Originally by: Xutech

---

"The majority of paying subscribers are non PvP Players and don't like your Attitude"

broken down:

The majority - More than half

of "paying subscribers" - The implication being that players who do not spend money are lesser players / or that spending money gives you a greater influence and a more important opinion. Or that the people with an opposite opinion to yours are not paying for their accounts, and therefore do not have an important opinion. Any opininion opposing yours would be a free opinion and therefore an unimportant one.

Are non-pvp players - Interesting; would this be an assertion that more than half of the subscribing players do not even pvp once? or to be more fair, on a regular basis? and would this include industrial characters who carry out mining and industrial / research work for pvp groups?

and don't like your attitude - so of the "enormous" group of players who pay money to CCP, you know that they do not pvp, and that they are united in their approval and disapproval of certain posters? this is extraordinary and a triumph of statistical analysis.

---

Originally by: Shivani

---

Post with your main, but i figure, you have not the balls.

---

Originally by: Sokratesz

---

Edited by: Sokratesz on 25/05/2010 19:57:28

Originally by: Shivani

---

Post with your main, but i figure, you have not the balls.

---

Oh hi Natana, how are you doing? Still bitter about being banned from eve-ger?

---

Originally by: Dariah Stardweller

---

I think you should have enough 'bitter' yourself to bake your cookies nao!

---

Originally by: Shivani

---

Originally by: FinnAgain Zero

---

P.S. Post with your main.

---

Oh, i am going to post with my main(s) (plural!), if the others will do too.

Originally by: captain foivos

---

Originally by: Shivani

---

This is, why Ankh is needed and will get the most votes. Dull, jealous Griefers, frustrated CSMs (like Sokratesz, who tend to forget to show respect to the paying customers). The majority of paying subscribers are non PvP Players and don't like your Attitude

I will make sure, of you Noobs gank her, you will get ganked over and over by me. And believe me: You will not like it being ganked in a fleet Battle or a Gate Camp by a Blue Player.

Respect the industrialist and carebears. I do that, though i am a mercenary. Your attitude is childish and disgusting, discrediting yourself.

---

There's so much fail I'm having a hard time deciding where to begin with.

"This is, why Ankh is needed" What, to stop people from killing people in EVE? To make all of our spaceships become cute, furry, delectable forest animals?

"Dull, jealous Griefers" I live in 0.0 and kill people, thank you very much. I don't know what dictionary you're using to define "griefing" but I'm assuming it's the one that says any form of killing another player is verboten in EVE. Also, I will fully admit to griefing Hulks during Hulkageddon II and killing a CSM candidate's pod the other day (note the semantic difference).

"The majority of paying subscribers are non PvP Players and don't like your Attitude"
I'll let that statement speak for itself.

"I will make sure, of you Noobs gank her, you will get ganked over and over by me. And believe me: You will not like it being ganked in a fleet Battle or a Gate Camp by a Blue Player."

Shivani's Salvager I strikes my Tempest perfectly, dealing for 1 armor plate and 2 tangled power conduits.

Also, I'm pretty sure I'm not set blue to any tards like you, so expect to feel a sharp and fatal pain upon jumping into my alliance's territory.

Also, you do not gank people in fleet battles.

Also, you don't gatecamp blues.

Also, you don't know who my main is, and to keep myself from having to deal with crap-faced evemails sent by the likes of you, nobody will ever know who captain foivos really is.

"Respect the industrialist and carebears." I respect Chribba and a few others. Namely, the people I build capships with and pew-pew-lazor with. Respect is not given. It is earned.

In closing:
Your attitude is childish and disgusting, discrediting yourself.

---

First off, my dear soon-to-be victim, i have undertaken far more extreme measures than ganking some blue or ganking someone, who was in the same gatecamp like me. That's why mercenaries have various mains. And a payment of 3 billion is worth the effort to invest some time to sneak into the alliances and corps. Ya, carebears got that many isk....

Second: You are only a cheap coward on an internetboard.:

Quote:

---

Also, you don't know who my main is, and to keep myself from having to deal with crap-faced evemails sent by the likes of you, nobody will ever know who captain foivos really is.

---

Post with your main, but i figure, you have not the balls.

---

Originally by: CCP Mitnal

---

I don't sleep.
I am always here.
Watching.
Waiting.

---

Originally by: captain foivos

---

After I posted the various links to what Ankh's said, I most definitely increased the number of people who want to gank her for being an idiot who could wind up as CSM chair.

---

Originally by: RedSplat

---

*Cough* Why dont you tell us whom came first?

(and that didn't require spamming trade hubs and evemails, lying to other players about other candidates to get missionrunner panic votes and the like)

---

Originally by: Dariah Stardweller

---

Originally by: RedSplat

---

*Cough* Why dont you tell us whom came first?

(and that didn't require spamming trade hubs and evemails, lying to other players about other candidates to get missionrunner panic votes and the like)

---

I see you have already started the smear campaign for the next elections

And why don't you tell us who came fourth?

See, I can ask pointless questions too...

---

Originally by: Dariah Stardweller

---

I see you have already started the smear campaign for the next elections

And why don't you tell us who came fourth?

See, I can ask pointless questions too...

---

Originally by: CCP Mitnal

---

I don't sleep.
I am always here.
Watching.
Waiting.

---

Originally by: Dariah Stardweller

---

Originally by: RedSplat

---

*Cough* Why dont you tell us whom came first?

(and that didn't require spamming trade hubs and evemails, lying to other players about other candidates to get missionrunner panic votes and the like)

---

I see you have already started the smear campaign for the next elections

---

Originally by: Bagehi

---

Edited by: Bagehi on 26/05/2010 16:53:39
We will have TeaDaze in CSM this time to document all the amusing things Ank says. Looking forward to the meeting minutes for this CSM!

---

Originally by: Dariah Stardweller

---

That being said, I would like to congratulate all elected members, that includes sourpuss Sok. Even if he is an alliance puppet.

---

Originally by: Sokratesz

---

Originally by: Dariah Stardweller

---

That being said, I would like to congratulate all elected members, that includes sourpuss Sok. Even if he is an alliance puppet.

---

If you knew me, you'd realise that I'm probably as far away from an 'alliance puppet' as possible. I have been accused of getting in through bloc vote before so I will repeat my argument here.

AAA is probably the least coherent alliance in-game when it comes to the CSM elections. The Russian community is very tight-knit so most of them will vote for korvin. Most of the BDCI votes went to Omber Zombie, a good part to other candidates (TeaDaze was popular), and most of the rest just doesn't give a **** about the CSM.

---

Originally by: Ashai Hirishuma

---

Or not.

Don't count your chickens.

When the truth will out, then we will see.

---

Originally by: Ciralla

---

you are literally the worst CSM ever, and that includes Darius 'IM LOUD AND DRUNK" JOHNSON.

---

Originally by: Terrigal

---

Originally by: Ciralla

---

you are literally the worst CSM ever, and that includes Darius 'IM LOUD AND DRUNK" JOHNSON.

---

I never thought I'd say this especially after Darius's attrocious job at commentating at the tourny. But Darius was good compared to you lot glad I didnt bother voting this time as my utter contempt of the CSM has been confirmed.

---