Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Pierre-Gilbert Agittain
Final Frontiers Incorporated
0
|
Posted - 2015.06.02 15:13:24 -
[1] - Quote
The lauchers hardpoint on the Navy issue Caracal are asymetric and distributed all over the hull. On the Cerberus, which sports the same number of missile launcher slots, the 6th and 5th launcher slot share the same hardpoint, resulting in an ugly clipping error when the bird goes into warp (2 launchers on the lower right get stacked on top of each other). There's 7 distinct engine nozzles in fixed places on the model. but only 3 weakish engine trails so far. |
|
CCP Savior
C C P C C P Alliance
26
|
Posted - 2015.06.02 15:29:59 -
[2] - Quote
Hi,
Thanks for bringing these to our attention, afraid to say that the Cerberus launcher issue is already known to us and we're looking into now. But I'll go and inquire about the engine trails, though this could be an artistic decision. Will update when I find out.
Associate Graphical QA Analyst | EVE Quality Assurance | Team TriLambda
|
|
Bienator II
madmen of the skies
3319
|
Posted - 2015.06.02 16:01:15 -
[3] - Quote
wasn't the cerberos supposed to receive a slightly different model as the t1 base hulls?
how to fix eve: 1) remove ECM 2) rename dampeners to ECM 3) add new anti-drone ewar for caldari 4) give offgrid boosters ongrid combat value
|
|
CCP Savior
C C P C C P Alliance
26
|
Posted - 2015.06.02 16:03:45 -
[4] - Quote
Gonna have to say that this is by design i'm afraid, personally I think having 7 engine trails would be interesting but on the other hand it could create a lot of noise on screen.
But if you do see anything that you think doesn't look correct please do fill out a bug report for us to look over, it allows us to at least start a dialogue about these things as well as actually fixing graphical issues with the game.
Associate Graphical QA Analyst | EVE Quality Assurance | Team TriLambda
|
|
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
1177
|
Posted - 2015.06.02 16:31:41 -
[5] - Quote
i thought the cerberus was supposed too get a modified model? http://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/30i284/i_was_bored_so_i_redesigned_the_cerberus/
Tech 3's need to be multi-role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists.
ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist, nerf sentries, -3 slots for droneboats
Nerf web strength, Make the blaster eagle worth using
|
Castelo Selva
Forcas armadas DARKNESS.
78
|
Posted - 2015.06.03 00:33:29 -
[6] - Quote
Yes, when people tell me the new model was in this patch I just get happy because of the cerberus.. Them I am unhappy again.
Why did it not get the announced model?
Best post ever!
|
Hjalmarbaby
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2015.06.30 12:41:07 -
[7] - Quote
Castelo Selva wrote:Yes, when people tell me the new model was in this patch I just get happy because of the cerberus.. Them I am unhappy again.
Why did it not get the announced model?
Any news on this?
|
|
CCP Darwin
C C P C C P Alliance
1561
|
Posted - 2015.06.30 15:54:17 -
[8] - Quote
Hjalmarbaby wrote:Castelo Selva wrote:Yes, when people tell me the new model was in this patch I just get happy because of the cerberus.. Them I am unhappy again.
Why did it not get the announced model? Any news on this? The current Cerberus model (which matches the new Caracal) is temporary while we finish work on the new Cerberus model. It's coming soon.
CCP Darwin GÇó Senior Technical Artist, EVE Online GÇó @mark_wilkins
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |