|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
2566
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 12:28:39 -
[1] - Quote
Arkady Romanov wrote:Hopefully never.
These are not ships that belong under Concord's aegis. At the same time allowing dreads in highsec would help undo the nigh-unassailability of defended highsec POS towers.
I think if capitals ate ever to be allowed in highsec serious considerations have to be made on giving them weapons timers for entering triage or siege modes like marauders do when going in to bastion. |
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
2566
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 12:39:47 -
[2] - Quote
Harry Forever wrote:baltec1 wrote:Arkady Romanov wrote:Hopefully never.
These are not ships that belong under Concord's aegis. Indeed. you guys are just scared that people in highsec have access to the same arsenal, after we have comparable bulletpower, we will sweep into your lands and bring blood and tears to you nulldogs... just wait and see No. People don't like the idea of capitals being combined with the virtual invulnerability that can be achieved in highsec.
Really I don't think that's an issue related to capitals, rather that there are too few ways to kill things in highsec. |
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
2566
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 12:47:27 -
[3] - Quote
You're pretty dim, huh? |
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
2566
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 12:54:48 -
[4] - Quote
Milla Jjovovich wrote: no worry, you highseccers wouldnt know what to do with a capital
I know exactly what I'd do with one.
Neutral triage reps. |
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
2566
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 13:10:19 -
[5] - Quote
I'd generally consider losing a carrier to a neutral DD less likely than losing a regular logistics ship to neutrals due to no Cynos in highsec, capitals being slow and combat requiring logistics of any kind often occurring in fairly low population places.
A random pirate battleship fleet with bhaalgorns in it would be more likely threat to a neutral triage carrier.
Plus a fitted triage carrier is only about as expensive as one of our nestors. |
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
2568
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 13:47:38 -
[6] - Quote
Between blap dreads and the massive corp hanger/ship maintenance bay on a carrier things would get really funky really fast.
Orca shenanigans would look like a joke by comparison. |
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
2576
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 15:47:33 -
[7] - Quote
Otso Bakarti wrote:You guys are just skeered you put all that time and effort into a pixel config that got dumped ultimately. As you guys like to tell us poor lowbies, "It happens. Deal with it." What does that even mean? |
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
2578
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 16:20:44 -
[8] - Quote
Afk autopiloting an archon full of all of your stuff. It will happen. |
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
2586
|
Posted - 2015.06.18 21:59:25 -
[9] - Quote
There would be a massive drop in the price of POS bash contracts. |
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
2605
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 14:39:27 -
[10] - Quote
I don't think you understand what pvp means.
And yes it has long been established that CODE. are horrible at conventional ship combat. |
|
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
2607
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 16:36:10 -
[11] - Quote
Anddo wrote:Vimsy Vortis wrote:I don't think you understand what pvp means.
And yes it has long been established that CODE. are horrible at conventional ship combat. Fighting someone who can't fight back isn't PvP. It's just kind of sad, and very carebear. It's a way for people who are bad at PvP to inflate killboards to give themselves a pointless ego boost. Sorry but you're factually wong. Or rather I suppose you're actually just bring intellectually dishonest, because I don't buy that you're actually stupid enough to believe what you just wrote.
A player destroying Tha ship of another player in inherently a player versus player interaction regardless of whether or not it is in line with your arbitrary sense of Internet honor.
Just because you don't like the way CODE. blow up people's space ships it doesn't render it any less a type of pvp. A duck does not stop being a duck because you don't like how it quacks. |
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
2615
|
Posted - 2015.06.21 01:08:06 -
[12] - Quote
Lan Wang wrote:Your factually wrong, pvp is player vs player ie 2 or more player engaged in combat together, these sort of things are like racing just because im on the road in my racecar and overtake a tractor it does not mean i won the race. Because the tractor was just driving on the road not racing
I understand the point you're making, and I understand why you are making it. You don't like ganking because it's not in-keeping with the artificially narrow and absurd definition of PVP you've come up with to inflate your own ego.
"Ganking isn't honorable combat between equal combatants, therefore it is not combat at all." or something like that is your line of reasoning. This allows you to think that you're in some way superior to gankers because you do real PVP and they don't. It's utterly transparent and a load of horse crap.
You can dislike ganking and feel superior to gankers as much as you like if that's what gets you hard, but no amount of wishful thinking on your part will make ganking anything other than an inherently PVP activity. Sorry about that. |
|
|
|