Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 8 post(s) |
Erica Dusette
Isogen 5
17053
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 01:29:00 -
[121] - Quote
Welp, now I'm just pissed tbh.
I directly quoted your comment about the Rocket dress, then clearly addressed it yet again in my second post. Unless you have a horrendous grasp of English then I don't understand how you could have misunderstood. Building hopes up, dropped them down again, then up again, then down again.
Let me demonstrate to you now the hypocrisy in your decision CCP karkur.
I cannot wear my Rocket Dress ingame however I can free look at my own and other people's avatars in nothing but underwear. I can freely post (ingame or forums) this, this and this and this and even this without violating any of the EULA. The list goes on. Yet for some reason you decline to modify the very dress which inspired the push for change to begin with.
I think I'd like to speak to your supervisor. Gÿá Part-time wormhole pirate | GÖí Full-time super model WH Blog | #420roloswag | Bio |
|
CCP karkur
C C P C C P Alliance
3556
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 02:03:00 -
[122] - Quote
Erica Dusette wrote:Welp, now I'm just pissed tbh. I directly quoted your comment about the Rocket dress, then clearly addressed it yet again in my second post. Unless you have a horrendous grasp of English then I don't understand how you could have misunderstood. Building hopes up, dropped them down again, then up again, then down again. Let me demonstrate to you now the absolute hypocrisy in your decision CCP karkur. I cannot wear my Rocket Dress ingame without pants however I can freely look at my own and other people's avatars in nothing but underwear. I can freely post (ingame or forums) this, this and this and this and even this without violating any of the EULA. The list goes on. Yet for some reason you decline to modify the very dress which inspired the push for change to begin with. I think I'd like to speak to your supervisor. Don't worry, I'll tweet your post to Explorer right now and you can speak to him all you want.
I took your post as if you understood that it was a top and that by "you're going to change it" you meant the name. CCP karkur | User Interface Programmer | Team Pirate Unicorns |-á@CCP karkur |
|
Erica Dusette
Isogen 5
17055
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 02:07:00 -
[123] - Quote
CCP karkur wrote:I took your post as if you understood that it was a top and that by "you're going to change it" you meant the name. Yeah sure, because that's what we've been pushing for all along.
Between this debacle and what you guys are doing in wormholes it's little wonder you've got so many detractors right now. You're about to gain another one too. ^^
Amount of time and money I pump into this game and I campaign for one single change and you guys can't even get that right.
I hope Explorer comes here and spend some time explaining this crazy decision because I don't use Twitter. Gÿá Part-time wormhole pirate | GÖí Full-time super model WH Blog | #420roloswag | Bio |
Salpun
Global Telstar Federation Offices Masters of Flying Objects
758
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 02:10:00 -
[124] - Quote
Erica Dusette wrote:CCP karkur wrote:I took your post as if you understood that it was a top and that by "you're going to change it" you meant the name. Yeah sure, because that's what we've been pushing for all along. Between this debacle and what you guys are doing in wormholes it's little wonder you've got so many detractors right now. You're about to gain another one too. ^^ Amount of time and money I pump into this game and I campaign for one single change and you guys can't even get that right. I hope Explorer comes here and spend some time explaining this crazy decision because I don't use Twitter. Have you even jumped on Sisi and seen the change? If i dont know something about EVE. I check https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/ISK_The_Guide
See you around the universe. |
Erica Dusette
Isogen 5
17055
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 02:12:00 -
[125] - Quote
Salpun wrote:Have you even jumped on Sisi and seen the change? I don't use Sisi.
I'm being told in this thread by CCP karkur that we can now wear the Sanctity Dresses without pants. However they will not allow us to wear the Rocket Dresses without pants. That is my issue. Gÿá Part-time wormhole pirate | GÖí Full-time super model WH Blog | #420roloswag | Bio |
Makoto Priano
Priano Trans-Stellar State Services Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
6334
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 02:19:00 -
[126] - Quote
Eh. Tempest in a tea cup. Priano Trans-Stellar: elegant solutions for the State's needs. |
Sugar Kyle
Snuff Box
637
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 02:25:00 -
[127] - Quote
Erica Dusette wrote:I cannot wear my Rocket Dress ingame without pants however I can freely look at my own and other people's avatars in nothing but underwear. I can freely post (ingame or forums) this, this and this and this and even this without violating any of the EULA. The list goes on. Yet for some reason you decline to modify the very dress which inspired the push for change to begin with.
Poor Avatar needs a sandwich. Low Sec Lifestyle - A Blog |
Erica Dusette
Isogen 5
17057
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 02:25:00 -
[128] - Quote
Makoto Priano wrote:Eh. Tempest in a tea cup. Thanks, I'll remember that next time I see you pushing for something that's important to your EVE and swing by to deride your passion for it.
Several hundred dollars per month and countless hours I put in here. If you're happy with your Sanctity dresses then go celebrate and put one on, I'll sit here and keep pushing for what is important to me.
Gÿá Part-time wormhole pirate | GÖí Full-time super model WH Blog | #420roloswag | Bio |
Erica Dusette
Isogen 5
17057
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 02:26:00 -
[129] - Quote
Sugar Kyle wrote:Erica Dusette wrote:I cannot wear my Rocket Dress ingame without pants however I can freely look at my own and other people's avatars in nothing but underwear. I can freely post (ingame or forums) this, this and this and this and even this without violating any of the EULA. The list goes on. Yet for some reason you decline to modify the very dress which inspired the push for change to begin with. Poor Avatar needs a sandwich. Yeap, I get that all the time lol
Gÿá Part-time wormhole pirate | GÖí Full-time super model WH Blog | #420roloswag | Bio |
Harrigan VonStudly
Stay Frosty. A Band Apart.
100
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 02:31:00 -
[130] - Quote
Erica Dusette wrote:Welp, now I'm just pissed tbh. I directly quoted your comment about the Rocket dress, then clearly addressed it yet again in my second post. Unless you have a horrendous grasp of English then I don't understand how you could have misunderstood. Building hopes up, dropped them down again, then up again, then down again. Let me demonstrate to you now the absolute hypocrisy in your decision CCP karkur. I cannot wear my Rocket Dress ingame without pants however I can freely look at my own and other people's avatars in nothing but underwear. I can freely post (ingame or forums) this, this and this and this and even this without violating any of the EULA. The list goes on. Yet for some reason you decline to modify the very dress which inspired the push for change to begin with. I think I'd like to speak to your supervisor.
Your arrogance is really smelly. This isn't how you get GM's to work with you. Just sayin' You might request some fresh panties as well considering yours are all tight wadded up into your ass atm. |
|
Erica Dusette
Isogen 5
17058
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 02:33:00 -
[131] - Quote
Lol the masses sense my anger and move in with tear buckets at the ready.
I think you mean Devs, not GMs.
And yeah, I'm pissed about it. vOv
I've been polite and diplomatic about it for months as I pushed for change in this issue, with the Rocket dress as centrepiece. Gÿá Part-time wormhole pirate | GÖí Full-time super model WH Blog | #420roloswag | Bio |
Reaver Glitterstim
Dromedaworks inc Test Alliance Please Ignore
1744
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 02:33:00 -
[132] - Quote
I don't understand why characters suddenly have to wear pants just because they have a shirt on. It may not be culturally acceptable to certain small groups on Earth in 2014 to wear shirts without pants, but it is also unacceptable in certain other cultures on Earth in 2014 to wear pants at all. Different cultures have their own unique and limited views on how clothing should be, but I don't see why one particular limited view should be imposed on the denizens of an entire galaxy outside our own, in the distant future Earth-year of YC114.
Go ahead and call the Rocket dress a top, but we should be able to wear bottomless tops if we want to. Fit a warfare link to your tech 1 battlecruiser. Train Wing Commander. Get in the Squad Commander or Wing Commander position. Your fleets will be superior to everyone else's. (had this sig BEFORE Odyssey BC rebalance) "What if [climate change is] a big hoax and we create a better world for nothing?" -comic on Greenmonk |
Erica Dusette
Isogen 5
17059
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 03:02:00 -
[133] - Quote
Have to agree, not only due to the logic in your post but also because we can wear bottoms with no top, but not vice-versa? It's permissible for female avatars to quite visibly show their bra under a vest or jacket. I'm not asking for it to be the other way around, with avatars getting about in t-shirt and underpants, but to simply wear all the dresses as dresses.
The Rocket dress is spectacular. By far the best of the entire selection when worn as an actual dress.
Anyway, I'll check my sh*t and stop being so pissy. Looking forward to hearing CCP Explorer's explanation and reasoning.
Gÿá Part-time wormhole pirate | GÖí Full-time super model WH Blog | #420roloswag | Bio |
Sibyyl
Gallente Federation
5805
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 03:40:00 -
[134] - Quote
CCP karkur wrote:I'm sorry for the misunderstanding... I did not mean that we are changing the Rocket dress... I was referring to the Sanctity dress and didn't realize you took it as if I was talking about the Rocket dress Sorry to make this more complicated, but will the Sanctity dress still be wearable with pants? I'd like to make sure we don't trade this functionality (ie: by changing the Sanctity top to behave like the Structure dress). The Muppets: P+¦pc++rn (thanks Ria!) "So.. youre saying you cant create content.... because other people are out... creating content?" --United Arab Emirates |
Xenuria
The Scope Gallente Federation
909
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 03:44:00 -
[135] - Quote
Erica Dusette wrote:Welp, now I'm just pissed tbh. I directly quoted your comment about the Rocket dress, then clearly addressed it yet again in my second post. Unless you have a horrendous grasp of English then I don't understand how you could have misunderstood. Building hopes up, dropped them down again, then up again, then down again. Let me demonstrate to you now the absolute hypocrisy in your decision CCP karkur. I cannot wear my Rocket Dress ingame without pants however I can freely look at my own and other people's avatars in nothing but underwear. I can freely post (ingame or forums) this, this and this and this and even this without violating any of the EULA. The list goes on. Yet for some reason you decline to modify the very dress which inspired the push for change to begin with. I think I'd like to speak to your supervisor.
Hello while I do not think you are directing you anger at the right people I do partially agree with you.
It has been well documented that clothing in eve leaves much to be desired.
The spooky Ghost Heel all female avatars have is nothing when compared to the almost Victorian oppression of the clothing style. I for one think we should be allowed to wear any length dress or skirt or nothing at all. This however will never happen.
You are fighting a losing battle. No amount of advocacy or lobbying will lead to more progressive (see modern) attire choices. It's not karkurs fault. Karkur is the last person who wants to see inequality in terms of gender, ingame or otherwise. Karkur like many at ccp are part of a team.
In terms of explanation you will get one of the following.
"Engine Limitation" "Design Choice" "Technical Limitation" Example
That was years ago when I asked the dev team. CSM 9 Candidate Philanthropist Polymath Savant Hero |
Erica Dusette
Isogen 5
17077
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 03:54:00 -
[136] - Quote
I know and I agree. I really shouldn't have snapped at CCP karkur like I did.
karkur just exasperated my frustration with the misunderstanding earlier. Combine that with other frustrating development issues currently in other areas of the game that are important to me personally (WHs) made me react a bit angrily. And I'm sorry for that karkur.
This may seem trivial to most, but to me whining about Sov, highsec ganking and AFK cloaking seems even more so. I'm the last person to rage about stuff anywhere here, but this is the one single little thing I'd really looked forward to and spent time helping push since the dresses were first unveiled. Personally I don't even like the Sanctity dresses.
I confident already I know exactly why they haven't changed the Rocket dresses, karkur's comment in their first post made that quite obvious, as if we should already know why.
Anyway, cheers Xenuria.
Gÿá Part-time wormhole pirate | GÖí Full-time super model WH Blog | #420roloswag | Bio |
Xenuria
The Scope Gallente Federation
910
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 04:02:00 -
[137] - Quote
Erica Dusette wrote:I know and I agree. I really shouldn't have snapped at CCP karkur like I did.
karkur just exasperated my frustration with the misunderstanding earlier. Combine that with other frustrating development issues currently in other areas of the game that are important to me personally (WHs) made me react a bit angrily. And I'm sorry for that karkur.
This may seem trivial to most, but to me whining about Sov, highsec ganking and AFK cloaking seems even more so. I'm the last person to rage about stuff anywhere here, but this is the one single little thing I'd really looked forward to and spent time helping push since the dresses were first unveiled. Personally I don't even like the Sanctity dresses.
I confident already I know exactly why they haven't changed the Rocket dresses, karkur's comment in their first post made that quite obvious, as if we should already know why.
Anyway, cheers Xenuria.
It's cool everybody loses their cool even me.
I can understand what you mean about the concept of a "trivial feature" being relative. I would love nothing more than to treat EvE like a social network in space. I would invite all my girlfriend to my CQ and we would do fireballs while watching the reanimated cyborg of NDT narrate the COSMOS tv show. It would be like second life only... good. While these are my views I have an understanding that most players would rather have something entirely different but just as specific or obscure.
As far as game companies go, CCP makes everybody else look like Umbrella Corp. The gaming industry now resembles political theature more than it does an entertainment industry. That is where CCP is the glimmer of hope. The light in the dark. The last bastion of true game development in a market full of half baked console ports and Football manager 2018.
Full disclosure: I have a gratuitous investment into the success of CCP.
CSM 9 Candidate Philanthropist Polymath Savant Hero |
Johnny May
Learn 2 Play Free 2 Play
9
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 07:27:00 -
[138] - Quote
So much rage about items which only have the purpose of looking good.. Seriously, this thread reminds me of when my ex dragged me shopping. Did I mention she's my ex now?
If I wanted CCP to change those dresses I'd be extra nice to their employees, and not the "I want to talk to your supervisor" asshat towards someone who seems to spend his/her weekend improving an purely optical detail in this game. |
Erica Dusette
Isogen 5
17086
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 07:40:00 -
[139] - Quote
Johnny May wrote:If I wanted CCP to change those dresses I'd be extra nice to their employees, and not the "I want to talk to your supervisor" asshat towards someone who seems to spend his/her weekend improving an purely optical detail in this game. Of course, I can understand how yourself or the casual observer wouldn't get irate like I did.
Why? Well because you have no interest in this stuff, don't use it, have spent no time campaigning and pushing for it's change or the implementation of fresh content, or probably even following it's development (or lack thereof). To you this stuff is "purely optical", but sir to many many others it's a lot more.
My attitude might stink a little in this thread, and I've already apologized for being rude in my earlier posts, but the logic behind my complaint is rock-solid. If that logic is ignored because they don't like the attitude of the paying customer who presents it then that says more about them than me. I don't expect you to appreciate the importance it holds to me, just like I don't appreciate the importance that 90% of the threads in this subsection have for others because they're not things I feel passionate about in my EVE. Passionate enough to unsub 5 of my 8 accounts over this (thereby along with 5/8ths of my considerable community activity) and cut my side-spending per month here by hundreds if the outcome isn't to this consumer's satisfaction. *shrug*
Gÿá Part-time wormhole pirate | GÖí Full-time super model WH Blog | #420roloswag | Bio |
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
5778
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 08:26:00 -
[140] - Quote
Erica Dusette wrote:Johnny May wrote:If I wanted CCP to change those dresses I'd be extra nice to their employees, and not the "I want to talk to your supervisor" asshat towards someone who seems to spend his/her weekend improving an purely optical detail in this game. Of course, I can understand how yourself or the casual observer wouldn't get irate like I did. Why? Well because you have no interest in this stuff, don't use it, have spent no time campaigning and pushing for it's change or the implementation of fresh content, or probably even following it's development (or lack thereof). To you this stuff is "purely optical", but sir to many many others it's a lot more. My attitude might stink a little in this thread, and I've already apologized for being rude in my earlier posts, but the logic behind my complaint is rock-solid. If that logic is ignored because they don't like the attitude of the paying customer who presents it then that says more about them than me. I don't expect you to appreciate the importance it holds to me, just like I don't appreciate the importance that 90% of the threads in this subsection have for others because they're not things I feel passionate about in my EVE. Passionate enough to unsub 5 of my 8 accounts over this (thereby along with 5/8ths of my considerable community activity) and cut my side-spending per month here by hundreds if the outcome isn't to this consumer's satisfaction. *shrug* I almost thought you had regained your dignity with that fine apology earlier, but since you stooped to the level of "I'll unsub if you don't do as I say" your chances of anyone caring what your opinion is on the matter just hit rock bottom.
If CCP took their creative cue's from everyone that pulled that old chestnut they would have gone out of business long ago.
I'm sure you realize that CCPs stance on our Avatars dress guidelines are based on a lot of variables, from legal advising them how best to maintain their current advisory rating, to corporate policy... from creative direction strategy to plans for future additions to the NEX... none of which are they obligated in any way to get your approval on or waste time explaining.
Nobody is going to fault you for pleading your case (now or in the future), but the hissy fit and threats to unsub are more than a little over the top... and certainly aren't helping your case.
Personally I'm all for more flexibility in customizing our Avatars, and come down squarely on the side of "I'd like to see things change to allow stuff like this"... but I also understand when the answer is No, or at least "not right now". If you like EVE Online and War Thunder content stop by my YouTube channel.-á
Ranger 1 Presents https://www.youtube.com/user/Ranger1Presents |
|
Erica Dusette
Isogen 5
17103
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 08:51:00 -
[141] - Quote
Heya Ranger
Well what a lot of folks who are dropping by this thread to take a poke at me don't seem to realise is that this is an issue that's been ongoing for quite a while. A few people have been pushing it and campaigning for it including me and nobody more-so than Sol, the OP here. For long months I've personally been nothing but polite and diplomatic. This isn't the first day of this issue, rather the climax. As Xenuria mentioned it's importance is relative and for me it's huge.
Over a silly dress?
No, not at all. It's a little deeper than that - for an analogy look in the WH forum this past week. Unprecedented rage, unsubbing and dozens of rebellious rage/spam threads. It's all over some proposed changes. Proposed! Not even implemented! Why such a reaction over something non-tangible? Because the very proposals themselves show a huge disconnect between the Devs and the WH community. It shows a continued direction of development that the players are sick to death of.
Similarly my upset here isn't simply because I can't wear an item how I want - it's because the reasoning is unsound and on the surface appears hypocritical. Just the latest straw thrown on the back of what has been a complete snub of avatar-related development for years here, an area important to many.
We're seeing more of it now days, got your NES and some more items in the pipe, microtransactions alive and well because CCP needs that money badly. With that in mind I'm not making a "threat" to unsub some of my accounts, I'm making a promise because I don't wish to invest my time and money in encouraging a development direction I don't agree with.
And each of us as users/consumers here are well within our rights to do so. My faith in the development process is dropping and naturally my motivation to play and spend money will drop along with it. I'm sorry if me highlighting those facts somehow devalue my opinion or make me seem like I'm throwing a "hissy fit".
Foremost Im looking forward to the reasoning behind it being explained by Explorer so I can make my decisions on fact rather than assumption - which is all us avatar supporters have had to work with for years.
Cheers. Gÿá Part-time wormhole pirate | GÖí Full-time super model WH Blog | #420roloswag | Bio |
Darkblad
Hilfe is like Free Entertainment
408
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 08:56:00 -
[142] - Quote
Samira Kernher wrote:CCP karkur wrote:Just be patient, we should have something cool for you soon-ish Ooh, looking forward to whatever it is! one can only wonder or take a deep look into the magic crystal ball like I did several times
Edit: To get their info on Sisi you might want to stress your mouse button through these links. Last Apparel I found was @ 34111! EVE Infolinks -+-áOld and new-áPortraits |
miiral
7922
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 10:08:00 -
[143] - Quote
Darkblad wrote:Samira Kernher wrote:CCP karkur wrote:Just be patient, we should have something cool for you soon-ish Ooh, looking forward to whatever it is! one can only wonder or take a deep look into the magic crystal ball likeIdidseveraltimesEdit: To get their info on Sisi you might want to stress your mouse button through these links. Last Apparel I found was @ 34111!
Nice, these came to sisi at last update ? I just browsed the db also, seems that CCP has done some renovation over the assets category...
Anyway, since nobody hasn't provided any "proof" about the change, here's some
|
Darkblad
Hilfe is like Free Entertainment
408
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 10:12:00 -
[144] - Quote
miiral wrote:[quote=Darkblad]Nice, these came to sisi at last update ? I just browsed the db also, seems that CCP has done some renovation over the assets category... I didn't check for newly used typeIDs for a while. My assumption is that the new Apparel got added on August 1st. The patch file from that day (814417 to 814563) was about 788MB in size.
EVE Infolinks -+-áOld and new-áPortraits |
Samira Kernher
Praetorian Auxiliary Force Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
677
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 10:14:00 -
[145] - Quote
OMG. Need to start saving up aurum again.
Thank you for those links.
I hope those tights are intended to be wearable under all other types of clothing so that they can be worn with skirts and such. That would be great!
And that headgear... old school! |
Darkblad
Hilfe is like Free Entertainment
408
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 10:26:00 -
[146] - Quote
Samira Kernher wrote:OMG. Need to start saving up aurum again.
Thank you for those links.
I hope those tights are intended to be wearable under all other types of clothing so that they can be worn with skirts and such. That would be great!
And that headgear... old school! You're welcome :) The Tights are "Bottoms", so they should be wearable with anything that a) doesn't use that same group and b) allows bottoms to be added.
The Space Suit uses the groups Outer, Bottoms and Footwear The Headwear is "Hair Styles", so it's possible that you're stuck with the Bob-ish hair. EVE Infolinks -+-áOld and new-áPortraits |
Samira Kernher
Praetorian Auxiliary Force Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
677
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 10:32:00 -
[147] - Quote
If they're bottoms then that's a problem, since most of the things that they would look best with (skirts) are also bottoms, or do not allow bottoms (like the structure dress). Ironically, the Sanctity dress with the new changes would be the thing that they would work great with.
Ideally they should get their own special layer, in the same way that the dress jacket has the mid layer, which can be worn under skirts.
And I really hope the headwear doesn't limit you to a specific hairstyle. That'd be annoying. We don't mind clipping, devs! |
|
CCP Explorer
C C P C C P Alliance
2303
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 11:07:00 -
[148] - Quote
Erica Dusette wrote:Welp, now I'm just pissed tbh. I directly quoted your comment about the Rocket dress, then clearly addressed it yet again in my second post. Unless you have a horrendous grasp of English then I don't understand how you could have misunderstood. Building hopes up, dropped them down again, then up again, then down again. Let me demonstrate to you now the absolute hypocrisy in your decision CCP karkur. I cannot wear my Rocket Dress ingame without pants however I can freely look at my own and other people's avatars in nothing but underwear. I can freely post (ingame or forums) this, this and this and this and even this without violating any of the EULA. The list goes on. Yet for some reason you decline to modify the very dress which inspired the push for change to begin with. I think I'd like to speak to your supervisor. Hey there Erica Dusette; I'm unfortunately having a difficult time understanding what the confusion here is, my apologies beforehand.
Reading the thread then CCP karkur is replying (in the middle of the night on a weekend no less), being enthusiastic and helpful, providing information and letting you know of a change that is being made (and is available for you on SiSi for testing, please provide us with feedback). Specifically then the Sanctity dress has been changed (again, on SiSi for testing) so it can now be worn without a bottom but the Rocket dress is not going to be changed. This is very clear from the first reply (and before you ask, I looked through the edit history and this is very clear from the first edition in my opinion).
I gather you are unhappy with this decision, and let's continue that discussion, but please stick to subject matter arguments and kindly stay away from personal accusation of "horrendous grasp of English" and "absolute hypocrisy" that are both inappropriate and without any merit whatsoever.
Cordially yours, CCP Explorer. Erlendur S. Thorsteinsson | Senior Development Director | EVE Online // CCP Games | @erlendur |
|
Darkblad
Hilfe is like Free Entertainment
409
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 11:18:00 -
[149] - Quote
Samira Kernher wrote:If they're bottoms then that's a problem, since most of the things that they would look best with (skirts) are also bottoms, or do not allow bottoms (like the structure dress). Ironically, the Sanctity dress with the new changes would be the thing that they would work great with.
Ideally they should get their own special layer, in the same way that the dress jacket has the mid layer, which can be worn under skirts.
And I really hope the headwear doesn't limit you to a specific hairstyle. That'd be annoying. We don't mind clipping, devs! I guessed that this might cause some troubles If only human bodies had more hardpoints to attach apparel to ... but I guess that'd require an overhaul of the character editor. And I guess that there's no DEV resources to make that happen anytime soon (even soonGäó is highly doubtful).
EVE Infolinks -+-áOld and new-áPortraits |
Reaver Glitterstim
Dromedaworks inc Test Alliance Please Ignore
1747
|
Posted - 2014.08.10 11:23:00 -
[150] - Quote
I'm rather excited to finally see headwear, though just as I am finally beginning to see a few attractive options for the types that we've had for a long time, I am seeing that the new headgear is all ugly as a sith just like all of the tops, bottoms, and shoes were when it first came out.
I want to put something on my head, but I want it to look nice. Somebody in their art department has finally taken the cap off of the color pens, but they haven't spread any of that glorious ink to the new hats! You'll have to forgive me, but I just don't feel like random polygonal cuts and hems on drab cloth is particularly spectacular. I've a good eye for clothing, I'm not as simple as my shirt would otherwise suggest--this is just the only thing I can put on just yet that rewards my senses. Fit a warfare link to your tech 1 battlecruiser. Train Wing Commander. Get in the Squad Commander or Wing Commander position. Your fleets will be superior to everyone else's. (had this sig BEFORE Odyssey BC rebalance) "What if [climate change is] a big hoax and we create a better world for nothing?" -comic on Greenmonk |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |