Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mikhem
Taxisk Unlimited
296
|
Posted - 2015.08.08 15:50:27 -
[1] - Quote
Year or two back CCP showed us plans for new damage model in EVE. I remember seeing pictures where shield and armor damage are shown in completely different way. What happened to these plans? Are they still coming or is this project cancelled?
Mikhem
Link library to EVE music songs.
|
Arla Sarain
589
|
Posted - 2015.08.08 16:14:24 -
[2] - Quote
Mikhem wrote:Year or two back CCP showed us plans for new damage model in EVE. I remember seeing pictures where shield and armor damage are shown in completely different way. What happened to these plans? Are they still coming or is this project cancelled? Please refer and show. |
Lucien Visteen
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
154
|
Posted - 2015.08.08 18:36:42 -
[3] - Quote
Arla Sarain wrote:Mikhem wrote:Year or two back CCP showed us plans for new damage model in EVE. I remember seeing pictures where shield and armor damage are shown in completely different way. What happened to these plans? Are they still coming or is this project cancelled? Please refer and show.
2012 Fanfest. 1h58min mark. I had almost forgotten about this. Atleast this is what I think he is talking about, but it could be something else.
The ships hung in the sky in much the same way that bricks don't.
|
Mikhem
Taxisk Unlimited
296
|
Posted - 2015.08.08 18:50:01 -
[4] - Quote
Lucien Visteen wrote:Arla Sarain wrote:Mikhem wrote:Year or two back CCP showed us plans for new damage model in EVE. I remember seeing pictures where shield and armor damage are shown in completely different way. What happened to these plans? Are they still coming or is this project cancelled? Please refer and show. 2012 Fanfest. 1h58min mark. I had almost forgotten about this. Atleast this is what I think he is talking about, but it could be something else. Yes there it is! Here is direct link to this new damage model thing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9Ozvef7CvQ&list=PLDDA989F65CD6E98A&feature=player_detailpage#t=7098 You can get timed url when you press right mouse button over video screen when it is in right spot.
Mikhem
Link library to EVE music songs.
|
Hal Morsh
Delusions of Granduer Two Drink Minimum
373
|
Posted - 2015.08.08 19:03:51 -
[5] - Quote
Here ya go a picture for you.
http://i.imgur.com/5q4m0bp.jpg
Dun'Gal > Hal is simply an imperfect ai, though if drunkeness ever gets programmed into ai's I foresee both a hilarious and tragic end to humanity.
|
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
6752
|
Posted - 2015.08.08 19:05:13 -
[6] - Quote
Ring mining too, I though it was going to shake up null, what happened to that?
I think it had pictures of rings~
^^ Delicious goon ((tech nerf, siphon, drone assist, supercap)) tears.
Taking a wrecking ball to the futile hopes and broken dreams of skillless blobbers.
|
Jonas Kanjus
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
18
|
Posted - 2015.08.08 19:11:20 -
[7] - Quote
Wow! That video brought back some memories! Although, I do have to ask, where is it? The interface, visible damage and everything else? Where the heck is all that? I guess like WiS, CCP decided to abandon those projects, too. *majorsadface*
My inauguration date to EVE Online:
6/25/2005 8:24:57 AM UTC
|
Xtreem
Echelon Research SpaceMonkey's Alliance
378
|
Posted - 2015.08.08 19:18:23 -
[8] - Quote
Arla Sarain wrote:Mikhem wrote:Year or two back CCP showed us plans for new damage model in EVE. I remember seeing pictures where shield and armor damage are shown in completely different way. What happened to these plans? Are they still coming or is this project cancelled? Please refer and show.
feel stupid yet?
|
Mikhem
Taxisk Unlimited
296
|
Posted - 2015.08.08 19:35:44 -
[9] - Quote
Oh that look so cool beyond amazing...
Mikhem
Link library to EVE music songs.
|
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
6916
|
Posted - 2015.08.08 20:34:14 -
[10] - Quote
The UI in that image made me think someone photoshopped a capture from ED.
Bring back DEEEEP Space!
|
|
Nihlus Valke
University of Caille Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2015.08.08 21:00:09 -
[11] - Quote
At this point I'm not sure why CCP keeps showing off features they know damn well they cannot deliver. Every fanfest they have presentations about what they would like to include and 90% of it never sees the light of day. More astonishing is the players who, despite being disappointed year after year, act as if CCP is actually serious about any of these types of improvements.
None of that was ever going to happen and CCP knew this when they showed it off. They just want to get people excited because I guess it would be deemed boring if their presentations were honest and practical.
Why have this...
"This year at EVE Fanfest: More of the same"
When you can flaunt this...
"The year at EVE Fanfest: Player piloted fighters!!! Actual ship explosions on destruction!!! Flying into low orbit and fighting within planetary atmosphere!!! Player avatars can now have sex with each other on stations!!! Exciting!!!" |
Hal Morsh
Delusions of Granduer Two Drink Minimum
374
|
Posted - 2015.08.08 21:07:08 -
[12] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:The UI in that image made me think someone photoshopped a capture from ED.
CCP made that image so you probably aren't far off, this one also made by them.
http://i.imgur.com/L7wkZcJ.jpg
Dun'Gal > Hal is simply an imperfect ai, though if drunkeness ever gets programmed into ai's I foresee both a hilarious and tragic end to humanity.
|
Nana Skalski
Poseidaon
634
|
Posted - 2015.08.08 21:13:49 -
[13] - Quote
I swear I saw a planetary flight demo few years ago. Also ambulation demo and even ship painting demo and tessellation demo. This damage model isnt really something worth talking about.
( -á° -ƒ-û -í°)
|
Barrogh Habalu
Forever Winter Absolute Zero.
1008
|
Posted - 2015.08.08 21:24:51 -
[14] - Quote
Then there is that hi-res texture pack. It was said that they even had some assets ready at that point...
I mean, there are dozens of pages of us bi***ing about relevant things these days, it's good to bi**h about irrelevant things from time to time for a change, agree?
That's not to say I don't want to see better damage model than that smoke trail from late 199x, or that pack, or something else... But eh.
Future of T3 cruisers - multi-tool they aspired to be instead of sledgehammer they have become
|
Xercodo
Xovoni Directorate
4250
|
Posted - 2015.08.08 22:53:25 -
[15] - Quote
Barrogh Habalu wrote:Then there is that hi-res texture pack. It was said that they even had some assets ready at that point...
I mean, there are dozens of pages of us bi***ing about relevant things these days, it's good to bi**h about irrelevant things from time to time for a change, agree?
That's not to say I don't want to see better damage model than that smoke trail from late 199x, or that pack, or something else... But eh.
Except the thing about the high res textures was more of a technology problem. The recent download on demand change allow them to do that now, but they need to make all the other textures that aren't already high res, and otherwise QA said textures to be truly ready.
In fact most of these are an internal technology problem, though I have no idea why the 2008 walking in stations demo-model was COMPLETELY scrapped
The Drake is a Lie
|
Jonas Kanjus
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
18
|
Posted - 2015.08.08 23:32:54 -
[16] - Quote
Xercodo wrote:Barrogh Habalu wrote:Then there is that hi-res texture pack. It was said that they even had some assets ready at that point...
I mean, there are dozens of pages of us bi***ing about relevant things these days, it's good to bi**h about irrelevant things from time to time for a change, agree?
That's not to say I don't want to see better damage model than that smoke trail from late 199x, or that pack, or something else... But eh. Except the thing about the high res textures was more of a technology problem. The recent download on demand change allow them to do that now, but they need to make all the other textures that aren't already high res, and otherwise QA said textures to be truly ready. In fact most of these are an internal technology problem, though I have no idea why the 2008 walking in stations demo-model was COMPLETELY scrapped
It was scrapped in favor of fixing game mechanics. Players felt it was more important for the dev team to focus on fixing the game than adding a new "thing" to the game.
My inauguration date to EVE Online:
6/25/2005 8:24:57 AM UTC
|
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
6920
|
Posted - 2015.08.09 00:39:37 -
[17] - Quote
Hal Morsh wrote:Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:The UI in that image made me think someone photoshopped a capture from ED. CCP made that image so you probably aren't far off, this one also made by them. http://i.imgur.com/L7wkZcJ.jpg
:-O
I just nerdgasmed
Bring back DEEEEP Space!
|
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
2357
|
Posted - 2015.08.09 01:08:26 -
[18] - Quote
For a start they could just give each ship model about 8 internal points that weapons fire targets. Rather than 1. So that when you fire weapons at a target, you get impacts across the ship, not just a single impact point. That alone would make a huge visual difference to a ship under fire. |
Nana Skalski
Poseidaon
641
|
Posted - 2015.08.09 07:53:29 -
[19] - Quote
Jonas Kanjus wrote:Xercodo wrote: In fact most of these are an internal technology problem, though I have no idea why the 2008 walking in stations demo-model was COMPLETELY scrapped
It was scrapped in favor of fixing game mechanics. Players felt it was more important for the dev team to focus on fixing the game than adding a new "thing" to the game. Considering they scrapped it before Incarna, this argument doesnt fit anywhere. As Xercodo said, it was a technology problem and they wanted to do it all with new shinies they had at that moment. Like the clothing system that did not fit into previous technology. They wanted it to be excellent, but gravity is not just a theory. If you want to get high, you will have to hold tight. They could have done that easilly by forgetting about delivering only one room and work on more assets and then delivering them later with bigger, more similar to demo, Incarna.
( -á° -ƒ-û -í°)
|
OverlordY
Interspan
19
|
Posted - 2015.08.09 10:58:28 -
[20] - Quote
So many abandoned cool features... In favour of not much ... |
|
Chance Ravinne
WiNGSPAN Delivery Services
430
|
Posted - 2015.08.09 13:17:38 -
[21] - Quote
Wow that's pretty cool. Would be nice to see active shield effects ripple along an outer shell like that also.
You've just read another awesome post by Chance Ravinne, CEO of EVE's #1 torpedo delivery service. Watch our misadventures on my YouTube channel: WINGSPANTT
|
Rain6637
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
32158
|
Posted - 2015.08.09 15:04:18 -
[22] - Quote
I see complications that look nice but aren't functional beyond what we have now. EVE hasn't figured out how to free itself from on-screen tables for starters. I think the concept layouts are mostly visual bloat and decoration. A functional tactical overlay would include icons that are bigger or smaller based on distance, instead of static icons that get in the way more than anything.
Help, I can't download EVE
President of the Commissar Kate Fanclub
PLEX: A Giffen good? (It's 1B?)
|
Market McSelling Alt
Bernie Madoff Investment Services LLC
373
|
Posted - 2015.08.09 15:11:11 -
[23] - Quote
Mikhem wrote:Year or two back CCP showed us plans for new damage model in EVE. I remember seeing pictures where shield and armor damage are shown in completely different way. What happened to these plans? Are they still coming or is this project cancelled?
They couldn't implement it because they were too busy adding in the Jove regions they promised us... The Comet Mining they promised us... The Ring Mining they promised us... The T3 versions of all the ships they promised us... The revamp of Low-Sec they promised us... The Ship Crews they promised us... The WIS they promised us...
I mean, Fozzie Sov.
Best description of Eve Online and why the community is the way it is
|
Lion Drome
Der Wehrmacht
1
|
Posted - 2015.08.09 16:21:35 -
[24] - Quote
Chance Ravinne wrote:Wow that's pretty cool. Would be nice to see active shield effects ripple along an outer shell like that also.
Could you ask about those things in the next CSM meeting with CCP?
Good questions would be few things what the guy above me said.
|
Mr Mieyli
Hedion University Amarr Empire
19
|
Posted - 2015.08.09 17:28:34 -
[25] - Quote
Nana Skalsk wrote: If you want to get high, you will have to hold tight.
Can confirm this is true. |
Tiberius Heth
Say No to Features
63
|
Posted - 2015.08.09 17:55:32 -
[26] - Quote
Those UI screenshots look utterly terrible, there's all kinds of cool colours and all that but the UI is eating up way too much screen real estate and it's actually MORE difficult to decipher the info. |
Lion Drome
Der Wehrmacht
1
|
Posted - 2015.08.09 18:07:15 -
[27] - Quote
Tiberius Heth wrote:Those UI screenshots look utterly terrible, there's all kinds of cool colours and all that but the UI is eating up way too much screen real estate and it's actually MORE difficult to decipher the info.
So it's basicly like a concept car in a car show.
Looks great on the outside. But practical usage with how it's designed is less so.
Still though. I love the current EVE UI. But it just seems a tad uniform, very boring, we can change the colours, but there is nothing space age about it. Nothing to get me excited when a fight begins. No warnings of a target lock, voiced ship AI giving feedback (Altough that could be a crew thing when they get implemented in the year 3000)
|
Tappits
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
169
|
Posted - 2015.08.09 19:17:48 -
[28] - Quote
I have been to 7 Fanfests... after the 3rd one i stopped caring about what CCP showed there an 95% of it never happened... Well tbh any fanfest after the move to the harpa was ****. |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |