Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
mazzilliu
Caldari Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2009.04.22 15:28:00 -
[91]
Edited by: mazzilliu on 22/04/2009 15:35:55
Originally by: Adrienne Hart
Quote: -getting shot at/scrambled should cancel self destruct.
Would this not mean you could be scrambled for hours if the attacking party does not kill your ship ? This would be an extremely bad change from a game perspective as this would create a situation where the game you pay for becomes impossible to play without a means of escape.
logging out works
Originally by: Jack Gilligan One Dev proposal was to remove sovereignty from POS's, what are your ideas?
it would be hard to keep track of who lives where and it would make useless the sov2,3,4 mechanics ccp already put a ton of work into. pos warfare would end up centering only around dyspro towers and the like and i dont know how station ownership would be handled
Originally by: Jack Gilligan
2. I think that it's time to increase the amount of claimable 0.0 space, well past time to do so, since the game population has increased so drastically in the last couple years. I also think that there needs to be a serious look at existing 0.0 space, and the fact that certain regions through also have NPC stations and agents in them which have broken truesec levels and thus are much, MUCH richer than others. I'd like to see truesec fixed in regions like Delve so that it functions like other regions and the addition of NPC stations and agents to other existing regions, what do you think of that and what are your ideas?
i like NPC 0.0 regions. it gives small corps with no friends an opportunity to live in 0.0 without obligations and makes it harder for large alliances to completely own such rich space, when enemies can just base out of NPC stations.
some regions ought to be better then others, so people who already have 0.0 space have something more to go for. and the richness of NPC regions is always offset by the fact that its a lot more active with enemies. vast tracts of owned 0.0 sov space might not be as rich but people wont bother you so much.
Originally by: Havlentia Castigatrix
Originally by: mazzilliu Edited by: mazzilliu on 11/04/2009 18:33:48 Hi, I'm running for CSM.
Got my vote, mainly from Vista's and Ankh's 'do more than we had to' butt-hurt.
i see my "likes to watch people get provoked into internet anger" base is well pandered to
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1045803 VOTE FOR ME FOR CSM |
13 HAMMERFIST
|
Posted - 2009.04.22 23:38:00 -
[92]
you got my vote mazz!!
|
vammathar
Vamms Trading Corp
|
Posted - 2009.04.23 06:00:00 -
[93]
My Mazz has my vote and then some
vamm
****Refining your loot since 2004****
|
Jaina Proudmoar
Caldari School of Applied Knowledge
|
Posted - 2009.04.23 12:21:00 -
[94]
@ mazzilliu
What is your position on High-sec POS sieging?
|
mazzilliu
Caldari Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2009.04.23 15:51:00 -
[95]
Originally by: Jaina Proudmoar @ mazzilliu
What is your position on High-sec POS sieging?
420 siege high sec poses errrryy day
(seriously though i don't know what you are asking me here. if someone gets wardecced, all their stuff in highsec is fair game to the attacker.)
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1045803 VOTE FOR ME FOR CSM |
Jaina Proudmoar
Caldari School of Applied Knowledge
|
Posted - 2009.04.23 18:05:00 -
[96]
Originally by: mazzilliu
Originally by: Jaina Proudmoar @ mazzilliu
What is your position on High-sec POS sieging?
420 siege high sec poses errrryy day
(seriously though i don't know what you are asking me here. if someone gets wardecced, all their stuff in highsec is fair game to the attacker.)
Highsec POS sieges are long, insanely boring and very repetitive and tedious. Do you think a rethink of how POS sieges work is necessary?
|
mazzilliu
Caldari Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2009.04.23 22:54:00 -
[97]
Originally by: Jaina Proudmoar
Originally by: mazzilliu
Originally by: Jaina Proudmoar @ mazzilliu
What is your position on High-sec POS sieging?
420 siege high sec poses errrryy day
(seriously though i don't know what you are asking me here. if someone gets wardecced, all their stuff in highsec is fair game to the attacker.)
Highsec POS sieges are long, insanely boring and very repetitive and tedious. Do you think a rethink of how POS sieges work is necessary?
now i think of it, it is pretty ****ty that you can't use dreads on highsec poses. do people use tons of hardeners on their poses or something? that's the only module i can think of that skews the balance too much against battleships. simply making them unanchorable in highsec should fix the problem to bring it more inline with 0.0 pos seiging, yes?
give me more complete information on the problem, as I don't have experience seiging highsec poses- none of my PVP characters can enter highsec. :)
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1045803 VOTE FOR ME FOR CSM |
Captain Pompous
Is Right Even When He's Wrong So Deal With It
|
Posted - 2009.04.23 22:58:00 -
[98]
I like you, please pledge to have MD shut down and the "regulars" "airlocked" (ingame) - if you know what I mean
---
I was going to run for CSM but life waylaid me :( |
mazzilliu
Caldari Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2009.04.24 01:38:00 -
[99]
Edited by: mazzilliu on 24/04/2009 01:38:16
Originally by: Captain Pompous I like you, please pledge to have MD shut down and the "regulars" "airlocked" (ingame) - if you know what I mean
i blindly pledge to do whatever you just asked of me in order to get your vote.
what is MD?
Originally by: vammathar My Mazz has my vote and then some
vamm
vamm's vote is a million votes
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1045803 VOTE FOR ME FOR CSM |
Roy Awesome
Gallente Guiding Hand Social Club Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.04.24 02:58:00 -
[100]
Hai, I was going to vote for Istvaan, but, since I can't, I will vote for youuuuuuuuu
-Roy Awesome
Now a CCP Navigator certified main! |
|
Wasp O'Ryan
Gallente The Illuminati. Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2009.04.24 03:15:00 -
[101]
Voting for Mazz with all my accounts because she's a GIRL on the INTERNET.
|
mazzilliu
Caldari Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2009.04.24 04:01:00 -
[102]
I'm still putting together propoganda material for my campaign website, but here's the beginning, since you can never be campaigning too early.
https://pandemic-legion.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=91
theres more to come, of course. one flash game is up so far: "mazz launcher"
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1045803 VOTE FOR ME FOR CSM |
Jaina Proudmoar
Caldari School of Applied Knowledge
|
Posted - 2009.04.24 10:32:00 -
[103]
Originally by: mazzilliu
Originally by: Jaina Proudmoar
Originally by: mazzilliu
Originally by: Jaina Proudmoar @ mazzilliu
What is your position on High-sec POS sieging?
420 siege high sec poses errrryy day
(seriously though i don't know what you are asking me here. if someone gets wardecced, all their stuff in highsec is fair game to the attacker.)
Highsec POS sieges are long, insanely boring and very repetitive and tedious. Do you think a rethink of how POS sieges work is necessary?
now i think of it, it is pretty ****ty that you can't use dreads on highsec poses. do people use tons of hardeners on their poses or something? that's the only module i can think of that skews the balance too much against battleships. simply making them unanchorable in highsec should fix the problem to bring it more inline with 0.0 pos seiging, yes?
give me more complete information on the problem, as I don't have experience seiging highsec poses- none of my PVP characters can enter highsec. :)
The short answer is that it takes about 50 well fitted battleships with decent pilots and support several hours to send a large POS into reinforced. While I appreciate that a large POS shouldn't be easy to take down, there has to be a better way than having a fleet or armageddons AFK for a couple of hours after the defences are incapacitated ...
|
Relatyve Mynd
|
Posted - 2009.04.24 16:24:00 -
[104]
vote for mazz she is very smart.
|
Ivas
|
Posted - 2009.04.24 17:45:00 -
[105]
Edited by: Ivas on 24/04/2009 17:45:56 If I vote for you mazz would you stop saying I'm a spy?
|
Brooke Fey
Via Negativa
|
Posted - 2009.04.24 18:24:00 -
[106]
Voting for mazz cos I heard her on TS once.
|
Hex Keng
Minmatar SniggWaffe
|
Posted - 2009.04.25 11:25:00 -
[107]
+1 Vote for Mazz. Check out the Flashgame! |
Larkonis TrassIer
Neo Spartans Laconian Syndicate
|
Posted - 2009.04.25 14:16:00 -
[108]
Vote for mazz otherwise Kugu will hack you computer and kill your family!!!
But it all honesty maz has plenty of good ideas, a pair of breasts and an AK so I'll say this...
If you have one account: Vote for Larkonis Trassler
If you have two accounts: Vote for Larkonis Trassler and Mazzilliu
|
Xerious Biz
|
Posted - 2009.04.25 18:21:00 -
[109]
Don't give two ****s about your agenda, but depending on cup-size might vote for you.
hth
|
mazzilliu
Caldari Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2009.04.25 21:39:00 -
[110]
Edited by: mazzilliu on 25/04/2009 21:45:52
Originally by: Jaina Proudmoar
The short answer is that it takes about 50 well fitted battleships with decent pilots and support several hours to send a large POS into reinforced. While I appreciate that a large POS shouldn't be easy to take down, there has to be a better way than having a fleet or armageddons AFK for a couple of hours after the defences are incapacitated ...
well that too bad then, because everyone in 0.0 has to deal with the same thing also. oftentimes when people think using dreads is unsafe they will use battleships, that's like standard operating procedure for us.
edit: vote for me i am not too afraid to tell people too bad
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1045803 VOTE FOR ME FOR CSM |
|
mazzilliu
Caldari Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2009.04.25 21:40:00 -
[111]
Edited by: mazzilliu on 25/04/2009 21:46:04 edit is not quote
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1045803 VOTE FOR ME FOR CSM |
Jaina Proudmoar
Caldari School of Applied Knowledge
|
Posted - 2009.04.25 23:02:00 -
[112]
Originally by: mazzilliu Edited by: mazzilliu on 25/04/2009 21:45:52
Originally by: Jaina Proudmoar
The short answer is that it takes about 50 well fitted battleships with decent pilots and support several hours to send a large POS into reinforced. While I appreciate that a large POS shouldn't be easy to take down, there has to be a better way than having a fleet or armageddons AFK for a couple of hours after the defences are incapacitated ...
well that too bad then, because everyone in 0.0 has to deal with the same thing also. oftentimes when people think using dreads is unsafe they will use battleships, that's like standard operating procedure for us.
edit: vote for me i am not too afraid to tell people too bad
Do you think POS sieging and cap ships need to be changed or do you believe they are fine as they are?
|
mazzilliu
Caldari Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2009.04.25 23:07:00 -
[113]
Originally by: Jaina Proudmoar
Do you think POS sieging and cap ships need to be changed or do you believe they are fine as they are?
motherships need to be changed, and the amount of time it takes putting up poses need to be changed. i'd like to figure out some helpful suggestion that would involve reducing the amount of time spent boringly shooting at a pos, but i havent thought of one and i havent seen one good enough.
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1045803 VOTE FOR ME FOR CSM |
Esmenet
Gallente
|
Posted - 2009.04.26 15:39:00 -
[114]
Originally by: mazzilliu
Real Life: I'm a girl in real life, a real girl. If you vote for me I will post pics. I'm also not fat or ugly.
You need a video or at least some pics to get your campaign moving. And yea this is my sig. Real PVP'ers only use f1. |
Jaina Proudmoar
Caldari School of Applied Knowledge
|
Posted - 2009.04.26 16:33:00 -
[115]
Originally by: mazzilliu
Originally by: Jaina Proudmoar
Do you think POS sieging and cap ships need to be changed or do you believe they are fine as they are?
motherships need to be changed, and the amount of time it takes putting up poses need to be changed. i'd like to figure out some helpful suggestion that would involve reducing the amount of time spent boringly shooting at a pos, but i havent thought of one and i havent seen one good enough.
Sounds fair - do you have any views on empire warfare, the use of neutrals to RR without any danger (just dock, rep, undock, repeat) and ******ed docking games?
(You actually have my vote, but I'd still like to know your views on this.)
|
mazzilliu
Caldari Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2009.04.27 09:24:00 -
[116]
Originally by: Jaina Proudmoar
Originally by: mazzilliu
Originally by: Jaina Proudmoar
Do you think POS sieging and cap ships need to be changed or do you believe they are fine as they are?
motherships need to be changed, and the amount of time it takes putting up poses need to be changed. i'd like to figure out some helpful suggestion that would involve reducing the amount of time spent boringly shooting at a pos, but i havent thought of one and i havent seen one good enough.
Sounds fair - do you have any views on empire warfare, the use of neutrals to RR without any danger (just dock, rep, undock, repeat) and ******ed docking games?
(You actually have my vote, but I'd still like to know your views on this.)
wasn't that declared an exploit though?
if its still a problem, maybe i can see if there can be some sort of transferrance of aggro caused by remote repping. but i wont come up with the issue myself since i dont really go into highsec and probably wont come up with the best possible proposal. but if it has support and highsec dwellers dont think its a stupid idea i will get behind it.
maybe you should post the issue yourself if you have something specific in mind.
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1045803 VOTE FOR ME FOR CSM |
mazzilliu
Caldari Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2009.04.27 09:27:00 -
[117]
Originally by: Esmenet
Originally by: mazzilliu
Real Life: I'm a girl in real life, a real girl. If you vote for me I will post pics. I'm also not fat or ugly.
You need a video or at least some pics to get your campaign moving.
itll all be here when it is. ill start by re-posting pics already posted on the PL forums, sometime today.
https://pandemic-legion.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=91
the last two weeks ive actually been out of town and using other people's computers for everything. so i havent been turning out material so fast. but i just got home so :)
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1045803 VOTE FOR ME FOR CSM |
RedSplat
RennTech
|
Posted - 2009.04.27 13:58:00 -
[118]
+1, although you may have to arrange for Lark to disappear; careful, those servicemen are sly. Secretly MirrorGod. Apparently
Originally by: CCP Mitnal
I don't sleep. I am always here. Watching. Waiting.
Originally by: CCP Mitnal it does get progressively longer.
|
Wrhaistek Zhelocomeir
|
Posted - 2009.04.27 15:42:00 -
[119]
I've only ever heard good things about Mazz, she gets my vote. :thumbsup: |
Krazor
|
Posted - 2009.04.27 15:51:00 -
[120]
+1 , I'm shallow :-)
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |