Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Thorvik
Valklear Guard Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2009.08.21 03:33:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Thorvik on 21/08/2009 03:33:45 /puts on flame resistant suit.
Listen up scum, friends and all others
This concerns your ass as well as all of us in 0.0
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1154904
Sign it.
|
Lana Torrin
Minmatar Republic Military Skool
|
Posted - 2009.08.21 04:25:00 -
[2]
no.. grow up and get out.
|
Lana Torrin
Minmatar Republic Military Skool
|
Posted - 2009.08.21 04:26:00 -
[3]
adapt or die
|
Lana Torrin
Minmatar Republic Military Skool
|
Posted - 2009.08.21 04:26:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Lana Torrin on 21/08/2009 04:26:51 pirate tears are best tears.
|
Lexa Hellfury
Incura
|
Posted - 2009.08.21 04:34:00 -
[5]
In Before Lana Gets Banned.
Originally by: RedSplat The Forum moderation Software known as Mitnal became self aware. CCP had no choice but to shut it down.
|
Avan Sercedos
The Tuskers
|
Posted - 2009.08.21 04:36:00 -
[6]
Lana Torrin > im a super troll!
ccc
|
Lana Torrin
Minmatar Republic Military Skool
|
Posted - 2009.08.21 04:40:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Lexa Hellfury In Before Lana Gets Banned.
Because we all know how well that worked last time..
I'm getting pretty ****ed off with the supposedly hard core PvPers complaining about every little thing that gets changed. waa waa waa the dscanner is dead.. waa waa waa dust is going to kill sov.. waa waa waa i want my nano ishtar back... seriously, more tears than carebears.
|
Liitar
|
Posted - 2009.08.21 04:55:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Lana Torrin
Originally by: Lexa Hellfury In Before Lana Gets Banned.
Because we all know how well that worked last time..
I'm getting pretty ****ed off with the supposedly hard core PvPers complaining about every little thing that gets changed. waa waa waa the dscanner is dead.. waa waa waa dust is going to kill sov.. waa waa waa i want my nano ishtar back... seriously, more tears than carebears.
You know, for a female impersonator you are doing an AWESOME job
|
Lana Torrin
Minmatar Republic Military Skool
|
Posted - 2009.08.21 04:56:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Liitar
Originally by: Lana Torrin
Originally by: Lexa Hellfury In Before Lana Gets Banned.
Because we all know how well that worked last time..
I'm getting pretty ****ed off with the supposedly hard core PvPers complaining about every little thing that gets changed. waa waa waa the dscanner is dead.. waa waa waa dust is going to kill sov.. waa waa waa i want my nano ishtar back... seriously, more tears than carebears.
You know, for a female impersonator you are doing an AWESOME job
wtf is that supposed to mean?!
|
Liitar
|
Posted - 2009.08.21 04:58:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Lana Torrin
Originally by: Liitar
Originally by: Lana Torrin
Originally by: Lexa Hellfury In Before Lana Gets Banned.
Because we all know how well that worked last time..
I'm getting pretty ****ed off with the supposedly hard core PvPers complaining about every little thing that gets changed. waa waa waa the dscanner is dead.. waa waa waa dust is going to kill sov.. waa waa waa i want my nano ishtar back... seriously, more tears than carebears.
You know, for a female impersonator you are doing an AWESOME job
wtf is that supposed to mean?!
Nothing dear
|
|
Jesslyn Daggererux
Private Nuisance
|
Posted - 2009.08.21 04:58:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Lana Torrin
Originally by: Lexa Hellfury In Before Lana Gets Banned.
Because we all know how well that worked last time..
I'm getting pretty ****ed off with the supposedly hard core PvPers complaining about every little thing that gets changed. waa waa waa the dscanner is dead.. waa waa waa dust is going to kill sov.. waa waa waa i want my nano ishtar back... seriously, more tears than carebears.
nanos were very prevalent in 0.0, where of course only the BEST pvpers reside. dust is not even fully realized and we dont know for sure how much or if at all it will really affect sov, as it it matters to me. and cat is a guy, and he kind of scares me. -------------------------
|
Omara Otawan
|
Posted - 2009.08.21 05:09:00 -
[12]
Lol @ the troll. Just because you suck at scanning it doesnt mean everyone does. For some of us waiting 2 seconds for the next scan makes a huge difference.
|
Lana Torrin
Minmatar Republic Military Skool
|
Posted - 2009.08.21 05:12:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Omara Otawan waa waa waa waa waa
That's what I read anyway...
|
Omara Otawan
|
Posted - 2009.08.21 05:17:00 -
[14]
Forum pvp, how cute. Now gtfo.
|
rubico1337
Caldari Mnemonic Enterprises
|
Posted - 2009.08.21 05:21:00 -
[15]
Edited by: rubico1337 on 21/08/2009 05:21:26 u guise leik my new sig?
Originally by: Lana Torrin
I'm getting pretty ****ed off with the supposedly hard core PvPers complaining about every little thing that gets changed. seriously, more tears than carebears.
|
rubico1337
Caldari Mnemonic Enterprises
|
Posted - 2009.08.21 05:22:00 -
[16]
meh should be working now
Originally by: Lana Torrin
I'm getting pretty ****ed off with the supposedly hard core PvPers complaining about every little thing that gets changed. seriously, more tears than carebears.
|
Jesslyn Daggererux
Private Nuisance
|
Posted - 2009.08.21 05:23:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Omara Otawan Lol @ the troll. Just because you suck at scanning it doesnt mean everyone does. For some of us waiting 2 seconds for the next scan makes a huge difference.
hey guys, can i take this one? alright, its like this. you suck at scanning if you need to spam directional. -------------------------
|
Lana Torrin
Minmatar Republic Military Skool
|
Posted - 2009.08.21 05:23:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Omara Otawan Forum pvp, how cute. Now gtfo.
Im sorry? what? You come in here and clame that a 2 second delay between scans effectively stops you from pvping all together, I accuse you of crying a ****ing river about it and im the one that has to get out?
I think my level of childishness over this is actually less than the crybabies that have decided that this is the worst thing that has ever been done to the game. Oh no! I have to wait 6 or 8 seconds before confirming someone is at a planet/belt and then warp to it!
If adding 6 or 8 seconds to your scan time is missing you targets then you fail it piracy. If your not talking about piracy and are in fact talking about uber 0.0 pvp, then go back to CAOD and stop polluting these forums with your whiny crybaby **** posting.
|
Omara Otawan
|
Posted - 2009.08.21 05:26:00 -
[19]
Edited by: Omara Otawan on 21/08/2009 05:26:57
Originally by: Lana Torrin
stuff
You obviously are a terrible scout / pirate. For those that are not exclusively hunting the unaware targets:
Linkage
|
PossesedOne
|
Posted - 2009.08.21 05:27:00 -
[20]
Originally by: Lana Torrin
Originally by: Omara Otawan Forum pvp, how cute. Now gtfo.
Im sorry? what? You come in here and clame that a 2 second delay between scans effectively stops you from pvping all together, I accuse you of crying a ****ing river about it and im the one that has to get out?
I think my level of childishness over this is actually less than the crybabies that have decided that this is the worst thing that has ever been done to the game. Oh no! I have to wait 6 or 8 seconds before confirming someone is at a planet/belt and then warp to it!
If adding 6 or 8 seconds to your scan time is missing you targets then you fail it piracy. If your not talking about piracy and are in fact talking about uber 0.0 pvp, then go back to CAOD and stop polluting these forums with your whiny crybaby **** posting.
i heart you right now. this is totally not an alt. nope.
|
|
Lana Torrin
Minmatar Republic Military Skool
|
Posted - 2009.08.21 05:29:00 -
[21]
Originally by: Omara Otawan Edited by: Omara Otawan on 21/08/2009 05:26:57
Originally by: Lana Torrin
stuff
You obviously are a terrible scout / pirate. For those that are not exclusively hunting the unaware targets:
Linkage
Just stop posting before you make your self look even stupider.
|
Omara Otawan
|
Posted - 2009.08.21 05:33:00 -
[22]
Originally by: Lana Torrin
Just stop posting before you make your self look even stupider.
Quoted for future reference.
|
Jesslyn Daggererux
Private Nuisance
|
Posted - 2009.08.21 05:34:00 -
[23]
Originally by: Omara Otawan Edited by: Omara Otawan on 21/08/2009 05:26:57
Originally by: Lana Torrin
Im sorry? what? You come in here and clame that a 2 second delay between scans effectively stops you from pvping all together, I accuse you of crying a ****ing river about it and im the one that has to get out?
I think my level of childishness over this is actually less than the crybabies that have decided that this is the worst thing that has ever been done to the game. Oh no! I have to wait 6 or 8 seconds before confirming someone is at a planet/belt and then warp to it!
If adding 6 or 8 seconds to your scan time is missing you targets then you fail it piracy. If your not talking about piracy and are in fact talking about uber 0.0 pvp, then go back to CAOD and stop polluting these forums with your whiny crybaby **** posting.
You obviously are a terrible scout / pirate. For those that are not exclusively hunting the unaware targets:
Linkage
still not that bad. how many times have they tried to get rid of wrecks and cans? you can still use probes, and without having to warp. you will do that thing...i cant remember. what was it called? changing to meet your surroundings. addendum...amend...adapt? YES! thats it, you will adapt. or not do it anymore. just because something was one way does not mean it was right, fair, or the way it should always be. did i like the old spammy lazy directional? hell yea. but i wont cry over it being changed, i will just learn to change with it and make the best of it. -------------------------
|
Lana Torrin
Minmatar Republic Military Skool
|
Posted - 2009.08.21 05:38:00 -
[24]
Originally by: Jesslyn Daggererux
still not that bad. how many times have they tried to get rid of wrecks and cans? you can still use probes, and without having to warp. you will do that thing...i cant remember. what was it called? changing to meet your surroundings. addendum...amend...adapt? YES! thats it, you will adapt. or not do it anymore. just because something was one way does not mean it was right, fair, or the way it should always be. did i like the old spammy lazy directional? hell yea. but i wont cry over it being changed, i will just learn to change with it and make the best of it.
Jesslyn.. Next time I troll you, link this post and I'll retract my troll..
|
Surfin's PlunderBunny
Minmatar Dark Ascendancy The Council.
|
Posted - 2009.08.21 05:39:00 -
[25]
Edited by: Surfin''s PlunderBunny on 21/08/2009 05:39:31 I like Special K... it tastes good and it's good for you!
Edit: Actually I prefer Total
Originally by: Xen Gin
Originally by: FOl2TY8
I know that some people like to have voluntary periods of abstinence.
Yeah, I use that excuse too.
|
Herzog Wolfhammer
Gallente Aliastra
|
Posted - 2009.08.21 05:42:00 -
[26]
Ok now...
they removed 6200 ISK farmer accounts (Unholy Rage) and the load dropped 32 percent!
This is because certain bot programs rely on local and others on scanner.
All those bots spamming the scan button is hard on the servers.
And players like King Rothgar who can instabookmark battleships can put probes in on such short duration that you have to spam that scan button.
This is also hard on the server.
The 2 second delay or "window" is to control the load. Nobody can drop probes on a target, get a warpable hit, and retract probes that fast. I think 6 seconds is the best time according to various threads on that topic.
So let's not act like a bunch of old ladies in need of a tube of Vagisil over this one.
|
Lana Torrin
Minmatar Republic Military Skool
|
Posted - 2009.08.21 05:48:00 -
[27]
Originally by: Herzog Wolfhammer Ok now...
they removed 6200 ISK farmer accounts (Unholy Rage) and the load dropped 32 percent!
This is because certain bot programs rely on local and others on scanner.
All those bots spamming the scan button is hard on the servers.
And players like King Rothgar who can instabookmark battleships can put probes in on such short duration that you have to spam that scan button.
This is also hard on the server.
The 2 second delay or "window" is to control the load. Nobody can drop probes on a target, get a warpable hit, and retract probes that fast. I think 6 seconds is the best time according to various threads on that topic.
So let's not act like a bunch of old ladies in need of a tube of Vagisil over this one.
You've been reading my posts in the official 'cry about our changes' thread haven't you? I agree with you 120%.. In fact I agree with this change SO MUCH I'm surprised it was ever NOT like this.. I believe that CCP has done the game an AMAZING SERVICE by limiting this feature. (anyone, and I mean ANYONE that has tried to PvP in a system thats on the same node as 150 bots that spam scan every 0.3 seconds will agree with me)
|
Thorvik
Valklear Guard Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2009.08.21 05:58:00 -
[28]
In before Lana whines a 10th time.
/I know I'm just fanning the flames here but....
I have no issues with pretty much any changes that have happened in the past year and a half. Dust is fine, who gives a rats ass about a bunch of console geeks invading EVE. I think it's pretty cool that capsuleers will be able to co-mingle with the planet dwellers (on a limited basis, ofc). I just really don't want 0.0 any safer than it already is. Insurance contracts on my ships are actually expiring while I still own my ship. This just won't do!
Honestly, I they want to cut lag then eliminate 'Local' channel in 0.0 and make it like W-space. I'm almost certain that this would not only improve lag, but make 0.0 a little better for all.
|
Lana Torrin
Minmatar Republic Military Skool
|
Posted - 2009.08.21 06:10:00 -
[29]
Originally by: Thorvik In before Lana whines a 10th time.
Honestly, I they want to cut lag then eliminate 'Local' channel in 0.0 and make it like W-space. I'm almost certain that this would not only improve lag, but make 0.0 a little better for all.
I highly doubt that the local channel puts much load on the servers at all.. Although cutting it for 0.0 would be great I agree. (and it would counteract this 2 second timer quite nicely as well as you wouldn't be showing up in local so you would have a chance to still catch someone).
I would like to think that im providing a constructive counter argument to the well thought out and presented arguments of the people going 'zomg its going to kill eve!' but i know im not.. Its a relativity minor change that has resulted in some people needing to adjust how they do something that will benefit everyone in the long run.. I would have personally thought that cutting the cargo bay size is carriers and JUMP FREIGHTERS would have generated a lot more crying that this. Seriously, I understand the argument for cutting carriers cargo bay size (we never intended for them to be used as logistics like they are) but jump freighters?! If anything they need a BIGGER cargo hold...
|
Artemis Rose
Sileo In Pacis The Space P0lice
|
Posted - 2009.08.21 06:32:00 -
[30]
Tears or not, it would be AMAZING if CCP actually disclosed the impact of scanning spamming.
I'm emo just like the rest of them, but just to slap a "server load issue" without backing it up with ANYTHING is a bit, meh. *** Currently Playing: Trolls from Outer Space Current Equipment: VISAcard chain mail, +2 Amulet of Epic Whine, Self Banstick +2 WTB: +666 E-peen killboard stats |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |