| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Reply to Topic | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
1077
 |
Posted - 2011.11.25 22:09:00 -
[31] - Quote
Tahna Rouspel wrote:It doesn't make sense to me. Why is it wrong to have wormhole self-sufficient on an equal level to null-sec? I hear nullsec has access to ice.
IIRC a concern at the time is that if WH's were self-sufficient, they would quickly be colonized by nullsec alliances and used as secure production facilities. CSM - because I have not yet plumbed the depths of my inherent masochism! CSM 6 Activities Summary | My CSM blog |

Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
454
 |
Posted - 2011.11.25 22:35:00 -
[32] - Quote
Ice in w-space doesn't count as a little thing, and it is not a bug, it is totally by design. Without the need to haul stuff, there would be a lot less traffic in w-space, and ganking a hauler is often the start of a fun fight. CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog What does CSM 6 do? |

Hirana Yoshida
Behavioral Affront
152
 |
Posted - 2011.11.25 23:48:00 -
[33] - Quote
Two step wrote:FW both needs little things and a larger overhaul. Until CCP is willing to commit resources to that larger overhaul, they would like to fix as many smaller FW issues as they can. Which would be awesome if doable, but every time .. let me repeat that EVERY TIME they have tried to fix a little thing in FW they have broken a whopping big thing. Hell even when they fix things theoretically unrelated to FW something breaks ..
FW is a great big mash-up of code from all over the place .. there is no small fixes available, the best you can do on that scale is tweaking but tweaks are neither wanted not needed .. the base mechanics are what people have been complaining about the past three years.
The perfect solution for me is for CCP to pour everything they have into a rewrite of null sovereignty system and then applying a simplified and slightly modified version of said system to FW. Should make for a much sturdier construct and goes a lot further towards making FW a taste of null warfare without forcing people out to null type deal which was one of the original intentions if I recall.
In short: I second (or however high number, haven't read all posts) the motion to remove the "little things" sticker from FW.
|

ImmutableDark
We Hit Women
2
 |
Posted - 2011.11.26 01:53:00 -
[34] - Quote
1. Give greater rewards for PVP combat i.e. more LP when you kill someone in the opposing faction. 2. Give LP rewards for taking over opposing faction's complexes (30k lp divided between fleet members). 3. Stop Opposing faction members from docking in your stations.
|

Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous
554
 |
Posted - 2011.11.26 02:25:00 -
[35] - Quote
All I have to say is that I'm extremely disappointed in the CSM for taking an issue like FW that the players have been working on for years now, providing volumes of feedback, and the CSM's response is to tack it on as a FOOTNOTE to a thread about wormholes.
Two Step, your "little things" list included nothing about FW. All you had to do is copy paste the list I've already compiled, the work has already been done for the CSM. Please explain, is this a personal list of stuff that you yourself want to see, or is that the list of things you want to see fixed based on what the community has asked for? If this thread is about FW and wormholes, why are there no FW items in your list?
Can the CSM just be honest if FW is a lower priority to you than even wormholes? I think I can speak for all of the FW community when I say we're tired of the lip service. We've worked tremendously hard, and written volumes about what we'd like to see, condensed those volumes into lists, linked to them, referenced again, explained in even more volume, more lists, more links, and still, today, both CCP and now the CSM are asking us to explain ourselves one more time.
Asking us to list all these things over again, in the body of a thread like this, is extremely insulting. If the CSM is clearly not taking the FW community seriously, why than should CCP? We deserve to know whether this is actually something that any one person in the CSM is willing to step forward and be a champion for, if no one is willing to address FW as a seperate area to fix worthy of its own discussion, than show us that respect at least so we can all stop wasting our time.
Faction Warfare has NOTHING to do with wormholes. Why the two are included in the same topic list is beyond me. This is probably the most disheartening turn of events in the history of this movement to see iterations on FW. We're finally getting momentum from CCP on development, the CSM had asked me to make you a list, I did so, even more feedback supported that list, and the CSM promised to make it a summit talking point.
Yet here we are, a single word in the title of a thread, followed by a list of fixes to wormholes, leaving the players to once again grovel, beg, and plead, for even a simply acknowledgment that one member, just one, has taken time to read the community's feedback, which has been consistent for years now, and include player feedback in the list being brought to CSM.
I apologize for what I know is an angry tone, but really, its just sadness and frustration. I really had a lot of respect for the CSM, appreciate all the time that was taken to respond to my mails, but after all that work, to see Faction Warfare delegated to a word tacked onto a wormhole discussion, is simply unbelievable.
I just don't know what more to say than that. |

