Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
khamael III
New Rome corp.
0
|
Posted - 2012.08.09 17:39:00 -
[91] - Quote
With a carrier the exploit seems actually possible.
As far as Dominix is concerned, I have some doubts:
1) is Domi's capacitor able to permarun 5 remorte reppers and the ship repper (or a shield booster), unless it's 5 small remote reppers?
2) and - should this be the case - is a small remote repper able to keep up a sentry against BS rats targetting it? |
|
CCP Sreegs
C C P C C P Alliance
2060
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 15:18:00 -
[92] - Quote
EvilweaselSA wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:EvilweaselSA wrote:there's many forms of passive income making left in the game v0v
it's not a team security decision,they just are throwing a fit their algorithms are detecting false positives and defining that away you have to admit that comparing this to PI, datacores, market orders or whatever is a bit of a stretch because the extent of their setup is a little more involved than "warp to complex, land, launch sentries, lock, rep, go to work" it doesn't really matter: passive income is clearly not banned, the only reason team security is here is because their algorithms are detecting false positives if i were in game design i'd tweak it, and i'd have no issues were game design to do that
As I told you in the other thread on this topic it very much is our decision and we explained why it was made. I would really appreciate it if you'd stop reinventing what our job is for our customers as you have absolutely no insight into what you're talking about. "Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012 |
|
Goremageddon Box
Guerrilla Flotilla
458
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 15:20:00 -
[93] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote:EvilweaselSA wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:EvilweaselSA wrote:there's many forms of passive income making left in the game v0v
it's not a team security decision,they just are throwing a fit their algorithms are detecting false positives and defining that away you have to admit that comparing this to PI, datacores, market orders or whatever is a bit of a stretch because the extent of their setup is a little more involved than "warp to complex, land, launch sentries, lock, rep, go to work" it doesn't really matter: passive income is clearly not banned, the only reason team security is here is because their algorithms are detecting false positives if i were in game design i'd tweak it, and i'd have no issues were game design to do that As I told you in the other thread on this topic it very much is our decision and we explained why it was made. I would really appreciate it if you'd stop reinventing what our job is for our customers as you have absolutely no insight into what you're talking about.
make ship spinning generate isk, profit!
Also, dance like a monkey. thats your job.
Also, sarcasm meter, please check it. |
|
CCP Sreegs
C C P C C P Alliance
2060
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 15:22:00 -
[94] - Quote
EvilweaselSA wrote:Frying Doom wrote: Actually given how low they have set the bar for bot detection, with only 2 data base errors and many thousands of bots eradicated, they are probably justified in there swagger that people they catch are most likely guilty.
I would accept their swagger if I actually believed the "only two false positives, both caused by a database error". I do not, and this thread is an example of why. The algorithm produced an unambiguious false positive (there was no macro or botting program), and that was neverthless declared a bot. Imagine the response when there's not such overwhelming proof a bot is impossible. Team Security doesn't have only two false positives. Team Security has two false positives that they admit to and their other statements make it very clear they're very unwilling to look for them.
Team security has two false positives. That hasn't changed. "Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012 |
|
Goremageddon Box
Guerrilla Flotilla
460
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 15:26:00 -
[95] - Quote
they also said it isnt 100% automated and manual verification is given before the hammer swings to the bANBANBAN buttan. |
Makari Aeron
The Shadow's Of Eve TSOE Consortium
41
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 15:29:00 -
[96] - Quote
This thread has made me re-realize why I hate stupid people and why I'm glad I can pod them in this game. CCP RedDawn: Ugly people are just playing life on HARD mode. Personally, I'm playing on an INFERNO difficulty...
|
|
CCP Phantom
C C P C C P Alliance
2084
|
Posted - 2012.08.10 15:47:00 -
[97] - Quote
Please do not create multiple threads about the same topic, thank you.
Thread locked.
Discussions about this topic can be continued in this thread here. CCP Phantom - German Community Coordinator |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |