Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
onegun
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 15:01:00 -
[1] - Quote
we have pirate frigs, cruisrs, and battleships, can we get some pirate battlecruisers.............and yes im bored, waiting out the new patch update...............but i still like the idea |
Zhilia Mann
Tide Way Out Productions
708
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 15:15:00 -
[2] - Quote
I'm gonna get a reputation for just linking to old threads pretty soon here, but this has been discussed at great length recently. So have a linky. |
Goldensaver
Vorbild Industries Inc. State Section 9
30
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 15:24:00 -
[3] - Quote
Zhilia Mann wrote:I'm gonna get a reputation for just linking to old threads pretty soon here, but this has been discussed at great length recently. So have a linky. But that was a good thread, with lots of discussion on the fact, so I think it's reasonable to do so. |
Alexa Coates
Red Fleet
203
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 16:29:00 -
[4] - Quote
at least it wasnt the typical derp navy drek pls post. That's a Templar, an Amarr fighter used by carriers. |
Riot Girl
RADIO RAMPAGE Initiative Mercenaries
167
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 16:48:00 -
[5] - Quote
Who needs Pirate BCs when you can have a Cynabal? |
Dibblerette
The Phantom Regiment THE ROYAL NAVY
96
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 22:43:00 -
[6] - Quote
Pirate Battlecruisers? You mean besides the Machariel? |
Lili Lu
536
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 23:13:00 -
[7] - Quote
Alexa Coates wrote:at least it wasnt the typical derp navy drek pls post. But that's just it. This is just another givens me a stealth faction draek plz thread. These things pollute S&M and other subforums on a regular basis. Anyway, at least the gap between cruisers and BCs will shrink with rebalancing and that may help halt the parade of these bad threads. |
Vilnius Zar
Ordo Ardish
198
|
Posted - 2012.10.17 07:55:00 -
[8] - Quote
It's this thread again...
As stated many times before (including statements by DEVS) it would be silly OP and completely mess up any sort of balance. Amat victoria curam. |
Flurk Hellbron
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
121
|
Posted - 2012.10.17 08:10:00 -
[9] - Quote
As if there should be any balance now? |
Riot Girl
RADIO RAMPAGE Initiative Mercenaries
170
|
Posted - 2012.10.17 08:20:00 -
[10] - Quote
Well at least they balanced Harbinger and Hurricane. |
|
Mike Whiite
Keystone Industrial
75
|
Posted - 2012.10.17 09:20:00 -
[11] - Quote
Well they actualy mantioned it in one of their Ballincing one ship at a time Dev blogs.
With the reballancing of ships and the racialisation of Destroyers and Battlecruisers there would be an opening for navy and Pirate ships.
so there might be navy/pirate battlecruiser but not before the reballance gets there, which isn't anytime soon I imagion. |
Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
835
|
Posted - 2012.10.17 14:40:00 -
[12] - Quote
Dibblerette wrote:Pirate Battlecruisers? You mean besides the Machariel?
It's a cruiser, just bigger. brb |
Kaikka Carel
White syndicate Wormhole Holders
85
|
Posted - 2012.10.17 17:16:00 -
[13] - Quote
How do I fit an Apoc for LVL4s? |
Bernard 2007
The Scarlet Storm
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.17 18:26:00 -
[14] - Quote
Zhilia Mann wrote:I'm gonna get a reputation for just linking to old threads pretty soon here, but this has been discussed at great length recently. So have a linky.
So what? That's not a good reason not to discuss it again. Between each time this same subject is discussed, new players join the game, old players come back and some players keep thinking about the subject while looking for a good answer on how it could be implented.
And without a constant stream interesting new threads popping up, people stop visiting the forum, so when someone posts a question, nobody answers, people leave the game, the forum dies, the game dies.
On the subject of new ships though, Navy Battlecruisers make way more sense then Pirate ones. A Gurista Battlecruiser would have to step in between the Gila and the Rattlesnake as well as have a Drone bonus combined with a Rocket setup, making it almost completely pointless or invalidating other currently viable choices. Hence making it an overall bad idea. |
Riot Girl
RADIO RAMPAGE Initiative Mercenaries
175
|
Posted - 2012.10.17 18:55:00 -
[15] - Quote
Well if you look at navy ships, they are generally geared to be something like a stepping stone between T1 and T2 ships. You pay a bit more for something like a T1.5 ship. When you apply that to BCs and create a ship that is half way between a BC and a Command Ship, I can see why CCP probably thought it was pointless. |
RobinAnne
Roving Guns Inc. RAZOR Alliance
3
|
Posted - 2012.10.18 00:57:00 -
[16] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote:Well if you look at navy ships, they are generally geared to be something like a stepping stone between T1 and T2 ships. You pay a bit more for something like a T1.5 ship. When you apply that to BCs and create a ship that is half way between a BC and a Command Ship, I can see why CCP probably thought it was pointless.
He did say "pirate". And generally it is T1-Faction-T2-Pirate |
Alexa Coates
Red Fleet
235
|
Posted - 2012.10.18 13:26:00 -
[17] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote:Well if you look at navy ships, they are generally geared to be something like a stepping stone between T1 and T2 ships. You pay a bit more for something like a T1.5 ship. When you apply that to BCs and create a ship that is half way between a BC and a Command Ship, I can see why CCP probably thought it was pointless. and then you have the navy exeQQuror, which says **** you to sense. That's a Templar, an Amarr fighter used by carriers. |
onegun
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
11
|
Posted - 2012.10.18 14:12:00 -
[18] - Quote
Bernard 2007 wrote:[quote=Zhilia Mann]I'm gonna get a reputation for just linking to old threads pretty soon here, but this has been discussed at great length recently. So have a linky.
So what? That's not a good reason not to discuss it again. Between each time this same subject is discussed, new players join the game, old players come back and some players keep thinking about the subject while looking for a good answer on how it could be implented.
And without a constant stream interesting new threads popping up, people stop visiting the forum, so when someone posts a question, nobody answers, people leave the game, the forum dies, the game dies.
On the subject of new ships though, Navy Battlecruisers make way more sense then Pirate ones. A Gurista Battlecruiser would have to step in between the Gila and the Rattlesnake as well as have a Drone bonus combined with a Rocket setup, making it almost completely pointless or invalidating other currently viable choices. Hence making it an overall bad idea.[ sorry to those that complain about this thread being disscused over and over again, .........but im not a forum ***** i dont read this stuff every day or even every month, ...........................i still like the idea |
Beat General
Painkiller.
65
|
Posted - 2012.10.18 16:30:00 -
[19] - Quote
sansha bc now pls. |
Soon Shin
Caucasian Culture Club Transmission Lost
167
|
Posted - 2012.10.18 22:32:00 -
[20] - Quote
Would prefer if they released Navy Tier 3 Battleships and racial variants of other cruisers than BC's. |
|
Cage Man
Evil Guinea Pigs
12
|
Posted - 2012.10.18 23:43:00 -
[21] - Quote
RobinAnne wrote:Riot Girl wrote:Well if you look at navy ships, they are generally geared to be something like a stepping stone between T1 and T2 ships. You pay a bit more for something like a T1.5 ship. When you apply that to BCs and create a ship that is half way between a BC and a Command Ship, I can see why CCP probably thought it was pointless. He did say "pirate". And generally it is T1-Faction-T2-Pirate
I don't know of anyone who would first fly a T2 before a pirate ship... hell I would go as far to say its T1 -- > Pirate --> ??? not sure what comes next.. maybe Jove or concord
|
Gummi75
Lamb Federation Navy Against ALL Authorities
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.19 07:04:00 -
[22] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote:Who needs Pirate BCs when you can have a Cynabal?
bah so last year
t3 for the win |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |