Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mr LaboratoryRat
Confederation of DuckTape Lovers
23
|
Posted - 2013.12.23 23:13:00 -
[1] - Quote
GÇó Same meta items have different ranges and damage types, why? GÇó Have there been ever been looked into after introduction? GÇó Riggs would be nice (maybe range?, damage?,.. or a total module overhaul (cap boosters))?
|
Seranova Farreach
519
|
Posted - 2013.12.23 23:37:00 -
[2] - Quote
t2 should be 10k for large, and t1 5k. meta 1.6 km meta 2.7 km meta 3.8 km meta 4.9 km
perhaps ancillary smartbombs? _______________________ http://i.imgur.com/d9Ee2ik.jpg
|
Electrique Wizard
Mutually Lucrative Business Proposals Market and Contract PVP
249
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 10:14:00 -
[3] - Quote
Seranova Farreach wrote:t2 should be 10k for large, and t1 5k. meta 1.6 km meta 2.7 km meta 3.8 km meta 4.9 km
perhaps ancillary smartbombs?
and up to 15k for faction and 20km for officer I am the Zodiac, I am the stars, You are the sorceress, my priestess of Mars, Queen of the night, swathed in satin black, Your ivory flesh upon my torture rack. |
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
616
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 10:30:00 -
[4] - Quote
Lets not encourage them to continue the meta tiers that make only meta 4 used by anyone with isk and the others just poor man variants. |
Mr LaboratoryRat
Confederation of DuckTape Lovers
23
|
Posted - 2013.12.26 12:26:00 -
[5] - Quote
well some changing is needed |
TheMercenaryKing
StarFleet Enterprises Almost Awesome.
66
|
Posted - 2013.12.26 15:32:00 -
[6] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Lets not encourage them to continue the meta tiers that make only meta 4 used by anyone with isk and the others just poor man variants.
In some cases Meta 4's are cheaper than T2, like Heavy Modulated Beam Lasers |
Mr LaboratoryRat
Confederation of DuckTape Lovers
24
|
Posted - 2013.12.31 16:16:00 -
[7] - Quote
Happy nwyr bumb! |
Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
3336
|
Posted - 2013.12.31 17:45:00 -
[8] - Quote
My 0.02 isk:
1.) There is only one "meta" variant of each smart bomb, not 4. We certainly don't need Meta 1, 2, 3, & 4 for smartbombs.
2.) Large Smartbombs do not need a 15 km blast radius, I'm not really comfortable with larges having a 10 km blast radius TBH. There is a lot of benefit in having smartbombs hit just shy of scram range (6-7.5 kms), where ships attempt to stay out of blast damage range while holding a scram.
|
Mr LaboratoryRat
Confederation of DuckTape Lovers
25
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 16:22:00 -
[9] - Quote
Gizznitt Malikite wrote: My 0.02 isk:
1.) There is only one "meta" variant of each smart bomb, not 4. We certainly don't need Meta 1, 2, 3, & 4 for smartbombs.
2.) Large Smartbombs do not need a 15 km blast radius, I'm not really comfortable with larges having a 10 km blast radius TBH. There is a lot of benefit in having smartbombs hit just shy of scram range (6-7.5 kms), where ships attempt to stay out of blast damage range while holding a scram.
Tbh i do think smartbombs should be a viable counter vs scram frigats, but not versus interceptors. I think 10km range would be nice and than faction to counter vs scramming interceptors |
Mr Doctor
Sex Machineguns
79
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 17:32:00 -
[10] - Quote
Have you seen how effecting smartbombs currently are? And you want a buff?
I'm not even considering how much of a nerft to missiles that would be either.... |
|
elitatwo
Congregatio
193
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 17:55:00 -
[11] - Quote
Mr LaboratoryRat wrote:Gizznitt Malikite wrote: My 0.02 isk:
1.) There is only one "meta" variant of each smart bomb, not 4. We certainly don't need Meta 1, 2, 3, & 4 for smartbombs.
2.) Large Smartbombs do not need a 15 km blast radius, I'm not really comfortable with larges having a 10 km blast radius TBH. There is a lot of benefit in having smartbombs hit just shy of scram range (6-7.5 kms), where ships attempt to stay out of blast damage range while holding a scram.
Tbh i do think smartbombs should be a viable counter vs scram frigats, but not versus interceptors. I think 10km range would be nice and than faction to counter vs scramming interceptors
A smartbomb is so smart that it doesn't care if that tackler is a ceptor or not, one large smartbomb can nuke them in 3-4 cycles regardless.
Since you seem to be new here, welcome to EVE and happy new year.
Every module and boat that has variations have a 'variations tab' on them with a 'compare' function, a very helpful thing for people -like me- just like to read things.
If you use it, you can read things too.
There might even be a variation of a smartbomb that isn't tech II but meta 7,8 and even higher with mucho more range and damage included but it's a secret that only the scholars that can read know about.
signature |
Mr LaboratoryRat
Confederation of DuckTape Lovers
25
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 19:37:00 -
[12] - Quote
elitatwo wrote:Mr LaboratoryRat wrote:Gizznitt Malikite wrote: My 0.02 isk:
1.) There is only one "meta" variant of each smart bomb, not 4. We certainly don't need Meta 1, 2, 3, & 4 for smartbombs.
2.) Large Smartbombs do not need a 15 km blast radius, I'm not really comfortable with larges having a 10 km blast radius TBH. There is a lot of benefit in having smartbombs hit just shy of scram range (6-7.5 kms), where ships attempt to stay out of blast damage range while holding a scram.
Tbh i do think smartbombs should be a viable counter vs scram frigats, but not versus interceptors. I think 10km range would be nice and than faction to counter vs scramming interceptors A smartbomb is so smart that it doesn't care if that tackler is a ceptor or not, one large smartbomb can nuke them in 3-4 cycles regardless. Since you seem to be new here, welcome to EVE and happy new year. Every module and boat that has variations have a 'variations tab' on them with a 'compare' function, a very helpful thing for people -like me- just like to read things. If you use it, you can read things too. There might even be a variation of a smartbomb that isn't tech II but meta 7,8 and even higher with mucho more range and damage included but it's a secret that only the scholars that can read know about.
Hello,
Happy new year to you too!
Unfortualy i am around for soo long that i even regret it. Since you seem to be new, let me teach you one or two things, instead of putting your brain fart in writing. Recently all the T1 ships got an overhaul. Even some T2 ships too! Nowardays ceptors haves nice scram range and agiliity bonus, even more than the buffed T1 small ships. Whooooww!! Ceptors even wooping 13,5 KM!! There are also some internal factors that makes it extar difficult to use smartbombs correctly. Did you actualy know that there is always a few km distance between landing point when you warp form one point to another? And all the ships are faster, hmm i wonder what that does, maybe we should ask it the EveFairy? Oh and did you mean the +1km variants where you pay +2 plex per meta lever higher? That totaly so seems worth fitting it to anything smaler than a super.... I still have a cormack sb panther somewhere... Sorry you failed your troll, go back to school. Maybe we can go together so i can teach you perhaps some things and i can fix my grammer?...
PS: Real men use EFT so you can compare everything at once,
Yours Cinciraly,
YourAD1ck |
Mr LaboratoryRat
Confederation of DuckTape Lovers
25
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 19:42:00 -
[13] - Quote
Mr Doctor wrote:Have you seen how effecting smartbombs currently are? And you want a buff?
I'm not even considering how much of a nerft to missiles that would be either....
Do you mean how they are used as firewalls in sov battles? |
Mr LaboratoryRat
Confederation of DuckTape Lovers
25
|
Posted - 2014.01.11 15:59:00 -
[14] - Quote
No ideas? |
Swiftstrike1
Interfector INC. Fade 2 Black
407
|
Posted - 2014.01.11 16:36:00 -
[15] - Quote
Smartbombs do not need more range. They do not need more damage. In fact, they are absolutely fine as they are. The only change that might be worthwhile is the introduction of capital smartbombs. Fleet Bookmarks New Gravimetric Sites Med Clones 2.0 |
Liner Xiandra
Sparks Inc Zero Hour Alliance
266
|
Posted - 2014.01.11 17:24:00 -
[16] - Quote
I'd like a damage type icon on them, along the lines of shield/armor amps/hardeners. |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |