Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Justice Angel
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
6
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 17:46:00 -
[1] - Quote
where is the best place to post for wormhole future ideas, I have found that the wormholes part of the forums is not the place to do it. |
Proclus Diadochu
Obstergo Bitten.
335
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 17:57:00 -
[2] - Quote
Features & Ideas Discussion
Please don't get too upset if they don't respond well to your idea(s) either. There are a lot of people who dislike bad ideas.
~Boredom Breeds Direction~ |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Polarized.
919
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 18:23:00 -
[3] - Quote
I prefer people to post wormhole related idea here, you just have to be careful to avoid subjects like:-
* Turning W-space into K-space * Blobbing * Too many blues Putting work in since 2010. |
Justice Angel
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
6
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 18:52:00 -
[4] - Quote
Well for starters they can bring back Deep Space probes, and put in comets like they said years ago for ice mining in WH's |
Phoenix Jones
Shockwave Innovations Surely You're Joking
93
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 19:15:00 -
[5] - Quote
Justice Angel wrote:Well for starters they can bring back Deep Space probes, and put in comets like they said years ago for ice mining in WH's
I don't see them coming back. There are quite a few who would like wormhole ice mining (well except the nullsec/lowsec/highsec people). Its been brought up... ALLOT. Most we got was a vague comment from Fozzie regarding it, and that they may explore it at a later date (I estimate year 2017).
I'll expand on your thread though (as I was just thinking it).
There has also been comments from Fozzie regarding the possibility of expanding wormhole space, making more wormholes that have no moons in it, making it not possible to anchor a pos in there and "stake a territorial claim".
|
Ronix Aideron
Shockwave Innovations Surely You're Joking
103
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 21:29:00 -
[6] - Quote
Phoenix Jones wrote: I don't see them coming back. There are quite a few who would like wormhole ice mining (well except the nullsec/lowsec/highsec people). Its been brought up... A LOT. Most we got was a vague comment from Fozzie regarding it, and that they may explore it at a later date (I estimate year 2017).
I'll expand on your thread though (as I was just thinking it).
There has also been comments from Fozzie regarding the possibility of expanding wormhole space, making more wormholes that have no moons in it, making it not possible to anchor a pos in there and "stake a territorial claim".
There fixed it for you. Start the day off slow and taper off from there.
http://eveboard.com/pilot/Ronix_Aideron |
Justice Angel
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
6
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 22:08:00 -
[7] - Quote
That was just an example I have other idea's that are a bit evil, and I know if it happen to me in my WH I would hate it, but A war of Attrition, would be a sick strategy, like a bomb that kills wh's in one or X number of shoots. Cutting off supply lines back to normal space no way out and no escape. |
Messoroz
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
417
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 23:57:00 -
[8] - Quote
Basically, consider all your ideas pointless because CCP will just ignore it anyway and implement something else 5 years later. |
Trinkets friend
T.R.I.A.D
1072
|
Posted - 2013.07.27 02:27:00 -
[9] - Quote
Why not have a system with no celestials at all? Just a black hole, and statics to fight on and a bunch of random gas sites. This would stop people making ISK off PI and setting up structures, which we all agree, are boring to grind. Indeed, a celestial-free system which is full of ladars would be awesome. Oh, oh, and special wormholes which you can take 20 supers through from nullsec, so all the mega-alliances can come be hardcore in w-space with their supers and titans. YOLO is the Carpe Diem of Gen Y http://www.localectomy.blogspot.com.au
|
Paikis
Vapour Holdings
907
|
Posted - 2013.07.27 05:35:00 -
[10] - Quote
c7 wormholes. (Change the name if c7 is an issue w/ existing c7 systems) - No moons (no POSs) - No Planets (no PI) - Standard c6 sites, spawn as normal.
c7 Wormhole connections. - All c7 holes have 1 Nullsec static, 1 c6 static and 1 c5 static. - All wormholes to and from a c7 hole last for 4 hours and cannot be closed. (unlimited mass) - Wormholes to/from c7 systems cannot support capital jumps.
Trolling may now commence, and you may call me bad. |
|
Jack Miton
Semper Ubi Sub Ubi
2195
|
Posted - 2013.07.27 06:03:00 -
[11] - Quote
Paikis wrote:- All wormholes to and from a c7 hole last for 4 hours and cannot be closed. (unlimited mass) >_< |
Angsty Teenager
Broski North Black Legion.
169
|
Posted - 2013.07.27 07:04:00 -
[12] - Quote
Quote:- All wormholes to and from a c7 hole last for 4 hours and cannot be closed. (unlimited mass)
Except via thermal collapsing, amirite?
|
Tul Breetai
Impromptu Asset Requisition Insurance Fraud.
305
|
Posted - 2013.07.27 11:39:00 -
[13] - Quote
Angsty Teenager wrote:Quote:- All wormholes to and from a c7 hole last for 4 hours and cannot be closed. (unlimited mass) Except via thermal collapsing, amirite?
Bombs only add 1 billion Gg mass, wouldn't work on an infinite mass wh. I suggest you read the thread on it. There's nothing worse than an EVE player, generally considered to be top of the food chain in the MMO world, that cannot smacktalk with wit and coherency. |
Sorany
Hard Knocks Inc. Kill It With Fire
75
|
Posted - 2013.07.27 17:21:00 -
[14] - Quote
still waiting on modular POSs and the ability to change my sub-systems.
come to think about it, my subs will likely no longer be an issue soon due to this impending, not so impending, maybe, sometime, possible t3 nerf so scrap that. At this pace it looks like that feature will be obsolete long after we stop using t3s.....
right? lololol |
Proclus Diadochu
Obstergo Bitten.
338
|
Posted - 2013.07.27 17:50:00 -
[15] - Quote
Paikis wrote:(Change the name if c7 is an issue w/ existing c7 systems)
Did I miss something? ~Boredom Breeds Direction~ |
Sorany
Hard Knocks Inc. Kill It With Fire
75
|
Posted - 2013.07.27 19:40:00 -
[16] - Quote
Proclus Diadochu wrote:Paikis wrote:(Change the name if c7 is an issue w/ existing c7 systems) Did I miss something?
clearly, we all have. |
Asayanami Dei
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
259
|
Posted - 2013.07.27 19:45:00 -
[17] - Quote
Class naming convention is originaly designating a wormhole TYPE not a system type. Wormholes leading to C5 systems are the actual C5's etc, highsec holes are C7's or something like that, basically that's what it originaly was back when CCP implemented it. www.wormholefundamentals.com www.youtube.com/user/asayanami www.twitter.com/Asayanami www.facebook.com/Asayanami.Dei
|
Nix Anteris
Bite Me inc Bitten.
118
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 13:43:00 -
[18] - Quote
In terms of how system classes are stored in the database: Highsec is class 7 Lowsec is class 8 Nullsec is class 9 |
Chester Floyd
Shadow Vanguard.
23
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 14:40:00 -
[19] - Quote
Paikis wrote:c7 wormholes. (Change the name if c7 is an issue w/ existing c7 systems) - No moons (no POSs) - No Planets (no PI) - Standard c6 sites, spawn as normal.
c7 Wormhole connections. - All c7 holes have 1 Nullsec static, 1 c6 static and 1 c5 static. - All wormholes to and from a c7 hole last for 4 hours and cannot be closed. (unlimited mass) - Wormholes to/from c7 systems cannot support capital jumps.
Trolling may now commence, and you may call me bad.
Nothing new. You still want that bannana? Try again you little orge |
Justice Angel
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
6
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 17:45:00 -
[20] - Quote
Messoroz wrote:Basically, consider all your ideas pointless because CCP will just ignore it anyway and implement something else 5 years later.
They don't always ignore there income lol, I mean fan base. |
|
Justice Angel
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
6
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 20:10:00 -
[21] - Quote
Another idea would be for cloaked ships to see one another if there in the same fleet, would help with bombing runs in getting lined up. |
Justice Angel
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
6
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 20:12:00 -
[22] - Quote
Tul Breetai wrote:Angsty Teenager wrote:Quote:- All wormholes to and from a c7 hole last for 4 hours and cannot be closed. (unlimited mass) Except via thermal collapsing, amirite? Bombs only add 1 billion Gg mass, wouldn't work on an infinite mass wh. I suggest you read the thread on it.
Yes thank you, would be hard to close a wh that has unlimited mass, but maybe we could just add a HP that bomb's are the only thing that will effect the HP of wh's |
Jack Miton
Semper Ubi Sub Ubi
2197
|
Posted - 2013.07.29 23:22:00 -
[23] - Quote
The reason I like WH ideas being posted in the features and ideas forum is because I don't read that forum.... Unlimited mass WHs? Seriously people..... |
IgnasS
Infinity Explorers Exhale.
30
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 09:31:00 -
[24] - Quote
Paikis wrote:c7 wormholes. (Change the name if c7 is an issue w/ existing c7 systems) - No moons (no POSs) - No Planets (no PI) - Standard c6 sites, spawn as normal.
c7 Wormhole connections. - All c7 holes have 1 Nullsec static, 1 c6 static and 1 c5 static. - All wormholes to and from a c7 hole last for 4 hours and cannot be closed. (unlimited mass) - Wormholes to/from c7 systems cannot support capital jumps.
Trolling may now commence, and you may call me bad.
Unlimited mass??? I think nobody in w-space wants a 1k "Mega" blob shooting their stuff... |
HerrBert
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
42
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 11:44:00 -
[25] - Quote
i do ... but i m wierd that way... also i m also on a personal quest to drive James Arget insane
My current proposals to him involved:
- New Wormhole Storyline Missions involving a war between the noble race of the United Hamster Federation vs the evil Space guinepig invasion force....
- Sleeper Dreads
- Bookmarks to overview
- Sleeper Dreads
- Nanonos Phoons pre first SpeedNerf
- removing the exploit of "bombing" a wormhole to collapse it
- hiding datachips of lore bits written by rhavas
- giving ventures a +125% Speed Increase per Mining Frigate Level
- Virtuell Pokerroom for the Posoverhaul...
- and sleeper dreads
did i say he stopped listening to me |
Justice Angel
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
6
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 13:56:00 -
[26] - Quote
Jack Miton wrote:The reason I like WH ideas being posted in the features and ideas forum is because I don't read that forum.... Unlimited mass WHs? Seriously people.....
I'm with you on this I could care less about unlimited mass, when I'm talking about stopping mass from using wh's at all lol |
Kuning
Obstergo Bitten.
58
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 14:15:00 -
[27] - Quote
Wormholes with stars that occasionally go supernova or massive solar flares...and clear out everything inside them. 12, 24, 48 hour timers or whatever. After the timer is up, star explodes destroying all ships and structures inside.
Make them very profitable, make them have 2 statics (one high class one lower class). A lot of travel between them and connection different states to encourage travel for PVP. Profitability encourages capital expos, but adds a sense of urgency to finish before the timer is up. More expos means more pvp. |
Justice Angel
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
6
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 14:38:00 -
[28] - Quote
Kuning wrote:Wormholes with stars that occasionally go supernova or massive solar flares...and clear out everything inside them. 12, 24, 48 hour timers or whatever. After the timer is up, star explodes destroying all ships and structures inside.
Make them very profitable, make them have 2 statics (one high class one lower class). A lot of travel between them and connection different states to encourage travel for PVP. Profitability encourages capital expos, but adds a sense of urgency to finish before the timer is up. More expos means more pvp.
killing logged off players as well lol that's sick and evil lol
Log off in wh come back after timer / in station with rookie ship haha |
Proclus Diadochu
Obstergo Bitten.
343
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 21:26:00 -
[29] - Quote
What class wormhole does the "Center for Advanced Studies" reside?
~Boredom Breeds Direction~ |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Polarized.
936
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 22:04:00 -
[30] - Quote
I would like to see POSs changed and expanded in a way that would bring some unique features to W-space.
I would like an anchored structure that can pull sleeper sites from connecting wormholes into my home system at a rate of 1 per hour.
Other that that, i really want to see roaming sleepers and i don't know why it's taking so long. Putting work in since 2010. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |