Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mirima Thurander
Deventer Exploration An Acquisition
33
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 15:28:00 -
[61] - Quote
killboards im impressed
O wait no i'm not...
I love the the smell of victory in the morning. It smells like... Blood, vomit and burning flesh. |
Jenshae Chiroptera
92
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 15:32:00 -
[62] - Quote
Mirima Thurander wrote: killboards im impressed
Relax. I don't think anyone takes Andski seriously. He just seems to roam from thread to thread and only makes sense half the time. Almost like he is using some sort of random forum phrase generator. CSM do you think? No matter the changes, high sec people chose the safests. Lots of stick and they will leave. Half the problem is the players in null sec; we do not want to be there with you. |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
517
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 15:33:00 -
[63] - Quote
Mirima Thurander wrote:killboards im impressed O wait no i'm not...
having some history with solo/small gang PvP would probably help your case, but of course you're probably some stain/venal mission runner who doesn't want to be spotted in local |
ITTigerClawIK
Galactic Rangers Galactic-Rangers
33
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 15:35:00 -
[64] - Quote
as long as D-scan was improved and made to automaticly D-scan every 5 seconds or something i would love to see Local removed |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
888
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 15:35:00 -
[65] - Quote
Mirima Thurander wrote:Is there any reason to keep local chat in null?
If its because of it being an easy mode Intel tool that's a reason to remove it.
I'm not happy with the amount of hate mail I'm getting ingame yet more please.
No argument from me, you just need to post how the scanning system needs to be improved. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |
Paragon Renegade
The Multinational Company.
54
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 15:38:00 -
[66] - Quote
ITTigerClawIK wrote:as long as D-scan was improved and made to automaticly D-scan every 5 seconds or something i would love to see Local removed
"Man, you aren't actually trying to do this, right? Nobody is that stupid right?"
"How wrong you are" |
Amro One
One.
9
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 15:43:00 -
[67] - Quote
Another idiot 0.0 pilot not aware that wormholes exist. Probably not aware that they have no local chat really.
Wonder if hes the same idiot that did not know WHs had ABC ore.
Morons should really shut up if they never played the game really. |
Teamosil
Good Time Family Band Solution
19
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 15:57:00 -
[68] - Quote
Is sov 0.0 safer nowdays or hi sec?
Sure, in 0.0 you have big fleet battles, but you're sort of intentionally joining those, so that is not that different from say faction warfare or duels in terms of your peace of mind. But with local you pretty much know there is 0 chance of getting ganked since most of the time everybody is local is blue to you, where in hi sec you can get ganked... Seems about the same. |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
519
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 17:11:00 -
[69] - Quote
Teamosil wrote:Is sov 0.0 safer nowdays or hi sec?
Sure, in 0.0 you have big fleet battles, but you're sort of intentionally joining those, so that is not that different from say faction warfare in terms of your peace of mind. But with local you pretty much know there is 0 chance of getting ganked in sov 0.0 since most of the time everybody is local is blue to you, where in hi sec you can get ganked. Seems about the same. In both you don't really need to dscan. In both you can go afk to make lunch or something with your ship in space and be reasonably certain that nothing will happen to it. You can mine and watch tv at the same time in 0.0, but not really in hi sec. In sov 0.0 there is probably a smaller chance that somebody is waiting to gank you on the other side of a gate you're heading towards since your alliance controls the system, but they could have a bubble up and there is no concorde, so if there is a ganker there, it's harder to survive it in 0.0. Overall it seems like it balances out to about the same level of security to me, right?
okay go ninja rat/mine/whatever in HED and tell me about "safety" |
Teamosil
Good Time Family Band Solution
19
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 17:18:00 -
[70] - Quote
Andski wrote:okay go ninja rat/mine/whatever in HED and tell me about "safety"
Uh, of course it is not safe to be in someone else's sov 0.0... Duh. But, I'm talking about being in one's own sov 0.0. Is that safer, less safe, or more safe, than hi sec? |
|
Jenshae Chiroptera
92
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 17:20:00 -
[71] - Quote
Teamosil wrote: Uh, of course it is not safe to be in someone else's sov 0.0... Duh. But, I'm talking about being in one's own sov 0.0. Is that more safe, less safe, or roughly as safe, as hi sec?
How many live and do their things in both? CSM do you think? No matter the changes, high sec people chose the safests. Lots of stick and they will leave. Half the problem is the players in null sec; we do not want to be there with you. |
Teamosil
Good Time Family Band Solution
19
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 17:20:00 -
[72] - Quote
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:How many live and do their things in both?
True. Maybe the sov 0.0 people just aren't really aware of what life is like elsewhere. All this "OMG that would mean I would need to dscan!" talk, like that would be a bizarre and unfair burden to place on them, despite the fact that in most systems you need to be doing that all the time, seems to support that theory... |
Jack Tronic
borkedLabs
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 17:21:00 -
[73] - Quote
Sentient Blade wrote:Because hitting the dscan button every 30 seconds is tedious in the extreme. Forcing constant manual scanning would harm game enjoyment.
Not to mention completely unrealistic as-is because even now, x-thousand years before EvE, you don't have people sitting on warships pushing a button to make the radar go around once every while.
You do realize wspace players seem to have no problem with dscan, especially when you find out hteres hidden hotkeys for it |
David Grogan
The Motley Crew Reborn
132
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 18:35:00 -
[74] - Quote
i have a proposal
remove local but introduce anchorable scanner probes at gates. The probes auto scan every 60 seconds. Also only a max of 3 (1 per person) per gate to prevent scanner lag.
now these ONLY tell you ship type that came through the gate not the player's name and ONLY tell the person who owns the probes.
The probes should be killable... maybe make them like GSC's in terms of hit points and resists Everytime you buy something that says "made in china" you are helping the rising unemployment in your own country unless your from china, Buy locally produced goods and help create more jobs. |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
524
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 20:33:00 -
[75] - Quote
Jack Tronic wrote:Sentient Blade wrote:Because hitting the dscan button every 30 seconds is tedious in the extreme. Forcing constant manual scanning would harm game enjoyment.
Not to mention completely unrealistic as-is because even now, x-thousand years before EvE, you don't have people sitting on warships pushing a button to make the radar go around once every while. You do realize wspace players seem to have no problem with dscan, especially when you find out hteres hidden hotkeys for it
Great, go to a wormhole |
Jita Alt666
437
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 20:44:00 -
[76] - Quote
Removing local affects the defence of lazy anomoly runners. Removing local limits the instantaneous intel of the lazy attackers. Most players in Eve are lazy. Removal of Local (with no other adjustments) will reduce the numbers involved in 0.0. Making an adjustment to the d-scan system that allowed both the attacker and the defender to see to go hand in hand with the removal of local could be a nice game enhancement.
|
Cypermethren
Hardcore p0wnography Cascade Probable
24
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 20:59:00 -
[77] - Quote
Mirima Thurander wrote:Sentient Blade wrote:Because hitting the dscan button every 30 seconds is tedious in the extreme. Forcing constant manual scanning would game enjoyment.
Not to mention completely unrealistic as-is because even now, x-thousand years before EvE, you don't have people sitting on warships pushing a button to make the radar go around once every while. So you like having an easy mode intel tool then? Katrina Oniseki wrote:Nope. Never seen this thread before. i know right?
Because clicking the same button and reading a list every 10 seconds take massive skill no?
I understand what you're getting at, but Dscan is not a good/viable solution. Help CCP come up with something fun/exciting - something that doesnt involve wearing down you're mouse button like your'e playing Diablo 2, and the 0.0 community may be more enticed to push for CCP to remove local.
But at current, we'd prefer to buy Monocles than sit there clicking dscan every 10seconds
Actualy, i'll tell you what.
Remove concord's reporting of 0.0 statistics, such as where cyno's are lit, how many npc's killed in system, and how many podkills, jumps, and all that ****. And i'll gladly take no local. |
Mirima Thurander
Deventer Exploration An Acquisition
40
|
Posted - 2011.10.30 22:56:00 -
[78] - Quote
Cypermethren wrote:
Actualy, i'll tell you what.
Remove concord's reporting of 0.0 statistics, such as where cyno's are lit, how many npc's killed in system, and how many podkills, jumps, and all that ****. And i'll gladly take no local.
yes please
I love the the smell of victory in the morning. It smells like... Blood, vomit and burning flesh. |
Barbara Nichole
Cryogenic Consultancy Black Sun Alliance
39
|
Posted - 2011.10.31 00:41:00 -
[79] - Quote
Sentient Blade wrote:Because hitting the dscan button every 30 seconds is tedious in the extreme. Forcing constant manual scanning would harm game enjoyment.
Not to mention completely unrealistic as-is because even now, x-thousand years before EvE, you don't have people sitting on warships pushing a button to make the radar go around once every while.
please note if you aren't already using dscan to look for active probes in null sec you are taking risks.. local gives free intel.. which is the greatest reason to like it. I'm not a proponent of removing all local... though I would not object to it's removal in null sec - the only thing I believe really needs to be done is removing cloaked vessels from local in null sec. [IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/OldST.jpg[/IMG] |
Mirima Thurander
Deventer Exploration An Acquisition
42
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 20:23:00 -
[80] - Quote
up I love the the smell of victory in the morning. It smells like... Blood, vomit and burning flesh. |
|
Zagam
Incompertus INC Fatal Ascension
216
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 20:42:00 -
[81] - Quote
The horse is past dead. It is a mass of goo on the ground, as it has been beaten to death, stomped to a pulp, and then that pulp was further beaten with several sporks. |
Morganta
Peripheral Madness The Midget Mafia
229
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 20:47:00 -
[82] - Quote
Mirima Thurander wrote:up
isn't there some rule against necroing your own failpost
The American public's reaction to the change was poor and the new cola was a major marketing failure. The subsequent reintroduction of Coke's original formula, re-branded as "Coca-Cola Classic", resulted in a significant gain in sales, leading to speculation that the introduction of the New Coke formula was just a marketing ploy |
Mirima Thurander
Deventer Exploration An Acquisition
42
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 21:08:00 -
[83] - Quote
i read the funniest in-game mail to day
Dear Mirima
i hope you die in a fire
best wishes
forum troll # 787599B I love the the smell of victory in the morning. It smells like... Blood, vomit and burning flesh. |
Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1388
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 21:09:00 -
[84] - Quote
hahahahahaha nullbears |
Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1388
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 21:09:00 -
[85] - Quote
suicide ganking should be removed from the game and i should be invulnerable as I mine in highsec
down with nullbears |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |