Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Hestel
|
Posted - 2004.12.15 10:50:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Hestel on 15/12/2004 10:54:37 well. ur all moning non are available. if there were to become avalable u would rent them right? and then they would be non left again. so theres always gona be moning. unless labs are avalable in eveystatation and that would be stupid. so stop moning. they cant fix with out adding 1000000000000 and there not gona.
just my 2 isk. i dont like flame grill so dont. it wastes ur time and eveyone els who reads da post.
|
Hestel
|
Posted - 2004.12.15 10:50:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Hestel on 15/12/2004 10:54:37 well. ur all moning non are available. if there were to become avalable u would rent them right? and then they would be non left again. so theres always gona be moning. unless labs are avalable in eveystatation and that would be stupid. so stop moning. they cant fix with out adding 1000000000000 and there not gona.
just my 2 isk. i dont like flame grill so dont. it wastes ur time and eveyone els who reads da post.
|
Caesium
|
Posted - 2004.12.15 16:35:00 -
[3]
This post makes my eyes bleed.
|
Caesium
|
Posted - 2004.12.15 16:35:00 -
[4]
This post makes my eyes bleed.
|
Weix
|
Posted - 2004.12.15 19:08:00 -
[5]
Eh...yeah right...
|
Weix
|
Posted - 2004.12.15 19:08:00 -
[6]
Eh...yeah right...
|
Lygos
|
Posted - 2004.12.16 03:26:00 -
[7]
Edited by: Lygos on 16/12/2004 03:26:50 This thread is interesting for one reason: the number of views it got.
Perhaps there is something about writing a headline that is so difficult to parse into a full thought that it forces people to click and see what could be the cause.
I had thought when I first read it that maybe there was maybe one too many clauses in it, or there wasn't enough space to write a full header. Either way, I was determined to discover the mystery behind the submitter's dilemma.
I think from now on, for every thread any of you comes up with, you should run it through altavista's babelfish, convert into a non-native language, then back to something with which you are familiar. German might be a good choice because it might completely bury the verb at the end of the phrase. If your headline causes complete synaptic failure or is at least cogitatable in the most distributed or incoherent fashion possible, you can ensure that you will draw in an audience for even the most minimally thought out position or entreaty. It comprises a complete intersubjective triumph. Even Don DeLillo would be impressed.
|
Lygos
|
Posted - 2004.12.16 03:26:00 -
[8]
Edited by: Lygos on 16/12/2004 03:26:50 This thread is interesting for one reason: the number of views it got.
Perhaps there is something about writing a headline that is so difficult to parse into a full thought that it forces people to click and see what could be the cause.
I had thought when I first read it that maybe there was maybe one too many clauses in it, or there wasn't enough space to write a full header. Either way, I was determined to discover the mystery behind the submitter's dilemma.
I think from now on, for every thread any of you comes up with, you should run it through altavista's babelfish, convert into a non-native language, then back to something with which you are familiar. German might be a good choice because it might completely bury the verb at the end of the phrase. If your headline causes complete synaptic failure or is at least cogitatable in the most distributed or incoherent fashion possible, you can ensure that you will draw in an audience for even the most minimally thought out position or entreaty. It comprises a complete intersubjective triumph. Even Don DeLillo would be impressed.
|
Minyon
|
Posted - 2004.12.16 03:53:00 -
[9]
They could fix it easy just make the stations with labs slots have an unlimited number of slot.
They could also limit the amount of time that a slot can be rented for and prevent the person that had just rented the lab from renting it again or a day or so giving over players a chance of geting a lab slot
|
Minyon
|
Posted - 2004.12.16 03:53:00 -
[10]
They could fix it easy just make the stations with labs slots have an unlimited number of slot.
They could also limit the amount of time that a slot can be rented for and prevent the person that had just rented the lab from renting it again or a day or so giving over players a chance of geting a lab slot
|
|
EzTarget
|
Posted - 2004.12.16 15:48:00 -
[11]
They could also limit the max value on mineral efficency, I mean what's the point in having BPo's with me's in the 1000's (hell or even 100's) after the first 20 or so runs for most bp's you don't get any noticable benifet, apart from saving 1 or 2 isk every 50-100 lvl's...
|
EzTarget
|
Posted - 2004.12.16 15:48:00 -
[12]
They could also limit the max value on mineral efficency, I mean what's the point in having BPo's with me's in the 1000's (hell or even 100's) after the first 20 or so runs for most bp's you don't get any noticable benifet, apart from saving 1 or 2 isk every 50-100 lvl's...
|
Feta Solamnia
|
Posted - 2004.12.18 05:37:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Lygos Edited by: Lygos on 16/12/2004 03:26:50 This thread is interesting for one reason: the number of views it got.
Perhaps there is something about writing a headline that is so difficult to parse into a full thought that it forces people to click and see what could be the cause.
I had thought when I first read it that maybe there was maybe one too many clauses in it, or there wasn't enough space to write a full header. Either way, I was determined to discover the mystery behind the submitter's dilemma.
I think from now on, for every thread any of you comes up with, you should run it through altavista's babelfish, convert into a non-native language, then back to something with which you are familiar. German might be a good choice because it might completely bury the verb at the end of the phrase. If your headline causes complete synaptic failure or is at least cogitatable in the most distributed or incoherent fashion possible, you can ensure that you will draw in an audience for even the most minimally thought out position or entreaty. It comprises a complete intersubjective triumph. Even Don DeLillo would be impressed.
Lygos, if this isn't a known marketing tactic, you might have hit a RL goldmine...
|
Feta Solamnia
|
Posted - 2004.12.18 05:37:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Lygos Edited by: Lygos on 16/12/2004 03:26:50 This thread is interesting for one reason: the number of views it got.
Perhaps there is something about writing a headline that is so difficult to parse into a full thought that it forces people to click and see what could be the cause.
I had thought when I first read it that maybe there was maybe one too many clauses in it, or there wasn't enough space to write a full header. Either way, I was determined to discover the mystery behind the submitter's dilemma.
I think from now on, for every thread any of you comes up with, you should run it through altavista's babelfish, convert into a non-native language, then back to something with which you are familiar. German might be a good choice because it might completely bury the verb at the end of the phrase. If your headline causes complete synaptic failure or is at least cogitatable in the most distributed or incoherent fashion possible, you can ensure that you will draw in an audience for even the most minimally thought out position or entreaty. It comprises a complete intersubjective triumph. Even Don DeLillo would be impressed.
Lygos, if this isn't a known marketing tactic, you might have hit a RL goldmine...
|
Psionist
|
Posted - 2004.12.19 02:46:00 -
[15]
Edited by: Psionist on 19/12/2004 02:48:56 Lygos makes me happy. Why can't everyone write so well?
Originally by: Feta Solamnia Lygos, if this isn't a known marketing tactic, you might have hit a RL goldmine...
So... I'm going to start seeing ads for Pepsi that say "pepsi - a drink ppesi 2 cent from u."? or perhaps "diet cOke: half only the calories, same to taste, great and."
|
Psionist
|
Posted - 2004.12.19 02:46:00 -
[16]
Edited by: Psionist on 19/12/2004 02:48:56 Lygos makes me happy. Why can't everyone write so well?
Originally by: Feta Solamnia Lygos, if this isn't a known marketing tactic, you might have hit a RL goldmine...
So... I'm going to start seeing ads for Pepsi that say "pepsi - a drink ppesi 2 cent from u."? or perhaps "diet cOke: half only the calories, same to taste, great and."
|
Kalfu
|
Posted - 2004.12.19 11:14:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Lygos I think from now on, for every thread any of you comes up with, you should run it through altavista's babelfish, convert into a non-native language, then back to something with which you are familiar.
I'd rather run it through Lost in Translation. For example, I would appreciate that the grooves of the laboratory are liberations current, with the same grooves, that are d'usine d amplor, because this the increased commerce to facilitate and l economy with benfit d'everyones to strengthen.
|
Kalfu
|
Posted - 2004.12.19 11:14:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Lygos I think from now on, for every thread any of you comes up with, you should run it through altavista's babelfish, convert into a non-native language, then back to something with which you are familiar.
I'd rather run it through Lost in Translation. For example, I would appreciate that the grooves of the laboratory are liberations current, with the same grooves, that are d'usine d amplor, because this the increased commerce to facilitate and l economy with benfit d'everyones to strengthen.
|
Heero Yuy
|
Posted - 2004.12.20 13:27:00 -
[19]
Edited by: Heero Yuy on 20/12/2004 13:27:59
Originally by: Lygos Edited by: Lygos on 16/12/2004 03:26:50 This thread is interesting for one reason: the number of views it got.
Perhaps there is something about writing a headline that is so difficult to parse into a full thought that it forces people to click and see what could be the cause.
I had thought when I first read it that maybe there was maybe one too many clauses in it, or there wasn't enough space to write a full header. Either way, I was determined to discover the mystery behind the submitter's dilemma.
I think from now on, for every thread any of you comes up with, you should run it through altavista's babelfish, convert into a non-native language, then back to something with which you are familiar. German might be a good choice because it might completely bury the verb at the end of the phrase. If your headline causes complete synaptic failure or is at least cogitatable in the most distributed or incoherent fashion possible, you can ensure that you will draw in an audience for even the most minimally thought out position or entreaty. It comprises a complete intersubjective triumph. Even Don DeLillo would be impressed.
I love your little criticism which in turn is full of grammatical errors. It is almost impossible to fully contemplate and understand without the use of babblefish!
|
Heero Yuy
|
Posted - 2004.12.20 13:27:00 -
[20]
Edited by: Heero Yuy on 20/12/2004 13:27:59
Originally by: Lygos Edited by: Lygos on 16/12/2004 03:26:50 This thread is interesting for one reason: the number of views it got.
Perhaps there is something about writing a headline that is so difficult to parse into a full thought that it forces people to click and see what could be the cause.
I had thought when I first read it that maybe there was maybe one too many clauses in it, or there wasn't enough space to write a full header. Either way, I was determined to discover the mystery behind the submitter's dilemma.
I think from now on, for every thread any of you comes up with, you should run it through altavista's babelfish, convert into a non-native language, then back to something with which you are familiar. German might be a good choice because it might completely bury the verb at the end of the phrase. If your headline causes complete synaptic failure or is at least cogitatable in the most distributed or incoherent fashion possible, you can ensure that you will draw in an audience for even the most minimally thought out position or entreaty. It comprises a complete intersubjective triumph. Even Don DeLillo would be impressed.
I love your little criticism which in turn is full of grammatical errors. It is almost impossible to fully contemplate and understand without the use of babblefish!
|
|
Payne Bringer
|
Posted - 2004.12.20 21:08:00 -
[21]
Edited by: Payne Bringer on 20/12/2004 21:10:10
Originally by: Heero Yuy I love your little criticism which in turn is full of grammatical errors. It is almost impossible to fully contemplate and understand without the use of babblefish!
Surely you mean: I love your little criticism that, in turn, is full of grammatical errors.
Strictly speaking, if you use "which", then you should have a comma before it. However, since "in turn" also requires being placed with commas, its best to dispense with "which" and go for "that", which is generally acceptable without a preceeding comma.
Of course, I could be wrong (and I generally am).
Come to think of it, I like which so will revise to: I love your little criticism which, in turn, is full of grammatical errors.
|
Payne Bringer
|
Posted - 2004.12.20 21:08:00 -
[22]
Edited by: Payne Bringer on 20/12/2004 21:10:10
Originally by: Heero Yuy I love your little criticism which in turn is full of grammatical errors. It is almost impossible to fully contemplate and understand without the use of babblefish!
Surely you mean: I love your little criticism that, in turn, is full of grammatical errors.
Strictly speaking, if you use "which", then you should have a comma before it. However, since "in turn" also requires being placed with commas, its best to dispense with "which" and go for "that", which is generally acceptable without a preceeding comma.
Of course, I could be wrong (and I generally am).
Come to think of it, I like which so will revise to: I love your little criticism which, in turn, is full of grammatical errors.
|
Phades
|
Posted - 2004.12.21 11:51:00 -
[23]
Attempting to critique another's grammar seems to attract others to scrutinize the first person who judged the writing.
|
Phades
|
Posted - 2004.12.21 11:51:00 -
[24]
Attempting to critique another's grammar seems to attract others to scrutinize the first person who judged the writing.
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |