Legion icon on the kill reports is huge compaired to the rest.

Are there diminishing returns on the increase or do you get the 'full' 15% from each resist that you're not being hit on? Specifically, if I were being hit exclusively with pure kinetic damage, what kinetic resist would the module confer?

The resist is calculated for the module itself, but when it's applied to the ship it goes through the normal channels. So, in the hypothetical scenario where you have no other resistance bonuses, then the max resist you could get from this module is 60% (the other three would then be at 0). But if you have other resistance bonuses, then your actual resist is calculated as usual.

I hope there's plans for more than just T1 modules. Can we expect Meta/T2/Faction/Deadspace?

Edit: And is this module at all affected by Armour Compensation skills?

Goonswarm and Death have thousands of pod pilots, you're asking concord to allow aggression against thousands of pilots.

Of course its going to be expensive. You're paying for targets, lots of targets, lots of targets means lots of money.

Besides you can go to null space where you can shoot them for FREE.

The resist is calculated for the module itself, but when it's applied to the ship it goes through the normal channels. So, in the hypothetical scenario where you have no other resistance bonuses, then the max resist you could get from this module is 60% (the other three would then be at 0). But if you have other resistance bonuses, then your actual resist is calculated as usual.

Can I take this opportunity to say that I love you, Punkturis? Thank you for these small fixes that make eve much more enjoyable.

That seems a little crazy, tbh. Theoretically, that means that the plain meta 0 t1 hardener can provide better resistances towards a specific damage type (60%) than a single-purpose T2 active hardener (55%). If the T2 version gets the same 10% increase over T1 as occurs with existing hardeners, that'd mean the plain jane T2 adaptive hardener could potentially provide a bigger resistance increase than a current X-type hardener.

But it does have important weakness normal modules don't have: FC commands fleet to use 1 damage type, then commands everyone to switch damage to something else which now has 0% resistance.

But it does have important weakness normal modules don't have: FC commands fleet to use 1 damage type, then commands everyone to switch damage to something else which now has 0% resistance.

Also I havn't yet seen mentioned how long it takes for module to reach that 60%. Will it happen during single cycle or does it take several cycles to fully adjust.

EDIT: Also you can't just use 2 of them to cover 2 damage types effectively. They would both adjust to 30% (I believe), and because of stacking penalty 2nd module would only give 26.1%, which is 48.3% total from those 2 modules (if I calculated this right).

thanks:)

Regarding the fueled shield booster - the first version I made actually used Hydrogen Batteries as fuel directly from the cargo hold, using a script. But there were several issues here, the most serious one being that it didn't fit one of the key criteria of the module, which was this is supposed to give temporary boost only. I.e. the intention was not to create a module that could be run non-stop throughout the whole combat. Instead, the thinking is that timing is important where you can temporarily tank more heavily than normally.

Now, whether cap boosters are the right choice or not can be debated, it has its pros and cons. Yes, it doesn't make sense to use an 800 instead of 400, but that isn't a bad thing per se - people will just use the 400 and that's fine. That being said, it is still in the picture to tweak stats and even create new kind of fuel charge, but fueling from the cargo hold didn't really work out when we tested it, i.e. it either allowed for endless boosting, or you having to fill you're cargo hold with a handful of fuel charges.

In fact, all T3 are not scaled correctly !

http://img11.hostingpics.net/pics/341444Capturedcran20120503231746.png

and the tengu in the same kill report is concerned too.

Regarding the fueled shield booster - the first version I made actually used Hydrogen Batteries as fuel directly from the cargo hold, using a script. But there were several issues here, the most serious one being that it didn't fit one of the key criteria of the module, which was this is supposed to give temporary boost only. I.e. the intention was not to create a module that could be run non-stop throughout the whole combat. Instead, the thinking is that timing is important where you can temporarily tank more heavily than normally.

Now, whether cap boosters are the right choice or not can be debated, it has its pros and cons. Yes, it doesn't make sense to use an 800 instead of 400, but that isn't a bad thing per se - people will just use the 400 and that's fine. That being said, it is still in the picture to tweak stats and even create new kind of fuel charge, but fueling from the cargo hold didn't really work out when we tested it, i.e. it either allowed for endless boosting, or you having to fill you're cargo hold with a handful of fuel charges.

That being said, it is still in the picture to tweak stats and even create new kind of fuel charge, but fueling from the cargo hold didn't really work out when we tested it, i.e. it either allowed for endless boosting, or you having to fill you're cargo hold with a handful of fuel charges.

[quote=CCP SoniClover
A suggestion would be to have it boost your shield massively, give it a long reload time(like now) ... and make every single cycle Really count.

Agreed would be a whole lot more viable if this could bring us back from the brink of death, otherwise as was stated before a cap booster and normal shield rep will be better.