still be overpowered). Hell... some the current "Tech 1" Pirate ship lineup is kinda on-par with the current "normal" Tech 2 lineup. or T3 lineup even...
Blobbing Explained
|
|
Amarisen Gream
Divine Demise Apocalypse Now.
107
|
Posted - 2015.08.25 06:42:22 -
[11] - Quote
Only thing I could see a purpose behind pirate Destroyers/BCs is this
Finally introduce a boosting dessi that offers they same boosting ability of a T1 BC at like twice the cost due to its higher move-ability. BCs that GǪ nvm. I haven't flown a BC in ages, what do we use them for???
xoxo
Amarisen Gream
|
Vic Jefferson
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
550
|
Posted - 2015.08.25 09:11:32 -
[12] - Quote
Amarisen Gream wrote:Only thing I could see a purpose behind pirate Destroyers/BCs is this
Finally introduce a boosting dessi that offers they same boosting ability of a T1 BC at like twice the cost due to its higher move-ability. BCs that GǪ nvm. I haven't flown a BC in ages, what do we use them for???
Yeah that seems good conceptually...until one realizes this would put another hard working ship class out of work. It's already bad enough that everything worth flying is so small, fast, and cheap, and everything larger strains to find good use in an extreme kiting and speed meta.
Vote Vic Jefferson for CSM X
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |