Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Wynta
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
23
|
Posted - 2015.06.25 21:14:12 -
[1] - Quote
Is this meant to require a gunnery skill or is it gonna be switched to either weapon upgrade or a missile support
|
stoicfaux
5983
|
Posted - 2015.06.25 23:03:29 -
[2] - Quote
Wynta wrote:Is this meant to require a gunnery skill or is it gonna be switched to either weapon upgrade or a missile support
Plus: Given that (last I checked) the MGC and MGE only affect three out of the four stated attributes (no flight time bonus,) but the MGC script affects four attributes, I would bet on it being not yet complete.
/patience_is_a_virtue (which is why I'm going to hell.)
Pon Farr Memorial: once every 7 years, all the carebears in high-sec must PvP or they will be temp-banned.
|
Arthur Aihaken
Perkone Caldari State
4460
|
Posted - 2015.06.26 02:29:12 -
[3] - Quote
stoicfaux wrote:Given that (last I checked) the MGC and MGE only affect three out of the four stated attributes (no flight time bonus,) but the MGC script affects four attributes, I would bet on it being not yet complete. That or it's just going to be missile velocity affected.
I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
|
Soldarius
Naliao Inc. Test Alliance Please Ignore
1319
|
Posted - 2015.06.26 17:11:09 -
[4] - Quote
Agreed. They probably copied the db stuff from tracking computers/enhancers and didn't bother to check. Fix plz. Should be missile skills.
http://youtu.be/YVkUvmDQ3HY
|
|
CCP Rise
C C P C C P Alliance
5240
|
Posted - 2015.07.01 14:07:49 -
[5] - Quote
Thanks, will fix.
@ccp_rise
|
|
afkalt
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1514
|
Posted - 2015.07.02 06:38:18 -
[6] - Quote
You know this was also pointed out in the feedback thread.....confidence...draining. |
epicurus ataraxia
Z3R0 Return Mining Inc. Illusion of Solitude
1742
|
Posted - 2015.07.02 17:46:07 -
[7] - Quote
Well, "thanks, will fix" is a pretty reasonable answer.
Of course if you wish an entire root cause analysis as to why it had not been done as quickly as you would like, and a few human sacrifices,for good measure and to appease your impatience, then I assume you are willing to pay the bill?
Whilst I am quite willing to criticise where appropriate, now is NOT appropriate.
Tldr Thanks Rise, glad you are fixing it.
There is one EvE. Many people. Many lifestyles. WE are EvE
|
afkalt
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1558
|
Posted - 2015.07.03 09:04:00 -
[8] - Quote
epicurus ataraxia wrote:Well, "thanks, will fix" is a pretty reasonable answer.
Of course if you wish an entire root cause analysis as to why it had not been done as quickly as you would like, and a few human sacrifices,for good measure and to appease your impatience, then I assume you are willing to pay the bill?
Whilst I am quite willing to criticise where appropriate, now is NOT appropriate.
Tldr Thanks Rise, glad you are fixing it.
I'll just requote myself here
afkalt wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:What gunnery skill did they put as requirement beside the obvious weapon upgrade which is in gunnery just because it has to be somewhere and nobody want to have to train a clone of it just for missiles. Trajectory analysis. Which also requires gunnery IV. We pointed it out on page 14 of this thread. After "great feedback", the nerf came on page 16. No mention of shady skill requirements CCP seemingly didn't know about the bad skill until they got around to this thread https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=431553&find=unread which they responded to yesterday - 4-5 or so days after they were first told in the "great feedback thread". So you'll have to forgive me if I suspect they've ignored a bunch of this feedback. Maybe they've not, but by gods it looks fairly damning - not even acknowledging it at the same time as the nerf.
Feels like maybe you've not read the actual feedback thread....
Let me tl;dr for you:
Overwhelming Feedback: Mods are good, some potential outlier hulls, overall good work.
Response: Based on feedback these are too good and :turrets:
Follow up feedback: This is too big a nerf, you're now nerfing all the ships fit today with new stacking penalities which weren't needed
Response: There isn't one. |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |