Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Pretty kitty
|
Posted - 2011.01.25 19:09:00 -
[1]
so um..I have made a cool 350mil so far with alts dokkening themselves on RR so far..who else is cashing in on this lack of foresight :)
|
Lynmar Sutek
|
Posted - 2011.01.25 19:12:00 -
[2]
what is 'dokkening' ?
|
Pretty kitty
|
Posted - 2011.01.25 19:13:00 -
[3]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiE8_pz013g
|
Xyland Miner
|
Posted - 2011.01.25 19:20:00 -
[4]
hehehe it works, first gang got 3 RR and pop pop pop..alt scooped and booked it..very nice :)
|
Hakaru Ishiwara
Minmatar Republic Military School
|
Posted - 2011.01.25 20:17:00 -
[5]
Love it. CCP game design at its best: Create a game mechanic that clearly promotes [limited] collaboration, but then royally screws the 9 guys earnestly RR'ing the 10th who just happens to accidentally another player in high-sec.
Keep at it CCP. You will drive your new game content in the ground faster than Icelandic banking tanked.
|
Funesta
|
Posted - 2011.01.25 20:28:00 -
[6]
And thus begins the practice of scanning every ship before you start repping it.
"I see your ship is worth less than mine, so I won't repair it. If you're going to potentially get my ship destroyed, it better cost you as much as it'll cost me."
|
Iden Secundus
|
Posted - 2011.01.25 20:31:00 -
[7]
upps... http://i149.photobucket.com/albums/s55/ego_terrorist/concorded.jpg
___ Where is my salvager...
|
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
|
Posted - 2011.01.25 20:35:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Hakaru Ishiwara Love it. CCP game design at its best: Create a game mechanic that clearly promotes [limited] collaboration, but then royally screws the 9 guys earnestly RR'ing the 10th who just happens to accidentally another player in high-sec.
àso collaborate with people you trust. ùùù ôIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡à you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.ö ù Karath Piki |
Dhaul
Agent-Orange Nabaal Syndicate
|
Posted - 2011.01.25 20:39:00 -
[9]
Why are you fleeting up with people you don't fully trust in the first place?
|
Grimpak
Gallente Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
|
Posted - 2011.01.25 20:41:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Tippia
Originally by: Hakaru Ishiwara Love it. CCP game design at its best: Create a game mechanic that clearly promotes [limited] collaboration, but then royally screws the 9 guys earnestly RR'ing the 10th who just happens to accidentally another player in high-sec.
àso collaborate with people you trust.
no no. stop being logical.
people think that everyone's a good guy and no harm will come to them.
can't wait for CCP to come and say "working as intended" ---
Quote: The more I know about humans, the more I love animals.
ain't that right. |
|
Barakkus
|
Posted - 2011.01.25 20:41:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Dhaul Why are you fleeting up with people you don't fully trust in the first place?
Who fully trusts people in EVE? - - [SERVICE] Corp Standings For POS anchoring
|
Scortched Merc
|
Posted - 2011.01.25 20:47:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Barakkus
Originally by: Dhaul Why are you fleeting up with people you don't fully trust in the first place?
Who fully trusts people in EVE?
I trust everyone... wanna trust me?
|
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
|
Posted - 2011.01.25 20:53:00 -
[13]
Edited by: Tippia on 25/01/2011 20:53:45
Originally by: Grimpak can't wait for CCP to come and say "working as intended"
They basically already did in some other thread (as far as the trust part goes)à
But they're also looking into RR-Concordoken, so it might "fixed" at some point in some way anyway. Originally by: Scortched Merc I trust everyone... wanna trust me?
With those glasses and that facial hair? Ehhhhmmmààà no. ùùù ôIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡à you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.ö ù Karath Piki |
HeIIfire11
|
Posted - 2011.01.25 20:54:00 -
[14]
Edited by: HeIIfire11 on 25/01/2011 20:56:39
Originally by: Tippia
Originally by: Hakaru Ishiwara Love it. CCP game design at its best: Create a game mechanic that clearly promotes [limited] collaboration, but then royally screws the 9 guys earnestly RR'ing the 10th who just happens to accidentally another player in high-sec.
àso collaborate with people you trust.
Im just going to leave this here....
I TOLD YOU SO!!!
Edit:OH and maybe this also....
Originally by: CCP Soundwave We are looking into this issue right now.
|
Scortched Merc
|
Posted - 2011.01.25 20:59:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Tippia Edited by: Tippia on 25/01/2011 20:53:45
Originally by: Grimpak can't wait for CCP to come and say "working as intended"
They basically already did in some other thread (as far as the trust part goes)à
But they're also looking into RR-Concordoken, so it might "fixed" at some point in some way anyway. Originally by: Scortched Merc I trust everyone... wanna trust me?
With those glasses and that facial hair? Ehhhhmmmààà no.
You hurt my feelings!
|
Shintai
Gallente Arx Io Orbital Factories Arx Io
|
Posted - 2011.01.25 21:05:00 -
[16]
Its amazing how many people work in CCP. And this was a own concord response for along time. And nobody was able to put 2 and 2 together. Im happy I havent done any incursion. Sad for those who did.
The responsible person at CCP should be thrown into a volcano to please the players. --------------------------------------
Abstraction and Transcendence: Nature, Shintai, and Geometry |
Grimpak
Gallente Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
|
Posted - 2011.01.25 21:06:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Tippia But they're also looking into RR-Concordoken, so it might "fixed" at some point in some way anyway.
if this ends up with yet another zombie incident happening then I say go ahead with the "fix". ---
Quote: The more I know about humans, the more I love animals.
ain't that right. |
Major Snitch
|
Posted - 2011.01.25 21:10:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Tippia
Originally by: Hakaru Ishiwara Love it. CCP game design at its best: Create a game mechanic that clearly promotes [limited] collaboration, but then royally screws the 9 guys earnestly RR'ing the 10th who just happens to accidentally another player in high-sec.
àso collaborate with people you trust.
mmmmmm Even CCP says trust know one.....eve about trust wait
|
Dizzy Toledo
|
Posted - 2011.01.25 21:46:00 -
[19]
Originally by: Dhaul Why are you fleeting up with people you don't fully trust in the first place?
Muwahahahahaha!!!
See see pee show once again how little they listen :)
All was foretold from Sissy server, all was ignored!
Continue using the designed game mechanic my looting lovelies!!!
LET CONCORD BE YOUR MIGHTY DRONES OF DOOM!!!
|
mkmin
|
Posted - 2011.01.25 21:49:00 -
[20]
Originally by: Scortched Merc
Originally by: Tippia Edited by: Tippia on 25/01/2011 20:53:45
Originally by: Grimpak can't wait for CCP to come and say "working as intended"
They basically already did in some other thread (as far as the trust part goes)à
But they're also looking into RR-Concordoken, so it might "fixed" at some point in some way anyway. Originally by: Scortched Merc I trust everyone... wanna trust me?
With those glasses and that facial hair? Ehhhhmmmààà no.
You hurt my feelings!
But you look like a homeless guy. Pan your portrait down and you'd see the "will grief for food" sign.
|
|
Barakkus
|
Posted - 2011.01.25 22:09:00 -
[21]
They should remove concord from incursions so Sansha loyalist players can aid the Sansha. - - [SERVICE] Corp Standings For POS anchoring
|
Liang Nuren
|
Posted - 2011.01.25 22:12:00 -
[22]
Originally by: Barakkus They should remove concord from incursions so Sansha loyalist players can aid the Sansha.
This. :)
-Liang -- Eve Forum ***** Extraordinaire On Twitter
|
Apollo Gabriel
Brotherhood Of Fallen Angels Etherium Cartel
|
Posted - 2011.01.25 22:41:00 -
[23]
wow Liang ... not the image I imagined for you, but it's a nice look. Best regards, Apollo Gabriel
|
yani dumyat
Minmatar Tribal Liberation Force
|
Posted - 2011.01.25 22:53:00 -
[24]
Originally by: Apollo Gabriel wow Liang ... not the image I imagined for you, but it's a nice look.
what, botox?
|
Commander Tycho
Minmatar Ready. Aim. Fire.
|
Posted - 2011.01.25 23:40:00 -
[25]
I don't think think the RR concorded thing is a problem at all. Just don't fly with strangers... problem solved.
So many people are complaining, like you must fleet with strangers to participate. Get your corp mates with you and form a fleet! If nobody in your corp wants to join you then join another corp, and if you prefer to fly solo then maybe Eve isnt your game.
The problem I have with Incursions is the rewards mechanic which pays out to those with a bigger gang even if they did none of the work.
|
Brixer
Dai Dai Hai
|
Posted - 2011.01.26 00:05:00 -
[26]
CCP should not let concord kill RR ships anyway. There is no way any kind of logistic can keep a ship primaried by Concord alive. This mechanic is only used to grief.
If this is such an important thing for CCP, everyone giving bonuses to the defender should be killed too as they 'help' him while he's doing illegal stuff.
While we're at it, the guy selling the mods used on offenders ship should get their sec status lowered.
|
Barakkus
|
Posted - 2011.01.26 00:07:00 -
[27]
Originally by: Brixer
While we're at it, the guy selling the mods used on offenders ship should get their sec status lowered.
Like the guy who puts the mods on the market has any say on who purchases his stuff... - - [SERVICE] Corp Standings For POS anchoring
|
Darth Gustav
Warp Devils United Pod Service
|
Posted - 2011.01.26 00:09:00 -
[28]
Originally by: Brixer
CCP should not let concord kill RR ships anyway. There is no way any kind of logistic can keep a ship primaried by Concord alive. This mechanic is only used to grief.
If this is such an important thing for CCP, everyone giving bonuses to the defender should be killed too as they 'help' him while he's doing illegal stuff.
While we're at it, the guy selling the mods used on offenders ship should get their sec status lowered.
You forgot one thing: Force multipliers. Sure, one ship may not save me from CONCORD, but all my friends' ships too? Yes, they could. And I assure you, people would gather together just to do this. Whole alliances would be formed around the concept. High sec would be no sec at all.
|
Brixer
Dai Dai Hai
|
Posted - 2011.01.26 00:09:00 -
[29]
Originally by: Barakkus
Originally by: Brixer
While we're at it, the guy selling the mods used on offenders ship should get their sec status lowered.
Like the guy who puts the mods on the market has any say on who purchases his stuff...
You should limit selling to corp contracts.
|
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
|
Posted - 2011.01.26 00:20:00 -
[30]
Originally by: Brixer CCP should not let concord kill RR ships anyway. There is no way any kind of logistic can keep a ship primaried by Concord alive. This mechanic is only used to grief.
Not quite.
First things first, the basic cause and effect: CONCORD kills ships that have GCC ù they are part of the GCC response in highsec.Supporting people with GCCs (and supporting criminals) gives you GCC.
Why fiddling with it needs to be done with care: Not giving supporting ships GCCs is a bad idea because that would completely break the lowsec rules of engagement in many new and nightmarish ways (suddenly, you can't kill the pirates' gignormous support fleets without getting -10 sec status yourself).Having different rulesets for what does and does not give GCC makes for inconsistent gameplay and only serves to confuse everyone (and leaves more rooms for special-case bugs).
Also, while it's admittedly very rare these days, there are conceivable reasons to provide logistics to suicide ships: it still takes CONCORD a while to get there, and if the target has an escort, they could potentially kill the attacker before ZE LAW gets there ù logistics makes this less likely (granted, the whole scenario is rather unlikely to begin with, but stillà). ùùù ôIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡à you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.ö ù Karath Piki |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |