|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
454
|
Posted - 2015.02.01 15:29:27 -
[1] - Quote
lame |
Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
456
|
Posted - 2015.02.04 03:38:04 -
[2] - Quote
u3pog wrote:
People who quit EVE in the first sight of danger shouldn't really be here. I got ganked, robbed, lied (paid to be released by pirates, what a mistake) numerous times when I was a new player. Did I quit? No! I learned. There was a time when I mined too and got ganked a few times --> switched to Procurer --> problem solved. Let 'em try killing 30k + ehp and even if they do, the ship can't get any cheaper. Problem solved. That's for solo miners ofc, if you are in groups there are many other options.
Nice of you to decide who should and shouldn't be part of the game. I have never really been ganked or scammed in this game...it's very possible to lead a collaborative and fun highsec life without PvP combat. No one needs your permission to play as they choose to. |
Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
456
|
Posted - 2015.02.04 04:13:53 -
[3] - Quote
Shailagh wrote:I would pay CCP an extra $20 a month to permaban Veers. P-sure a lot of people would contribute to this worthy cause as well ccp.
Ccp you want lots of cash right? Screw this new player retention you got recently and just collect 20$ from tons (literaly) of people a month to kick this idiot out.
Also any who says, U Cant do that! CCP.l cant do that! Or whateva else.... Yes they can and yes they would do almost anything for lots more cash right now. Ccp this is your jackpot!!
Well, that was a useful and constructive post...apparently the new solution to combating people you disagree with on the forums is to try to bribe the game developers to ban them from the game. Sounds like high class elite PvP to me.... |
Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
460
|
Posted - 2015.02.05 02:56:45 -
[4] - Quote
John E Normus wrote:Veers Belvar wrote:Shailagh wrote:I would pay CCP an extra $20 a month to permaban Veers. P-sure a lot of people would contribute to this worthy cause as well ccp.
Ccp you want lots of cash right? Screw this new player retention you got recently and just collect 20$ from tons (literaly) of people a month to kick this idiot out.
Also any who says, U Cant do that! CCP.l cant do that! Or whateva else.... Yes they can and yes they would do almost anything for lots more cash right now. Ccp this is your jackpot!! Well, that was a useful and constructive post...apparently the new solution to combating people you disagree with on the forums is to try to bribe the game developers to ban them from the game. Sounds like high class elite PvP to me.... Dear C & P, Veers is one of CODE alliance's most valuable assets. Any attack on Veers will be considered an attack on James 315. Thank you Management
Continuing the CODE tripe as usual...they have never been more upset or frustrated by anyone in the game as they are with me.....Loyalanon is reduced to sputtering rage, and James 315 is afraid to even log in. |
Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
501
|
Posted - 2015.02.15 05:33:25 -
[5] - Quote
Kinda scratching my head at these defeat code threads. Their organization is semi-dormant, all their FCs have quit...and their leader is nowhere to be found. Not to mention their spectacular failure in actually changing the risk/reward balance.
Asking how to beat code is like asking how to beat walter mondale...you win just by showing up. |
Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
502
|
Posted - 2015.02.15 14:00:38 -
[6] - Quote
Six Beavers wrote:Veers is certainly ahead in the "how many troll threads can i maintain in C&P this month" category. I hope his RL position as senior online legal document provider doesn't suffer.
Oh boy...there is a keeper...calling PvE players "carebears," "victims," "whiners," "prey," etc....isn't trolling....declaring that james 315 was somehow "elected" "savior of highsec" isn't trolling....but pointing out that code is failing in it's stated mission is trolling. Gotta give you credit for Alice in Wonderland style consistency.
|
Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
502
|
Posted - 2015.02.15 14:02:00 -
[7] - Quote
admiral root wrote:Veers Belvar wrote:Kinda scratching my head at these defeat code threads. Their organization is semi-dormant, all their FCs have quit...and their leader is nowhere to be found. Our leader is nowhere to be found? John E Normus is frequently to be found in the minerbumping channel and in highsec. As for FCs, it's seldom I don't see one on our TS server and more in-game. Now for my favourite part - stats. Code: 2,052 kills in the last 14 days. Veers Belvar: 0 Ok, that's not really fair. Let's throw in January, December and November as well for him, giving us a grand total of *drumroll* Veers Belvar: 0
John is only leader because James and Loyalanon, among others, quit the post. That doesn't exactly sound like a winning record. Further, highsec has more PvE than ever, your 2000 kills are but a drop in the bucket. And comparing kills with a PvE player..... |
Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
502
|
Posted - 2015.02.15 15:49:50 -
[8] - Quote
Capt Starfox wrote:FFS Veers stop being bad!
The New Order is a hierarchy with James at the very top.
There are several other leaders in the New Order and CODE. alliance alike.
James didn't quit, I don't know why you keep saying this. When the blog stops, then you can say James quit. Until then he's very much attached to what's going on with New Order and CODE. affairs.
Writing some blog posts and logging in once a month to send some isk is not "playing the game." He has given up...and it is time for you to do the same. The whole agenda to radically change highsec was flawed from the getgo...a few bored nullsec folks with some catalysts have no ability to materially change the gameplay experience of thousands of highsec PvE players. To think otherwise was always foolish.
Sad to see you waste your time on this hopeless endeavor...stick to wormholes. |
Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
502
|
Posted - 2015.02.15 17:39:01 -
[9] - Quote
Capt Starfox wrote:Some? You mean usually once per day. Playing a game is relative. Could logging into a video game be considered playing said video game? Some would say that technically does constitute playing that video game, others of course would say otherwise. I suppose you lean more towards the latter? I don't know about you, but if someone logged into a video game, intimately checked their in-game emails, wrote about those emails on a blog and handed out in-game currency for acting in one's behalf, yeah I'd say that's playing a video game. I'd also say that's brilliant. I started in Highsec with a Thrasher. We must be doing something right, you're still here louder than ever. e: Well... a Rifter which I used to can flip in, then a Thrasher.
Good try Ms. Foxxie....from the blog posts I identify at least three distinct human writers...so James is certainly not writing every day.
And no, logging in to check mail and write is not playing the game. James tried bumping, tried ganking, tried running for CSM, tried fundamentally changing highsec, failed everywhere, and left the game. It's a sad tale Foxxie...and I'm worried the same will happen to you. Leave code before the stench of failure compels you to unsub. |
Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
508
|
Posted - 2015.02.17 05:45:13 -
[10] - Quote
Capt Starfox wrote:Veers Belvar wrote:
Good try Ms. Foxxie....from the blog posts I identify at least three distinct human writers...so James is certainly not writing every day.
And no, logging in to check mail and write is not playing the game. James tried bumping, tried ganking, tried running for CSM, tried fundamentally changing highsec, failed everywhere, and left the game. It's a sad tale Foxxie...and I'm worried the same will happen to you. Leave code before the stench of failure compels you to unsub.
I remember years ago when carebears were saying how the New Order wasn't doing anything and how is was going to fail. I believe around this time we were camping the static ice belts, but small in numbers. The carebears were so quick to say how our efforts were meaningless for [insert carebear reason here] and because of that the New Order wasn't going to accomplish anything; or, in your case, won't change Highsec. Since then we have organized fleets that have caused hundreds of trillions worth of damage to Orcas, Freighters, mission runners, Barges/Exhumers, the standard T1/T2 hauler and various other types of ships (Frigates, pods, etc.). Not to mention that CODE. and the New Order have become so well-known that we are often times brought up in articles and other blog posts for reference, or complaints. You're some years too late. What you're saying has already been said and yet here we are. In fact, the only real difference is that we've grown since then.
You didn't do anything. You blew up some pathetic miners. You griefed some noobs in ventures. You used cheap bumping tactics to kill a few freighters. Yippee ka yay yea. You have completely failed to even mildly perturb us elite mission and incursion runners. You managed to troll yourself in a staggering defeat in the AT, and now your leaders have all quit the game.
Ganking some pathetic afk ships is one thing, fundamentally changing the risk/reward balance in highsec is quite another. James is gone, Loyalanon is gone, Rabe Raptor is gone, I mean you guys are really scraping the bottom of the barrel days...all you got left is Chocolate Moose guy and people with unpronounceable names. It's more like an AA support group than an elite PvP organization....kinda like the misfit football team in the "Little Giants."
Ms. Foxxie...let's be real here...you gave it your all, but came up (way) short. Highsec was just too much for you. Sometimes you just gotta admit defeat, accept your place in the food chain, and move on. I'm always here if you need a shoulder to cry on. |
|
|
|
|