Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 |
41. I Challenge Hans ... - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Poetic Stanziel wrote: corestwo wrote: You fled the losing side in the face of a horde of farmers ( ) to join the winning Caldari, and are only now returning back after Agony Empire & company might have a shot at turning things around (a...
- by corestwo - at 2012.10.23 21:53:00
|
42. I Challenge Hans ... - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
You fled the losing side in the face of a horde of farmers ( ) to join the winning Caldari, and are only now returning back after Agony Empire & company might have a shot at turning things around (and they're off to a fine start if the current...
- by corestwo - at 2012.10.23 21:36:00
|
43. High sec CSM members, how about some kind of public statement - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: Issler Dainze wrote: RazielZian wrote: As a toon who has used drone boats for high sec PvE for the last 6 years, I frankly do not see what the problem is. Sure your drones are at more risk than before, you can no...
- by corestwo - at 2012.10.05 17:30:00
|
44. High sec CSM members, how about some kind of public statement - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: corestwo wrote: Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: Dersen Lowery wrote: Are there high sec L4s where towers fire Citadel Torpedoes that do 160,000 points of damage? I am not arguing the changes to the AI are pure deat...
- by corestwo - at 2012.10.05 01:47:00
|
45. High sec CSM members, how about some kind of public statement - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: Dersen Lowery wrote: Are there high sec L4s where towers fire Citadel Torpedoes that do 160,000 points of damage? I am not arguing the changes to the AI are pure death to null sec plexes. Anyone who has run null s...
- by corestwo - at 2012.10.04 19:43:00
|
46. Changing CSM Votes: Standpoints of the CSM - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: CliveWarren wrote: "at a minimum" doesn't leave any room for discussion. Sure it does, and you did discuss it. All you have to say is "Sorry CSM, we don't agree with your requirements and we would like to ach...
- by corestwo - at 2012.09.10 21:30:00
|
47. Changing CSM Votes: Standpoints of the CSM - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: Cede Forster wrote: :tinfoilhat: making a discussion thread and then making sure it is so controversial that it fails would be a way to justify not involving the public Naaahh, nothing like that. In retrospect I...
- by corestwo - at 2012.09.10 20:17:00
|
48. Changing CSM Votes: Standpoints of the CSM - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: CliveWarren wrote: Hey Hans, why didn't you just share that opinion in the discussion thread instead of trying to blame the idea on Trebor? Better yet, why not go post it there right now? And while you're at it, may...
- by corestwo - at 2012.09.10 20:10:00
|
49. Call For Discussion : CSM Voting Reform - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
EvilweaselFinance wrote: Alekseyev Karrde wrote: EvilweaselFinance wrote: We're only willing to have a discussion about a fair voting system. So have it? One paragraph from an IDEA the OP used to start a conversation 20+ pages ago has y...
- by corestwo - at 2012.09.10 00:21:00
|
50. Call For Discussion : CSM Voting Reform - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Sal Volatile wrote: To be fair, the current CSM is actually pretty strong evidence that the existing voting system does not produce a very good CSM. By Alekseyev's own admission, then, the more gameable (by goons), the better! Alekseyev K...
- by corestwo - at 2012.09.10 00:07:00
|
51. Call For Discussion : CSM Voting Reform - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Alekseyev Karrde wrote: corestwo wrote: Alekseyev Karrde wrote: And yes those 10k wasted votes have to do with how the election/voting system works. Kind of a "duh" response Yeah you're going to have to justify that one. Mittens getti...
- by corestwo - at 2012.09.09 23:58:00
|
52. Call For Discussion : CSM Voting Reform - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Alekseyev Karrde wrote: And yes those 10k wasted votes have to do with how the election/voting system works. Kind of a "duh" response Yeah you're going to have to justify that one. Mittens getting booted off simply meant that the next alter...
- by corestwo - at 2012.09.09 23:52:00
|
53. Call For Discussion : CSM Voting Reform - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Alekseyev Karrde wrote: To be honest, I'm VERY surprised at the number of Goonswarm posting that things should be kept exactly the same. You want to talk disenfranchisement, the over 10,000 votes for TheMitanni got thrown out because of his ban...
- by corestwo - at 2012.09.09 23:36:00
|
54. Call For Discussion : CSM Voting Reform - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote: Either CSM Chairman Seleene is backing propositions without having actually read them, or is really bad at deceiving the player base he is intended to represent. Which is it? Perhaps both. Seleene is not exactly know...
- by corestwo - at 2012.09.09 21:01:00
|
55. Call For Discussion : CSM Voting Reform - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Seleene wrote: The bottom line for me as Chairman is that, regardless of any tinfoil flying about, this is a discussion that needs to be had and I believe the community should have input on it. The intent being to minimize the power of organ...
- by corestwo - at 2012.09.09 20:38:00
|
56. Call For Discussion : CSM Voting Reform - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Still haven't seen a reason justifying disenfranchising voters. C'mon girls, knuckle up and come up with something. Even our Republicans have the stones to claim that they do what they do to combat voter fraud. Voter fraud doesn't happen, but that...
- by corestwo - at 2012.09.09 16:26:00
|
57. Call For Discussion : CSM Voting Reform - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
So I still haven't heard Hans justify how disenfranchising members of an organized bloc, whether it's the CFC or some other mythical group, is okay. We're waiting, Hans.
- by corestwo - at 2012.09.09 02:09:00
|
58. Call For Discussion : CSM Voting Reform - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: I asked why they felt it targeted the CFC in particular and not "whichever group in the game has the most organized power". In other words, if your worst nightmare came true and Kelduum metagamed EVE University into th...
- by corestwo - at 2012.09.08 19:22:00
|
59. Call For Discussion : CSM Voting Reform - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: I asked why they felt it targeted the CFC in particular and not "whichever group in the game has the most organized power". In other words, if your worst nightmare came true and Kelduum metagamed EVE University into the...
- by corestwo - at 2012.09.08 18:06:00
|
60. Call For Discussion : CSM Voting Reform - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: Lord Zim wrote: Were you against this suggestion? How many months have you guys spent on drafting this? Did you guys really think it wasn't gameable? We've had some brief internal discussion about it, but the bot...
- by corestwo - at 2012.09.08 16:47:00
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |