Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
cynomakinggirl
No Risk No ISK
11
|
Posted - 2014.06.04 09:40:00 -
[61] - Quote
Ame Umida wrote:Are ya tryin to break the game?
-1
and then
- over 9000!!!! for posting probably the stupidest idea in all of eve history.
Thank you for your tears. "The internet is a reliable source of information." - Abraham Lincoln |
Asuka Solo
Stark Fujikawa Stark Enterprises
2681
|
Posted - 2014.06.04 09:59:00 -
[62] - Quote
oohthey ioh wrote:why do carebears hate gankers so much? so what they ganked you a few times here and there, but they remove items form circulation and generally help the market.
if anything they need more of a incentive to gank, ganking it's at all time low.
Your post goes both ways....
Eve is about Capital ships, WiS, Boobs, PI and Isk! |
Xe'Cara'eos
A Big Enough Lever
201
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 18:11:00 -
[63] - Quote
Hasikan Miallok wrote:Silly idea.
Concorde moving the med clone out of high sec (in many cases its already out of highsec anyway) to the nearest NPC station in lowsec might be fun though :D
THIS! perfectly reasonable - all their assets should be moved to the same station too >:D For posting an idea into F&I: come up with idea, try and think how people could abuse this, try to fix your idea - loop the process until you can't see how it could be abused, then post to the forums to let us figure out how to abuse it..... If your idea can be abused, it WILL be. |
Iain Cariaba
In Over Our Heads
39
|
Posted - 2014.06.13 18:24:00 -
[64] - Quote
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:OP: For your heresy against HTFU and calls to nerf hisec we are adding a +1 to the Kill-It-Forward queue. Another innocent carebear in hisec will be murdered in your name by one of our highly trained inquisitors. Your heresies, our hands, their blood, your conscience. When these heresies against HTFU stop, we will stop. tldr; HTFU you pansy, Katie Sackhoff says so... F Thank you, Feyd. If I agreed with you, we'd both be wrong. |
Ohhhh Feely Nice
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
27
|
Posted - 2014.06.14 04:19:00 -
[65] - Quote
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:no Never in my life have I more so supported a completely contentless response. |
Ohhhh Feely Nice
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
27
|
Posted - 2014.06.14 04:21:00 -
[66] - Quote
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:OP: For your heresy against HTFU and calls to nerf hisec we are adding a +1 to the Kill-It-Forward queue. Another innocent carebear in hisec will be murdered in your name by one of our highly trained inquisitors. Your heresies, our hands, their blood, your conscience. When these heresies against HTFU stop, we will stop. tldr; HTFU you pansy, Katie Sackhoff says so... F EVE nerd calling another EVE nerd a pansy. How amusing.
I'm sure whoever made you this aggressive is laughing as hard as I am. |
Nariya Kentaya
Phoenix funds
1335
|
Posted - 2014.06.14 04:33:00 -
[67] - Quote
cynomakinggirl wrote:Gawain Edmond wrote:cynomakinggirl wrote:Schmata Bastanold wrote:Oh, I just remembered something: recycling characters to avoid consequences of one's actions is not allowed. With this change you would just circumvent this rule and in fact boost whole ganking business. So I guess let's do this. Make it last 1 month. The NPC medical facility, after refusing to make you a clone, forgets to send a notice to the Amount Of Characters Per Account Police and they still think that your character is alive and well, refusing to allow you to make one more. It's only after a month of inactivity that they get suspicious and do a search to see if the character is still in the EVE Universe, to which they discover it isn't and allow you to make another. no because that's a silly idea what if you're a pirate hunter and you've been teaching new pirates that it's a bad idea and you end up losing all your toons and then can't play for a month i think we should just biomas characters who come up with bad ideas like this and then ban the accounts of the people who make them Are you trying to say that now gankers, who stupidly enough get podded in highsec, and do it on all their toons, are the victims? What about the ganked!? The ganked may have spent a year to accumulate all the wealth he/she is transporting in his juicy industrial. Anyone who is transporting "all the wealth theyve made in a year in their industrial" is either broke poor and wasnt playing that year, converting it all to PLEX for "reasons", or just, plain and simple, an idiot. You never carry any meaningful amount of value in an industrial. even at the freighter level, you never fill it (which is why I find it hilarious everyone bitches about "muh M3" at the "nerf" since id fit tank mods in the lows anyday, since anythign that actually FILLS a freighter is mroe than enough to pay for the gank fleet that kills it 2 times over, and that value ratio is true at every level fo industrial) |
baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
11928
|
Posted - 2014.06.14 05:28:00 -
[68] - Quote
cynomakinggirl wrote:Ame Umida wrote:Are ya tryin to break the game?
-1
and then
- over 9000!!!! for posting probably the stupidest idea in all of eve history. Thank you for your tears.
Those weren't tears. Like all bears you have no idea when to use that term. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |
Caleb Seremshur
The Atomic Fallout Kids
295
|
Posted - 2014.06.14 06:16:00 -
[69] - Quote
Schmata Bastanold wrote:Yes, unleash severe punishment upon those who actually play this game.
I'm not normally one to defend the viewpoint of the terminally stupid but this is a pretty weak claim to make. Apart from proving someone's botting operation has been impacted you're going to need a bit more substantial evidence to prove that your playstyle is more legitimate than theirs. As gankers and their apologists constantly claim "you have the same toolset they do". https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=348015 T3 OHing subsystem review and rebalance https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=290346 LP faction weapon store costs rebalancing
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |