Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Messoroz
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
412
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 11:45:00 -
[181] - Quote
Winthorp wrote:Who lent this dickhead a brain?
Bro, why are you here |
Winthorp
Van Diemen's Demise Northern Coalition.
162
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 11:46:00 -
[182] - Quote
Messoroz wrote:Winthorp wrote:Who lent this dickhead a brain? Sorry, I'm not going to be a gentle snowflake.
Why are you?
Damn you ninja edit quick. |
Kira Hhallas
Very Drunken Eve Flying Instructors Brotherhood Of Silent Space
171
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 11:50:00 -
[183] - Quote
Hey its ah ceap fit... why i should but to more ISK in it .
Before you muck around like a WoW Player, please enlight me , and give me Fit with the best cost-efficiently. Cuiusvis hominis est errare, nullius nisi insipientis in errore perseverare -
Irren ist menschlich, doch im Irrtum zu verharren ist ein Zeichen von Dummheit. |
Senn Denroth
Lead Farmers Kill It With Fire
86
|
Posted - 2013.07.18 23:38:00 -
[184] - Quote
Rengas wrote:This era of Dread blapping is similar to the issue that K-space residents used to have with that of the tracking Titan.
A possible solution for WH residents tired of having their expensive T3s volleyed in mere seconds would be to nerf Dread tracking even further while simultaneously increasing the signature radius of Sleeper battleships.
edit: Yeah I know this has been discussed to death. But the more we bring it up the more likely someone from CCP will actually notice and do something about it.
Hmmm not 100% sure I agree with this. I think it needs to be balanced to some degree to stop single cruiser sized hulls getting blapped off the field because you have your MWD on or have a slightly bad angle while flying toward a dread.
If they opponent has webs and target painters then by all means I think it should be possible that they can shoot your cruisers with the aid of the webs/TP's being focused.
We've had smaller forces able to fight us in their home because they can bring as many dreads/carriers to make up for their smaller numbers vs our larger fleet. Take this away and you take away a lot of fights in W Space.
Solution: Reduce the sig radius bloom when a MWD is active.
When you really think about it, why would activating a MWD cause a sig radius to become so huge? It wouldn't.. if anything you could speed tank all day. It was a nerf to minmatar ships a long time ago which could tank any man and their dog all day long.
On the subject of T3's I want to be able to take subsystems in my cargohold and refit on the fly. Or just leave them alone. T3's were invented by sleepers using magnets and all sorts of other magic. Besides the tank of a T3, which T3 does better than it's T2 counterpart?? If anything it's the T2 ships that need a balance to make them more relevant. |
|
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
358
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 01:04:00 -
[185] - Quote
I have removed some rule breaking posts (and those that quoted them) and let some edge cases stay. Please keep it on topic people and above all civil!
The rules: 2. Be respectful toward others at all times.
The purpose of the EVE Online forums is to provide a platform for exchange of ideas, and a venue for the discussion of EVE Online. Occasionally there will be conflicts that arise when people voice opinions. Forum users are expected to be courteous when disagreeing with others.
4. Personal attacks are prohibited.
Commonly known as flaming, personal attacks are posts that are designed to personally berate or insult another forum user. Posts of this nature are not beneficial to the community spirit that CCP promote and as such they will not be tolerated.
5. Trolling is prohibited.
Trolling is a defined as a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting other players in an attempt to incite retaliation or an emotional response. Posts of this nature are disruptive, often abusive and do not contribute to the sense of community that CCP promote.
26. Off-topic posting is prohibited.
Off-topic posting is permitted within reason, as sometimes a single comment may color or lighten the tone of discussion. However, excessive posting of off-topic remarks in an attempt to derail a thread may result in the thread being locked, or a forum warning being issued. ISD Ezwal Lt. Commander Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
Yuan Taizu
1
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 15:06:00 -
[186] - Quote
I think CCP will do the right thing and look into T2 re-balancing before they start any serious discussions on T3 ships. The nullifier might be OP, but if they were to remove that subsystem, at least give blockade runners the nullified ability!
And one more thing..more of a request. CCP, please give covert fitted T3's the same jump effect as bombers and blockade runners, PLEASE! |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |