Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Alonzo Harris
Elbflorenz Industries
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 15:13:00 -
[181] - Quote
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:*non-related gibberish*
shut up james, why dont you at least post with your "main character" ? people are discussing "you" on forum threads without having heard one actual word from "you" Power to the People! http://freehighsec.wordpress.com/ |
Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
932
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 15:42:00 -
[182] - Quote
Alonzo Harris wrote:Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:*non-related gibberish* shut up james, why dont you at least post with your "main character" ? people are discussing "you" on forum threads without having heard one actual word from "you" Ouch, that hurt.
Since you altered the quote, it's hard to tell what post you're actually referring to, especially as my last post was pretty closely related to the question that I was answering. You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric
Vote James 315 for CSM 8! |
Vin King
State War Academy Caldari State
54
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 16:15:00 -
[183] - Quote
Alonzo Harris wrote: shut up james, why dont you at least post with your "main character" ? people are discussing "you" on forum threads without having heard one actual word from "you"
Calm down, James. There's no reason to be so angry at your own alts.
315 4 CSM 8 |
John E Normus
New Order Logistics CODE.
28
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 17:26:00 -
[184] - Quote
Alonzo Harris wrote:Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:*non-related gibberish* shut up james, why dont you at least post with your "main character" ? people are discussing "you" on forum threads without having heard one actual word from "you"
His posts are best seen here.
Why do you think he has to post on EvE-O when his blog is getting so many visitors? Former Knight of the New Order of Highsec.-á I sell N.O. secrets for isk! |
Wodensun
ZeroSec
64
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 16:07:00 -
[185] - Quote
Lady Spank wrote:Someone that may have once run a ponzi scheme and nowadays shitposts and bumps miners and 'singlehandedly' runs a personal blog where he sperges biased playground level babble on subjects of no consequence has no relevance representing high-sec interests.
/Thread |
Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
968
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 19:15:00 -
[186] - Quote
Wodensun wrote:Lady Spank wrote:Someone that may have once run a ponzi scheme and nowadays shitposts and bumps miners and 'singlehandedly' runs a personal blog where he sperges biased playground level babble on subjects of no consequence has no relevance representing high-sec interests. /Thread Hardly. Or are the scammers and gankers and bumpers who live and play in highsec not legitimate voters? You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric
Vote James 315 for CSM 8! |
Bethan Le Troix
Krusual Investigation Agency
2
|
Posted - 2013.03.15 16:33:00 -
[187] - Quote
You're at work in real life. There are maybe twenty other people working with you. One of these people is a boring jerk who incessantly takes the **** out of the weakest/strangest person in the room. He often pushes the boat out too far. This jerk could be James 315.
I have no problem with bumping and suicide ganking. If you use your head these activities can be avoided. It's not hard to do.
I have read James 315's blog a few times and it honestly a load of b******* and boring as well. He makes some of what The Mittani writes interesting. Not that suggest you vote for The Mittani either.
In short James 315 is a joke and obviously not viable as a candidate for the CSM.
|
Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
714
|
Posted - 2013.03.15 21:12:00 -
[188] - Quote
John E Normus wrote:Why do you think he has to post on EvE-O when his blog is getting so many visitors? To get nominated?
Linky please to the official candidacy thread, I seem to have missed it.
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |
Snow Axe
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1062
|
Posted - 2013.03.15 21:43:00 -
[189] - Quote
Bethan Le Troix wrote:You're at work in real life. There are maybe twenty other people working with you. One of these people is a boring jerk who incessantly takes the **** out of the weakest/strangest person in the room. He often pushes the boat out too far. This jerk could be James 315.
So wait, highsec is the 1-in-20 minority now? I always thought they were the massive majority and thus needed dedicated catering? "Look any reason why you need to talk like that? I have now reported you. I dont need to listen to your bad tone. If you cant have a grown up conversation then leave the thread[" |
Khergit Deserters
794
|
Posted - 2013.03.15 22:16:00 -
[190] - Quote
Reading all these candidates' posts is too much work. I just want to vote against James 315. What's the best way to do that? |
|
John E Normus
New Order Logistics CODE.
33
|
Posted - 2013.03.15 22:31:00 -
[191] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:John E Normus wrote:Why do you think he has to post on EvE-O when his blog is getting so many visitors? To get nominated? Linky please to the official candidacy thread, I seem to have missed it.
http://community.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=74283
You're adorable. Vote JAMES 315 for CSM8 |
Vin King
State War Academy Caldari State
89
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 00:16:00 -
[192] - Quote
Khergit Deserters wrote:Reading all these candidates' posts is too much work. I just want to vote against James 315. What's the best way to do that?
By voting for him. 315 4 CSM 8 |
Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
714
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 01:16:00 -
[193] - Quote
Well, aren't you a special little snowflake?
Linky to *james* candidacy thread.
You know, the one where he throws his hat in the ring...
Otherwise this is just more BS as usual.
Khergit Deserters wrote:Reading all these candidates' posts is too much work. I just want to vote against James 315. What's the best way to do that? Trebor would probably be the troll candidate.
Otherwise, Malcanis for a serious candidate.
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |
Nathalie LaPorte
Republic University Minmatar Republic
85
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 01:20:00 -
[194] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:Well, aren't you a special little snowflake? Linky to *james* candidacy thread. You know, the one where he throws his hat in the ring... Otherwise this is just more BS as usual.
Clearly you didn't read that devblog. It's fairly short and renders all your questions moot. Try reading the part with words, this time.
|
Vin King
State War Academy Caldari State
90
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 03:17:00 -
[195] - Quote
Vin King wrote:Khergit Deserters wrote:Reading all these candidates' posts is too much work. I just want to vote against James 315. What's the best way to do that? By voting for him.
I've received a few questions asking me how this would work. So far, nobody I've replied to has understood the physics involved correctly, so let me try to give a brief explanation. Essentially, according to the Uncertainty Principle, when you want to interfere with the measurement of an object, all you have to do is participate with that object. To disrupt the CSM efforts of the Saviour of HighSec, you can vote for the Saviour of HighSec, and that will disrupt the measurement of his vote to the point that he cannot be elected. This is a surefire way for protesters to ensure his defeat, according to my understanding of particle physics.
If you disagree with my reading, you'd best be prepared to show your educational endorsements on this matter, and if yours cannot defeat mine, you're practically certain to be wrong. 315 4 CSM 8 |
Nathalie LaPorte
Republic University Minmatar Republic
86
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 03:38:00 -
[196] - Quote
Vin King wrote:Vin King wrote:Khergit Deserters wrote:Reading all these candidates' posts is too much work. I just want to vote against James 315. What's the best way to do that? By voting for him. I've received a few questions asking me how this would work. So far, nobody I've replied to has understood the physics involved correctly, so let me try to give a brief explanation. Essentially, according to the Uncertainty Principle, when you want to interfere with the measurement of an object, all you have to do is participate with that object. To disrupt the CSM efforts of the Saviour of HighSec, you can vote for the Saviour of HighSec, and that will disrupt the measurement of his vote to the point that he cannot be elected. This is a surefire way for protesters to ensure his defeat, according to my understanding of particle physics. If you disagree with my reading, you'd best be prepared to show your educational endorsements on this matter, and if yours cannot defeat mine, you're practically certain to be wrong.
This is completely wrong. The uncertainty principle doesn't just state that interaction disrupts measurement, it states that measurement CONSTITUTES disruption, and therefore the granularity of one's measurements are limited by the amount you can limit said disruption, which possesses a distinct lower-bound related to the planck constant. According to this observation, the more votes that are cast, the less uncertainty matters as a ratio, which makes your reasoning incorrect.
However, your macro-level intuition is correct, the best way to vote against James315 is to vote for him. To wit: Everyone is an alt of James315, or of the Mittani. James315 secretly is the Mittani. Therefore, a vote for anyone other than James315, is actually a vote for James315. If you omit James315 from your CSM ballot, you are voting for 14 other people. Those 14 people are all actually James315. Thus, omitting James315 from your ballot, is like voting for James315 14 times. Voting for James315 is therefore superior to not voting for James315. You might ask, what if I don't vote for anyone at all? This calls into question quantum mechanics again...yes, I know you thought we were done with QM once Vin King's use of Uncertainty was called into question, but you were wrong. If you don't vote for anyone, then your vote exists like Schrodinger's Cat, in a hidden box. Your vote in that box is voting for every possible candidate. therefore, not voting, is like voting for 28+ candidates, who are all James315. This is at least twice as bad as actually voting your block, and over 28 times as bad as just voting for James315 directly. |
Lyza Kimbo
Cat Scratch Fever
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 20:00:00 -
[197] - Quote
James315 is a dirtbag of the first and highest level, and those New Order lackeys of his are just pirates in disguise. That protection money scam he and his minions are running in and around Kamio is like something out of 1929 Chicago.
That someone so widely loathed and detested could possibly have any chance of being elected to "represent" the very people he victimizes is a serious indictment of the whole CSM system. |
Wescro2
New Order Logistics CODE.
83
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 20:25:00 -
[198] - Quote
Lyza Kimbo wrote:James315 is a dirtbag of the first and highest level, and those New Order lackeys of his are just pirates in disguise. That protection money scam he and his minions are running in and around Kamio is like something out of 1929 Chicago.
That someone so widely loathed and detested could possibly have any chance of being elected to "represent" the very people he victimizes is a serious indictment of the whole CSM system.
That fact that he can generate such a strong reaction in people, and mostly with his words and ideas, not as much his in-game actions, is a pretty solid reason to put him in that seat. The guy gets things done.
Playing a pretend-cultist political terrorist in a sandbox game is a valid play style and is just as deserving of a CSM spot as a white knight, e-bushido-honoring goodie-two-shoes. |
Tiberius StarGazer
StarGazer Heavy Industries And Exploration
308
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 14:59:00 -
[199] - Quote
A man who (and encourages his corp members also to) effectively grief and oppress the highsec residents as per link below is not someone I want in CSM representing my interests as a highsec industrialists and occasions FW defender of the Caldari State.
http://soundcloud.com/drtylereve/mineteck20130301 |
Powers Sa
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
568
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 05:58:00 -
[200] - Quote
Yo James, how do you feel about tags for sec? http://youtu.be/g3jK-XZ2KnM?t=22m40s I suicide gank, and I would really like a streamlined method for regaining my sec status, but CCP abandoned this idea in the crimewatch patch. Would you champion getting this back into the dev cycle? Vote Nullsec for CSM8 Mynnna Kesper North-á Malc00nis |
|
admiral root
Red Galaxy SpaceMonkey's Alliance
495
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 07:45:00 -
[201] - Quote
Tiberius StarGazer wrote:A man who (and encourages his corp members also to) effectively grief and oppress the highsec residents
While there's no doubt that the New Order is higly effective, we don't grief (CCP said so, so you're utterly wrong) and we only oppress the bot-aspirants and those who would dare to defy the saviour in word or deed. To everyone else in highsec we're protectors of at-the-keyboard gameplay, interaction and assorted kinds of fluffy sweetness. We're the good guys.
Tiberius StarGazer wrote:
I like how you completely skip over the part where the guy did it to himself. The Agents who were present tried to resolve a customer complaint and, by pure happenstance, record the legend of the exploding strawberry. We're historians, as well as educators.
You're falling into the same trap that a lot of people fell into when Mittens was the CSM chair - you're confusing James 315, saviour of highsec and target of huge amounts of unreasonable hatred by rabid bot aspirants, with the guy behind the character who seeks election to represent the players to CCP. Anyone who can't distinguish between the two should probably seek psychiatric help. No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff
Vote 315 for CSM 8 |
Tiberius StarGazer
StarGazer Heavy Industries And Exploration
308
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 10:20:00 -
[202] - Quote
Your reply reads like a lot of the brainwashed dogma that New Order is so agressively peddling in its activities.
Considering that James315 spends a majority of his Eve gametime parading as the "Saviour" of highsec and organising an alliance to further his in game aspirations which is fundementally "highsec is broken" is probably a very good yard stick with which to mesure his intentions. It also reflects the playerbase that will vote for him.
Afterall the Mittani eventually showed his own thoughts and feelings were not to diseperate from his online charecter, particularly after a few beers.
Also to suggest that I also have some difficulty with seperating reality from fantasy from one post also indicates a level of fanaticism on your part that quite frankly is disturbing. Afterall, how do you know I'm not posting as my charecter? |
admiral root
Red Galaxy SpaceMonkey's Alliance
495
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 12:48:00 -
[203] - Quote
Tiberius StarGazer wrote:Considering that James315 spends a majority of his Eve gametime parading as the "Saviour" of highsec and organising an alliance to further his in game aspirations which is fundementally "highsec is broken" is probably a very good yard stick with which to mesure his intentions considering the website
Fact: Highsec is broken.
Fact: James doesn't spend any time "organising an alliance" - I've spent more time organising Code. then he has, which is to say I put the forum together. What he does is dispense justice and mercy, as is appropriate for the saviour of high sec.
Fact: His intentions are to try and persaude CCP that highsec needs their attention sooner, rather than later.
Fact: Punctuation is your friend.
Tiberius StarGazer wrote:It also reflects the playerbase that will vote for him.
You mean people who want to see highsec fixed?
Tiberius StarGazer wrote:Afterall the Mittani eventually showed his own thoughts and feelings were not to diseperate from his online charecter, particularly after a few beers.
I wasn't there, but my understanding is that it was considerably more than "a few beers". People do and say regrettable things when drunk. The measure of a man is how he conducts himself after sobering up and realising what he's done. The Mittani conducted himself in an honourable way. I'm really not sure what this has to do with James having a vast knowledge of the game and a desire to see CCP address important issues.
Tiberius StarGazer wrote:Also to suggest that I also have some difficulty with seperating reality from fantasy from one post also indicates a level of fanaticism on your part that quite frankly is disturbing.
I didn't say *you* had difficulty, I was just making a general observation. I seem to have touched a nerve, though. No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff
Vote 315 for CSM 8 |
Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
715
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 17:43:00 -
[204] - Quote
admiral root wrote:Fact: Highsec is broken. You're confusing subjective opinion for established fact. For you it's correct. For me it's overstatement and hyperbole.
Tiberius StarGazer wrote:Also to suggest that I also have some difficulty with separating reality from fantasy from one post also indicates a level of fanaticism on your part that quite frankly is disturbing.
admiral root wrote:I didn't say *you* had difficulty, I was just making a general observation. I seem to have touched a nerve, though. Since that last paragraph was a direct response to him, you did actually. Dial back your fan-boi a couple of notches and you'll be fine.
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |
Tiberius StarGazer
StarGazer Heavy Industries And Exploration
308
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:40:00 -
[205] - Quote
admiral root wrote:Fact: Highsec is broken.
This is an opinion, not a fact, if you are going to state a "Fact" you should support it with evidence. And this is an opinion that I do not agree with. Indeed I find James315 arguments that highsec is broken to be vague and lacking.
admiral root wrote:Fact: James doesn't spend any time "organising an alliance" - I've spent more time organising Code. then he has, which is to say I put the forum together. What he does is dispense justice and mercy, as is appropriate for the saviour of high sec.
While you acting as his forum admin may be "Fact" I will also take it that he is to busy dispensing "Justice" and "Mercy" to actually promote his own CSM campaign and is relying on his co-horts to promote his message... as vague as this message appears to be.
However, I am currently on interview 13 of the Crossing Zebras and I understand James315 one is number 16, so I hope to be proved wrong. But given his lackluster presence on this forum I find it somewhat discouraging.
admiral root wrote:Tiberius StarGazer wrote:It also reflects the playerbase that will vote for him. You mean people who want to see highsec fixed?
As in the people who wish to change highsec into something that a number of highsec residents dont want? Then yes. I feel that James315 vision of Mercy and Justice is one thats not shared by the many. |
Tiberius StarGazer
StarGazer Heavy Industries And Exploration
308
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:40:00 -
[206] - Quote
admiral root wrote:Tiberius StarGazer wrote:Afterall the Mittani eventually showed his own thoughts and feelings were not to diseperate from his online charecter, particularly after a few beers. I wasn't there, but my understanding is that it was considerably more than "a few beers". People do and say regrettable things when drunk. The measure of a man is how he conducts himself after sobering up and realising what he's done. The Mittani conducted himself in an honourable way. I'm really not sure what this has to do with James having a vast knowledge of the game and a desire to see CCP address important issues.
I guess I need to expand on the example some more to clarify my rational, The Mittani is the leader of an organisation which are known as Pranksters, Gankers, and Greifers. What amased me was the fact that after he designed, wrote and then presented a Fanfest peice on griefing another player came as a huge surprise. The master of griefers was infact, a griefer himself.
Ultimately, the way you play Eve is what you, as the person behind the computer screen, enjoys doing. Ergo, any chance you have of shaping and moulding the game will be based on the things you, as a player, enjoys doing.
If anyone says this is false is niave at best.
admiral root wrote:I didn't say *you* had difficulty, I was just making a general observation. I seem to have touched a nerve, though.
admiral root wrote:You're falling into the same trap that a lot of people fell into when Mittens was the CSM chair - you're confusing James 315, saviour of highsec and target of huge amounts of unreasonable hatred by rabid bot aspirants, with the guy behind the character who seeks election to represent the players to CCP. Anyone who can't distinguish between the two should probably seek psychiatric help.
Quite clearly by using You Are twice in that paragraph you were adressing me directly, and your blase way of attempting to use mental illness as a derogatory insult with which to attempt to quell my dissent is quite frankly insulting.
As a representative of james315 and a promoter of his policies it reflects very badly. |
Khergit Deserters
796
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 20:17:00 -
[207] - Quote
Tiberius StarGazer wrote: While you acting as his forum admin may be "Fact" I will also take it that he is to busy dispensing "Justice" and "Mercy" to actually promote his own CSM campaign and is relying on his co-horts to promote his message... as vague as this message appears to be.
I'm beginning to suspect that these cohorts are just Jim 315 himself, speaking through his alts. |
Wescro2
New Order Logistics CODE.
90
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 22:59:00 -
[208] - Quote
Khergit Deserters wrote:I'm beginning to suspect that these cohorts are just Jim 315 himself, speaking through his alts.
That should seriously go on the miner bingo board.
Tiberius StarGazer wrote:This is an opinion, not a fact, if you are going to state a "Fact" you should support it with evidence. And this is an opinion that I do not agree with. Indeed I find James315 arguments that highsec is broken to be vague and lacking.
- Evidence #1: An overwhelming majority of characters live in high-sec.
- Evidence #2: Miner ganking is at historic lows according to the CSM minutes.
- Evidence #3: It's more profitable for a miner to fit for yield and get ganked occasionally, than to fit tank and sacrifice yield.
Conclusion: High sec is either too safe, or too rewarding.
Unlike you, Admiral Root has this information, as do most people who have taken the time to form an informed opinion on the subject.
Tiberius StarGazer wrote:While you acting as his forum admin may be "Fact" I will also take it that he is to busy dispensing "Justice" and "Mercy" to actually promote his own CSM campaign and is relying on his co-horts to promote his message... as vague as this message appears to be.
Now I know you are trolling. Weren't you in the Trebor thread earlier supporting his candidacy? Trebor being a candidate who had to be pushed for 5 pages in his thread before he gave some specifics about what he stands for, and it's still hard to say if anything he says is his opinion or another bout of his devils advocacy.
On the other hand, James positions are far from vague. They are in fact so clear that people like you can form strong opinions against them, while others like myself and root strongly support them. Unlike Trebor, James actually stands for something, instead of promising everything to everyone. |
Ustrello
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
93
|
Posted - 2013.03.19 00:50:00 -
[209] - Quote
James is love james is life |
Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
718
|
Posted - 2013.03.19 00:59:00 -
[210] - Quote
Wescro2 wrote:
- Evidence #1: An overwhelming majority of characters live in high-sec.
- Evidence #2: Miner ganking is at historic lows according to the CSM minutes.
- Evidence #3: It's more profitable for a miner to fit for yield and get ganked occasionally, than to fit tank and sacrifice yield.
Conclusion: High sec is either too safe, or too rewarding. Characters =/= players Scouts, traders, haulers and logistics (some or all of them alts of Low-sec/Null-sec/WH players) count against the total. Because ganking is the only pvp in hi-sec evidence #3 is the same for hi and null sec miners (and possibly low-sec miners as well).
Conclusion: your conclusion (or logic) is flawed.
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |