Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
418
|
Posted - 2012.07.04 21:57:00 -
[31] - Quote
Tippia wrote:GǪso instant access to agents, reduced taxes, no refinery waste, and (at the extreme end) free ships isn't enough? It has to be increased security as well?
No.
In fact, if anything, standings gain needs to be decoupled from missions as it is and be turned into something that you can gain in numerous ways.
I would agree with the fact faction standings gain should be mainly from FW, after all why would you gain faction standings by killing rats or mission to corporations?
Corporation standings raise with missions, yes Gain concord SS by killing rats, yes Faction just by doing some important mission every 16 missions, no, this should be reserved for FW only.
Would promote more high sec/low sec pvp and make players get involved faster on cheapo throw away pvp, this can only be good.
On topic:
High sec JB's? -If they need you to fuel them, are destructible (so, player owned) and limited range to half of those null ones, why not? brb |
Danfen Fenix
132
|
Posted - 2012.07.04 22:02:00 -
[32] - Quote
Hisec - Hisec Jump bridges? No thanks
Hi sec - low sec
Hi sec - NPC 0.0
Sure, that might be cool to see.
or even possibly
hi sec - Alliance 0.0 (limited/limits set up by alliance etc)...although improbable, just fits my dream of there eventually being an allaince who allows people through their space, possibly with taxes on gates etc (properly...not CVA style. Kinda like a player run 'Empire space' ) |
Abdiel Kavash
Paladin Order Fidelas Constans
652
|
Posted - 2012.07.04 22:23:00 -
[33] - Quote
ITT: comparing shooting at red crosses to the :effort: of taking, holding, and defending sovereignty, setting up and fueling two POSes, installing and paying taxes for sov upgrades, and fueling bridges every time some idiot jumps an orca with MWD on through. |
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
1404
|
Posted - 2012.07.04 22:46:00 -
[34] - Quote
so who pays for the sov upgrades and fuels the jump bridges exactly? |
Buhhdust Princess
Mind Games. Suddenly Spaceships.
67
|
Posted - 2012.07.04 22:52:00 -
[35] - Quote
Didn't read the rest of the comments but.
This would only work if: 1. Members of the Faction ONLY can use the jump bridges, this means that freighters will have to take a risk by being constantly wardecced to do it. 2. These would have to be fueled by someone in the factional warfare corporation. |
Barkaial Starfinder
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
25
|
Posted - 2012.07.04 22:58:00 -
[36] - Quote
If 100.000.000,00 ISK for Freighters 20.000.000,00 ISK for BS 10.000.000,00 ISK for Cruisers 1.000.000.00,00 ISK for Frigates
and Jumps within the same empires
with 8+ Standings
Then maybe. |
Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub Like I Give A F--K
1420
|
Posted - 2012.07.04 23:07:00 -
[37] - Quote
Barkaial Starfinder wrote:If 100.000.000,00 ISK for Freighters 20.000.000,00 ISK for BS 10.000.000,00 ISK for Cruisers 1.000.000.00,00 ISK for Frigates
and Jumps within the same empires
with 8+ Standings
Then maybe. Why are you using commas and full stops the wrong way round?
Also still no.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |
Bane Loppknow
Pel Industries
50
|
Posted - 2012.07.04 23:25:00 -
[38] - Quote
As long as the jump bridges function the same as null bridges (Meaning no added protections or anything like that) I'd be fine with this. Wanna gank a freighter? It's a good bet they're headed for a key jump bridge. Wanna haul some freight? You just shaved 6 jumps off your trip. Everyone gets something nice.
Plus, as CCP has said before, more clicks != better gameplay. More jumps = more clicks. |
Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub Like I Give A F--K
1420
|
Posted - 2012.07.04 23:29:00 -
[39] - Quote
Bane Loppknow wrote:As long as the jump bridges function the same as null bridges (Meaning no added protections or anything like that) I'd be fine with this. Wanna gank a freighter? It's a good bet they're headed for a key jump bridge. Wanna haul some freight? You just shaved 6 jumps off your trip. Everyone gets something nice.
Plus, as CCP has said before, more clicks != better gameplay. More jumps = more clicks. If CCP really wanted to make Eve smaller they'd bring back the highways. They removed them for a reason.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-á-á-MXZF |
Crunchie Attuxors
Always Another Corporate Venture
78
|
Posted - 2012.07.05 01:06:00 -
[40] - Quote
ITT: carebears who want nullsex without nullstds. Eve forums official anthem:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pudOFG5X6uA |
|
Abditus Cularius
Clancularius Industries
24
|
Posted - 2012.07.05 01:43:00 -
[41] - Quote
No. Never. Ever. Please.
Force projection is a terrible problem in eve, and does not need to be increased. |
Iria Ahrens
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
61
|
Posted - 2012.07.05 02:58:00 -
[42] - Quote
Not as such. The devs said they always ask how a given change can increase contention and that iteration sounds like it decrease it.
But maybe a very few LONG JB across polar opposite ends of the universe so that players wanting to visit the major hubs would still have to traverse the usual territory, while increasing the number of potential enemies that might attack a soverign space might be alright. Say a North-South, and East-West gate, and leave it at that. "I was about to say GÇ£HereGÇÖs a RubikGÇÖs cube, go f%$^ yourself,GÇ¥ because thatGÇÖs what we do with EVE Online." EVE Lead Game Designer Kristoffer Touborg for PC Gamer |
BabydoII
Republic University Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.07.05 07:26:00 -
[43] - Quote
Werst Dendenahzees wrote:Actually, I agree with this, but make it so that players have to fuel them just like in 0.0. Let's see who sacrifices his sanity for the good of the many.
Or lets see who actually listens too the alliance leaders when they say "bring your own jump fuel in your cargo hold". |
BabydoII
Republic University Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.07.05 07:28:00 -
[44] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:so who pays for the sov upgrades and fuels the jump bridges exactly?
You clearly didnt read the original post the jump fuel would come in the form of Tickets which would be bought with LP from the LP store. |
TheGunslinger42
Bite Me inc Exhale.
129
|
Posted - 2012.07.05 07:39:00 -
[45] - Quote
Garibaldi Sinatra wrote:How about giving us diligent hard working mission runners something new to aim for and use.
Im terrible at explaining ideas but hopfully this short explaination will hint at what i am suggesting.
I would love too see a high speed transit system for getting around highsec. My suggestion would be that the mechaninc requires you have standings with the relevant Empire who controls the jump bridges and prehaps the use of some kind of ticket that you could buy in bulk from the LP store.
This would be a nice addition too the LP store and would provide a good reason for grinding standings with diffeent empire' besides the pure persuit of higher level missions.
Thanks for taking the time too consider this. I hope most of you will agree this is a good idea; i would love too see it implemented.
Discuss
GS
Counter suggestion: No.
Moving through hisec is safe and secure and you can even AFK it. No need to make it even quicker and easier. |
Samillian
Moonshine Industries The Last Chancers.
168
|
Posted - 2012.07.05 07:56:00 -
[46] - Quote
No NBSI shall be the whole of the Law |
Lipbite
Express Hauler
126
|
Posted - 2012.07.05 08:17:00 -
[47] - Quote
Make hi-sec more attractive by introducing meaningful gameplay add-on? It will make small but very vocal null-sec "communities" feel even more lonely, bitter and frustrated. Forget about it. |
Mechael
Ouroboros Executor Collective
160
|
Posted - 2012.07.05 08:31:00 -
[48] - Quote
Fast travel does not belong in EVE. Regular jump bridges (and cynos, too) are more than bad enough. Gotta jump halfway across the galaxy just to find conflict these days. Whether or not you win the game matters not. -áIt's if you bought it. |
Mechael
Ouroboros Executor Collective
160
|
Posted - 2012.07.05 08:34:00 -
[49] - Quote
Kuehnelt wrote:"Familiarity should breed adoration". Given deriving standings, this might be irritating. For instance, someone grinding Guristas standings wouldn't like having to grind away the Guristas penalties from merely shopping at Jita.
And yet that's exactly how it should work. You're doing business with one of the Guristas' primary enemies. NPCs in this game are currently pure ****. It'd be nice if that changed. Whether or not you win the game matters not. -áIt's if you bought it. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |