Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Ms Amidala
|
Posted - 2010.08.25 18:57:00 -
[1]
I have read a few posts about the lag issues in eve and this one just now http://www.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&bid=778 It seems to me you are trying to use a one dimensional herical ladder or pyramid structure. I see eve more as a thin rubber sphere thats should stretch and move around the sphere. You're 1-dimensional pathway will never scale large enough it is however the norm for how programmers think. That is not a slam just the reality of how most programmers think. If your stackless IO is akin to a proprarity protocal as it appears to be expressed in the forums then you have the resources to do much more than one dimensional optimizations. Why are you not using this resource to it potential? There are several areas you could make amazing improvements IMO. Of course if you realize the potential I am inferring then you might not ever clean up the code you have. lol
|
Sash Windu
Gallente The Green Banana Corporation
|
Posted - 2010.08.25 19:00:00 -
[2]
So many words.
Zero content.
|
Ms Amidala
|
Posted - 2010.08.25 19:02:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Ms Amidala on 25/08/2010 19:03:00 it seems you missed the word inferring. I also wonder if you have the slightest undetstanding of what I said. I am sure warlock will.
|
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
|
Posted - 2010.08.25 19:10:00 -
[4]
àand this deserved its own thread, rather than going into the comment thread why exactly? ùùù ôIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡à you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.ö ù Karath Piki |
Atticus Fynch
Gallente The Scope
|
Posted - 2010.08.25 19:17:00 -
[5]
As for fabric I'd say EVE is like tweed.
|
omgfreemoniez
|
Posted - 2010.08.25 19:18:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Ms Amidala I have read a few posts about the lag issues in eve and this one just now http://www.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&bid=778 It seems to me you are trying to use a one dimensional herical ladder or pyramid structure. I see eve more as a thin rubber sphere thats should stretch and move around the sphere. You're 1-dimensional pathway will never scale large enough it is however the norm for how programmers think. That is not a slam just the reality of how most programmers think. If your stackless IO is akin to a proprarity protocal as it appears to be expressed in the forums then you have the resources to do much more than one dimensional optimizations. Why are you not using this resource to it potential? There are several areas you could make amazing improvements IMO. Of course if you realize the potential I am inferring then you might not ever clean up the code you have. lol
TL;DR
|
Ms Amidala
|
Posted - 2010.08.25 19:22:00 -
[7]
so many trolls so few bullets to fill them with.
|
Zeba
Minmatar Honourable East India Trading Company
|
Posted - 2010.08.25 19:23:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Ms Amidala so many trolls so few bullets to fill them with.
It might help if you established your internats credentials first.
Originally by: CCP Oveur My milkshake brings all the boys to the yard.
Originally by: CCP Adida Moved from missions and complexes. All other game discussions are only aloud in OOP.
|
Professor Tarantula
Hedion University
|
Posted - 2010.08.25 19:31:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Ms Amidala You're 1-dimensional pathway
I'll have you know i'm multidimensional pathway, and don't you forget it.
My Warmest Regards. Prof. Tarantula, Esq. |
Alianne Cooper
|
Posted - 2010.08.25 19:33:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Ms Amidala Edited by: Ms Amidala on 25/08/2010 19:03:00 it seems you missed the word inferring. I also wonder if you have the slightest undetstanding of what I said. I am sure warlock will.
Must control fist of grammar ****!!!
2/10 cause some people bit.
|
|
Haxfar Portlaind
|
Posted - 2010.08.25 19:38:00 -
[11]
I didn't find the hiding message of the game, but i did think of it... I lost.
|
Stick Cult
|
Posted - 2010.08.25 19:45:00 -
[12]
Congrats on your new position as backseat systems architect. We hope you enjoy your time here. Be sure to correctly establish your e-credentials though, before insulting CCP. Also, giving examples of how they could better use their time would be good.
In short, **** off.
Originally by: CCP Tuxford my bad. Rest assured I'm being ridiculed by my co-workers.
|
Spurty
Caldari D00M. Northern Coalition.
|
Posted - 2010.08.25 19:50:00 -
[13]
So what you are trying to say is that CCP is that:
- you see the game differently from how the developers have created it - that they are using some 'chain of command' to pass the messages and data around the system (where things shouldn't, but often do get out of order due to timing out) - but you have some 'loosey goosey' method that works simultaneously across multiple dimensions and all asynchronously so order isn't important and therefore, can't time out causing knock on affects?
or am I trying too hard to work out what it is you are hinting at?
Make a tech demo, hand it to CCP. If it works (and isn't 'academic day dreaming', you'll be loved by everyone. If its "not quite off the chalk board" stuff, then well .. see posters before me.
|
Ms Amidala
|
Posted - 2010.08.25 21:23:00 -
[14]
Spurty, I applaud you in your interpretation. You are very close to what I inferred with the exception of the 'loosey goosey' part. I am happy to see at least one post here was intelligent.
|
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
|
Posted - 2010.08.25 21:25:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Tippia àand this deserved its own thread, rather than going into the comment thread why exactly?
ùùù ôIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡à you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.ö ù Karath Piki |
Simply Human
|
Posted - 2010.08.25 21:33:00 -
[16]
Edited by: Simply Human on 25/08/2010 21:33:32 http://www.ccpgames.com/en/jobs/job-details.aspx?jobid=157
If you really think you could do better. |
Necrosmith
Gallente Chunder Corp
|
Posted - 2010.08.25 23:40:00 -
[17]
Isn't EVE more like a canvas type fabric? There's sooo many things waiting to be created on/in it. __________________ Follow me on Twitter Please add the ability to autolink planets in support of PI.
|
Ghoest
|
Posted - 2010.08.26 04:59:00 -
[18]
The "LOL" at the end really sells this sh!t.
Wherever you went - Here you are.
|
Toby Kintay
|
Posted - 2010.08.26 05:20:00 -
[19]
I have read many articles about my lag issues in the bathroom and this one just now http://digestive.niddk.nih.gov/ddiseases/pubs/constipation/ It seems to be I'm trying to use a one dimensional hierarchical ladder or pyramid structure. In my abdominal and rectal muscle retractions. I'll try to visualize the movement more as a thin rubber sphere that should stretch and move around the blockage. My 1-dimensional pathway movement will never scale large enough it is however the norm for how we fat people think. That is not a slam to you skinny people just the reality of how most fat people think. If my stackless intestinal track is akin to a proprietary protocol as it appears to be after years of binge eating then I actually have the resources to do much more than one dimensional optimizations. Why am I not using this resource to it's potential? There are several areas I could make amazing improvements IMO. For the needy the spelling is fixed. Of course if you realize the potential I am inferring then I might not ever clean up the fecal blockage I have. lol
|
Amanda Mor
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.08.26 05:39:00 -
[20]
Originally by: Toby Kintay I have read many articles about my lag issues in the bathroom and this one just now http://digestive.niddk.nih.gov/ddiseases/pubs/constipation/ It seems to be I'm trying to use a one dimensional hierarchical ladder or pyramid structure. In my abdominal and rectal muscle retractions. I'll try to visualize the movement more as a thin rubber sphere that should stretch and move around the blockage. My 1-dimensional pathway movement will never scale large enough it is however the norm for how we fat people think. That is not a slam to you skinny people just the reality of how most fat people think. If my stackless intestinal track is akin to a proprietary protocol as it appears to be after years of binge eating then I actually have the resources to do much more than one dimensional optimizations. Why am I not using this resource to it's potential? There are several areas I could make amazing improvements IMO. For the needy the spelling is fixed. Of course if you realize the potential I am inferring then I might not ever clean up the fecal blockage I have. lol
One of the best responses to a gibberish OP that I've ever read. Well done, keep up the good work. ---------------------------------------------- I don't have an alt, but there's a main that would be upset if he heard me say that... |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |