| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Reply to Topic | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Implying Implications
Broski Enterprises
51
 |
Posted - 2012.05.15 00:06:00 -
[61] - Quote
Dumping ships into space for people to board is not an exploit. |

bongsmoke
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
0
 |
Posted - 2012.05.15 00:13:00 -
[62] - Quote
Implying Implications wrote:Dumping ships into space for people to board is not an exploit.
Agreed
I dont like griefers, nor the bs ways of raping people, but orca isnt the problem.
Just make Concord pod kill any pirates(red sec stat) as if it was a ship. End of issue |

Roparzh Greek
Eternal Profiteers Empire
0
 |
Posted - 2012.05.21 04:21:00 -
[63] - Quote
Scrapyard Bob wrote:The real fix for the "problem" might be:
1) Boarding a ship in space should start you off with zero capacitor.
2) Or possibly a delay of 5-20 seconds before you can activate modules.
3) Can't do anything at all for 5-20 seconds after boarding.
4) There should be a 5-20 second delay before you can target anything (similar to the decloak delay).
Not being able to target anything for 20 seconds after boarding would some of the current grief play. Starting off with zero capacitor would require the use of cap boosters in order to warp out before the faction navy catches up with you.
Not sure which of those methods would be best.
interesting idea, it could work... |

Fiddler Hays
East Central Industrial Corp Imperial Crimson Legion
1
 |
Posted - 2012.05.30 21:11:00 -
[64] - Quote
bongsmoke wrote:Implying Implications wrote:Dumping ships into space for people to board is not an exploit. Agreed I dont like griefers, nor the bs ways of raping people, but orca isnt the problem. Just make Concord pod kill any pirates(red sec stat) as if it was a ship. End of issue
Absolutely. Why isn't CCP taking consequences in hi-sec to a logical conclusion? I always hear that CONCORD gives consequences not protection. And yet criminals can waltz into hi-sec in a pod with no consequences.
If CONCORD starts podding criminals you will still have miners being ganked. But not from the same toon(s) indefinitely.
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
7510
 |
Posted - 2012.05.30 21:14:00 -
[65] - Quote
Fiddler Hays wrote:Why isn't CCP taking consequences in hi-sec to a logical conclusion? I always hear that CONCORD gives consequences not protection. And yet criminals can waltz into hi-sec in a pod with no consequences. That's because the criminals have already suffered the consequences. That's how they became criminals. Now they're no longer CONCORD's problem. The logical conclusion was reached ages ago. GG#If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GkmvGkm you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GG%
Shift-click does nothing GGv why the Unified Inventory isn't ready for primetime. |

Haldor Rune
State War Academy Caldari State
17
 |
Posted - 2012.05.30 21:17:00 -
[66] - Quote
NickyYo wrote:I did! Orca is meant for mining not killing miners.. That's some powerful irony right dere.
|

Roisin Saoirse
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
16
 |
Posted - 2012.05.30 21:23:00 -
[67] - Quote
Don't touch the Orca in any way at all, otherwise it will lead to the slippery slope of scannable corp hangars and make the ship basically pointless for anything BUT mining... <.< |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1662
 |
Posted - 2012.05.30 21:29:00 -
[68] - Quote
Fiddler Hays wrote:bongsmoke wrote:Implying Implications wrote:Dumping ships into space for people to board is not an exploit. Agreed I dont like griefers, nor the bs ways of raping people, but orca isnt the problem. Just make Concord pod kill any pirates(red sec stat) as if it was a ship. End of issue Absolutely. Why isn't CCP taking consequences in hi-sec to a logical conclusion? I always hear that CONCORD gives consequences not protection. And yet criminals can waltz into hi-sec in a pod with no consequences. If CONCORD starts podding criminals you will still have miners being ganked. But not from the same toon(s) indefinitely.
As soon as someone in a pod shoots you, CONCORD will start podding. Single-Shard, Player Driven-aSandbox.
5 words. That's what makes it special. |

Fiddler Hays
East Central Industrial Corp Imperial Crimson Legion
1
 |
Posted - 2012.05.30 21:30:00 -
[69] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Fiddler Hays wrote:Why isn't CCP taking consequences in hi-sec to a logical conclusion? I always hear that CONCORD gives consequences not protection. And yet criminals can waltz into hi-sec in a pod with no consequences. That's because the criminals have already suffered the consequences. That's how they became criminals. Now they're no longer CONCORD's problem. The logical conclusion was reached ages ago.
And if that was the case why does CCP restrict criminals from entering certain sections of hi-sec? If as you said the criminal has paid his price, why restrict him at all? They have done their time. Of course that is never the case with criminal acts in RL and shouldn't be here. You want to commit a crime. Fine. But don't tell me you paid the price so you can waltz right back in to do it again. You should be restricted to the jail (low-sec) with the other criminals and have CONCORD enforce the consequences of your actions.
|

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1662
 |
Posted - 2012.05.30 21:38:00 -
[70] - Quote
Fiddler Hays wrote:Tippia wrote:Fiddler Hays wrote:Why isn't CCP taking consequences in hi-sec to a logical conclusion? I always hear that CONCORD gives consequences not protection. And yet criminals can waltz into hi-sec in a pod with no consequences. That's because the criminals have already suffered the consequences. That's how they became criminals. Now they're no longer CONCORD's problem. The logical conclusion was reached ages ago. And if that was the case why does CCP restrict criminals from entering certain sections of hi-sec? If as you said the criminal has paid his price, why restrict him at all? They have done their time. Of course that is never the case with criminal acts in RL and shouldn't be here. You want to commit a crime. Fine. But don't tell me you paid the price so you can waltz right back in to do it again. You should be restricted to the jail (low-sec) with the other criminals and have CONCORD enforce the consequences of your actions.
CCP Restricts nobody from going anywhere.
Faction Navies restrict SHIPS flown by Criminals from entering their space. As soon as you get illegally shot by a Pod, CONCORD and the Faction Navies will start shooting pods.
Anyway, anyone can shoot a criminal's pod. If you want to keep criminals pods out of your space, shoot them or hire someone to shoot them. Single-Shard, Player Driven-aSandbox.
5 words. That's what makes it special. |
|

Karn Dulake
Souls Must Be Trampled The.Alliance
823
 |
Posted - 2012.05.30 21:41:00 -
[71] - Quote
Quote: I did! Orca is meant for mining not killing miners
The Orca is one of the most versatile ships in the game, but an idiot has decided that it only has one use according to the idiots law.
Say hi to your mom for me I dont normally troll, but when i do i do it on General Discussion. |

Roisin Saoirse
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
18
 |
Posted - 2012.05.30 21:42:00 -
[72] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:CCP Restricts nobody from going anywhere.
Faction Navies restrict SHIPS flown by Criminals from entering their space. As soon as you get illegally shot by a Pod, CONCORD and the Faction Navies will start shooting pods.
Anyway, anyone can shoot a criminal's pod. If you want to keep criminals pods out of your space, shoot them or hire someone to shoot them. Killing a criminal's pod outside of wardec will earn you a visit from CONCORD btw. |

Rath Kelbore
The Six-Pack Syndicate
213
 |
Posted - 2012.05.30 21:45:00 -
[73] - Quote
OP has a point. Capital ships aren't suppose to be in high sec for a reason. Fix this broken mechanic of allowing the orca in high security space. If you want to mine with bonuses from a cap ship it should be confined to low and null sec. I plan on living forever.......so far, so good. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
7511
 |
Posted - 2012.05.30 21:50:00 -
[74] - Quote
Fiddler Hays wrote:And if that was the case why does CCP restrict criminals from entering certain sections of hi-sec? They don't. GG#If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GkmvGkm you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GG%
Shift-click does nothing GGv why the Unified Inventory isn't ready for primetime. |

NickyYo
StarHug
133
 |
Posted - 2012.05.30 21:51:00 -
[75] - Quote
You all whine about my threads, yet you keep resurrecting week old threads of mine.. I have released a basic EVE Lottery Framework for you all you use to make lottery sites :) Check it out here -> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1333688&#post1333688 |

Ziranda Hakuli
Relativity Holding Corp AAA Citizens
76
 |
Posted - 2012.05.30 21:52:00 -
[76] - Quote
NickyYo wrote:Want to kill Burn Jita and Hulkageddon?  It's simple!! Fix the Orca so it cannot jettison ships in space for -10 status pirates to jump into from their pods.. This has got me thinking, you can easily fix this exploit BUT do you want to? Do you want these events to take place and why? And it amazes me how delusional people are, thinking they are making a difference in eve.. and can ransom CCP etc.. Above line mainly aimed at the goons.. HmmhHHHMMMmmmm...
the look on your face is perfect man. surprise butt sex. did you get owned...again
|

Roisin Saoirse
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
19
 |
Posted - 2012.05.30 21:54:00 -
[77] - Quote
Rath Kelbore wrote:OP has a point. Capital ships aren't suppose to be in high sec for a reason. Fix this broken mechanic of allowing the orca in high security space. If you want to mine with bonuses from a cap ship it should be confined to low and null sec. You do realise the only capitals that aren't allowed in highsec are the ones that can't use gates, right? That by restricting Orcas to low-null only they would also have to restrict freighters too?
Well thought out reasoning there.  |

Haldor Rune
State War Academy Caldari State
17
 |
Posted - 2012.05.30 21:54:00 -
[78] - Quote
NickyYo wrote:You all whine about my threads, yet you keep resurrecting them.. But with Goons new 24/7 infinite hulkageddon, expect this nerf to ganking to come very, very soon! Just gotta say. Awesome avatar, bro.
|

Fiddler Hays
East Central Industrial Corp Imperial Crimson Legion
2
 |
Posted - 2012.05.30 21:57:00 -
[79] - Quote
Quote:CCP Restricts nobody from going anywhere.
Faction Navies restrict SHIPS flown by Criminals from entering their space. As soon as you get illegally shot by a Pod, CONCORD and the Faction Navies will start shooting pods.
Anyway, anyone can shoot a criminal's pod. If you want to keep criminals pods out of your space, shoot them or hire someone to shoot them.
And yet this is not my space as in 0.0 it is NPC controlled space. In 0.0 you keep the un-welcomed out by the cohesion of your alliance. There is no such thing in hi-sec. Except CONCORD.
And I understand CCP not wanting to restrict anyone, but it would seem to me that they will need to revisit that idea. In many ways the criminal ship restriction is preventing you from fully utilizing an area already. Along with being a hole to exploit for other activities. And having CONCORD pod you does not restrict you from entering that area. It just gives you consequences for doing so. That were incurred by your actions.
|

Rath Kelbore
The Six-Pack Syndicate
214
 |
Posted - 2012.05.30 21:57:00 -
[80] - Quote
Roisin Saoirse wrote:Rath Kelbore wrote:OP has a point. Capital ships aren't suppose to be in high sec for a reason. Fix this broken mechanic of allowing the orca in high security space. If you want to mine with bonuses from a cap ship it should be confined to low and null sec. You do realise the only capitals that aren't allowed in highsec are the ones that can't use gates, right? That by restricting Orcas to low-null only they would also have to restrict freighters too? Well thought out reasoning there. 
You realise I was making a ridiculous statement in order to make a point? Sorry if you missed it. I plan on living forever.......so far, so good. |
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
7512
 |
Posted - 2012.05.30 22:02:00 -
[81] - Quote
Fiddler Hays wrote:And I understand CCP not wanting to restrict anyone, but it would seem to me that they will need to revisit that idea. Why? GG#If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GkmvGkm you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GG%
Shift-click does nothing GGv why the Unified Inventory isn't ready for primetime. |

Roisin Saoirse
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
19
 |
Posted - 2012.05.30 22:04:00 -
[82] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Roisin Saoirse wrote:Killing a criminal's pod outside of wardec will earn you a visit from CONCORD btw. No. Interesting, I stand corrected. |

Josef Djugashvilis
The Scope Gallente Federation
252
 |
Posted - 2012.05.30 22:05:00 -
[83] - Quote
NickyYo wrote:Want to kill Burn Jita and Hulkageddon?  It's simple!! Fix the Orca so it cannot jettison ships in space for -10 status pirates to jump into from their pods.. This has got me thinking, you can easily fix this exploit BUT do you want to? Do you want these events to take place and why? And it amazes me how delusional people are, thinking they are making a difference in eve.. and can ransom CCP etc.. Above line mainly aimed at the goons.. HmmhHHHMMMmmmm...
Thought you quit? You want fries with that? |

Roisin Saoirse
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
19
 |
Posted - 2012.05.30 22:07:00 -
[84] - Quote
Rath Kelbore wrote:You realise I was making a ridiculous statement in order to make a point? Sorry if you missed it. In that case, my apologies. It's been a long day. 
|

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1662
 |
Posted - 2012.05.30 22:19:00 -
[85] - Quote
Fiddler Hays wrote:Quote:CCP Restricts nobody from going anywhere.
Faction Navies restrict SHIPS flown by Criminals from entering their space. As soon as you get illegally shot by a Pod, CONCORD and the Faction Navies will start shooting pods.
Anyway, anyone can shoot a criminal's pod. If you want to keep criminals pods out of your space, shoot them or hire someone to shoot them. And yet this is not my space as in 0.0 it is NPC controlled space. In 0.0 you keep the un-welcomed out by the cohesion of your alliance. There is no such thing in hi-sec. Except CONCORD. And I understand CCP not wanting to restrict anyone, but it would seem to me that they will need to revisit that idea. In many ways the criminal ship restriction is preventing you from fully utilizing an area already. Along with being a hole to exploit for other activities. And having CONCORD pod you does not restrict you from entering that area. It just gives you consequences for doing so. That were incurred by your actions.
Cohesive alliances are a player organized thing. You're a player; go organize an alliance that keeps criminals out of a certain system.
CONCORD provides consequences for Gankers, they do not provide protection. CONCORD has never provided protection.
What restriction? Faction Navies just start shooting you (they're even kind enough to web you first). That's not a restriction, that's PvE content.
CONCORD destroys ships that commit illegal acts. When a pod kills you, then you can complain about CONCORD not podding. Single-Shard, Player Driven-aSandbox.
5 words. That's what makes it special. |

Fiddler Hays
East Central Industrial Corp Imperial Crimson Legion
3
 |
Posted - 2012.05.30 22:19:00 -
[86] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Fiddler Hays wrote:And I understand CCP not wanting to restrict anyone, but it would seem to me that they will need to revisit that idea. Why?
Because I don't believe CCPs concept of hi-sec is working. Eve Online is a harsh games. Hard to learn. CCP has said hi-sec is safer. Not safe. Safer. There will be consequences if some one breaks a hi-sec law. And yet the consequences for criminals are underwhelming.
With the current setup, this is what CCP is telling me.
1. If someone drives into your peaceful neighbor, blows up your car and shoots you in the head we will take his car and send him on his way.
2. If someone pays this person to drive into your neighborhood, blows up your car and shoots you in the head we will take his car and send him on this way.
3. If we see this person again we will watch him until his does that all over again before we take his car..again.
I think there would be a bit more outrage in the real world. Questions like: Um. Why are you letting him into our neighborhood again when you know that they are just going to put a bullet in someones head?
I don't mind the actions so much as the consequences attached to them. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1662
 |
Posted - 2012.05.30 22:27:00 -
[87] - Quote
Fiddler Hays wrote:Tippia wrote:Fiddler Hays wrote:And I understand CCP not wanting to restrict anyone, but it would seem to me that they will need to revisit that idea. Why? Because I don't believe CCPs concept of hi-sec is working. Eve Online is a harsh games. Hard to learn. CCP has said hi-sec is safer. Not safe. Safer. There will be consequences if some one breaks a hi-sec law. And yet the consequences for criminals are underwhelming. With the current setup, this is what CCP is telling me. 1. If someone drives into your peaceful neighbor, blows up your car and shoots you in the head we will take his car and send him on his way. 2. If someone pays this person to drive into your neighborhood, blows up your car and shoots you in the head we will take his car and send him on this way. 3. If we see this person again we will watch him until his does that all over again before we take his car..again. I think there would be a bit more outrage in the real world. Questions like: Um. Why are you letting him into our neighborhood again when you know that they are just going to put a bullet in someones head? I don't mind the actions so much as the consequences attached to them.
The faction police start shooting his car as soon as it shows up.
Again, CONCORD provides consequences to specific acts of illegal aggression. Always has. There is no thought Police in EvE. Single-Shard, Player Driven-aSandbox.
5 words. That's what makes it special. |

Talon SilverHawk
Patria o Muerte
259
 |
Posted - 2012.05.30 22:35:00 -
[88] - Quote
YES Free Willy ..........
Tal
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
7513
 |
Posted - 2012.05.30 22:40:00 -
[89] - Quote
Fiddler Hays wrote:And yet the consequences for criminals are underwhelming. Compared to what?
Quote:With the current setup, this is what CCP is telling me. [silly RL comparisons]
I don't mind the actions so much as the consequences attached to them. GG*and yet, they do pretty much exactly what they're intended to do. What CCP is telling you is that it's your job to ensure your own security, and they've given you the tools to do so. So why should CCP suddenly start to restrict where people can go when it's only happening because you're not doing your job? Why should other suffer because you're lazy? GG#If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GkmvGkm you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GG%
Shift-click does nothing GGv why the Unified Inventory isn't ready for primetime. |

Fiddler Hays
East Central Industrial Corp Imperial Crimson Legion
3
 |
Posted - 2012.05.30 22:45:00 -
[90] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Fiddler Hays wrote:Tippia wrote:Fiddler Hays wrote:And I understand CCP not wanting to restrict anyone, but it would seem to me that they will need to revisit that idea. Why? Because I don't believe CCPs concept of hi-sec is working. Eve Online is a harsh games. Hard to learn. CCP has said hi-sec is safer. Not safe. Safer. There will be consequences if some one breaks a hi-sec law. And yet the consequences for criminals are underwhelming. With the current setup, this is what CCP is telling me. 1. If someone drives into your peaceful neighbor, blows up your car and shoots you in the head we will take his car and send him on his way. 2. If someone pays this person to drive into your neighborhood, blows up your car and shoots you in the head we will take his car and send him on this way. 3. If we see this person again we will watch him until his does that all over again before we take his car..again. I think there would be a bit more outrage in the real world. Questions like: Um. Why are you letting him into our neighborhood again when you know that they are just going to put a bullet in someones head? I don't mind the actions so much as the consequences attached to them. The faction police start shooting his car as soon as it shows up. Again, CONCORD provides consequences to specific acts of illegal aggression. Always has. There is no thought Police in EvE.
How is it thought police when you have a security status based on your own actions? When the rap sheet on a criminal gets to a certain length you can't talk fast enough to avoid punishment. They know you. The APB is out. |
|
|
|
| |
Reply to Topic |
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |