| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Reply to Topic | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mocam
EVE University
Ivy League
60
    |
Posted - 2011.11.26 00:19:00 -
[151] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Zaratustra wrote:
Give us reasons why this would be bad, PL. Real reasons. Any elitist attitudes will invalidate your argument.
If you can't move supers through lowsec you essentially restrict all movement in EVE as everything would have to re route through 0.0, half of which is permanently cyno jammed.
A couple pages back I asked about where these nullsec pockets came into being. Now you come out and say it's due to cyno jammers.
So what you are saying is that the nullsec super ships would actually need to start nullsec wars to clear cyno jammers out of the way in many systems so they could move?
And this is a bad thing to push onto nullsec? - wars due to traffic issues?!?
This sounds more like a solid argument FOR locking them out so those who hold them will finally start using them in SOV space to clear traffic routes. |
Blast x
Habitual Euthanasia
Pandemic Legion
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.26 06:54:00 -
[152] - Quote
how bout macking empire 25% of its actual size , rest changed into lowsec , incursion payout should be 30% ,incursion npc way more powerfull , missions should pay 50% less
wardeccs should be on a 3-6h timer before agressions , isk spent on them should be less with no/minimal penalty to multiple deccs
you shouldent be able to dock witin 5min of agressing - if you engage into battle then battle is what you should do ..not station games
\o/ - then feel free to take of supers form lowsec / nullsec / wateversec
|
Oggat
Viziam
Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.26 07:06:00 -
[153] - Quote
I agree with the OP. Make all space null sec. |
Crosi Wesdo
Spiritus Draconis
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.26 12:27:00 -
[154] - Quote
Its not hard guys, remove fighter bombers from low-sec. Everything else stays the same (EDIT - apart from the upcoming changes which i endorse). While they are in transit through low sec they use fighters, on arriving back in null, swap out to fighter bombers.
That leaves their presence in low-sec as highly buffered combat (non-triage) carriers with 3x the dps of a thanatos. 3x is still a huge leap over the class below (due to number of fighters it can field).
Sure this will still not address the RR mom blobs as such but it might further loosen the choke hold that null-sec alliances have on low-sec capital use of carriers for logistics or dreads for pos bashing. Particularly with the other changes, they might lose a super, which is the whole point after all right? ;) |
OninoTimmo
ElitistOps
Pandemic Legion
18
|
Posted - 2011.11.26 17:24:00 -
[155] - Quote
the whine from low-sec pubbies is great
keep it up, I'm enjoying the tears |
Weiland Taur
Taur Industries
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.26 20:43:00 -
[156] - Quote
Ecky X wrote:
The fact is without lowsec accessibility, capitals would be trapped in pockets of space.
Deal with it.
It would be interesting if supers could move through losec but were unable to operate any offensive systems. That would reinforce the need for support craft to protect them and induce a greater target for roaming gangs of subcapital ships. |
Pavel Bidermann
whips chains and ballgags
Care Factor
8
|
Posted - 2011.11.26 22:02:00 -
[157] - Quote
How about EVE without supers? I like that idea a lot. |
MeestaPenni
Mercantile and Stuff
97
|
Posted - 2011.11.26 22:49:00 -
[158] - Quote
Pavel Bidermann wrote:How about EVE without supers? I like that idea a lot.
This.
|
Mag's
the united
Negative Ten.
2356
|
Posted - 2011.11.26 23:40:00 -
[159] - Quote
OninoTimmo wrote:the whine from low-sec pubbies is great
keep it up, I'm enjoying the tears Some, not all. 
CCP Zulu.....
Forcing players to dock at the captain's quarters is a form of what we actually wanted to get through, which is making Incarna a seamless part of the EVE Online experience. |
|
|
| |
Reply to Topic |
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |