| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
EL Kadin
    |
Posted - 2009.04.04 18:11:00 -
[1]
How does a well run corp do it? What are the ways they become sucessful? What is a badly run corp? What do they do to run it into the ground. Any personal expierence in both types would be a good read. Also, how does this translate to Alliance's, where you have left an alliance or corp because it was run badly and why?
|
Cat o'Ninetails
Rancer Defence League
|
Posted - 2009.04.04 18:15:00 -
[2]
the difference between a good corp and a bad one is teh members lol
second is to have a good ceo or director team
visit my blog for my adventures
|
Haakelen
Gallente
The Scope
|
Posted - 2009.04.04 18:28:00 -
[3]
Originally by: EL Kadin
How does a well run corp do it? What are the ways they become sucessful? What is a badly run corp? What do they do to run it into the ground. Any personal expierence in both types would be a good read. Also, how does this translate to Alliance's, where you have left an alliance or corp because it was run badly and why?
In my experience, well-run small corps are families with lots of equality, and well-run large corps are authoritarian and regimented. Small corps can be successful when all the members are smart/capable enough and have enough autonomy to make decisions by themselves. Large corps need a dedicated, competent, tough directorate to stop it from descending into anarchy.
There's plenty of ways to badly run a small corp. Pretending it's big, clashes of egos, little participation, and no direction to name a few. Large corps can think they're closer-knit than they actually are. They can have problems with delegation of responsibility and authority. And they can have bad communication. In a large corp it's inexcusable to not have a good structure of people to explain what's going on to the regular members.
I've been in small corps that were run into the ground. Mostly through infighting and lack of activity. I've also been a mid-level director in a larger corp, and been partially responsible for disrepair of it. When a corp is more than a clique of friends, proper communication is vital. Without it, nobody's happy.
Alliances need to be streamlined, and very strict. There can't be more than a handful of corps, or it disintegrates. For an alliance to be successful, it has to be made up of highly organized corps, who like each other. An alliance is supposed to be a corp of corps, not a group of quasi-related people.
IMO, at least.
|
Some Advisor
|
Posted - 2009.04.04 19:17:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Some Advisor on 04/04/2009 19:18:34
Originally by: Cat o'Ninetails
the difference between a good corp and a bad one is teh members lol
second is to have a good ceo or director team
so, youre the bad corp then? :)
Haakelen: nice read
|
Cat o'Ninetails
Rancer Defence League
|
Posted - 2009.04.04 19:22:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Some Advisor
Edited by: Some Advisor on 04/04/2009 19:18:34
Originally by: Cat o'Ninetails
the difference between a good corp and a bad one is teh members lol
second is to have a good ceo or director team
so, youre the bad corp then? :)
no my corp fights for good and justice and honor and all that fluffy stuff
visit my blog for my adventures
|
Korerin Mayul
|
Posted - 2009.04.04 19:39:00 -
[6]
just for us noobs, can somone draw a line in the sand bwtween 'small corp' and 'large corp' how meny menvers &c
|
Haakelen
Gallente
The Scope
|
Posted - 2009.04.04 19:44:00 -
[7]
20-30ish seems small to me. With that many you're likely to have alts and people on weird timezones, so you won't have much more than a third or so online at once. 150+ with good activity is beginning to get big.
|
Korerin Mayul
|
Posted - 2009.04.04 20:25:00 -
[8]
dang, looks like we need to open recruitment again :/
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |