Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Tasiv Deka
End-of-Line
193
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 23:27:00 -
[31] - Quote
I see a few people missing the point of the thread...
We arent mad at getting blobbed... We dont care... What Rall is trying to say is that if you are going to ***** about no one fighting you then maybe YOU should do something about it and then he is offering a solution.
Its simple keep the nuke ready but dont drop it if you dont need it. Oh, Do go on... no seriously ive got nothing better to do then listen to all the petty arguments and feeble trolling attempts...-á
The sad thing is i'm not sure if i'm telling the truth. |
Lajos Perseus
Conquering Darkness
35
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 23:39:00 -
[32] - Quote
Just because someone has a bigger stick then you do doesn't mean they should down size. With that said I can see where your coming from. ( yes I read your full post)
Just my opinion all these smaller fleets getting there **** pushed in should entice them to recruit more pilots into there corp. if not gtfo of wh space or take all the smaller corps and let them create there own alliance.
Just my thoughts. |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Polarized.
1252
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 23:49:00 -
[33] - Quote
Rall Mekin wrote: If PvP entities even individually decided, "Hey, we're not blobbing everyone to death anymore" and figured out ways that worked for them to implement that, well, it might be slow to change their reputation, but eventually word will get out, "Hey, these guys just want a fight, not to pad their killboard," and smaller groups would engage. We wouldn't see wormhole empires arise, become powerful, revered, and respected only to have them have to leave wormhole space. Each time it happens, we loose a little of our collective soul as a people.... It is sad.
Consider, would you rather be able to roll into many holes and get small skirmishes and be able to show your self openly saying, "Fight at x planet and x moon" and people actually show up, or would you rather every single person hide when they see your corp? I'd rather be known to be honorable and have people willing to engage me, even if it means splitting up my fleets and having them roam different parts of space, possibly loosing a few fights I'd otherwise win.
I understand where you are coming from but you have to understand that people will naturally want to be the biggest and most powerful because it's their nature. We could all agree to not have an active member base over 50 and only ever fight with equal numbers but that isn't realistic. You can't turn round to someone in your corp/alliance and say "you are going to have to sit this one out because we only like "fair" fights. If PVP was just me jumping into a system and saying "5v5 at the sun guyz?" i would quit the game.
Part of the reason we formed a new alliance has to get away from the bad image of you old so again, i understand where you are coming from. We try to avoid the wormhole politics and the coalition style invasions and we don't blob people willing to fight and i think we are better for it.
I think the notion of fair arranged fights is a bad thing and shows how stale wormhole PVP has become (in c5/c6 mainly). Sure the player share some responsibility but IMO, CCPs lack of action plays a bigger part so i'll keep being one of the people screaming for improvements.
@ Jack, it's late here so forgive me but i didn't read through the entire 2 page post but i thought i got the gist... i'll try again tomorrow. +1 |
CeNSeR
Boris Johnson's Love Children
70
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 00:20:00 -
[34] - Quote
Tasiv Deka wrote:I see a few people missing the point of the thread...
We arent mad at getting blobbed... We dont care... What Rall is trying to say is that if you are going to ***** about no one fighting you then maybe YOU should do something about it and then he is offering a solution.
Its simple keep the nuke ready but dont drop it if you dont need it.
So if your not mad about getting blobbed and you dont care what is the point of this thread?
Or are you just trying to convey my ideals and sentiments for wormhole space pvp then as you can see I disagree a little. |
Tasiv Deka
End-of-Line
193
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 00:26:00 -
[35] - Quote
CeNSeR wrote:Tasiv Deka wrote:I see a few people missing the point of the thread...
We arent mad at getting blobbed... We dont care... What Rall is trying to say is that if you are going to ***** about no one fighting you then maybe YOU should do something about it and then he is offering a solution.
Its simple keep the nuke ready but dont drop it if you dont need it. So if your not mad about getting blobbed and you dont care what is the point of this thread? Or are you just trying to convey my ideals and sentiments for wormhole space pvp then as you can see I disagree a little.
Its more the idea that we are irritated with people complaining about not getting fights, and yes i know bitching to end bitching doesnt always work Oh, Do go on... no seriously ive got nothing better to do then listen to all the petty arguments and feeble trolling attempts...-á
The sad thing is i'm not sure if i'm telling the truth. |
Dmitry Wizard
THE AESIR. Ragnarok.
155
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 00:28:00 -
[36] - Quote
Blobbing is the natural progression of the "Group" it does happen it is up to you to break the norm. "over-ride" your natural instincts. Ragnarok. since it's intrusion to Class 6 wormhole space has done what it can to try and break the norm by not requiring T3 cruisers and simply saying "fly what you think is fun" weve been repelling away from the t3 norm as best we can but eventually more and more t3's leak into fleets.
The natural progression happens. Don't regret becoming the size you are it simply means people like to fly with you and enjoy the cohesive unit you have created with blood sweat and tears. With END. being a 300 man alliance we are able to put up 30 man fleets and go roaming. With that being said we like to break our fleets up with multiple FC's and go do different things so we arent rroaming around in the WH equivalent of a blob. it takes leadership being strong and willing to break that paradigm
"Wormhole corps are like a bunch of homeschooled kids" |
Jack Miton
Semper Ubi Sub Ubi
2889
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 01:19:00 -
[37] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:I understand where you are coming from but you have to understand that people will naturally want to be the biggest and most powerful because it's their nature. this is only true for people that are lazy. I'd MUCH rather be good on my own than irrelevant in a blob. every time, not even close. Stuck In Here With Me:-á http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/ |
CeNSeR
Boris Johnson's Love Children
70
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 01:47:00 -
[38] - Quote
Jack Miton wrote:Rek Seven wrote:I understand where you are coming from but you have to understand that people will naturally want to be the biggest and most powerful because it's their nature. this is only true for people that are lazy. I'd MUCH rather be good on my own than irrelevant in a blob. every time, not even close.
Was this sentiment the same when you were part of AHARM?
Or was it you grew tired of that style of play and decided you wanted to try something different.
You see some people like playing this game as a team and some dont. Being lazy has nothing to do with it or it could have been with people you have flown with in the past.
The generalizations in this thread is just hilarious. |
Winthorp
Sky Fighters
581
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 01:51:00 -
[39] - Quote
Rall Mekin wrote:Winthorp wrote:Keep it brief he says. Sorry i stopped reading after i scrolled down and saw all that sperging with no paragraph structure.
Why do we have to have these threads every two bloody days that amount to nothing other then a WH'er mad about the way things are and their brilliant solutions that CCP will never implement? TL;DR We are the problem, not wormhole space or CCP. Don't blob people and you will get more fights, even if you are capable of being amazingly large.
Are you not the one looking to get into an alliance to blob up? |
Glyndi
Doom Generation THE H0NEYBADGER
128
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 02:03:00 -
[40] - Quote
We like to blob with wrecks as we conga-line into fleets....does this count?
For serious though, there is a reason we're trying to stay small while being large enough so that we have consistent number of bodies for activities daily. I'd rather overpower someone with skill then numbers, we're still working on that skill part |
|
Le'Mon Tichim
End-of-Line
106
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 03:15:00 -
[41] - Quote
Winthorp wrote:Rall Mekin wrote:Winthorp wrote:Keep it brief he says. Sorry i stopped reading after i scrolled down and saw all that sperging with no paragraph structure.
Why do we have to have these threads every two bloody days that amount to nothing other then a WH'er mad about the way things are and their brilliant solutions that CCP will never implement? TL;DR We are the problem, not wormhole space or CCP. Don't blob people and you will get more fights, even if you are capable of being amazingly large. Are you not the one looking to get into an alliance to blob up?
That is not the purpose of our interest in an alliance. Can you hear them? They are calling to us. It is beautiful. http://thegreattichim.wordpress.com/ |
Blodhgarm Dethahal
Transcendent Sedition Dustm3n
78
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 05:35:00 -
[42] - Quote
At least the bigger the group the harder to maintan and higher chance of shattering into smaller entities. -Bl+¦d
Transcendent Sedition is recruiting! Join "TSED Recruitment" chat ingame to talk to us if you are interested in Wormhole life! |
Witchway
Hard Knocks Inc. Kill It With Fire
107
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 05:47:00 -
[43] - Quote
this place is going to ****... |
QT McWhiskers
Hard Knocks Inc. Kill It With Fire
373
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 06:25:00 -
[44] - Quote
Rall Mekin wrote:QT McWhiskers wrote:Not a bad attempt rall, but you are missing some key elements. Get with me later if you need pointers on how to effectively make a threadnought.
For now I will simply help you out by getting you to the next page. \o/ I I / \ Another celebrity posting! Actually, I do need to spend some time of Hard Knocks comms soon. Its been too long since I reconnected with my heritage--you guys did pop my w-space cherry after all. Let me know when is a good time in game or lets get on comms together. ON ANOTHER NOTE to others: The paragraph structure is not exactly what I'd do on more formal writing, but I'd have also proof read better if this wasn't for a video game. Something I learned in my writing courses at college is that sometimes breaking a paragraph early is easier on the eye than letting it wander on, even if its not optimal, and I realize I'm dealing with a largely "tl;dr" crowd. I'm not pro at it, but I write fiction as a hobby (sometimes), and have been known to do a lot of more formal type writing. I also know I talk too long for my own good sometimes, especially when I'm trying to be thorough.
IM more like a george zimmerman level celebrity. Everyone knows who I am and usually recognizes me in local... but its not really in a good way lol.
Blodhgarm Dethahal wrote:At least the bigger the group the harder to maintan and higher chance of shattering into smaller entities.
THats why you should just get a massive corp leading the charge... |
Axloth Okiah
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
253
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 07:04:00 -
[45] - Quote
You wont change people's nature. Some simply wont fight unless they have overwhelming force because its safer. On the bright side you should be grateful that large organizations arent compatible with the environment of wormholes. While you and many others complain about wh groups allegedly getting always bigger and bluer (I beg to differ and have yet to see any actual proof of that) they keep fragmenting and reforming, swelling and breaking apart.
btw arent you trying to join an alliance...? :P W-Space Realtor |
Rall Mekin
End-of-Line
191
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 07:46:00 -
[46] - Quote
Axloth Okiah wrote:You wont change people's nature. Some simply wont fight unless they have overwhelming force because its safer. On the bright side you should be grateful that large organizations arent compatible with the environment of wormholes. While you and many others complain about wh groups allegedly getting always bigger and bluer (I beg to differ and have yet to see any actual proof of that) they keep fragmenting and reforming, swelling and breaking apart.
btw arent you trying to join an alliance...? :P
Alliance? Absolutely. As I stated many times, it's not the groups size per se but how they choose to wield their power. A large group willing to not blob will get fights more often and have less complaints about "no fights." That is my point.
I'm also NOT complaining, I'm offering a solution to those who constantly are. My stance is the problem lies not with wormhole space, but with how we resonsibly or irresponsibly wield power. Join End-of-Line, -EOL, today, and kill your CEO! (Terms and conditions apply.)
http://imgur.com/yEQqAeb |
Axloth Okiah
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
254
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 08:30:00 -
[47] - Quote
This "solution" unfortunately has several issues. For example what you do when you find an easy gank (lets say a drake in C2) but you have 15 guys currently online and ready to go? Will you tell most of them to stay home? Or what if it's a bait and your "fair force" gets slaughtered and podded? In wormholes you can rarely be sure what you're getting into.
Trust me, we run into this problem all the time despite being essentially a single corp without blues. People refuse to engage us even when they have a superior force, simply because they cannot be sure we don't have reinforcements hidden somewhere. Unfortunately it's only the "glorious" fights with T3 blobs that get the attention and by which corporations are judged. No one remembers all the utter failures and welps.
One way around this are the honorable staged fights, which we've been trying out with mixed success. When they work out, they are actually great fun and leave no hard feelings. However some groups will simply refuse these as well. W-Space Realtor |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Polarized.
1254
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 09:06:00 -
[48] - Quote
Jack Miton wrote:Rek Seven wrote:Blobbing has been and always will be a thing in eve so at the end of the day, all we can do as individuals is deal with it.
What is not under our control is the implementation of new content. I have heard lots of fantastic suggestions for ways in which ccp could improve wormhole space (roaming sleeper, C7 wormholes, multiple statics in some c4-c6, more attackable structure, ect.) but CCP do nothing. All they do is fix things that should have been that way from the start (e.g. changing subsystems at a pos).
Now CCP are talking about adding new space so if you are 100% happy with wormhole space, you are in luck because you can bet your ass wormholes are going to be ignored from now on anyway. You know Rek, if there was an award for missing the point, you'd have to buy a bigger house just so that you can fit all your awards in your spare rooms.
Brilliant smart-arsed and pointless comment as always Jack. Perhaps, for once, you could be constructive and tell me what point you think i missed.
The OP states that this thread is a result of people asking for more conflict drivers. I am one of those people so i felt i should share my opinion.
If you believe the OP is right and we should all arrange fights and keep our numbers to a minimum, then you fail to understand basic wormhole PVP and human nature... And if you think the answer to more fights is for people not to blob the upstart corps in the vein hope that they will one day grow to be a competitor, you're deluded. +1 |
Kalel Nimrott
Sky Fighters
756
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 09:34:00 -
[49] - Quote
You guus are all sp wrong.... |
Jack Miton
Semper Ubi Sub Ubi
2894
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 11:50:00 -
[50] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:If you believe the OP is right and we should all arrange fights and keep our numbers to a minimum, then you fail to understand basic wormhole PVP and human nature... And if you think the answer to more fights is for people not to blob the upstart corps in the vein hope that they will one day grow to be a competitor, you're deluded. let me try spell it out one last time. it isnt about arranged fights or keeping numbers small or anything game related. It's about mentality and attitude. you, and others, keep saying there's no conflict in WHs, no reason to fight. well, youre wrong. i can't make is any clearer for you. youre wrong, because people like me and the op and others keep telling you that there are conflict drivers, that there are reasons to fight and that WHs are just fine the way they are.
if you dont have any drive to pvp in WHs then why are you living in WHs? and i'm being serious with this question. why live in space you dont like and clearly dont enjoy being in? If i hated WHs as much as you clearly do I would have moved out years ago and gone done something else.
i think you really need to consider if you want to be here. if not, that's fine. wspace is definitely NOT for everyone, im not saying it is, but it provides a very unique gaming environment that you seem very eager to make closer to kspace. people like you saying there's no reason to do anything in Whs or people like herrbert saying scanning is boring and that WHs should be anoms doesnt help wspace at all. the best case scenario is people just ignore you, the worst is that CCP listen to you and ruin Whs for those of us who actually like them.
PS: hoping that smaller corps one day 'grow up to be a competitor' is exactly the wrong attitude im talking about. Ive met many really good small corps and likewise many really awful large corps. size has very little to do with quality and in WHs space, size past a certain point only adds chaff. Stuck In Here With Me:-á http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/ |
|
Cheesy Feet
Anomalous Existence Surely You're Joking
65
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 13:19:00 -
[51] - Quote
Jack Miton wrote:I think you really need to consider if you want to be here. if not, that's fine. wspace is definitely NOT for everyone, im not saying it is, but it provides a very unique gaming environment that you seem very eager to make closer to kspace. People like you saying there's no reason to do anything in Whs or people like herrbert saying scanning is boring and that WHs should be anoms doesnt help wspace at all.
+1 - A hundred times this
Jack Miton wrote: The best case scenario is people just ignore you, the worst is that CCP listen to you and ruin Whs for those of us who actually like them.
+2 - A thousand times this |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Polarized.
1254
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 13:21:00 -
[52] - Quote
Jack Miton wrote:Rek Seven wrote:If you believe the OP is right and we should all arrange fights and keep our numbers to a minimum, then you fail to understand basic wormhole PVP and human nature... And if you think the answer to more fights is for people not to blob the upstart corps in the vein hope that they will one day grow to be a competitor, you're deluded. let me try spell it out one last time. it isnt about arranged fights or keeping numbers small or anything game related. It's about mentality and attitude. you, and others, keep saying there's no conflict in WHs, no reason to fight. well, youre wrong. i can't make is any clearer for you. youre wrong, because people like me and the op and others keep telling you that there are conflict drivers, that there are reasons to fight and that WHs are just fine the way they are. if you dont have any drive to pvp in WHs then why are you living in WHs? and i'm being serious with this question. why live in space you dont like and clearly dont enjoy being in? If i hated WHs as much as you clearly do I would have moved out years ago and gone done something else. i think you really need to consider if you want to be here. if not, that's fine. wspace is definitely NOT for everyone, im not saying it is, but it provides a very unique gaming environment that you seem very eager to make closer to kspace. people like you saying there's no reason to do anything in Whs or people like herrbert saying scanning is boring and that WHs should be anoms doesnt help wspace at all. the best case scenario is people just ignore you, the worst is that CCP listen to you and ruin Whs for those of us who actually like them. PS: hoping that smaller corps one day 'grow up to be a competitor' is exactly the wrong attitude im talking about. Ive met many really good small corps and likewise many really awful large corps. size has very little to do with quality and in WHs space, size past a certain point only adds chaff.
I have been trying to hold judgement but that post pretty much confirmed to me that you are stupid. Saying "you're wrong because we have different play-styles and i don't agree with yours" is not an argument and you should save your time and mine and just not reply to my posts.
Most of what i see on your corps killboard are people being ganked in a C2 and that's fine. I lived in a C2 as part of a smaller corp and it was far more entertaining than living in a C5/C6. To me that would indicate that there is a problem with C5/C6 wormholes... And if you disagree, why did you home to a system with a low class static?
For your information, i live in wormhole space because it used to feel like the least broken region in the game but now i've seen and done everything and i'm bored. Why is are you so against improvements to wormhole space or more reasons to fight?
The best case scenario is you STFU and continue playing the game the way you do and CCP start to add more content to wormholes. The worst case scenarios is that CCP listen to people like you who say wormhole are 100% perfect and fail to iterate on wormholes for so long that it ends up becoming like the old low sec wastelands. +1 |
Axloth Okiah
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
256
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 13:39:00 -
[53] - Quote
Rek Seven and Jack Miton wrote:things I'm afraid the intense love between you two prevents you both from seeing that one is talking about adding new content and the other about changing existing mechanics... those two are neither mutualy exclusive nor dependent.
W-Space Realtor |
Cheesy Feet
Anomalous Existence Surely You're Joking
65
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 13:44:00 -
[54] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:The best case scenario is you STFU and continue playing the game the way you do and CCP start to add more content to wormholes. The worst case scenarios is that CCP listen to people like you who say wormhole are 100% perfect and fail to iterate on wormholes for so long that it ends up becoming like the old low sec wastelands.
I'm guessing that you will just ignore my real questions and proceed to tell me why i, and people who share my opinion, are wrong.
Do you really have no doubts that CCP won't mess up if they make changes or add new content to WH's?
What we have in WH's now is more by luck than judgement on CCP's part - it was only intended as a place for exploration, it is the player base that made WH's a new way of life - that was never forseen by CCP.
Depends whether you're a cup half full or half empty kind of guy, but I'd rather keep what we have now, than gamble that CCP would add any meaningful new content without messing something else up whilst doing so. |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Polarized.
1254
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 13:47:00 -
[55] - Quote
Yeah to me it sounded like Jack read a post where i said "CCP should throw existing WH mechanics in the trash and start over", when what i was actually saying is CCP should add new things to wormholes and maybe something that the large alliance can fight over (i.e. end-game content) +1 |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Polarized.
1254
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 13:52:00 -
[56] - Quote
Cheesy Feet wrote:Rek Seven wrote:The best case scenario is you STFU and continue playing the game the way you do and CCP start to add more content to wormholes. The worst case scenarios is that CCP listen to people like you who say wormhole are 100% perfect and fail to iterate on wormholes for so long that it ends up becoming like the old low sec wastelands.
I'm guessing that you will just ignore my real questions and proceed to tell me why i, and people who share my opinion, are wrong. Do you really have no doubts that CCP won't mess up if they make changes or add new content to WH's? What we have in WH's now is more by luck than judgement on CCP's part - it was only intended as a place for exploration, it is the player base that made WH's a new way of life - that was never forseen by CCP. Depends whether you're a cup half full or half empty kind of guy, but I'd rather keep what we have now, than gamble that CCP would add any meaningful new content without messing something else up whilst doing so.
That i a completely fair point and if i'm honest, no, i don't have that faith in CCP.
However, i believe the are things CCP could do to make wormholes feel more alive and exciting but that's for another thread.
Where wormholes are concerned, i'm definitely a "glass half full" guy and i would like CCP to fill me wormhole class to the top. +1 |
Borsek
A.A.A Ragnarok.
140
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 14:54:00 -
[57] - Quote
Small guys fight to live, big guys fight to keep their patch of farmland. Everyone fights for the lulz. That being said, blobbing has always been present in eve, because it's 10x as fun and safe as trying to artificially maintain a level engagement. Also, fair fights in eve? You must be playing the wrong game, good sir! Blob them with falcons! |
HerrBert
V0LTA Triumvirate.
330
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 15:13:00 -
[58] - Quote
Oh the rightious oh you delighted, Oh you ccp why did you leave the holes like you did, why did you make pos fuel easier? why did you gave us the corp bookmarks? why did you steal our boosting subsystems and gave us command ships on steroids? why did you make it possible to refit a probe launcher via a mobile depot? why did you move ore belts to anoms? why did you fiddle with the wormholes? why did you fiddle with pos gun ui in inferno? why did you implement a new mechanic and broke the entire boosting mechanic? why did you revamp the probe system to make exploration easier ? why did you figure out that the chimera was **** to fit (well that was twostep)? why did you went forth and reduced the overall requirements to live in this space? why did you give us uncatchable haulers and reworked the entire mining department to warpcore stabbed whiney bitches? why did you make us boost infront of the pos and why did you make the naglfar viable again? why did you make a MemberCHA when we asked for SMAs? why did you invent the ******* venture and made it the most profitable ship in eve? Why did Chichi and James crawled on bleeding knees after you and asked for fixing the SMA drops...for a year Why did you implement the wormhole wobble... why did you do all these and many more but people still assume that wormholes haven't changed?
Why did we just sit there and take it up the arse .... because we didnt see an enviroment change that has been minorly changing since its inception and has now moved so far of the original that we still think it hasnt changed?
I guess its just more comfy to sit and watch, then to scream and shout.
Just saying "Wormhole space hasn't definitly not ever never changed since 2008, still the same."
Oh yeah ... WHAT DA FUDGE CAKE GHOST SITES? My mind does not reflect my corp ... it just shows you what they care about...
The Pontiff of Wormholes http://www.youtube.com/user/HerrBertism |
Red Garsk
32
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 16:44:00 -
[59] - Quote
Rall Mekin wrote:Van Steiza wrote:Rall Mekin wrote:Van Steiza wrote:Come have tea with Whalegirth.
<3 Does tea involve T3s and capitals? If you want? Ah. I'll have diplo convo you guys.
Wait what? You tell a real good story and most of it is true, however, somewhere at the end you become the problem you are trying to point out.
Stop creating alliances... Stop diplo bullshit and fight. No blues, no battphone... Just you and your guys. |
Winthorp
Sky Fighters
582
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 18:30:00 -
[60] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote: How old are you Jack? You seem to fail to understand that different people have different desires and motivations. I once knew a guy that thought that he was the only real person and we were all figments of his imagination... but i digress...
Saying "you're wrong because we have different play-styles and i don't agree with yours" is not an argument and you should save your time and mine and just not reply to my posts.
Most of what i see on your corps killboard are people being ganked in a C2 and that's fine. I lived in a C2 as part of a smaller corp and it was far more entertaining than living in a C5/C6. To me that would indicate that there is a problem with C5/C6 wormholes... And if you disagree, why did you home to a system with a low class static?
For your information, i live in wormhole space because it used to feel like the least broken region in the game but now i've seen and done everything and i'm bored.
The best case scenario is you STFU and continue playing the game the way you do and CCP start to add more content to wormholes which provid you with new ways to play in addition. The worst case scenarios is that CCP listen to people like you who say wormhole are 100% perfect and fail to iterate on wormholes for so long that it ends up becoming like the old low sec wastelands.
If you are going to reply answer me this or don't bother replying at all: Why are you so against improvements to wormhole space or more reasons to fight?
So you couldn't beat his argument and went KB trolling tsk tsk whats next insult his mom jokes? |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |