EVE Search - Posts by deadEd

Search EVE-Online forums for:

Result 1-20 of 62 for by author deadEd (0,52 seconds)

Pages: [1] 2 3 4
1. Fixing Lowsec - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Now this is the right train of thinking. Lowsec needs to be more valuable to live in, preferably done in connection with making Highsec less profitable (moving all L4 agents to lowsec would be a good start). Yes, it's more targets for the pirates,... - by deadEd - at 2008.12.01 21:02:00
2. (ISSUE / IDEA) Changes need to be made to newb corps for older players - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Originally by: I SoStoned Simply put: There should be a cost to that immunity, a cost higher than corp channel spam. I'll go you one better: That kind of immunity shouldn't be in the game - by deadEd - at 2008.12.01 20:06:00
3. So why did you vote the way you did? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread] Originally by: Cyprus Black Edited by: Cyprus Black on 29/11/2008 06:34:50 I abstained from voting because not a single CSM candidate was willing to address the horrid learning cliff and entrance bar for new players. In essence, no rep... - by deadEd - at 2008.11.29 13:35:00
4. special thanks goons! - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread] Originally by: Doctor Penguin War-Deccing is pay-to-grief atm. Simply because the system cannot handle super alliances like BoB or the Goons. I'd say that War-Deccing in highsec space should be still allowed, but at a much higher cost t... - by deadEd - at 2008.11.29 13:31:00
5. (ISSUE / IDEA) Changes need to be made to newb corps for older players - in Assembly Hall [original thread] NPC taxes aren't the solution - that ultimately just becomes a way to "pay" to avoid a large part of the game (dealing with other player corps). Honestly there's no reason why anyone older than a few months should need to be in an undeccable cor... - by deadEd - at 2008.11.28 17:47:00
6. [PROPOSAL] Good Bug Reporting Incentives - in Assembly Hall [original thread] I like the idea of superficial rewards like medals or flags on your character or whatever, but I don't like the idea of giving actual ship/isk rewards etc. The idea is to encourage people to actually report bugs, not to get people to spam reports ... - by deadEd - at 2008.11.28 17:42:00
7. Can Flipping Yes/No? - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread] If you want to be safe from ore theft, bring a hauler along (alt account or friend, whatever). If you're not willing to do that, deal with the risks. Bringing up the safety of mission runners is pointless as well, since that's a whole other prob... - by deadEd - at 2008.11.28 17:32:00
8. special thanks goons! - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread] Originally by: Bunyip As a CSM delegate, it falls to us to tell CCP our ideas on how to improve this broken system. Goons will be goons, that is inevitable. Now you know one of the reasons I remain in an NPC corp. The only thing broken... - by deadEd - at 2008.11.27 19:13:00
9. Disabling ghost training - the blog edition - in EVE Information Portal [original thread] You know, if the announcement from the beginning would have been something along the lines of "ok, you've had this for years, but sorry guys, gravy train's done, we want to cash in on this", it would have been a lot easier to swallow. Trying to sp... - by deadEd - at 2008.10.14 01:51:00
10. Ghost Training to be Removed - in EVE Information Portal [original thread] Edited by: deadEd on 13/10/2008 21:32:22 Originally by: Jimer Lins I'm having a VERY hard time being unhappy about fewer alts. Alts are really good at distracting mains when they get burned out on the large amount of stuff in this ... - by deadEd - at 2008.10.13 21:32:00
11. Ghost Training to be Removed - in EVE Information Portal [original thread] Originally by: Kerdrak CCP get rid of 30d GTC: people stop training alts CCP get rid of "ghost training": people stop using alts CCP aims for 1 character -> 1 person... CCP aims for 1 character per person: Main characters burn out ... - by deadEd - at 2008.10.13 20:50:00
12. Ghost Training to be Removed - in EVE Information Portal [original thread] Originally by: DigitalCommunist JAlso, regardless of CCP's stance, the two day warning is just ridiculous. It probably takes more than a week for most of the playerbase to read a new dev blog. Now GTC demand has been artificially boosted b... - by deadEd - at 2008.10.13 20:29:00
13. Ghost Training to be Removed - in EVE Information Portal [original thread] Originally by: Kayl Breinhar Edited by: Kayl Breinhar on 13/10/2008 19:57:03 One other thing, CCP... ...doing this right after a Power of Two promo ends? VERY Low. Bad form. hahahahaha I didn't even realize that. This decision... - by deadEd - at 2008.10.13 19:59:00
14. Ghost Training to be Removed - in EVE Information Portal [original thread] Originally by: Wynteryth Fett Sure looks to me like you got 3 months of training for free. And in return i'll be indefinitely running 3 or 4 accounts once they're usable as opposed to the 1 I would have ran otherwise. That's the point... - by deadEd - at 2008.10.13 19:47:00
15. Ghost Training to be Removed - in EVE Information Portal [original thread] Edited by: deadEd on 13/10/2008 19:16:00 Edited by: deadEd on 13/10/2008 19:15:39 Originally by: Bloody Rabbit You are just upset beause this will cut into your player base (Goon Alliance) more than the others. I'm happy with the ... - by deadEd - at 2008.10.13 19:15:00
16. Ghost Training to be Removed - in EVE Information Portal [original thread] Good move CCP - now not only do I never want to bother rolling and maintaining alts, next time I get burned out by how unbelievably broken certain segments of this game are, I'll have no reason at all to even consider re-subbing later! Thanks for ... - by deadEd - at 2008.10.13 19:02:00
17. [Idea & Issue] POS fuel over complected, Fuel rods will save your day. - in Assembly Hall [original thread] A nice idea. POS fueling becomes less needlessly tedious and traders/manufacturers have one more thing to build and sell. Supported - by deadEd - at 2008.10.12 11:48:00
18. [Idea] Balancing siege warfare bonuses - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Edited by: deadEd on 12/10/2008 11:46:26 Supported No reason in the world that shields shouldn't be filled up after bonuses are applied. Doesn't matter if other modules don't work like that, this is a basic balance issue. - by deadEd - at 2008.10.12 11:46:00
19. [Issue] Arazu/Lachesis/Celestis/Maulus/Keres need a boost - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Way too many ships were made effectively useless by the RSD nerf. Something needs to be done. Supported definitely. - by deadEd - at 2008.10.12 11:41:00
20. It begins - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread] Originally by: Raving Gerbil STOP USING SO MANY FKING PEOPLE IN FIGHTS THEN MAYBE THE NODE WONT CRASH AND YOU WONT CRY ON THE FORUMS. THE SYSTEMS ARE CRASHING BECAUSE THERE IS TOO MANY PEOPLE, SO SEND PEOPLE AWAY, DONT USE 40 CAP ALTS. ... - by deadEd - at 2008.10.11 21:19:00
Pages: [1] 2 3 4
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.