Tahna Rouspel
BWE Special Forces Rage Alliance
17
 |
Posted - 2011.11.26 02:32:00 -
[36] - Quote
Hans,
The reason why Faction warfare and Wormholes are tackled together is because they're both activities with a minority of players in them. What percentage of EVE participates in wormholes and faction warfare? 5% maybe? |

Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous
555
 |
Posted - 2011.11.26 02:45:00 -
[37] - Quote
Tahna Rouspel wrote:Hans,
The reason why Faction warfare and Wormholes are tackled together is because they're both activities with a minority of players in them. What percentage of EVE participates in wormholes and faction warfare? 5% maybe?
This is a direct result of years of neglect like this. We were not always a minority activity, its become that way because the fans have mostly given up because they've shared their feedback time and time again only to be ignored.
Currently statistics on FW participation have very, very little to do with how many players wish Faction Warfare were given attention.
In the myriad threads discussing the feature, a great deal of the feedback is coming from those that got tired of the broken mechanics, and left. The CSM has even historically passed resolution after resolution to put FW fixes on to the table, finally their resolutions were no longer about the fixes but merely to call attention to the fact that the previous resolutions have been ignored.
There are only a few of us left with the energy to keep fighting, but thousands upon thousands more that would both benefit, participate, and resubscribe if Faction Warfare to be fixed. Also, if the CSM were to take the time to read the feedback, they would see that fixing Faction Warfare has far-reaching benefits to the EvE playerbase at large - increased FW activity provides a healthy role play environment, an abundance of small-gang warfare that players across the board have begged for, economic incentive to live in lowsec, and a food source for piracy, a classic pillar of EvE gameplay. Its not just about FW, its about all the other areas of gameplay FW stands to improve should its basic mechanics be fixed according to the feedback that has been clearly provided now ad nauseum.
My ongoing fight has been and continues to be not just for the die-hard vets that still participate, but for all the frustrated pilots that have walked away, moved elsewhere, or even left the game because of treatment just like this. Its also for every pilot that has ever said, "I wish there was more small gang PvP" or "1 vs 1 fights are dead" or "lowsec is worthless and boring".
CCP said they'd include FW in a list of fixes - than failed to elaborate. This hurt the community deeply, and prompted a great deal of feedback that came from many people, FW participants and non-participants alike.
Now, the CSM is doing the same - including FW in a list, than failing to elaborate. |

Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
454
 |
Posted - 2011.11.26 03:00:00 -
[38] - Quote
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:All I have to say is that I'm extremely disappointed in the CSM for taking an issue like FW that the players have been working on for years now, providing volumes of feedback, and the CSM's response is to tack it on as a FOOTNOTE to a thread about wormholes.
Two Step, your "little things" list included nothing about FW. All you had to do is copy paste the list I've already compiled, the work has already been done for the CSM. Please explain, is this a personal list of stuff that you yourself want to see, or is that the list of things you want to see fixed based on what the community has asked for? If this thread is about FW and wormholes, why are there no FW items in your list?
Can the CSM just be honest if FW is a lower priority to you than even wormholes? I think I can speak for all of the FW community when I say we're tired of the lip service. We've worked tremendously hard, and written volumes about what we'd like to see, condensed those volumes into lists, linked to them, referenced again, explained in even more volume, more lists, more links, and still, today, both CCP and now the CSM are asking us to explain ourselves one more time.
Asking us to list all these things over again, in the body of a thread like this, is extremely insulting. If the CSM is clearly not taking the FW community seriously, why than should CCP? We deserve to know whether this is actually something that any one person in the CSM is willing to step forward and be a champion for, if no one is willing to address FW as a seperate area to fix worthy of its own discussion, than show us that respect at least so we can all stop wasting our time.
Faction Warfare has NOTHING to do with wormholes. Why the two are included in the same topic list is beyond me. This is probably the most disheartening turn of events in the history of this movement to see iterations on FW. We're finally getting momentum from CCP on development, the CSM had asked me to make you a list, I did so, even more feedback supported that list, and the CSM promised to make it a summit talking point.
Yet here we are, a single word in the title of a thread, followed by a list of fixes to wormholes, leaving the players to once again grovel, beg, and plead, for even a simply acknowledgment that one member, just one, has taken time to read the community's feedback, which has been consistent for years now, and include player feedback in the list being brought to CSM.
I apologize for what I know is an angry tone, but really, its just sadness and frustration. I really had a lot of respect for the CSM, appreciate all the time that was taken to respond to my mails, but after all that work, to see Faction Warfare delegated to a word tacked onto a wormhole discussion, is simply unbelievable.
I just don't know what more to say than that.
I know, since I didn't say something like "my personal list", it is easy to see how you could have misunderstood that list as the definitive CSM list. 
Look, I'm terribly sorry that you feel that everyone is ignoring FW, but I hate to break it to you, most of EVE is ignoring FW. Like I said to you in EVE mail, we don't have anyone on the current CSM that participates in FW. If you want us to bring up your little issues, you need to tell us what they are, and having them all in one thread makes that easier.
I also think you aren't understanding what Trebor and I said to you. We didn't promise you that everything wrong with FW would be fixed, we asked you for a list of smaller issues, because we wanted to have a list to present to CCP. This doesn't mean CCP is going to fix everything wrong with FW in the next patch (or even ever). This summit topic was a CCP requested topic, not a CSM requested topic.
As far as I can tell, there are far fewer FW folks than people that are living in w-space. Of course, FW needs a lot more work to be fixed, where w-space is mostly in good shape. CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog What does CSM 6 do? |

Xorv
Questionable Acquisitions
2
 |
Posted - 2011.11.26 03:13:00 -
[39] - Quote
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: This is a direct result of years of neglect like this. We were not always a minority activity, its become that way because the fans have mostly given up because they've shared their feedback time and time again only to be ignored.
I agree that Faction Warfare could be so much better, but as it is despite being a gamer that played in Lore/RP groups in games like Shadowbane and Darkfall I have never had interest in participating in Faction War in EVE as implemented. Nothing that happens in FW has much of an impact on the game world outside of those that signed up for it, and even then it's minimal. It's just another themepark ride, devoid of story, sandbox, and meaningful consequences to the world at large.
Perhaps with some fixes it will appeal to Hans and others more, but personally I think it needs a complete overhaul. Hans is right though it's hardly surprising that something long neglected by CCP garners little participation from the playerbase |

Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous
555
 |
Posted - 2011.11.26 03:16:00 -
[40] - Quote
Two step wrote: Look, I'm terribly sorry that you feel that everyone is ignoring FW, but I hate to break it to you, most of EVE is ignoring FW. Like I said to you in EVE mail, we don't have anyone on the current CSM that participates in FW. If you want us to bring up your little issues, you need to tell us what they are, and having them all in one thread makes that easier.
I also think you aren't understanding what Trebor and I said to you. We didn't promise you that everything wrong with FW would be fixed, we asked you for a list of smaller issues, because we wanted to have a list to present to CCP. This doesn't mean CCP is going to fix everything wrong with FW in the next patch (or even ever). This summit topic was a CCP requested topic, not a CSM requested topic.
As far as I can tell, there are far fewer FW folks than people that are living in w-space. Of course, FW needs a lot more work to be fixed, where w-space is mostly in good shape.
Thank you for your response, and rest assured I don't have any grandiose expectations about having everything fixed. I'm certainly not naive enough to think that we can just ask and it will be given. Also, I'm not naive enough to think that we represent the majority of EvE players. I've said that before. My case has always been that improving FW has implications beyond just FW, and I was hoping that the CSM could think beyond the one niche community and imagine the possibility that a thriving FW system could provide the type of small-scale combat that players across the game have been asking for, and revitalize lowsec, which has as many issues as nullsec does in terms of broken mechanics and stale activity.
I also was never under the impression that you PROMISED it to be fixed either. What I am reacting to, is that you asked for the list of small fixes to be condensed into one thread, which has been done. I guess the misunderstanding here is that by asking in this thread once again to see a list of little fixes, that I interpreted this to mean you hadn't seen the list that has already been compiled.
And you're right, you said personal list of fixes, I'm sorry for questioning something that should have been more obvious. I was a little flustered, only because there's only so many times you can asked to provide a list of fixes, than provide them, than asked to provide them again. I will go back and edit my previous post for fairness to your personal list, I apologize for jumping the gun.
|
|

Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous
555
 |
Posted - 2011.11.26 03:52:00 -
[41] - Quote
Also, since you have clarified that this list was proposed by CCP, and not the CSM, I just wanted to add that I am not personally holding the CSM responsible for somehow failing us once again.
I know that you are not all FW participants, I'm asking you to think beyond a group of niche players and see that lowsec gameplay is stale for the same reasons nullsec is stale - lack of rewards, broken sovereignty mechanics. The things that bother you, bother us in FW as well.
Think of past CSM - their repeated proposals fell on deaf ears because of Incarna and WoD focus - Faction Warfare used to be a much larger talking point. Please don't punish us for having suffered dwindling numbers due to time and attrition - take advantage of this opportunity now that CSM 6 has the privilege to be working with "the new CCP", and help us get the attention that is long overdue.
Our only chance here is for members of the CSM to look beyond pure representational demographics and think about FW fixes on the basis of merit, not simply on popular support. |

Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
454
 |
Posted - 2011.11.26 04:05:00 -
[42] - Quote
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:Also, since you have clarified that this list was proposed by CCP, and not the CSM, I just wanted to add that I am not personally holding the CSM responsible for somehow failing us once again.
I know that you are not all FW participants, I'm asking you to think beyond a group of niche players and see that lowsec gameplay is stale for the same reasons nullsec is stale - lack of rewards, broken sovereignty mechanics. The things that bother you, bother us in FW as well.
Think of past CSM - their repeated proposals fell on deaf ears because of Incarna and WoD focus - Faction Warfare used to be a much larger talking point. Please don't punish us for having suffered dwindling numbers due to time and attrition - take advantage of this opportunity now that CSM 6 has the privilege to be working with "the new CCP", and help us get the attention that is long overdue.
Our only chance here is for members of the CSM to look beyond pure representational demographics and think about FW fixes on the basis of merit, not simply on popular support.
To clarify again, it wasn't the *list* that was proposed by CCP, it was the session topic.
With regards to convincing CCP to work on FW, that is going to have to mostly fall on the *players* not on the CSM. One of the things the CSM doesn't really do is decide directions for CCP to work on, though we are helpful once said direction has been decided on. If you want CCP to work on FW stuff more, you are going to have to convince them that it is worth working on. CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog What does CSM 6 do? |

Tahna Rouspel
BWE Special Forces Rage Alliance
18
 |
Posted - 2011.11.26 05:11:00 -
[43] - Quote
I agree with Hans when he says that Faction Warfare could much more than it is. It's not just for roleplayers, it's for anyone that wants a purpose in their fight. Not everyone has a chance or wants to join large null sec alliance, but the large scale epic space opera is appealing.
Faction Warfare is the step between highsec NPC and null sovereignty wars. I personally think it's good for the game to have people immersed in the story and support their faction. As I said before, it gives them a purpose and pride while they fight the enemy.
One thing I would like to see in highsec is more faction division. Most capsuleer seem to avoid standing-lowering missions. They aren't choosing side, they are just friendly with all faction. I find that lame. I want division and more fighting. People should feel compelled to pick side. Siding with a faction against their enemies should have more advantages. Not necessarily in a faction warfare way, but just have better reward for those faction missions.
Also, Two Steps, you're from Aperture harmonics, so I assume you have an opinion on most things related to wormholes. What's your thought on Intensive Refining Array? Do you know the reason why refining in a wormhole comes at such a lost?
Is that also to promote more movement between known space and wormholes? How much independence do you think wormholes should have? |

Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous
555
 |
Posted - 2011.11.26 06:16:00 -
[44] - Quote
Two step wrote: To clarify again, it wasn't the *list* that was proposed by CCP, it was the session topic.
With regards to convincing CCP to work on FW, that is going to have to mostly fall on the *players* not on the CSM. One of the things the CSM doesn't really do is decide directions for CCP to work on, though we are helpful once said direction has been decided on. If you want CCP to work on FW stuff more, you are going to have to convince them that it is worth working on.
I guess I still have a lot to learn than about what exactly the CSM does than. (I'm being serious here, not snarky) It was my understanding that many of you ran on campaigns that stood for things like "iterations before new features" and have specifically promoted that CCP redirects its focus from WiS to FiS. So what I thought I was seeing was a CSM that was very much in a position to influence the projects that CCP works on, seeing is how you were such outspoken supporters for the shift away from Incarna and World of Darkness and back onto "EvE proper" fixes. You engaged in a media blitz exposing CCP for ignoring the fanbase, than CCP swings around and starts working on features that have been championed by CSM members present and past on behalf of the player base.
Thus, it takes me by surprise to hear you say, (and I still don't fully understand) that "the CSM doesn't really decide the direction for CCP to work on." I mean, obviously you can't mandate anything, no argument there, but surely you can (and do) say "we believe X deserves some attention sooner than Y"?
Are you implying that current Crucible list is comprised of things CCP decided to work on out of a vacuum with or without the CSM's advocacy?? Again, not at all being sarcastic, I'm genuinely trying to learn about the whole process here, I appreciate your time and patience. |

Ya Huei
Imperial Collective
32
 |
Posted - 2011.11.26 13:42:00 -
[45] - Quote
Why don't Class 4 systems have the random outgoing wormholes like the other class types have ? also, why do C4's not have the possibility of getting a k162 from K-SPACE ?
In case this is confusing people, occasionally a system can have a wormhole that is not "typical" to the system, ie, not one of its static wormholes. As far as I know this never occurs in C4's.
I'd like that added.
|

Cearain
The IMPERIUM of LaZy NATION
86
 |
Posted - 2011.11.26 14:02:00 -
[46] - Quote
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: My ongoing fight has been and continues to be not just for the die-hard vets that still participate, but for all the frustrated pilots that have walked away, moved elsewhere, or even left the game because of treatment just like this. Its also for every pilot that has ever said, "I wish there was more small gang PvP" or "1 vs 1 fights are dead" or "lowsec is worthless and boring".
.
Two step wrote:I know, since I didn't say something like "my personal list", it is easy to see how you could have misunderstood that list as the definitive CSM list.  Look, I'm terribly sorry that you feel that everyone is ignoring FW, but I hate to break it to you, most of EVE is ignoring FW. Like I said to you in EVE mail, we don't have anyone on the current CSM that participates in FW. If you want us to bring up your little issues, you need to tell us what they are, and having them all in one thread makes that easier. I also think you aren't understanding what Trebor and I said to you. We didn't promise you that everything wrong with FW would be fixed, we asked you for a list of smaller issues, because we wanted to have a list to present to CCP. This doesn't mean CCP is going to fix everything wrong with FW in the next patch (or even ever). This summit topic was a CCP requested topic, not a CSM requested topic. As far as I can tell, there are far fewer FW folks than people that are living in w-space. Of course, FW needs a lot more work to be fixed, where w-space is mostly in good shape.
Hans, two step is right. He is here to represent players as they exist in eve now. Not what eve could be.
Fact is CCP has abandoned the only mechanic for frequent quality small gang and solo pvp for so long , very few of us have stuck with eve. Most people who play eve are fine with the blobs and certainly the current csm is fine with it. Some of the alternates I think may have an interest in small scale pvp, or at least they did in the past, but its unclear what they can do.
Not one full delegate on the csm does small scale pvp. It's amazing that ccp still has people clamoring for small scale pvp after they have consistently refused to work on mechanics to bring it about for so long. Really when are we going to give it?
EVE is blob warfare by design. 1000 ship fights make the news in the gamer websites. Players who don't like that leave and have left. Therefore the csm is going to be players who don't mind the blob and have no real interest in mechanics for small scale and solo pvp.
FW isn't going to be something that csm can champion. It's entirely too foreign to them. It will have to be ccp that decides they will finally implement a mechanic that promotes frequent quality small scale pvp.
I think the csm can recognize this. The only people who can give much input would be Elise Randolf and Prometheus. Even there Im not sure prom even knows the mechanics and you may have pissed Elise off with all your whining about pls super caps.  Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
456
 |
Posted - 2011.11.26 16:44:00 -
[47] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Hans, two step is right. He is here to represent players as they exist in eve now. Not what eve could be. Fact is CCP has abandoned the only mechanic for frequent quality small gang and solo pvp for so long , very few of us have stuck with eve. Most people who play eve are fine with the blobs and certainly the current csm is fine with it. Some of the alternates I think may have an interest in small scale pvp, or at least they did in the past, but its unclear what they can do. Not one full delegate on the csm does small scale pvp. It's amazing that ccp still has people clamoring for small scale pvp after they have consistently refused to work on mechanics to bring it about for so long. Really when are we going to give it? EVE is blob warfare by design. 1000 ship fights make the news in the gamer websites. Players who don't like that leave and have left. Therefore the csm is going to be players who don't mind the blob and have no real interest in mechanics for small scale and solo pvp. FW isn't going to be something that csm can champion. It's entirely too foreign to them. It will have to be ccp that decides they will finally implement a mechanic that promotes frequent quality small scale pvp. I think the csm can recognize this. The only people who can give much input would be Elise Randolf and Prometheus. Even there Im not sure prom even knows the mechanics and you may have pissed Elise off with all your whining about pls super caps. 
I disagree that FW is the only small gang PVP available. I think that a lot of the folks that went to FW looking for small gang PVP have found it in w-space. I nearly always PVP in fleets of 20 members or lower, often less than 10. If that isn't small gang PVP, I don't know what is. CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog What does CSM 6 do? |

Cearain
The IMPERIUM of LaZy NATION
86
 |
Posted - 2011.11.26 17:48:00 -
[48] - Quote
Sitting in a wh waiting to gank an industrial is not anything close to what I am after. Hans is right fw and wh are completely different playstyles. At least they would be if ccp fixed fw. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Hiram Alexander
Seraphim Securities
113
 |
Posted - 2011.11.26 18:45:00 -
[49] - Quote
I don't currently live in a WH, but when I did, one of the most frustrating things was being unable to repackage modules... over time you end up with insane amounts of unpackage items in your hangars (drones, especially...). Fixing that would be a godsend. |

Hiram Alexander
Seraphim Securities
113
 |
Posted - 2011.11.26 18:51:00 -
[50] - Quote
Two step wrote:Remember, this is *little* things. I am still working on my personal list, here is what is on it so far:
1) Shields on ships out of a SMA/entering a Pulsar/joining a fleet 2) Better system than POS passwords for POS access (same UI as chat channels, would be awesome) 3) Capital SMAs allowed in w-space 4) Cans in corp hangers. Should be able to name them, open them, put stuff in them 5) Rename all POS structures 6) Randomness in sleeper spawns 7) Don't change sig ids after DT 8) Capital ship SD timers
Two step wrote:Remember, this is *little* things. I am still working on my personal list, here is what is on it so far: 6) Randomness in sleeper spawns
100% this. Both from an economic perspective, and that of zzzzzz boredom.
But judging by the (apparent) damage being inflicted to the EVE economy by the comparatively risk-free hisec Incursion system, this should also be seriously looked at for the dynamic-spawn scenario... |
|

MNagy
Yo-Mama Quixotic Hegemony
37
 |
Posted - 2011.11.27 02:39:00 -
[51] - Quote
Tahna Rouspel wrote: One thing I would like to see in highsec is more faction division. Most capsuleer seem to avoid standing-lowering missions. They aren't choosing side, they are just friendly with all faction. I find that lame.
I will give you a simple reason why I keep all my factions at High standing... I plan to play this game a year from now and perhaps even 2 years from now.
I do not want to be "STUCK" just to Minmatar space or Caldari space just cause I wanted to run a couple FW things for a couple months.
The whole Faction standing needs a bit of work, as it takes waaaaayyyy tooo long to grind out missions to get the standing back.
So you may find it lame...
I find it lamer that it prevents me from playing other aspects of the game I might want to do later in life. Why would I pay for an account if I am only going to screw up my character and I suddenly can only play in 1 Faction's space. Wormholes jump out to every system possible - even there - I would be limiting myself to gameplay. |

Cearain
The IMPERIUM of LaZy NATION
86
 |
Posted - 2011.11.27 03:09:00 -
[52] - Quote
Two step wrote:I disagree that FW is the only small gang PVP available. I think that a lot of the folks that went to FW looking for small gang PVP have found it in w-space. I nearly always PVP in fleets of 20 members or lower, often less than 10. If that isn't small gang PVP, I don't know what is.
There is no good mechanic in eve for frequent quality small scale pvp. When I join fw i want to constantly have plexes to go and fight over. CCP should strive to have 2-5 decent pvp fights per hour happening in fw.
If people want to continue with the current game where you might wait around for hours for a single gank they wouldn't want to join fw. However I think allot of people would love it if the pvp action came allot faster than it currently does.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous
556
 |
Posted - 2011.11.27 03:37:00 -
[53] - Quote
Cearain wrote: Hans, two step is right. He is here to represent players as they exist in eve now. Not what eve could be.
Fact is CCP has abandoned the only mechanic for frequent quality small gang and solo pvp for so long , very few of us have stuck with eve. Most people who play eve are fine with the blobs and certainly the current csm is fine with it. Some of the alternates I think may have an interest in small scale pvp, or at least they did in the past, but its unclear what they can do.
Not one full delegate on the csm does small scale pvp. It's amazing that ccp still has people clamoring for small scale pvp after they have consistently refused to work on mechanics to bring it about for so long. Really when are we going to give it?
I completely understand Cearain. But you and I are players too, and there's nothing wrong with asking the CSM to share information with CCP. That's really all I'm trying to do here, is take what I've heard from the people I interact with, consolidate it, and send the message up the chain that this is what we see is broken, this is what would benefit the game if it were fixed. Also, that we see Faction Warfare as an area where minimal fixes can reap great reward in terms of enhanced gameplay and activity.
You and I have a different background than Two Step, that's totally cool. I truly appreciate the diversity of activities there are in the game, and really want there to continue to be a variety of vibrant and unique forms of gameplay each with its own set of challenges and rewards. Wormholing is indeed a place where small gang PvP can occur, and it is also one of the areas that is essentially Supercap and Titan free. But just because Two Step and I have spent time in different areas of the game doesn't mean I'm somehow ineligible to say anything to him and have him pass it along during a summit talk. All I can do is ask, and if I didn't at least ask I would be doing my own community a disservice, regardless of whether Two Step shares our lists of fixes with CCP.
And Two Step - I understood you, when I meant "the list" I mean the topics list - I'm saying its not your fault that the topic is called "Little things: FW and Wormholes". No one should be seeing the CSM as somehow trying to "belittle" us by using that phrasing, cause it was CCP's words not yours. The other list you posted is your own, which rightfully so is focused on wormhole fixes because that's your background. You have your wish list, I've compiled a wish list on behalf of the Faction Warfare community, I'm just confirming that you're talking about both during the summit. Whether Cearain feels you represent me or not, you had offered to share our list, so I'm simply following up is all. |

Tiger's Spirit
Troll Hunters INC.
23
 |
Posted - 2011.11.27 09:19:00 -
[54] - Quote
FW: The most important changes what need.
No docking permissions for the enemy FW participants in occupied enemy controlled systems. Let a sense be given the fight for starsystems. |

Damassys Kadesh
Eternal Damnation of the Woken Mind
22
 |
Posted - 2011.11.27 09:28:00 -
[55] - Quote
Speaking up for FW here, and repeating again for crystal clarity:
The OP has been edited to list the top trending FW issues with a description of each, and the threadnought that follows goes into extreme depth, should any more clarification be needed:
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=18015
I can copy and past the list right into this thread if that will make it easier... |

Wolodymyr
Mando'a Navy Controlled Chaos
5
 |
Posted - 2011.11.27 10:15:00 -
[56] - Quote
I really wish I could set up a station in a wormhole.
cloning bay, market orders, all in W-space. Although the market would probably have to be limited to only displaying the solar system.
Maybe this ruins the manliness of living out of a POS with no reliable access to regular space to rely on. And it might make it way too easy to turtle up and make these impenetrable W-space fortresses. But sometimes I just want to dock up. |

Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
1081
 |
Posted - 2011.11.27 11:15:00 -
[57] - Quote
Cearain wrote:EVE is blob warfare by design. 1000 ship fights make the news in the gamer websites. Players who don't like that leave and have left. Therefore the csm is going to be players who don't mind the blob and have no real interest in mechanics for small scale and solo pvp.
FW isn't going to be something that csm can champion. It's entirely too foreign to them. It will have to be ccp that decides they will finally implement a mechanic that promotes frequent quality small scale pvp.
QFT. The current game design has a greater-than-unity power scaling function for fleets -- it's almost always, if not always, increasing the size of your fleet, which leads to a mutual runaway to the blob. I raised this issue in my original CSM5 campaign, coining "fleets expand to fit the lag available".
TiDi will address some of the technical issues with lag, but it also opens headroom to permit even larger blobs, so it's only really buying time; eventually the fleets will get big enough to make the TiDi factor so large that it'll be unplayable. CCP really needs to change the mechanics to get away from the "dirtbag is primary, everyone shoot dirtbag. douchenozzle is secondary..." blob fights we have now.
WRT FW, if changes are made that make it more popular without addressing the underlying combat mechanics issues the game faces, it'll just blob up. CSM - because I have not yet plumbed the depths of my inherent masochism! CSM 6 Activities Summary | My CSM blog |

Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous
556
 |
Posted - 2011.11.27 11:29:00 -
[58] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote: WRT FW, if changes are made that make it more popular without addressing the underlying combat mechanics issues the game faces, it'll just blob up.
Could you elaborate a little more on what you meant by this? I was wondering which changes you are referring to in terms of popularity, and which underlying mechanics issues you speak of.
|

Wendi Wu
ZERO HEAVY INDUSTRIES
5
 |
Posted - 2011.11.27 17:34:00 -
[59] - Quote
Damassys Kadesh wrote:I can copy and past the list right into this thread if that will make it easier...
I think that's probably a good idea.
Here's the summarized version of Hans' compiled list of requested fixes from the FW community:
Quick Fixes
1.) Have plexes spawn throughout the day instead of primarily after downtime. 2.) Pirate frigates shouldn't be allowed in minor plexes. 3.) Repping a militia member with low security status should not kill faction standing. 4.) Repping a friendly low sec status militia member who is a victim of aggression should not result in GCC. 5.) Give some kind of highly visible alert or intel system for when territory is threatened.
Big Fixes
1.) Make plexing more rewarding. 2.) Balance faction NPCs. 3.) Change FW missions so they can't be soloed in a stealth bomber. 4.) Make FW sov do something, rather than being meaningless as it is at present.
The full, expanded list can be found here: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=18015 |

Damassys Kadesh
Eternal Damnation of the Woken Mind
22
 |
Posted - 2011.11.27 18:30:00 -
[60] - Quote
Something else I'll chime in on here.
It's not up to us to throw around estimated statistics of FW or WH popularity, or to compare them, or to then decide which issues have merit.
There is a strong voice in the EVE community asking for recognition and development time. The voice is strong enough that it has been heard by CCP employees, discussed by CCP employees, sent up the chain by CCP employees, to the point where the CEO, the man in charge of the entire company, has heard it, considered it, and deemed it weighty enough to directly reference it's need for work in a very important letter to the entire community.
That should be enough for everyone. If we just stick to the simplest communication here, it will be best for everyone.
What are the issues? Are the issues clear to the CSM? Can the CSM communicate them clearly to CCP? |
|
|
|
| |
Reply to Topic |
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |