Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Slimy Worm
Cyan Wolf
|
Posted - 2010.09.23 23:56:00 -
[1]
According to the Incursion update release page, "Pilots can join public fleets and co-operate to destroy the Sansha incursions and return the universe to normal, receiving wealthy bounties, earning loyalty rewards and high commendation."
Make the bounties and loyalty points that result from destroying Sansha fleets correspond to the security of the system that the event takes place in (and possibly null, but not highsec) so that you get more rewards if you take the risk of going out to lowsec.
Basically, highsec should have substantially lower rewards, lowsec should have substantially higher rewards. The content can either be the same (so that highsec carebears can still kill battleship fleets if they enjoy doing that without skewing risk vs. reward) or more difficult NPC Sansha fleets can spawn in lowsec only, but the rewards in highsec need to be minimal.
---------------
|
Skarfase
|
Posted - 2010.09.24 01:28:00 -
[2]
I'm fairly confident they already said they were doing this.
|
Laxyr
Chamsin Mining Inc.
|
Posted - 2010.09.24 13:32:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Laxyr on 24/09/2010 13:33:33 "[...]in all areas of space, high sec, low sec and zero sec, with the appropriate reward multipliers depending on where it is of course.[...]"
Dev-Blog
|
Slimy Worm
Cyan Wolf
|
Posted - 2010.09.24 14:10:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Laxyr Edited by: Laxyr on 24/09/2010 13:33:33 "[...]in all areas of space, high sec, low sec and zero sec, with the appropriate reward multipliers depending on where it is of course.[...]"
Dev-Blog
If it's anything like missions then highsec fleets will pay too much and lowsec and nullsec ones too little. CCP needs to promise the people who play its game that it will do a better job at balancing risk vs reward this time.
---------------
|
Crazy KSK
|
Posted - 2010.09.24 15:17:00 -
[5]
and incursion in high sec should never ever in any case be able to out isk lvl 4 missions because if that happens I guess we all can imagine what will happen then....no one will go to low sec even if it gives 4 times more reward....
|
Laxyr
Chamsin Mining Inc.
|
Posted - 2010.09.24 18:53:00 -
[6]
Why cant you just let them implement the feature first before you start complaining about what a crappy job they have done?
They promise to balance highsec/lowsec/nullsec rewards. Should they fail you have every right to complain about it afterwards but now... all you're basically doing is threaten the designers "If you don't get it right THIS time I will [insert generic idle threat here]"
I'm sure CCP is well aware of the stream of complaints they'll receive should the balancing not please the customers.
Just relax and let them do their work =)
Lax
|
Julia Venatrix
|
Posted - 2010.09.25 08:15:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Laxyr Why cant you just let them implement the feature first before you start complaining about what a crappy job they have done?
They promise to balance highsec/lowsec/nullsec rewards. Should they fail you have every right to complain about it afterwards but now... all you're basically doing is threaten the designers "If you don't get it right THIS time I will [insert generic idle threat here]"
I'm sure CCP is well aware of the stream of complaints they'll receive should the balancing not please the customers.
Just relax and let them do their work =)
Lax
I'm sure CCP is well aware that whatever balancing they implement will displease quite a lot of the customers regardless, guaranteeing them a stream of complaints. --- Some days you are the pigeon, and some the statue. |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |