|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Martosh Toma
Gallente Fraction Investment
|
Posted - 2010.09.04 00:41:00 -
[1]
so what if the trustees had demanded you'd make this installing process for the new trustees save, requiring you to create smaller blocks and having the new trustees confirming receiving the shares before creating new shares.
would this have kept the whole thing working as originally presented?
|
Martosh Toma
Gallente Fraction Investment
|
Posted - 2010.09.04 01:21:00 -
[2]
Thought so.
BB, I need to go to sleep, need to be awake tomorrow supervising some sea scouts. Could you please clearly confirm or deny whether I lost almost 24B (and others whatever they invested) on this? even if only privately?
I mean, this is just a game and I should not loose sleep over it, but the suspense and frequent updates are keeping me awake.
|
Martosh Toma
Gallente Fraction Investment
|
Posted - 2010.09.04 01:26:00 -
[3]
ok, thx and good night.
(and may you be podded for all eveturnity)
|
Martosh Toma
Gallente Fraction Investment
|
Posted - 2010.09.05 07:36:00 -
[4]
what this changed for me, would I have met BB in game. Last week in some lowsec hub and would I have been offered the option to pay ransom. Then, assuming the request was reasonebly priced, I would have payed and I would have expected to get out safely. Now I expect no ransom offer, nor would I expect to get out if an offer was made and paid.
|
Martosh Toma
Gallente Fraction Investment
|
Posted - 2010.09.05 09:50:00 -
[5]
What I meant is that nothing much changed, except maybe I trust eve personalities a little less. I guess the only way to invest in eve is by fully secured loans.
We already had a problem where a business could not fail or it would be labeled a scam. Now trustees are not to blame if they fail to secure that with which they are entrusted.
Instead of increasing the tools we have to enable investment and a secondary market we are killing it.
I might be a bit bleak in my outlook on things right now but, I guess investing in eve is like betting with someone he will return you more than you just placed on the bet. Using a third party only adds another person to the list of people that could run off with your bet.
|
Martosh Toma
Gallente Fraction Investment
|
Posted - 2010.09.07 05:41:00 -
[6]
BB claimed he would have continued to run T4U legitimately had the trustees insisted the new trustees were brought into the company securely (as in only make shares for one new trustee at a time, perhaps insist the shares not handed out to a now inactive trustee be reused etc), but he would never have wrapped it up or liquidated it.
He did not need to scam it now, he could easily afford to wait for the system to fail and do his best to work towards it in slow steps. In time it would probably only have become easier to take even more isk.
|
Martosh Toma
Gallente Fraction Investment
|
Posted - 2010.09.07 13:30:00 -
[7]
nStedt,
I think that trick falls under exploits and can be petitioned. That is the detail you are missing I think.
|
|
|
|