Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
killorbekilled TBE
Dare Bears
91
|
Posted - 2012.06.01 18:11:00 -
[1] - Quote
so with all the empire care bears packing there bags and skipping into the sunset for a better life filled with happiness and tranquility is it time for ccp to reduce high security empire space borders?
or what ever side of the coin you look at it increase the boundaries of low security.
This new change would come in light of concord not being able to protect its own empire dwelling citizens and there for reducing security status of 50% of 0.5 systems to 0.4 systems
This could be tied into a new eve era and story line, there could be a you tube movie, hats, lunch box's everything
in summary
more low sec more pvp more back story more immersive game play
less high sec less boring ness less single player mode
in light of what has happened in the last month or so the players are creating a story and would be a shame to ignore it. huh? |
Par'Gellen
123
|
Posted - 2012.06.01 18:11:00 -
[2] - Quote
1/10 CCP, I understand that "To err is human", but it shouldn't be the company motto... |
Kiteo Hatto
The Fiction Factory Blue Nation
73
|
Posted - 2012.06.01 18:16:00 -
[3] - Quote
Quote:less single player mode
Find this amazing, simply because pvp guys have alts that have alts. More interaction with.....yourself.
Please by all means go ahead and suggest things like these, im interested to see what eve becomes. Apparently a really healthy mmo sandbox that fills the niche for it's playerbase. |
THE L0CK
Denying You Access
419
|
Posted - 2012.06.01 18:19:00 -
[4] - Quote
/yawn
Do you smell what the Lock's cooking? |
Spineker
161
|
Posted - 2012.06.01 18:21:00 -
[5] - Quote
Not even a good troll worst on the board right now. Try to be original or something |
Price Check Aisle3
44
|
Posted - 2012.06.01 18:21:00 -
[6] - Quote
More low-sec would be awesome. +1 |
Marlona Sky
Massive PVPness Psychotic Tendencies.
1031
|
Posted - 2012.06.01 18:24:00 -
[7] - Quote
300,000+ subscribers and I have seen what... 5-7 quit threads.
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |
Kiteo Hatto
The Fiction Factory Blue Nation
73
|
Posted - 2012.06.01 18:30:00 -
[8] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:300,000+ subscribers and I have seen what... 5-7 quit threads. I'd like to know how many of those 300k are: - still logging on - have an alt - have multiple alts
Having an alt is more than likely, so you are probably looking at what...150k actual people(best case) ?
Given the case of forum dwellers being 5% of the population, 7 threads is actually quite a lot for this 5%, more over they all had alts.(be it truth or not, i don't know) |
EnslaverOfMinmatar
You gonna get aped
34
|
Posted - 2012.06.01 18:31:00 -
[9] - Quote
Change the highsec systems that connect Amarr-minmatard and ghaylente-Caldari to 0.4 Every EVE player must read this http://www.eveonline.com/background/potw/default.asp?cid=29-01-07 or uninstall and DIAF |
Tomcio FromFarAway
Singularity's Edge
60
|
Posted - 2012.06.01 18:32:00 -
[10] - Quote
Price Check Aisle3 wrote:More low-sec would be awesome. +1
Yes definitely. It's not like MOST of the current lowsec is empty |
|
Kiteo Hatto
The Fiction Factory Blue Nation
73
|
Posted - 2012.06.01 18:32:00 -
[11] - Quote
EnslaverOfMinmatar wrote:Change the highsec systems that connect Amarr-minmatard and ghaylente-Caldari to 0.4 Bad idea, people would never leave their starting area and those 0.4s will be camped to HELL. |
Nariya Kentaya
Tartarus Ventures Surely You're Joking
201
|
Posted - 2012.06.01 18:53:00 -
[12] - Quote
Kiteo Hatto wrote:EnslaverOfMinmatar wrote:Change the highsec systems that connect Amarr-minmatard and ghaylente-Caldari to 0.4 Bad idea, people would never leave their starting area and those 0.4s will be camped to HELL. while i agree high-security space sucks, im afraid im going to ahve to agree with this gentlemen on the "border high with lows" idea, as it would make it near impossible for traders to operate outside of 1 trade hub, and any noob on his epic arc quests or whicher noob missions it was that made you go all around the universe, they would be killed REPEATEDLY. |
Price Check Aisle3
44
|
Posted - 2012.06.01 19:11:00 -
[13] - Quote
Tomcio FromFarAway wrote:Yes definitely. It's not like MOST of the current lowsec is empty Exactly. Pack high-sec dwellers in even tighter. Makes it easier to cull the herd. |
Spineker
161
|
Posted - 2012.06.01 19:13:00 -
[14] - Quote
Remove empty wasteful low-sec completely. Deserted wasteland that can be plundered without fear of even seeing another ship most of the time. Redundant and boring, need more highsec space and PVE stuff. |
Roisin Saoirse
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
100
|
Posted - 2012.06.01 19:18:00 -
[15] - Quote
Price Check Aisle3 wrote:Tomcio FromFarAway wrote:Yes definitely. It's not like MOST of the current lowsec is empty Exactly. Pack high-sec dwellers in even tighter. Makes it easier to cull the herd. Spoken like a true forum warrior Jita alt. I for one value your opinion. |
Roisin Saoirse
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
100
|
Posted - 2012.06.01 19:20:00 -
[16] - Quote
Spineker wrote:Remove empty wasteful low-sec completely. Deserted wasteland that can be plundered without fear of even seeing another ship most of the time. Redundant and boring, need more highsec space and PVE stuff. There's plenty of highsec, even a fair few highsec systems are low population because they're dead end or just underdeveloped (no stations, low quality agents etc.).
If any region of space was to be expanded, I'd rather there be more nullsec tbh. |
Price Check Aisle3
44
|
Posted - 2012.06.01 19:21:00 -
[17] - Quote
Roisin Saoirse wrote:Price Check Aisle3 wrote:Tomcio FromFarAway wrote:Yes definitely. It's not like MOST of the current lowsec is empty Exactly. Pack high-sec dwellers in even tighter. Makes it easier to cull the herd. Spoken like a true forum warrior Jita alt. I for one value your opinion. Thank you. I, too, value the opinion of forum alts like you. |
Roisin Saoirse
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
100
|
Posted - 2012.06.01 19:31:00 -
[18] - Quote
Price Check Aisle3 wrote:Thank you. I, too, value the opinion of forum alts like you. Touch+¬, although tbh the reason for this alt is because I don't want my asshattery to bite the recipient of my mains after the character transfers have gone through. |
Spineker
161
|
Posted - 2012.06.01 19:40:00 -
[19] - Quote
Roisin Saoirse wrote:Spineker wrote:Remove empty wasteful low-sec completely. Deserted wasteland that can be plundered without fear of even seeing another ship most of the time. Redundant and boring, need more highsec space and PVE stuff. There's plenty of highsec, even a fair few highsec systems are low population because they're dead end or just underdeveloped (no stations, low quality agents etc.). If any region of space was to be expanded, I'd rather there be more nullsec tbh.
No we need more fun stuff. Nothing Fun in NullSec space at all, just a bunch of Cronyism Elitist Epeening and slaving for dumb CEO's that are scamming you. Only fools live in Null space and only assbackwards Devs that is CCP cater to them any other company would ignore them mostly. |
Price Check Aisle3
44
|
Posted - 2012.06.01 19:42:00 -
[20] - Quote
Roisin Saoirse wrote:Price Check Aisle3 wrote:Thank you. I, too, value the opinion of forum alts like you. Touch+¬, although tbh the reason for this alt is because I don't want my asshattery to bite the recipient of my mains after the character transfers have gone through. My main is forum banned. |
|
Nariya Kentaya
Tartarus Ventures Surely You're Joking
201
|
Posted - 2012.06.01 19:48:00 -
[21] - Quote
Spineker wrote:Roisin Saoirse wrote:Spineker wrote:Remove empty wasteful low-sec completely. Deserted wasteland that can be plundered without fear of even seeing another ship most of the time. Redundant and boring, need more highsec space and PVE stuff. There's plenty of highsec, even a fair few highsec systems are low population because they're dead end or just underdeveloped (no stations, low quality agents etc.). If any region of space was to be expanded, I'd rather there be more nullsec tbh. No we need more fun stuff. Nothing Fun in NullSec space at all, just a bunch of Cronyism Elitist Epeening and slaving for dumb CEO's that are scamming you. Only fools live in Null space and only assbackwards Devs that is CCP cater to them any other company would ignore them mostly. i can tell you with personal experience ebtween me and dozens of my friends, that very rarely will you get scammed or screwed by your CEO's in null, even then, it is usually the CEOs not the alliance leaders, adn after the scamming corp has been kicked, you are usually welcomed with open arms into oen of the more loyal/not-pants-on-head-ratarded corps.
the good thinga botu eve, is that you CAN scam people, but if you scam them too much, you lose everythingt yourself, i won't argue that every CEO in nullsec has all their money and funds going to their members, because that woudl be ********, but its not liek you join and they say "sorry, we now have all your stuff, oha dn you owe us everything", because if they did that they woudl have no members to abckup their reputation.
so please, think before you post drivel and nonsense on the forums, outside of isolated cases, i'd prefer trusting a null-sec CEO over a highsec CEO anyday. |
Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
257
|
Posted - 2012.06.01 19:55:00 -
[22] - Quote
Kiteo Hatto wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:300,000+ subscribers and I have seen what... 5-7 quit threads. I'd like to know how many of those 300k are: - still logging on - have an alt - have multiple alts Having an alt is more than likely, so you are probably looking at what...150k actual people(best case) ? Given the case of forum dwellers being 5% of the population, 7 threads is actually quite a lot for this 5%, more over they all had alts.(be it truth or not, i don't know)
Yeah, 7 quit threads out of 7500 people is a MASSIVE amount. Also pretty sure that the last time CCP released subscription figures, they said over 340k UNIQUE subscribers. Not 340k total subscriptions.
Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |
Roisin Saoirse
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
100
|
Posted - 2012.06.01 20:20:00 -
[23] - Quote
Price Check Aisle3 wrote:My main is forum banned. Congrats, I'd love to be banned. You are now my hero.
(Actually I'm serious.) |
Marlona Sky
Massive PVPness Psychotic Tendencies.
1031
|
Posted - 2012.06.01 20:22:00 -
[24] - Quote
Kiteo Hatto wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:300,000+ subscribers and I have seen what... 5-7 quit threads. I'd like to know how many of those 300k are: - still logging on - have an alt - have multiple alts Having an alt is more than likely, so you are probably looking at what...150k actual people(best case) ? Given the case of forum dwellers being 5% of the population, 7 threads is actually quite a lot for this 5%, more over they all had alts.(be it truth or not, i don't know)
So 7 people out of 15,000. Oh yes, there is massive amount of people quitting right?? lol
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |
Price Check Aisle3
44
|
Posted - 2012.06.01 20:22:00 -
[25] - Quote
Roisin Saoirse wrote:Price Check Aisle3 wrote:My main is forum banned. Congrats, I'd love to be banned. You are now my hero. (Actually I'm serious.) Just be a meanie when some butt-hurt AFK miner is around.
Also, not lying about more low-sec (or even NPC null), but for different reasons. |
Kiteo Hatto
The Fiction Factory Blue Nation
73
|
Posted - 2012.06.01 20:26:00 -
[26] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:Kiteo Hatto wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:300,000+ subscribers and I have seen what... 5-7 quit threads. I'd like to know how many of those 300k are: - still logging on - have an alt - have multiple alts Having an alt is more than likely, so you are probably looking at what...150k actual people(best case) ? Given the case of forum dwellers being 5% of the population, 7 threads is actually quite a lot for this 5%, more over they all had alts.(be it truth or not, i don't know) So 7 people out of 15,000. Oh yes, there is massive amount of people quitting right?? lol
Yes because everybody makes a "quitting" thread and checks in with you before they just leave the game.(not talking about the ones that come back) |
Roisin Saoirse
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
100
|
Posted - 2012.06.01 20:33:00 -
[27] - Quote
Kiteo Hatto wrote:Yes because everybody makes a "quitting" thread and checks in with you before they just leave the game.(not talking about the ones that come back) This.
I've never made a quitting thread in any game I've left (I've never really understood why people do tbh), and I know a few people who are leaving or have already who either don't use the forums or are just mature enough to leave without the tantrums. |
Zyress
The Fabulous Thunderbirds
91
|
Posted - 2012.06.01 21:17:00 -
[28] - Quote
Spineker wrote:Remove empty wasteful low-sec completely. Deserted wasteland that can be plundered without fear of even seeing another ship most of the time. Redundant and boring, need more highsec space and PVE stuff.
While I agree with most of this post, it is the only place outside of null where the alliances can load up their Cap ships to take stuff back out to their Null havens |
Plaude Pollard
Crimson Cartel
35
|
Posted - 2012.06.01 21:36:00 -
[29] - Quote
killorbekilled TBE wrote:This new change would come in light of concord not being able to protect its own empire dwelling citizens CONCORD controls 7 systems. Considering they're an omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent force, I honestly don't think they'd have trouble controlling those 7 systems. They're also Neutral towards all Empires, so they wouldn't be in danger of losing their sovereignty anyway. As for the rest of high-sec, I'm pretty sure CONCORD can just create a billion more clones and stuff those onto their ships and send them out on patrol. They already have near infinite resources at hand, so there's no reason they wouldn't be able to keep High-Sec as secure as it's always been. |
Shea Valerien
House of Valerien
39
|
Posted - 2012.06.01 21:38:00 -
[30] - Quote
Yay, more gate camping. NO THANKS! |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |