Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 [40] 50 60 70 80 .. 80 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 15 post(s) |
Anope
Gallente the united Negative Ten.
|
Posted - 2009.06.03 03:09:00 -
[1171]
brilliant idea, beats the hell out of the current lame/annoying pos layout
|
Esiel
Caldari
|
Posted - 2009.06.05 21:43:00 -
[1172]
something was bothering me about this picture. I think it is a photoshop compilation, the arm that has the sunspot is at the wrong angle. So I don't think this is something they have coming. I know most of us would love to have our stations look more like stations but like allways it seems CCP has no love for us.
CSM will you please bring this up and let CCP know we really want this and get some real answers to why not!
...
Beat the dead horse |
JAG Fox
GunStars
|
Posted - 2009.06.07 03:48:00 -
[1173]
This is a brilliant idea.. CCP get on this!!! |
Syberbolt8
Gallente I.M. Force
|
Posted - 2009.06.08 02:50:00 -
[1174]
Found this on the wrong page, move it to the first page where it belongs, best post in F&I since 2006 |
Gabi Angel
|
Posted - 2009.06.08 04:08:00 -
[1175]
Sounds a neat idea! :)
First time i saw a POS i got disappointed. Was thinking about something like you made in this topic! Something with a star base look.
Congrats and I hope CCP agree with your idea like i do.
|
Iveran
Amarr Banteki
|
Posted - 2009.06.09 05:50:00 -
[1176]
In your face CCP!
Please, give us something other than the BS we currently have in POSs. _______
|
Pro Versius
Amarr The Lost Tribe Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
|
Posted - 2009.06.09 06:45:00 -
[1177]
I would also love to see this change. The photo of the May 09 newsletter has T3 Tengu ship assy arrays on it.
My point!!! While you are making over the interface and mechanics of the POS's, you need to make Corp hangar arrays assignable. Meaning right now an alliance member can put items in a corp hangar array at a POS, but can't see or take from that hangar, even if it's assigned to another corp... So you need either make POS's to where they can accept corp hangar arrays that are anchored by corps in that alliance, or make the arrays assignable to alliance corporations.
I would think that if a POS is anchored for an alliance you should be able to assign different corp hangars to different corps in the alliance, or just allow access to the anchoring corp.. But I think the easiest change would be to have POS's allow corporation hangars that are anchored by and for antoher corporation in that alliance...
|
Malus Erus
|
Posted - 2009.06.09 06:47:00 -
[1178]
/signing this epic thread
OP is win.
|
Ki Rathos
Minmatar Urban Mining Corp
|
Posted - 2009.06.11 17:38:00 -
[1179]
I am no gcoder or anything but I think I understand enough to know how some of it works. With the most recent upgrade to the graphics engine and the modular functionality of T3 ships, I would think this should be doable. Time coding and testing etc, but the idea is solid. Would be real nice for vertical and horazontal connections to, would have some real crazy layouts at that point. |
Niko Lorenzio
United Eve Directorate
|
Posted - 2009.06.11 18:32:00 -
[1180]
Simply brilliant!!!
/signed
|
|
Macmuelli
Gallente Meltd0wn Aggression.
|
Posted - 2009.06.11 19:50:00 -
[1181]
Since years very good.
CCP go for it.
Signed. |
Vaneshi SnowCrash
|
Posted - 2009.06.12 01:06:00 -
[1182]
2007 was when a dev last posted in here talking about post Trinity time. Why has something not been done with POS's to make them actually look like something other than floating collection of parts already?
More importantly, what exactly are CCP thinking of doing to POS's to make them look less silly.
Even more important is that this goe back on the first page, it's the best damn idea I've read in ages. |
Jinx Barker
Caldari GFB Scientific
|
Posted - 2009.06.12 01:46:00 -
[1183]
Page 40... gosh... I guess CCP thinks we do not really want this, or anything.
|
Edward Thunderbuns
|
Posted - 2009.06.12 20:37:00 -
[1184]
Oveur mentioned this thread at the EvE Vegas Dev meet. |
Marconi Bandr
|
Posted - 2009.06.12 22:29:00 -
[1185]
/signed. Having just partly set up and used a POS for the first time recently, you are 100% correct on the impression the current system makes. Even the look and feel improvement would be worthwhile.
|
Jinx Barker
Caldari GFB Scientific
|
Posted - 2009.06.13 00:57:00 -
[1186]
Originally by: Edward Thunderbuns Oveur mentioned this thread at the EvE Vegas Dev meet.
Yes he did, and he was very, very, drunk. But, Oveur is no longer part of EVE Dev team, unfortunately, otherwise I would be e-mailing poor guy. He is no longer EVE Online Executive, but the "Vampire MMO" executive, as such he has very little input, I am afraid.
Too bad, I miss the guy, was always very good with the players.
|
Jinx Barker
Caldari GFB Scientific
|
Posted - 2009.06.13 18:12:00 -
[1187]
Edited by: Jinx Barker on 13/06/2009 18:15:37 Reposting here what I said, again in the "SUPPORT" thread: Support The Dead Horse POS.
CSM has failed EVE Community miserably with this.
The excuses are appalling, "we were allowed to discuss, but we did not, because CCP did not want us to" ... "we did discuss"... "no we did not really".... "the expectations are unreasonable" ...
This is a joke. CSM is a f-ing joke, I have a letter from Bunyip - that says he will bring it up before the end of the term, did he? I have not heard of anything of the sort.
What is more shameful is that CCP is totally ignoring this thread, and has been ignoring other one for years now, guys, YEARS...
Anyway, I think EVE community is to apathetic about pretty much anything, and CSM are too scared of NDA, CCP, and a loss of a trip to Iceland. Personally, I think CSM is a failed experiment, and as I mentioned before a biggest gimmick and a PR stunt of CCP.
An issue which has been overwhelmingly supported, and yet ignored lingers on the forums. CSM making excuses for CCP as to why they can not talk about it, and CCP is just keeping its mouth shut, not even a dev blog on - on an issue that has been around for over 3 years!!! The best part of it though, is that CSM is now CCP's mouthpiece, the CCP themselves do not have to say anything at all, just let CSM make excuses for their Iceland plane ticket sponsors, and hotel payers.
|
Syberbolt8
Gallente I.M. Force
|
Posted - 2009.06.14 02:00:00 -
[1188]
Edited by: Syberbolt8 on 14/06/2009 02:00:42 As stated in the Support thread, I will be bumping this thread every 24 hrs, I would also like it if anyone that has ever thought this idea was a good one, would help me keep it on the front page of F&I, lets make it known that we want this to happen, and we are willing to lobby it, lets make the need for a sticky on this post worthless and keep it on the front page nonetheless
/signed as the best Idea on F&I since 2006
as always check my sig for the link to the support thread, or see my isksense ads on most eve-online based websites. Support the DEAD HORSE POS's |
Danton Marcellus
Nebula Rasa Holdings
|
Posted - 2009.06.14 09:23:00 -
[1189]
POS' still looking like crap years after the release is more than a little unsettling.
Should/would/could have, HAVE you chav!
Also Known As |
Barbanikos
Amarr Alternative Routes
|
Posted - 2009.06.14 12:22:00 -
[1190]
Excellent work and great idea.This is all for the looking of it though ...
What can u do with a bounch of good looking POS's holding sov that is there only for farming moons while you and ur alliance is in fact based 2 or 3 regions away?
Check my other idea which has to do with the mechanics to sov ... another good reason to get to enjoy ur POS and th elook of it
Linkage
|
|
Esiel
Caldari
|
Posted - 2009.06.14 22:45:00 -
[1191]
Edited by: Esiel on 14/06/2009 22:45:38 I would rather CCP just change the look now rather than wait for the day they figure out how to fix sov. I am sure this is one of the reasons they never got around to it. Sad thing is, the devs have said in the past that one of the important aspects of eve is that it looks good (see the sections on why they upgraded all the ship graphics)
.
Read my eve fiction go to http://fiction.topcities.com/ |
FT Diomedes
Gallente Factio Paucorum
|
Posted - 2009.06.14 23:30:00 -
[1192]
That's some great looking artwork in the OP, looks a hell of a lot better than any POS I ever went near. |
BeanBagKing
Ch3mic4l Warfare DEFI4NT
|
Posted - 2009.06.15 01:24:00 -
[1193]
without reading through all the comments, only the original post...
BRILLIANT IDEA! when I first heard about POSs, this is what I thought of, much better (IMO) than the current system. I love the 3d exhibits. BTW, Exhibit H is broke :(
CCP... Please? Pretty please with cherry's on top? |
JonnyKay
Gallente Federation of Freedom Fighters Aggression.
|
Posted - 2009.06.15 02:24:00 -
[1194]
/signed
|
Evelgrivion
Ignatium. Rote Kapelle
|
Posted - 2009.06.15 05:41:00 -
[1195]
I replaced the URL for exhibit H since the old link was not working anymore. All of the image exhibits should work fine now.
|
Morgs44
Kangaroos With Frickin Lazerbeams
|
Posted - 2009.06.15 13:11:00 -
[1196]
Edited by: Morgs44 on 15/06/2009 13:13:58 All very good! keep it on front page!!
How come rats can connect their crap togeather and we cant?
Oh and Evelgrivion you stick sum skins on and some eve space background! |
Jinx Barker
Caldari GFB Scientific
|
Posted - 2009.06.15 20:00:00 -
[1197]
Originally by: Morgs44 How come rats can connect their crap togeather and we cant?
Thats cause they spent all ISK on the connecting tubes, and hence why they have to send a wave after wave of disposable frigates after mission runners, and not something substantial.
|
Leon Singhali
Gallente
|
Posted - 2009.06.15 23:04:00 -
[1198]
This is an amazing idea, its a shame how bad POS's currently are. CCP please change POS's It Shall Be Done |
Syberbolt8
Gallente The Fated E.Y
|
Posted - 2009.06.16 13:43:00 -
[1199]
Not even CCP can argue this is the most liked and agreed on post in F&I, more positive posts have been made about this idea in he last 3 years then any other post I have ever seen.
/signed best post in 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009 |
Re'taka
Minmatar Republic University
|
Posted - 2009.06.16 18:24:00 -
[1200]
/signed
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 [40] 50 60 70 80 .. 80 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |