I'm no hippy, so wind your neck in on that score sunshine. You're an idiot that just won't shut his mouth and thinks anyone who doesn't agree with him is a lower form of life. Others have made points that didn't require abusing everybody else in the thread and posting childish little graphics that keep getting removed.

Your impotent internet nerd rage just makes removes all validity from any point you're trying to make. Maybe if you'd actually stopped to make your point without being such a cretin in this thread, you'd get more civil responses. It's your own fault that your viewed as the annoying one.

Just unsub and end your pain.

I'm more than open to ideas, and when the VERY few have said a little more than "duh...I like it", I have replied and ask them, how it has improved gameplay for them and to give me, and others, some tips on how to utilize it......but guess what dumbazz.....they have no answer for that....hmmm, I wonder why O_o

So, AGAIN, u have failed to say anything that is substantial...and u have simply failed in the same way ur fellow trolls have.

But fair warning to u and all ur little punk troll friends. Don't for one second think ur gonna run ur little b!tch mouths here and not get a reply from me.

Mr. Trump says, "Virgil.....You're fired.......peace"

Latest blog update:

http://community.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=72794

[i]Hello Spacefriends

As mentioned previously, we are not at all happy with the state of the unified inventory. To everyone that is currently struggling with it, you have my apologies.

You people have overplayed the unsubbing card. It just doesn't the weight it did just after Incarna.

You people have overplayed the unsubbing card. It just doesn't the weight it did just after Incarna.

People have been signing each and every one of their complaint posts with " -x number of [last decade year] accounts" for a while now.

Latest blog update:

http://community.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=72794

Hello Spacefriends

As mentioned previously, we are not at all happy with the state of the unified inventory. To everyone that is currently struggling with it, you have my apologies.

As a remedy, weGGVre going to try and provide you with weekly changes to it, until we get it into a state where youGGVre happy with it. Our first group of fixes will go out Tuesday, May 29th, and are as follows:

Looting: Cargo containers and wrecks will function the same. Having multiple wrecks or containers open should be easy to loot as you can just click GG#loot allGG% and it will automatically go to the next item on the list instead of your ships cargohold. There is an added performance increase as well.
Ship Hangars: Your active ship will be displayed in the ship hangar. It was a bit confusing that it would disappear. All assembled ships will now be displayed, regardless of activity state.
Ship Hangars: When you have a ship hangar open but switch ships, the hangars for the old ships will still be listed as GG#active shipGG%. That has been corrected.
Containers: Containers are sorted alphabetically. That makes a lot of sense.
Performance: WeGGVve applied fixes that let you handle larger numbers of items more gracefully. It should be a great deal faster now.
Performance: Handling large numbers of POS modules was extremely slow. That has been remedied and it should be back to pre-patch performance.
Errors: Action failed messages would pop up if you had two cargoholds open and tried to open a third. This has been fixed as well.
Corp Hangars: If a corporation has impounded items present in a station, directors will have a GG#release itemsGG% button which will give you access to the impounded assets.
ThatGGVs it for Tuesday, but we will not stop there. As soon as these improvements are published, we start working on the next round of changes. WeGGVll update what those are and when they go out shortly after.

Again, you guys have my deepest apologies for this situation. WeGGVll do whatever we can to rectify it. We're going to continue to take your valuable feedback and add it to the list of changes we want to make.



More changes are coming, I'll do another update on Tuesday (May 29th).

Soundwave

Ship Hangars: When you have a ship hangar open but switch ships, the hangars for the old ships will still be listed as GG#active shipGG%. That has been corrected. <--- this is one issue that I hope they have really fixed, because the discription of what they fixed is not accurate to the problems that I have seen. It isn't just the 'listed ship' but it is also the wrong ship. The picture in my sig is a great example of it. The Prowler has two items in it (it always does, I swap speed lows for cargo lows when needed). The Orca however has an empty bay (so why the inventory says there is one item worth 5 million isk I have no idea, just another 'unified uncertainty')..

...maybe it is Schrodinger's cat.

Some people just cannot handle change...

How bout the option to disable this new uniified CRAP system and revert back to the old style. Just like CQ don't force a new flawed bassackwards system the most people don't want on us, give us an option.

As a visually impaired player this has all but convinced me that CCP dosen't think or care what disabled players need/want.

Makes me wonder if the guy that coded this garbage has even played the game?

Thanks for making my EVE play unbearable.

Ontopic: I can see rationale to a unified inventory as well (can we at long last have a toon wide search function with the ability to search containers and ships as well please?).

However, both active ship cargohold and current station items need to be ONE CLICK AFFAIRS automatically opening SEPERATELY.

1 account went already and when this one expires tomorrow it is -2.

See you when inventory is fixed and nice reactivation offer with apology drops to the mailbox.

I dislike one aspect of the new inventory, in that it makes it harder to move items. The new inventory system would work well if certain things were implemented.

The Ability to hide the isk count. (don't need it all the time), heck the ability to hide individual elements over all.

The Ability to have multiple windows, before it was efficient to move things around with multiple windows, it is why every OS with windows allow multiple instances of them.

If I open a Can in space and only want one item, I have to resize the window, make visible the side bar and then drag the item over. Before can opened in a small window I moved the item over and closed the can.

The new system feels like a file system not an inventory system...

Is it worth QQing over..

It's frustrating, it doesn't make the game better, and (from the dev blogs) it doesn't even fully work as intended yet for some reason it was implemented.

In RL if your Bank implemented a half finished change to it's online banks system, that made it more difficult to use, or less efficient, people would stop using it. This is the same thing, people see the change, they find it clunky and inefficient.

It's nice that it's being updated but it should have been finished before being implemented, if there are features you want but can't add them without breaking what you have, then what you have isn't very good.

Let me guess: you LOLEMORAGEFAILQUIT when you heard WiS wasn't coming any time soon? And you have NEX swag in your hangar?

After spending some time with the new system I have to say I like it better. Its just easyer and quicker to use.

If you are unsubbing over a change to the UI, then good riddance.


Yes i has problems, but it is nowhere near as bad as some things CCP has done. Get some perspective.


Its like quitting work because you had a coworker that smelled funny one day. Its petty.

I cannot see any reason for CCP to apologise any further than they already have.

More like quitting your job because they instituted mandatory cavity searches.

Yes. Exactly like it was.

More like quitting your job because they instituted mandatory cavity searches.