| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Reply to Topic | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |

Roll Sizzle Beef
Space Mutiny
739
 |
Posted - 2012.07.31 20:45:00 -
[121] - Quote
CCP Goliath wrote: The reason I'm not giving stats is because I want people to actually go onto the test server and try the changes out rather than just theorycrafting
And every page afterward: theorycrafting. |

Dave stark
Bombardier Inc
333
 |
Posted - 2012.07.31 20:47:00 -
[122] - Quote
Roll Sizzle Beef wrote:CCP Goliath wrote: The reason I'm not giving stats is because I want people to actually go onto the test server and try the changes out rather than just theorycrafting
And every page afterward: theorycrafting.
considering it's not tomorrow, and the changes aren't up to test... Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

Dave stark
Bombardier Inc
333
 |
Posted - 2012.07.31 20:48:00 -
[123] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Dave stark wrote:even with the current system we have options; cargo space or crystal flexibility. Good news: with the new system, you will have that and much, much more. You are even given a reason to actually actively play the game and (gasp!) interact with other people. There is literally zero downsides. Well, aside from the standard brainless miner response of adding more bots. 
good news; nobody likes the new system. doesn't matter if it's better or not in your mind. no miner has responded positively. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
8842
 |
Posted - 2012.07.31 20:50:00 -
[124] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:good news; nobody likes the new system. Too bad that those news are incorrect.
GG#If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GkmvGkm you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GG%
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

Suddenly Forums ForumKings
Republic University Minmatar Republic
98
 |
Posted - 2012.07.31 20:51:00 -
[125] - Quote
This is amazing.
CCP buff AFK mining, and you still cry. |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1773
 |
Posted - 2012.07.31 20:51:00 -
[126] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: The only choice that I don't like is to have to install a bot to deal with the asinine menial tasks the new Hulk will involve. CCP is with me on that. So here you go, from real fitting choices we get to install a bot and defeat all your oh so needed so skillful drawbacks. Don't delude yourselves, if this stuff goes live, miners WILL install more bots to counter it.
So long as you are aware of and willing to deal with the consequences for violating the EULA. No one else gets to wish all their tedium and planning away by screaming a bot could do it, why should miners?
It's hard to find non mining tasks that can beat mining tedium, it's why bots are almost all mining oriented (then rat / hauler mission oriented, finally few are trading oriented). Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Dave stark
Bombardier Inc
333
 |
Posted - 2012.07.31 20:53:00 -
[127] - Quote
Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:This is amazing.
CCP buff AFK mining, and you still cry.
where did they say all the asteroids are going to have more ore in them after every DT? i must have missed that one. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
8842
 |
Posted - 2012.07.31 20:53:00 -
[128] - Quote
Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:This is amazing-acompletely unsurprising.
CCP buff AFK mining, and you still cry. It's the normal miner state of being. 
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:It's hard to find non mining tasks that can beat mining tedium, it's why bots are almost all mining oriented (then rat / hauler mission oriented, finally few are trading oriented). Shouldn't it be a bit uplifting, then, that you are given things to do while you mine? You know, such as co-ordinating logistics and planning for the next moveGG* GG#If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GkmvGkm you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GG%
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1773
 |
Posted - 2012.07.31 20:54:00 -
[129] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Well, aside from the standard brainless miner response of adding more bots. 
Do you know what they used to do to teach cats FAST how not to poop around the house? They forced them to eat their own poop.
You too should try mining for 1-2 months and see how good juicy your invented fantasy skill and socialization features are. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Dave stark
Bombardier Inc
333
 |
Posted - 2012.07.31 20:54:00 -
[130] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Dave stark wrote:good news; nobody likes the new system. Too bad that those news are incorrect. you're right, it's not good news when a game is made less enjoyable regardless of all the other facts. mining isn't exactly enthralling to begin with. why make it even less enjoyable? Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |
|

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1773
 |
Posted - 2012.07.31 20:56:00 -
[131] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:This is amazing-acompletely unsurprising.
CCP buff AFK mining, and you still cry. It's the normal miner state of being.  Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:It's hard to find non mining tasks that can beat mining tedium, it's why bots are almost all mining oriented (then rat / hauler mission oriented, finally few are trading oriented). Shouldn't it be a bit uplifting, then, that you are given things to do while you mine? You know, such as co-ordinating logistics and planning for the next moveGG*
Yeah "logistics". You should not even pair "logistics" and some dumb crystals flipping possibly with a further net loss forcing somebody playing caddy. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1773
 |
Posted - 2012.07.31 20:57:00 -
[132] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Wannabe Smart Einstein wrote:
CCP buff AFK mining, and you still cry.
It's the normal miner state of being. 
Both you and the other known trolls don't even do what they spam about, so why do you judge off your golden pedestal about stuff you have never done nor will ever do?
Also to the other Einstein, we are talking about fleet super optimized ops, so WTF are you talking about AFK mining. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
8842
 |
Posted - 2012.07.31 21:01:00 -
[133] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:You too should try mining for 1-2 months Done and done.
Quote:Yeah "logistics". You should not even pair "logistics" and some dumb crystals flipping possibly with a further net loss forcing somebody playing caddy. No-one is being forced to play caddy. It's just one more detail that you can plan your op around, and depending on how you choose to attack the belt, it can be solved in numerous ways. It is quintessentially about logistics (but then, mining always was, because the whole sucking-up-rocks part is so trivial).
Dave stark wrote:you're right, it's not good news when a game is made less enjoyable regardless of all the other facts. mining isn't exactly enthralling to begin with. why make it even less enjoyable? How is it being made less enjoyable? I can only think of one way, and I can't really say it without being incredibly rudeGG* GG#If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GkmvGkm you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GG%
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

Dave stark
Bombardier Inc
333
 |
Posted - 2012.07.31 21:07:00 -
[134] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Dave stark wrote:you're right, it's not good news when a game is made less enjoyable regardless of all the other facts. mining isn't exactly enthralling to begin with. why make it even less enjoyable? How is it being made less enjoyable? I can only think of one way, and I can't really say it without being incredibly rudeGG*
mining isn't fun to begin with, having to have another account giving me things i didn't need it to give me before now is in no way making it interesting and just adding an unwanted, unneeded and unnecessary activity i have to do in order to mine.
how does this change make mining more fun, interesting, better, or anything positive? Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
262
 |
Posted - 2012.07.31 21:08:00 -
[135] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: The only choice that I don't like is to have to install a bot to deal with the asinine menial tasks the new Hulk will involve. CCP is with me on that. So here you go, from real fitting choices we get to install a bot and defeat all your oh so needed so skillful drawbacks. Don't delude yourselves, if this stuff goes live, miners WILL install more bots to counter it.
So long as you are aware of and willing to deal with the consequences for violating the EULA. No one else gets to wish all their tedium and planning away by screaming a bot could do it, why should miners? It's hard to find non mining tasks that can beat mining tedium, it's why bots are almost all mining oriented (then rat / hauler mission oriented, finally few are trading oriented). I'd have to disagree. Having done mining missioning (including courier) and ratting there isn't so much tedium as waiting in mining. It's those empty times that made it seem that much less engaging and ultimately unbearable for me. |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
262
 |
Posted - 2012.07.31 21:10:00 -
[136] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:Tippia wrote:Dave stark wrote:you're right, it's not good news when a game is made less enjoyable regardless of all the other facts. mining isn't exactly enthralling to begin with. why make it even less enjoyable? How is it being made less enjoyable? I can only think of one way, and I can't really say it without being incredibly rudeGG* mining isn't fun to begin with, having to have another account giving me things i didn't need it to give me before now is in no way making it interesting and just adding an unwanted, unneeded and unnecessary activity i have to do in order to mine. how does this change make mining more fun, interesting, better, or anything positive? Use a mack. It's made for what you currently want. At this point you are arguing that the group ship is not good solo which means that yes, they DID do it right. |

Dave stark
Bombardier Inc
333
 |
Posted - 2012.07.31 21:13:00 -
[137] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:Dave stark wrote:Tippia wrote:Dave stark wrote:you're right, it's not good news when a game is made less enjoyable regardless of all the other facts. mining isn't exactly enthralling to begin with. why make it even less enjoyable? How is it being made less enjoyable? I can only think of one way, and I can't really say it without being incredibly rudeGG* mining isn't fun to begin with, having to have another account giving me things i didn't need it to give me before now is in no way making it interesting and just adding an unwanted, unneeded and unnecessary activity i have to do in order to mine. how does this change make mining more fun, interesting, better, or anything positive? Use a mack. It's made for what you currently want. At this point you are arguing that the group ship is not good solo which means that yes, they DID do it right.
no it isn't. a mackinaw isn't made for maximising yield. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

Suddenly Forums ForumKings
Republic University Minmatar Republic
98
 |
Posted - 2012.07.31 21:14:00 -
[138] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:Karl Hobb wrote:FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:CCP has plainly stated that hulks are intended for fleet ops. CCP WHAY U NURF HULK??!! Hand some EVE "players" salvation and a major buff on a silver platter and they'll still be whining up a storm over minor details of inconvenience. It serves to illustrate the utter lack of imagination that these carebears have. CCP is handing them the ability to choose between optimal yield, optimal tank, or the ability to solo mine with a decent tank and solid yield. They're complaining because the highest-yield miner in the game isn't going to be built as a tanky solo miner. The points, you are missing all of them. The highest yield miner in game has to have a competitive yield advantage (duh!). The more you make achieving that yield cumbersome, the more they have to overbuff that ship to make it appetible more than the zero drawbacks alternatives. Hulk should have the least "stops" and micromanagement so its performance is fully used. The other ships should have that factors to slow them down instead.
I feel obligated to point out that the more all miners overbuff their ship to get a "yield advantage" the less valuable the mining profession becomes because you flood the market with lots of mins. I love the free market!
|

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
262
 |
Posted - 2012.07.31 21:15:00 -
[139] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:Dave stark wrote:Tippia wrote:Dave stark wrote:you're right, it's not good news when a game is made less enjoyable regardless of all the other facts. mining isn't exactly enthralling to begin with. why make it even less enjoyable? How is it being made less enjoyable? I can only think of one way, and I can't really say it without being incredibly rudeGG* mining isn't fun to begin with, having to have another account giving me things i didn't need it to give me before now is in no way making it interesting and just adding an unwanted, unneeded and unnecessary activity i have to do in order to mine. how does this change make mining more fun, interesting, better, or anything positive? Use a mack. It's made for what you currently want. At this point you are arguing that the group ship is not good solo which means that yes, they DID do it right. no it isn't. a mackinaw isn't made for maximising yield. So now your complaint is that you can't have solo and max yield, in which case yes, they still did it right. There is no problem with that. |

Dave stark
Bombardier Inc
334
 |
Posted - 2012.07.31 21:16:00 -
[140] - Quote
Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:Karl Hobb wrote:FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:CCP has plainly stated that hulks are intended for fleet ops. CCP WHAY U NURF HULK??!! Hand some EVE "players" salvation and a major buff on a silver platter and they'll still be whining up a storm over minor details of inconvenience. It serves to illustrate the utter lack of imagination that these carebears have. CCP is handing them the ability to choose between optimal yield, optimal tank, or the ability to solo mine with a decent tank and solid yield. They're complaining because the highest-yield miner in the game isn't going to be built as a tanky solo miner. The points, you are missing all of them. The highest yield miner in game has to have a competitive yield advantage (duh!). The more you make achieving that yield cumbersome, the more they have to overbuff that ship to make it appetible more than the zero drawbacks alternatives. Hulk should have the least "stops" and micromanagement so its performance is fully used. The other ships should have that factors to slow them down instead. I feel obligated to point out that the more all miners overbuff their ship to get a "yield advantage" the less valuable the mining profession becomes because you flood the market with lots of mins. I love the free market! it's irrelevant, if you're not maxing your yield gimping your raw isk/hour regardless of what minerals cost on the market.
Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |
|

Dave stark
Bombardier Inc
334
 |
Posted - 2012.07.31 21:16:00 -
[141] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote: So now your complaint is that you can't have solo and max yield, in which case yes, they still did it right. There is no problem with that.
you don't even understand the topic of discussion. stop posting. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
8843
 |
Posted - 2012.07.31 21:17:00 -
[142] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:mining isn't fun to begin with Then why are you doing it with even one account? (Oh, and no, you don't need a second one.)
Quote:how does this change make mining more fun, interesting, better, or anything positive? It gives you more options and offers more decisions GGv that is more fun, interesting, and better in and of itself.
It also adds an element of planning and task-managing. It also increases the rewards of socialising and running disciplined fleets. It gives you stuff to do while the lasers cycle, reducing that supposed tedium. All of it fun, interesting, and better. GG#If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GkmvGkm you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GG%
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

Suddenly Forums ForumKings
Republic University Minmatar Republic
98
 |
Posted - 2012.07.31 21:17:00 -
[143] - Quote
Dave stark wrote: it's irrelevant, if you're not maxing your yield gimping your raw isk/hour regardless of what minerals cost on the market.
Until you realize every single miner thinks exactly this way. Your individual greed is collectively screwing over your entire profession. |

Dave stark
Bombardier Inc
334
 |
Posted - 2012.07.31 21:20:00 -
[144] - Quote
Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:Dave stark wrote: it's irrelevant, if you're not maxing your yield gimping your raw isk/hour regardless of what minerals cost on the market.
Until you realize every single miner thinks exactly this way. Your individual greed is collectively screwing over your entire profession.
i'm not arguing with you because you're wrong. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

Suddenly Forums ForumKings
Republic University Minmatar Republic
98
 |
Posted - 2012.07.31 21:21:00 -
[145] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:Dave stark wrote: it's irrelevant, if you're not maxing your yield gimping your raw isk/hour regardless of what minerals cost on the market.
Until you realize every single miner thinks exactly this way. Your individual greed is collectively screwing over your entire profession. i'm not arguing with you because you're wrong.
excellent debate skills, considering running for the US Senate? |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
262
 |
Posted - 2012.07.31 21:22:00 -
[146] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote: So now your complaint is that you can't have solo and max yield, in which case yes, they still did it right. There is no problem with that.
you don't even understand the topic of discussion. stop posting. The topic is that you feel the hold is insufficient and that you should need outside assistance to fully utilize the capabilities of the ship. My statement is simplified but a direct response to the arguments you've been making. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
8843
 |
Posted - 2012.07.31 21:23:00 -
[147] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:i'm not arguing with you because you're wrong. Not really, no. It's basic economics.
The higher you push your yield, the less valuable it becomes. Your only hope is that miners in general are opting for something else. So more likely, you're not arguing with him because you can't find any faults with the reasoning. GG#If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GkmvGkm you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GG%
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

Dave stark
Bombardier Inc
334
 |
Posted - 2012.07.31 21:23:00 -
[148] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Dave stark wrote:mining isn't fun to begin with Then why are you doing it with even one account? (Oh, and no, you don't need a second one.) Quote:how does this change make mining more fun, interesting, better, or anything positive? It gives you more options and offers more decisions GGv that is more fun, interesting, and better in and of itself. It also adds an element of planning and task-managing. It also increases the rewards of socialising and running disciplined fleets. It gives you stuff to do while the lasers cycle, reducing that supposed tedium. All of it fun, interesting, and better.
there's a difference between fun and enjoyable. i find mining enjoyable but not fun.
it doesn't add an element of planning at all, like i said earlier it just makes me warp in and out 1 more time. that's just a waste of my time. it doesn't reward fleets for being disciplined and organised, it just pisses off haulers because they have more crap to do. you don't gain a single goddamn thing with this new system. if we got a bigger bonus on crystal multipliers etc i'd put up with it and say "well the crystal situation is **** but at least we're getting a bonus for putting up with this bollocks"
none of it is fun, interesting or better. you're pissing off the haulers by giving them extra and pointless work, and having to warp in and out of a belt because i can't carry enough crystals just wastes my time. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

Dave stark
Bombardier Inc
334
 |
Posted - 2012.07.31 21:24:00 -
[149] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Dave stark wrote:i'm not arguing with you because you're wrong. Not really, no. It's basic economics. The higher you push your yield, the less valuable it becomes. Your only hope is that miners in general are opting for something else. So more likely, you're not arguing with him because you can't find any faults with the reasoning.
costs go down, mining does down, still takes as long to buy some thing. from a miners pov the value of minerals means nothing. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1773
 |
Posted - 2012.07.31 21:25:00 -
[150] - Quote
Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote: I feel obligated to point out that the more all miners overbuff their ship to get a "yield advantage" the less valuable the mining profession becomes because you flood the market with lots of mins. I love the free market!
They overbuff the Hulk so much because it has still to be viable over Macks despite both the drawbacks PLUS the crystal logistics.
If it only had the tank + cargo hold drawbacks then it could be buffed much less and would still be viable over Macks and this would help vs the minerals flood. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |
|
|
|
| |
Reply to Topic |
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |