|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
14931
|
Posted - 2013.12.22 09:58:00 -
[1] - Quote
Mr Pragmatic wrote: Oh I dunno, how about the fact its not documented well
This is Eve, there's very little documentation about anything from CCP. |
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
14932
|
Posted - 2013.12.22 12:13:00 -
[2] - Quote
It's relatively easy to avoid if you're paying attention, pull your drones in when a member of the mission inspectorate visits. |
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
14932
|
Posted - 2013.12.22 12:45:00 -
[3] - Quote
Haygrove wrote:And we all know how up to date the Drone Interface is. We all know that the drone interface is, to put it bluntly, shite. That doesn't make what the OP is describing a bug or an exploit, especially when it's trivially easy to avoid. |
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
14933
|
Posted - 2013.12.22 13:12:00 -
[4] - Quote
Alice Ituin wrote:What's the point of the green safety when you can still do stuff that gets you a limited engagement timer? When you set your drones to aggressive you don't get a warning that his might make you a legal target. One or the other needs fixing. When someone has a pop at an MTU they go suspect, the crimewatch rules say that you can shoot at a suspect, entering a limited engagement, without Concord getting in your face; weapons you can use to do so include drones. Working as intended as far as I can see. |
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
14933
|
Posted - 2013.12.22 15:12:00 -
[5] - Quote
Miasmos wrote:Overall: add description about aggressive drones guarding the depots. Problem solved, most depoteers will still fall for it. That won't help, some people would continue to mewl about it if you had it neon pink capital letters at the top of the item description.
|
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
14936
|
Posted - 2013.12.23 00:17:00 -
[6] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:My question is: why is shooting at a in space deployable not a concording offense? It is if they engage POS. A POS is a corporate structure and requires a wardec to attack in highsec, an MTU/Depot is a personal structure and seems to be regarded in the same vein as a jetcan for aggro purposes, that's a pretty big difference. CCP also categorically stated that attacking the new structures will not result in Concordokken but merely a suspect flag.
I'll, seriously beginning to hate the post timer, once again I get a 404 ganked and a 36 second timer before I can post. |
|
|
|