| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Reply to Topic | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |

Apolyon I
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
31
 |
Posted - 2012.05.08 00:50:00 -
[211] - Quote
StuRyan wrote:Asmodes Reynolds wrote:StuRyan you make a good point .(Sarcastic).
Nice read GGt Let me point out a few things: When writing a post in a discussion it is good practice not to assume. Since I have been involved in high sec groups, low sec groups, worm hole groups and null sec groups I have a varied background and am perfectly capable of contributing without sounding condescending, something that you may wish to consider when contributing to a discussion. From all that writing I took the following points: Group based activity versus Reward already runs. Null sec is condemned to hundreds of people working together to achieve an infrastructure. Infrastructure is used to secure a higher ISK/Hour. Question then GGt Why do I see a lot of Test Alliance pilots in High sec running Incursions? incursion is broken??? |

Audrey Koshka
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
1
 |
Posted - 2012.05.08 01:25:00 -
[212] - Quote
xVx dreadnaught wrote:Audrey Koshka wrote:Coming at this from a different direction, what about making incursions worth more by making lp worth more? For example, +6 attribute implants to go alongside those +6% hardwirings. I like it... I really do, but not really on topic :P now you should yell at one of the nullbears/WHbears/incubears/other random trolls The +6 implants would in all serious be a nice addition to the Concord LP store, since it is kinda limited in there. Would be something else to spend my LP on.
I agree it's coming at it from a different direction, but I think it is actually on topic somewhat. One concern people had about pre-nerf incursions was how much of the rewards were a direct isk injection. One solution to that is to give more non-isk rewards like LP. The challenge with simply increasing the amount of LP awarded is you'll devalue that same LP because of increased supply. If instead the LP store has lots of really cool stuff people really want, that LP will be more valuable. Imagine if they added civilian issue Concord ships (i.e. look like concord ships but reasonable t1 hull stats) to the LP store. |

Asmodes Reynolds
Rayn Enterprises
19
 |
Posted - 2012.05.08 01:33:00 -
[213] - Quote
StuRyan wrote:
Nice read GGt Let me point out a few things:
When writing a post in a discussion it is good practice not to assume.
Since I have been involved in high sec groups, low sec groups, worm hole groups and null sec groups I have a varied background and am perfectly capable of contributing without sounding condescending, something that you may wish to consider when contributing to a discussion.
From all that writing I took the following points: Group based activity versus Reward already runs. Null sec is condemned to hundreds of people working together to achieve an infrastructure. Infrastructure is used to secure a higher ISK/Hour.
Question then GGt Why do I see a lot of Test Alliance pilots in High sec running Incursions?
as much as I would like to get off my high horse right now because I was wrong about you being a high sec skirt dweller. so I apologize for that. and you have a respectable KillBoard. You've proven the point of all null sec players beyond a shadow of a doubt why were upset about incursions.
StuRyan wrote: Why do I see a lot of Test Alliance pilots in High sec running Incursions? and the answer ... drumroll please .....
Is It is Safer, Around amount of money per hour and logistically easier. Then most activities that can be done in our space bonus: pre-patch: It was more money than you could make in anomalies. but not as much as the low sec incursions.
To keep up their same isk per hour, you need either a pimp fit ratting Ship or fighters assigned, sometimes both depending on your skills, which is constantly under threat of being blown up by other players.
In high sec, They just have to chill and shoot at the right target. As far as before the patch I have no idea
(bonus: in case you didn't figure this out by by the time you read this. I purposely wrote it so that I get a response similar to yours from someone in the in this thread. You fell for my trap fair and square, the only reason why you even have a leg to stand on is because I was wrong about you being a high sec sec dweller. )
now take a few minutes to look at your other viewpoints.
Group based activity versus Reward already runs. Yes it does ( You don't like the way CCP's system to promote the way players interact works) What would be the incentive of putting together all the effort required to take space in 0.0 if you could make more money in high sec? And fights in low sec. All the masses fights in EVE are driven by territory and politics, and these are driven by player ego and wealth.
Null sec is condemned to hundreds of people working together to achieve an infrastructure. (condemn this is such a strong word, but basically you're correct in order to get at Intel network that is reliable an accurate)
Infrastructure is used to secure a higher ISK/Hour. (yes, that is a secondary function. The primary function is to cute secure our space. Give a superior mobility, intelligence, and an region control . Over anybody who might want to take it.)
|

Asmodes Reynolds
Rayn Enterprises
20
 |
Posted - 2012.05.08 01:57:00 -
[214] - Quote
xxanjoahir wrote:
Pubbie Test got served....
Test pilots run incursions because null space doesn't give the same pay out--- hmmmm perhaps thats an issue with null sec...since everything about eve is null sec.... Null pilots really do think that they are doing eve a favour from playing the game thatt way??? 6% of eve plays in null sec ladies = thats the issue. Besides null sec isn't about moons is it? All that passive isk?
I don't even know how to respond to this one,, null sec isn't everything. However, CCP are the designers and owners of this videogame, decided that it would be run on the risk versus reward model. Null-sec being a theoretical riskiest place, means by CCP's own design everything should be more profitable in null sec. Otherwise it's broken. CCP has said this on numerous occasions.
As far as the moon goo is concerned that pays for our inter-structure, our and our alliance run programs. |

xxanjoahir
Hedion University Amarr Empire
15
 |
Posted - 2012.05.08 02:21:00 -
[215] - Quote
Asmodes Reynolds wrote:xxanjoahir wrote:
Pubbie Test got served....
Test pilots run incursions because null space doesn't give the same pay out--- hmmmm perhaps thats an issue with null sec...since everything about eve is null sec.... Null pilots really do think that they are doing eve a favour from playing the game thatt way??? 6% of eve plays in null sec ladies = thats the issue. Besides null sec isn't about moons is it? All that passive isk?
I don't even know how to respond to this one,, null sec isn't everything. However, CCP are the designers and owners of this videogame, decided that it would be run on the risk versus reward model. Null-sec being a theoretical riskiest place, means by CCP's own design everything should be more profitable in null sec. Otherwise it's broken. CCP has said this on numerous occasions. As far as the moon goo is concerned that pays for our inter-structure, our and our alliance run programs.
It amazes me that still you play this card..... believe that if you want to. What do you do with moons that do not have any raw material to mine?
I just want to point out:
Quote:CCP's own design everything should be more profitable in null sec
It is is you stop being lazy about it. and yet you will still get the elitest null sec pilots running incursion in high sec.... again thats an issue with null sec. |

Asmodes Reynolds
Rayn Enterprises
20
 |
Posted - 2012.05.08 02:44:00 -
[216] - Quote
xxanjoahir wrote:Asmodes Reynolds wrote:xxanjoahir wrote:
Pubbie Test got served....
Test pilots run incursions because null space doesn't give the same pay out--- hmmmm perhaps thats an issue with null sec...since everything about eve is null sec.... Null pilots really do think that they are doing eve a favour from playing the game thatt way??? 6% of eve plays in null sec ladies = thats the issue. Besides null sec isn't about moons is it? All that passive isk?
I don't even know how to respond to this one,, null sec isn't everything. However, CCP are the designers and owners of this videogame, decided that it would be run on the risk versus reward model. Null-sec being a theoretical riskiest place, means by CCP's own design everything should be more profitable in null sec. Otherwise it's broken. CCP has said this on numerous occasions. As far as the moon goo is concerned that pays for our inter-structure, our and our alliance run programs. It amazes me that still you play this card..... believe that if you want to. What do you do with moons that do not have any raw material to mine? I just want to point out: Quote:CCP's own design everything should be more profitable in null sec It is is you stop being lazy about it. and yet you will still get the elitest null sec pilots running incursion in high sec.... again thats an issue with null sec.
I fail to see the point you're trying to make with this post? please clarify? it just seems to make my point even clearer?
|

Andochas
TechnoCore
2
 |
Posted - 2012.05.08 03:18:00 -
[217] - Quote
I'll be your Post Necro for this evening. (insert evil maniacal laugh here) Back on #141,
Simi Kusoni wrote: The "high sec" crap is the reason they got nerfed, and very few run them in low sec because for the extra hassle it simply is not worth it. Because high sec incursions pay out too much relative to them.
You cannot simply dismiss the risk reward elements behind the incursion nerfs because it does not support your argument for the nerfs to be reversed.
"for the extra hassle it simply is not worth it." Exactly; you said it yourself. There are parts of the risk reward equation that you're deliberately hiding. Simi, you can't dismiss the risk-reward of high sec Incursions because the risk-reward is present and justifiable.
Incursions have the risk of PvE ship loss GGt Sansha web, neut, jam, and focus fire. Ship loss is possible unless minimized by trusted pilots in your fleet. Incursions have the risk of depending on other players - disconnects, griefing, and misplaced trust are constant risks. Incursions have the risk of PvP, even if it's not the straight on PvP of null. Bricksquad claimed a lot of ships until the Incursion community bonded together like a null sec alliance. Incursions have the risk of high sec shipping GGt too many shinies, and someone will suicide gank you.
And finally, you're overvaluing the reward side. The time spent moving to the next Incursion constellation, the time spent waiting for fleet formation, and the time lost waiting on other players are never included in the "omg! 160M ISK/hr!" figure that people throw around. Some players can minimize those figures by running their own fleets for 12+ hrs/day, but that's not the vast majority of Incursion pilots. More on this in the next reply. |

Andochas
TechnoCore
2
 |
Posted - 2012.05.08 03:20:00 -
[218] - Quote
Back on #148,
Simi Kusoni wrote: Yes but the game shouldn't be balanced around the newbies, it needs to be balanced around the rich players abusing the system and refusing to leave the protected confines of high sec.
High sec is not intended as the end game, high profit risk free isk faucets are damaging to Eve as a whole. They funnel ISK into the economy, they fail to increase the velocity of money, they fail to create sufficient demand for new ships and quite simply are the primary cause of mudflation.
If Eve had a voluntarily terrible economy, and wasn't driven by war and competition, incursions could have continued the way they were going. Unfortunately the reality is that the way they were going ended in hyper-inflation, stagnation, mudflation and the complete heat death of the Eve universe.
Bull ****! Not a single thing in EVE is balanced around rich players abusing the system! It's a sandbox. The rich constantly abuse the system, and it only gets worse as the sec status gets lower. There will always be certain players that abuse the system and profit from it far more than the other 99%.
"They funnel ISK into the economy" GGt True, but far less than other game elements. "they fail to increase the velocity of money" GGt False, Incursion pilots funnel billions of ISK back into the system. "they fail to create sufficient demand for new ships" GGt False, False, False, as incursion pilots have an average of three dedicated incursion ships, and the richest incursion pilots buy the most expensive ships you can fly in high sec. "quite simply are the primary cause of mudflation" GGt False, as I have kicked out two of the three legs of your argument. |

Xorv
Questionable Acquisitions
306
 |
Posted - 2012.05.08 04:17:00 -
[219] - Quote
Andochas wrote:Back on #148, Simi Kusoni wrote: Yes but the game shouldn't be balanced around the newbies, it needs to be balanced around the rich players abusing the system and refusing to leave the protected confines of high sec.
High sec is not intended as the end game, high profit risk free isk faucets are damaging to Eve as a whole. They funnel ISK into the economy, they fail to increase the velocity of money, they fail to create sufficient demand for new ships and quite simply are the primary cause of mudflation.
If Eve had a voluntarily terrible economy, and wasn't driven by war and competition, incursions could have continued the way they were going. Unfortunately the reality is that the way they were going ended in hyper-inflation, stagnation, mudflation and the complete heat death of the Eve universe.
[load of BS].. I have kicked out two of the three legs of your argument.
You don't even understand the argument. No one other than your fellow PvE Raiding Incursion farmers buys into your BS, so don't even bother.
Here's a great blog post by Tippia on the ISK generated by Incursions http://blog.beyondreality.se/Incursion-hose
|

Apolyon I
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
31
 |
Posted - 2012.05.08 04:34:00 -
[220] - Quote
Andochas wrote:I'll be your Post Necro for this evening. (insert evil maniacal laugh here) Back on #141,
none of those are risk.
I ran VG, I know there's no where in the universe you can die even if the logis got jammed.
noone will suicide gank you if you don't stupidly fit 5b mods on your ship.
EDIT: why do I still bother explain it to these selfish scrubs |
|

xVx dreadnaught
The Dude's Interstellar Enterprizes Quixotic Hegemony
47
 |
Posted - 2012.05.08 07:16:00 -
[221] - Quote
Apolyon I wrote:Andochas wrote:I'll be your Post Necro for this evening. (insert evil maniacal laugh here) Back on #141, none of those are risk. I ran VG, I know there's no where in the universe you can die even if the logis got jammed. noone will suicide gank you if you don't stupidly fit 5b mods on your ship. EDIT: why do I still bother explain it to these selfish scrubs 2nd EDIT: isnt plex going down???
You Sir are a troll... The majority of shiny modules in Incursion runners are Tank mods. They need to be tanked because we take a lot of damage
Ships have been known to go down if the Niarja spawn isn't taken care of quick enough. If a cap chain is broken and there is too much incoming DPS you lose ships.
You have done a couple sites (with a full blue bar I'd guess and assume everything always goes swimmingly) Hell I've seen Logi's get melted in the early stages of NMC's from the 4 Romi's (pre patch) some that didn't have a strong enough tank just couldn't be kept up by the other logi's
Have you logi'd incursions? Have you ran anything above VG's? Or are you just one of the many people that are commenting on something you know almost nothing about?
P.S. Note to the smart ass that hired a merc corp... I have other characters I can run incursions on... Don't think that a war dec will stop me. |

Andochas
TechnoCore
2
 |
Posted - 2012.05.08 07:17:00 -
[222] - Quote
Xorv wrote:Andochas wrote:Back on #148, Simi Kusoni wrote: Yes but the game shouldn't be balanced around the newbies, it needs to be balanced around the rich players abusing the system and refusing to leave the protected confines of high sec.
High sec is not intended as the end game, high profit risk free isk faucets are damaging to Eve as a whole. They funnel ISK into the economy, they fail to increase the velocity of money, they fail to create sufficient demand for new ships and quite simply are the primary cause of mudflation.
If Eve had a voluntarily terrible economy, and wasn't driven by war and competition, incursions could have continued the way they were going. Unfortunately the reality is that the way they were going ended in hyper-inflation, stagnation, mudflation and the complete heat death of the Eve universe.
[load of BS].. I have kicked out two of the three legs of your argument. You don't even understand the argument. No one other than your fellow PvE Raiding Incursion farmers buys into your BS, so don't even bother. Here's a great blog post by Tippia on the ISK generated by Incursions http://blog.beyondreality.se/Incursion-hose Yes, I've read Tippia's post quite a few times. Like Simi, Tippia is hiding facts that don't support her argument.
Mining is a faucet. In exchange for time, an item is created that has value. The ore created did not exist before it was mined. MOVING the ore or refined mineral is a pump. Planetary Interaction is a faucet. Researching Datacores is a faucet. Salvage is a faucet, as well as Module Drops. Drone Alloys were a faucet that have now been plugged. Both Module Drops and Drone Alloys were correctly identified as faucets by CCP, and cut off in Escalation.
Industrial waste is a sink. Refining waste, reprocessing tax, manufacturing waste (blueprint efficiency), manufacturing costs - all are sinks. Ammunition and charges (even mining crystals) are sinks.
Miners love Escalation because the ore faucet is once again the primary source of minerals. To give a little credit to Tippia, CCP didn't release stats for the above faucets and sinks. They may or may not be tracked. Rinn gets it, but he dances around the subject. "Use faction and T2 missiles, and count your salvos GGv i.e.: stop firing when there are enough missiles in flight to kill the target" - Rinn identifies ammo as a sink. I'm sure Tippia gets it too; she'd just rather not tell.
Simi's argument "fail to increase the velocity of money" refers to the richest Incursion pilots hoarding earnings. I agree, that was a problem that was fixed with the Escalation change of killing OTA blitzing. I support this change to the rate of site completion, but I'm arguing two counterpoints. 1, Incursions don't deserve to die for the actions of a small segment of players, and 2, reversing the payout nerf should be enough to bring participation in Incursions back to a reasonable level.
I understand the argument. That's why you didn't bother to refute my points.
|

xVx dreadnaught
The Dude's Interstellar Enterprizes Quixotic Hegemony
47
 |
Posted - 2012.05.08 07:43:00 -
[223] - Quote
Well I've not hoarded my earnings... I've spent nearly all of it. On nice shiny ships and modules.
Who do you think will keep buying the A-type EANM's and faction damage modules? |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
961
 |
Posted - 2012.05.08 08:05:00 -
[224] - Quote
Andochas wrote:Bull ****! Not a single thing in EVE is balanced around rich players abusing the system! It's a sandbox. The rich constantly abuse the system, and it only gets worse as the sec status gets lower. There will always be certain players that abuse the system and profit from it far more than the other 99%. Spending a few billion on a pirate faction battleship does not make you a rich player, nor does it make you some elevated "1%". Due to the fact that incursion wealth is simply accumulated over time the number of players flying those ships steadily increases.
Andochas wrote:"They funnel ISK into the economy" GGt True, but far less than other game elements. "they fail to increase the velocity of money" GGt False, Incursion pilots funnel billions of ISK back into the system. How? Incursion pilots occasionally buy new ships, but they do not lose enough for it to really be of any consequence. As for comparing it to "other game elements", it's a bit less than wormholes and around a third of bounties.
However the income from bounties spans the entire of null sec, low sec and high sec missions, belt rats, exploration rats and anomalies. Not to mention the fact that the amount of ISK sunk into Sov upgrades, alliance taxes and recirculated through the economy via ship destruction in null sec alone dwarves anything from incursions.
Andochas wrote:"they fail to create sufficient demand for new ships" GGt False, False, False, as incursion pilots have an average of three dedicated incursion ships, and the richest incursion pilots buy the most expensive ships you can fly in high sec. "quite simply are the primary cause of mudflation" GGt False, as I have kicked out two of the three legs of your argument. No, you've failed to understand my arguments.
I mean, seriously, "incursion pilots have an average of three dedicated incursion ships"? Where did you grab that number from? And do you even understand what demand means in this sense? A null sec player who loses three ships a month is one who probably doesn't log on very often, an incursion player who loses three ships a month is an absolute idiot.
Andochas wrote:"for the extra hassle it simply is not worth it." Exactly; you said it yourself. There are parts of the risk reward equation that you're deliberately hiding. Simi, you can't dismiss the risk-reward of high sec Incursions because the risk-reward is present and justifiable. Then why do ship destruction statistics for high sec incursion systems not differ from the surrounding systems?
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-a-a-MXZF |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
961
 |
Posted - 2012.05.08 08:08:00 -
[225] - Quote
Andochas wrote:Incursions have the risk of PvE ship loss GGt Sansha web, neut, jam, and focus fire. Ship loss is possible unless minimized by trusted pilots in your fleet. Incursions have the risk of depending on other players - disconnects, griefing, and misplaced trust are constant risks. Incursions have the risk of PvP, even if it's not the straight on PvP of null. Bricksquad claimed a lot of ships until the Incursion community bonded together like a null sec alliance. Incursions have the risk of high sec shipping GGt too many shinies, and someone will suicide gank you. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
Andochas wrote:And finally, you're overvaluing the reward side. The time spent moving to the next Incursion constellation, the time spent waiting for fleet formation, and the time lost waiting on other players are never included in the "omg! 160M ISK/hr!" figure that people throw around. Some players can minimize those figures by running their own fleets for 12+ hrs/day, but that's not the vast majority of Incursion pilots. More on this in the next reply. Oh no, it must be horrible having to go 20-30 jumps through high sec to reach your next incursion. I mean, having to face the logistical challenges of getting loot into/out of wormholes/null sec is trivial in comparison.
And CTAs? Pfft, 5 minute jobs really.
xVx dreadnaught wrote:Well I've not hoarded my earnings... I've spent nearly all of it. On nice shiny ships and modules.
Who do you think will keep buying the A-type EANM's and faction damage modules?
According to Eve central they are still down at 1 bill each, a 200 million drop from when I got mine... I suppose I could hold onto mine till the next boom and sell them when they go up again. Good for you. Lose a couple of those ships/modules and maybe it will mean something.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-a-a-MXZF |

xVx dreadnaught
The Dude's Interstellar Enterprizes Quixotic Hegemony
47
 |
Posted - 2012.05.08 09:36:00 -
[226] - Quote
Simi Kusoni wrote:xVx dreadnaught wrote:Well I've not hoarded my earnings... I've spent nearly all of it. On nice shiny ships and modules.
Who do you think will keep buying the A-type EANM's and faction damage modules?
According to Eve central they are still down at 1 bill each, a 200 million drop from when I got mine... I suppose I could hold onto mine till the next boom and sell them when they go up again. Good for you. Lose a couple of those ships/modules and maybe it will mean something.
Oh dude I have... I lost a full HG slave clone with all 6% implants. Also a paladin, a legion and 2 Bhaalgorns.
All bought and paid for with Incursions
Which is a lot, but then think about the Cartel in null sec, that have dictated to everyone how much they will sell their Moon harvest materials... or "We'll take your moon from you" I'm sorry but Cartels fixing the Tech moon prices I think is a much more abusive form of market manipulation than someone joining incursions.
Also I was waiting for someone to make a 99% vs 1% argument here... and oh my god the Incursion community is not the 1% The difference being is that "1%" is more of an exclusive thing. Like the trillions in isk that Null sec alliances bring in from Moon products and DED plex's... To which no one other than a select few may participate in without feeling the Wrath of the 1%
The Incursion communities are in the most part open and public and free for anyone to participate in. We have 2 main channels, one for Shield and another for Armor This is only for tanking preferences because it made sense to have the 2 channels to operate independently and even competing against each other for the rights and glory of the mom kills. I see, if anything Incursion runners are the middle class of eve, able to fund their PVP habits and invest in BPO's and other production ventures with the isk earned in incursions. But they are a far cry from those elite leaders of Alliances of null sec in New Eden.
But isn't Hulkageddon a wonderful thing... This drive to use T1 ships to suicide gank a bunch of expensive mining ships. I thought it very interesting that Covetors and Retrievers were removed from the list of ships rewarded for it. Then I realised that not much Technetium is used to produce these. And that the Goons fund Hulkageddon now because for every Hulk destroyed they sell more Technetium and profit even better. The thing is, once a Hulk is bought how often does it need re-bought? It isn't not unless you have a drive every year to remove as many from hi-sec as you can. So that all those hulks dying need replaced. Filling the Null-sec pockets even more... This is a perfect example of the 1% (moon owners in null sec) literally taking money from the 99% (hi-sec miners) |

Herr Ronin
Malum Crusis
50
 |
Posted - 2012.05.08 09:47:00 -
[227] - Quote
xVx dreadnaught wrote:Apolyon I wrote:Andochas wrote:I'll be your Post Necro for this evening. (insert evil maniacal laugh here) Back on #141, none of those are risk. I ran VG, I know there's no where in the universe you can die even if the logis got jammed. noone will suicide gank you if you don't stupidly fit 5b mods on your ship. EDIT: why do I still bother explain it to these selfish scrubs 2nd EDIT: isnt plex going down??? You Sir are a troll... The majority of shiny modules in Incursion runners are Tank mods. They need to be tanked because we take a lot of damage Ships have been known to go down if the Niarja spawn isn't taken care of quick enough. If a cap chain is broken and there is too much incoming DPS you lose ships. You have done a couple sites (with a full blue bar I'd guess and assume everything always goes swimmingly) Hell I've seen Logi's get melted in the early stages of NMC's from the 4 Romi's (pre patch) some that didn't have a strong enough tank just couldn't be kept up by the other logi's Have you logi'd incursions? Have you ran anything above VG's? Or are you just one of the many people that are commenting on something you know almost nothing about? P.S. Note to the smart ass that hired a merc corp... I have other characters I can run incursions on... Don't think that a war dec will stop me.
Well considering ISN use's 1 Pith C Type Inv for Vanguards, If we do assaults, Just add a LSE, But are we know getting war threats in this thread now?
QQ Management Of ISN - Incursion Shiny Network
|

Herr Ronin
Malum Crusis
50
 |
Posted - 2012.05.08 09:49:00 -
[228] - Quote
Apolyon I wrote:Andochas wrote:I'll be your Post Necro for this evening. (insert evil maniacal laugh here) Back on #141, none of those are risk. I ran VG, I know there's no where in the universe you can die even if the logis got jammed. noone will suicide gank you if you don't stupidly fit 5b mods on your ship. EDIT: why do I still bother explain it to these selfish scrubs 2nd EDIT: isnt plex going down???
Well i flew a 2 Bill Vindi, I had two Gank attempt's, Which failed, Maybe they just don't like my Troll's, But doesn't that mean i win..
Do i get a prize? Management Of ISN - Incursion Shiny Network
|

xVx dreadnaught
The Dude's Interstellar Enterprizes Quixotic Hegemony
47
 |
Posted - 2012.05.08 09:53:00 -
[229] - Quote
Herr Ronin wrote:
Well considering ISN use's 1 Pith C Type Inv for Vanguards, If we do assaults, Just add a LSE, But are we know getting war threats in this thread now?
QQ
Not a Threat... someone actually hired mercs against us. when contacted they told us "I pissed someone off" But it's ok, the mercs have about 13 current war decs, our only casualty so far was one of our guys got drunk and decided to attack them... Firing on a stargate instead and getting Concordukkoned |

Herr Ronin
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
50
 |
Posted - 2012.05.08 09:58:00 -
[230] - Quote
xVx dreadnaught wrote:Herr Ronin wrote:
Well considering ISN use's 1 Pith C Type Inv for Vanguards, If we do assaults, Just add a LSE, But are we know getting war threats in this thread now?
QQ
Not a Threat... someone actually hired mercs against us. when contacted they told us "I pissed someone off" But it's ok, the mercs have about 13 current war decs, our only casualty so far was one of our guys got drunk and decided to attack them... Firing on a stargate instead and getting Concordukkoned
Haha, Classic!
Dude the amount of people who are mad at Incursion FC's is hilarious, I mean check our threads for this, ISN Spy guy, He is just comical, What did your guy lose when he shot the gate, Only a BC i hope.
Management Of ISN - Incursion Shiny Network
|
|

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
961
 |
Posted - 2012.05.08 10:08:00 -
[231] - Quote
xVx dreadnaught wrote:Oh dude I have... I lost a full HG slave clone with all 6% implants. Also a paladin, a legion and 2 Bhaalgorns.
All bought and paid for with Incursions And yet I do not see any of those losses on your kill board. Perhaps you would like to screen cap them? I find it especially odd your HG slave clone does not show up, given that you are API verified, or have Sansha begun podding pilots now?
xVx dreadnaught wrote:Which is a lot, but then think about the Cartel in null sec, that have dictated to everyone how much they will sell their Moon harvest materials... or "We'll take your moon from you" I'm sorry but Cartels fixing the Tech moon prices I think is a much more abusive form of market manipulation than someone joining incursions. Incursions aren't a form of market manipulation, and the very fact that you think market manipulation is an issue shows you may have misunderstood the concept of a sand box style MMO.
Tech moons are an issue because they funnel money to the leaders of alliances rather than the members, and are controlled too easily by a small force with easy power projection. But that is a separate issue and not exactly relevant. What is relevant is that tech moons are fought over, they result in a large number of ship losses and they force people to genuinely band together to control them.
That said, tech moons aren't perfect and it does look like they are on their way out. But, as I said, they're not exactly related.
xVx dreadnaught wrote:Also I was waiting for someone to make a 99% vs 1% argument here... and oh my god the Incursion community is not the 1% The difference being is that "1%" is more of an exclusive thing. Like the trillions in isk that Null sec alliances bring in from Moon products and DED plex's... To which no one other than a select few may participate in without feeling the Wrath of the 1% I run a 5 man corporation consisting of me and my alts, yet I run DED complexes regularly. Go figure.
xVx dreadnaught wrote:The Incursion communities are in the most part open and public and free for anyone to participate in. We have 2 main channels, one for Shield and another for Armor This is only for tanking preferences because it made sense to have the 2 channels to operate independently and even competing against each other for the rights and glory of the mom kills. I see, if anything Incursion runners are the middle class of eve, able to fund their PVP habits and invest in BPO's and other production ventures with the isk earned in incursions. But they are a far cry from those elite leaders of Alliances of null sec in New Eden. There are certain other games that segregate gameplay into PvE raids and PvP content, where the PvE content is a grind used to fund PvP gear: they are called themepark MMOs. They rise and fall all the time, usually due to the issues I've been talking about (market saturation, lack of player-driven content, mudflation, hyper-inflation etc.)
xVx dreadnaught wrote:But isn't Hulkageddon a wonderful thing... This drive to use T1 ships to suicide gank a bunch of expensive mining ships. I thought it very interesting that Covetors and Retrievers were removed from the list of ships rewarded for it. Then I realised that not much Technetium is used to produce these. And that the Goons fund Hulkageddon now because for every Hulk destroyed they sell more Technetium and profit even better. The thing is, once a Hulk is bought how often does it need re-bought? It isn't not unless you have a drive every year to remove as many from hi-sec as you can. So that all those hulks dying need replaced. Filling the Null-sec pockets even more... This is a perfect example of the 1% (moon owners in null sec) literally taking money from the 99% (hi-sec miners) Wow that is a lot of tinfoil. But let's just say you're correct: so what?
Some hulk pilots refuse to leave high sec, and refuse to pay attention to the game whilst playing. They saturate the market with cheap minerals, making life even less profitable for the genuine new players who actually belong in high sec. So the goons organise a periodic player driven event to manipulate market prices and generally have a bit of fun, how is this bad?
And more importantly, how does it have anything to do with incursion farming?
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-a-a-MXZF |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
185
 |
Posted - 2012.05.08 10:27:00 -
[232] - Quote
This rant does not even touch that worm hole blue loot IS GREATER THEN INCURSION LOOT WAS AS AN ISK INJECTOR and skirts the real culpable causes of inflation. If the real ISK hoses have to be capped instead of killing whole communities of people working together WH's & bounties should have seen the 10% nerf before Incursions did
Hell even CCP Sound wave has mentioned more then once Incursion ISK well: CCP Soundwave "Incursions are not a big issue in terms of isk globally" |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
185
 |
Posted - 2012.05.08 10:39:00 -
[233] - Quote
Simi Kusoni wrote:
I run a 5 man corporation consisting of me and my alts, yet I run DED complexes regularly. Go figure.
[?
No wonder you are so BUTTHURT about incursions. As a solo hermit you've lost out in the MMO communities and when CCP started rewarding non hermit Incursions runners because they work together you & your 5 alts dual to hex boxing lost ground economically. So people working together & whom don't live under a rock shouldn't make as much ISK as you do even though add to the sandbox unlike your solitary ways. This explains many of your posts TBH
CCP Soundwave "Incursions are not a big issue in terms of isk globally" |

Dinger
Task Force Delta-14
4
 |
Posted - 2012.05.08 10:44:00 -
[234] - Quote
Simi Kusoni wrote:having to face the logistical challenges of getting loot into/out of wormholes/null sec is trivial in comparison.
Actually it is.
Due to the spawning mechanics which encourage farming and therefore lead to low turnover of incurions the fulltime incursion runners don't get the option of cherry picking those close to themselves, if that's their thing they have to follow from one incursion to the next moving their entire incursion dedicated assets every single time.
Wormholers get to pick and choose when they do their loot/supply runs, normally when their highsec exit pops up near to a market hub, at that point it's mearly a case of scouting to make sure the hole isn't bubbled/camped and jumping the few jumps between the hole and the market and back again.
Nullseccers have it even easier in that they have a permenant shortcut thanks to jump drives/bridges, if they actually had to organise moving their loot/moongoo from null to empire via convoys of non-jump capable ships that would be more than balanced, however we all know that it simply gets lobbed into a carrier/mom/JF for near risk free rapid transport, even the backup option of standard freighters using static/titan jump bridges is trivial given the values that can be moved at such little risk.
Take one example which I'm quite familiar with, from Z-M5A1 in Period Basis to Jita is 63 jumps conventionally (28null, 12low 23high including 2 in an island) In a 5/4/4 jump freighter from Z-M to Pakkonen is 7 jumps, plus another 4 to get to Jita, a total of 11 jumps, the return trip can be done with the same 7 jumps directly from the Jita 4-4 undock, nothing trivial about that at all. |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
961
 |
Posted - 2012.05.08 10:52:00 -
[235] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:No wonder you are so BUTTHURT about incursions. As a solo hermit you've lost out in the MMO communities and when CCP started rewarding non hermit Incursions runners because they work together you & your 5 alts dual to hex boxing lost ground economically. A) Hex is six. And I don't "hex box", usually the maximum number of clients I run at a time is three.
B) I don't PvE for ISK. I do it for fun. I long ago went past the point where I don't really need any more ISK.
C) I'm running solo at the moment because I dropped from my main alliance due to work and a new gf meaning I'm not online as much, previously I helped build a 350 man low sec alliance and I had just rejoined the same group to rebuild in Syndicate. They're up to 200 and something members again now and doing pretty well, and I'll join them again when I've got more time to spend in game (read: when I screw up and get fired/dumped).
DarthNefarius wrote:So people working together & whom don't live under a rock shouldn't make as much ISK as you do even though add to the sandbox unlike your solitary ways. This explains many of your posts TBH My solitary ways do add to the sandbox, hell the two T3s I run wormholes in cost more than most incursion fleets. And I regularly add to the sandbox by going out of my way to pester, harass and otherwise screw with other players and the market.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-a-a-MXZF |

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
961
 |
Posted - 2012.05.08 10:54:00 -
[236] - Quote
Dinger wrote:Simi Kusoni wrote:having to face the logistical challenges of getting loot into/out of wormholes/null sec is trivial in comparison.
Actually it is. Due to the spawning mechanics which encourage farming and therefore lead to low turnover of incurions the fulltime incursion runners don't get the option of cherry picking those close to themselves, if that's their thing they have to follow from one incursion to the next moving their entire incursion dedicated assets every single time. I've been a full time incursion runner, please do not try and pretend moving a couple of ships a few jumps to another part of Amarr is a big deal.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"-a-a-MXZF |

Ana'Gia
Pink Bunny Club
1
 |
Posted - 2012.05.08 11:08:00 -
[237] - Quote
Vanguards: VG Payout is fine. I ran a pure Legion fleet a couple of days ago and we were doing (NCOs) in 7 mins, NMC in 9 mins. The problem is really the OTA Wall. So my sugestion is that you move Hacking Tower abit closer so that a Logi or Cruiser with an Afterburner can go for it and hack it. Dont touch the Mara if people fit 3-4 tracking Comps instead of an Afterburner they are just dump. Assaults: - NCNs really take too long, perhaps removing a pocket wil fix it
Overall payout is too low because its really a pain the arse to form a fleet and keep that fleet going.
HQs: Havnt dont alot, because alot of pilots(armor) have dissapeared in Incursions. Structure shooting for 10 mins(tztztztztztz) i feel like being in 0.0
Incursion bar: Really nice that you changed the bar from a Downtime to Downtime bar to a Incursion start Incursion End bar.
Overall: That Incursion Iteration was abit hard. |

Xemnus
Mechanical Eagles Inc. The Ancients.
8
 |
Posted - 2012.05.08 12:42:00 -
[238] - Quote
Would be nice to allow Command Ships in NCN Cruiser Pocket since Battlecruisers can go there now. |

Apolyon I
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
31
 |
Posted - 2012.05.08 12:49:00 -
[239] - Quote
xVx dreadnaught wrote: Have you logi'd incursions? Have you ran anything above VG's? Or are you just one of the many people that are commenting on something you know almost nothing about?
P.S. Note to the smart ass that hired a merc corp... I have other characters I can run incursions on... Don't think that a war dec will stop me.
I only fly logistics, sir, easiest ships to fly in incursion tbh.
my FC is ladytomahawk or something, cant really remember |

Herr Ronin
ISN - Management ISN - Incursion Shiny Network
50
 |
Posted - 2012.05.08 13:01:00 -
[240] - Quote
Apolyon I wrote:xVx dreadnaught wrote: Have you logi'd incursions? Have you ran anything above VG's? Or are you just one of the many people that are commenting on something you know almost nothing about?
P.S. Note to the smart ass that hired a merc corp... I have other characters I can run incursions on... Don't think that a war dec will stop me.
I only fly logistics, sir, easiest ships to fly in incursion tbh. my FC is ladytomahawk or something, cant really remember
Your FC is well, He flys a CNR, Enough said really.
Management Of ISN - Incursion Shiny Network
|
|
|
|
| |
Reply to Topic |
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |