EVE Search - Posts by Zarnak Wulf

Search EVE-Online forums for:

Result 581-600 of 2420 for by author Zarnak Wulf (0,69 seconds)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 [30] 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
581. Sticky:[Winter] New destroyers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Daichi Yamato wrote: now make a proper catalyst fit... [Catalyst, Catalyst P2 - Brawler] Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Damage Control II Limited 1MN MicroWarpdrive I J5b Phased Prototype Warp Scrambler I Light Ion... - by Zarnak Wulf - at 2012.09.30 11:37:00
582. Sticky:[Winter] New destroyers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Some Math on Gallente: Current Rail Catalyst - Absolute Gank sans implants High : 125mm II x 8 Mid : Named MWD Sensor Booster II Low : MFS II x 2 TE II Rigs : Ancillary Current Router Hybrid Burst Ionic Field Projector With Faction Antimatt... - by Zarnak Wulf - at 2012.09.30 04:26:00
583. Sticky:[Winter] New destroyers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] If you make Destroyers too fast, too tanky, or give them too much utility they can replace frigates. It's as simple a that. - by Zarnak Wulf - at 2012.09.29 19:12:00
584. Sticky:[Winter] New destroyers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] The electronic attack ships are horribly broken. I love the belief that the sentinel's role will be infringed upon. I haven't seen one of those in months and I'm in FW, land of frigs and destroyers. - by Zarnak Wulf - at 2012.09.29 18:36:00
585. Sticky:[Winter] New destroyers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Daichi Yamato wrote: the AC's and arties do specialised damage and more of it. Also, the thrashers RoF bonus converts to 7/0.75 = 9.33 effective turrets and will do more adaptable dps than the new caldari dessie. The cormorant is still fairl... - by Zarnak Wulf - at 2012.09.29 14:13:00
586. Sticky:[Winter] New destroyers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] More thoughts on Caldari - The Kinetic damage bonus should go. It has 8 launcher hardpoints. 8 weapon slots isn't unique for a destroyer. What is unique is that it is the only one with a damage bonus AND 8. Previously the Thrasher was the only d... - by Zarnak Wulf - at 2012.09.29 12:37:00
587. Sticky:[Winter] New destroyers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Eckyy wrote: Zarnak Wulf wrote: Amarr Destroyer: I think after the ooo's and ahhhh's wear off from the novelty - most people will realize that this ship isn't as good as they think it is. Let's review: The nos/nuets will have a range of 12... - by Zarnak Wulf - at 2012.09.29 01:25:00
588. Sticky:[Winter] New destroyers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Amarr Destroyer: I think after the ooo's and ahhhh's wear off from the novelty - most people will realize that this ship isn't as good as they think it is. Let's review: The nos/nuets will have a range of 12km. Pulse lasers also will also have a... - by Zarnak Wulf - at 2012.09.29 01:08:00
589. Sticky:[Winter] New destroyers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Gallente - kill the hybrid damage bonus. Give it a hybrid tracking bonus instead. Give it a fifth turret slot (4 * 1.25 = 5 anyways). It's CPU is too weak to consider drone upgrades in those two spare highs anyways. - by Zarnak Wulf - at 2012.09.28 18:23:00
590. Sticky:[Winter] New destroyers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] TrouserDeagle wrote: Zarnak Wulf wrote: The Gallente destroyer doesnt cut it. It will be hard to make rails work on the Gallente dessy due to no tracking bonus. It is also the largest destroyer at 72m. And it only has 4 turrets out of 6 high... - by Zarnak Wulf - at 2012.09.28 17:56:00
591. Sticky:[Winter] New destroyers - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] The Gallente destroyer doesnt cut it. It will be hard to make rails work on the Gallente dessy due to no tracking bonus. It is also the largest destroyer at 72m. And it only has 4 turrets out of 6 high slots. I'm not impressed. - by Zarnak Wulf - at 2012.09.28 17:45:00
592. Sticky:FW: I-hub and system upgrades - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Well, I just read this: Pinky's Blog And I really think that everyone is overthinking everything at this point in time. The primary motivator in Faction Warfare right now is not system ownership or the upgrades thereof but the loyalty points i... - by Zarnak Wulf - at 2012.09.27 20:51:00
593. Stop neutrals entering FW complexes? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread] Neutrals come into my plex and they leave in a pod. Man up. - by Zarnak Wulf - at 2012.09.27 12:54:00
594. I need a ship ass cool as I am - in Ships and Modules [original thread] The Dominix has a big ass. I don't know how it compares to yours though. - by Zarnak Wulf - at 2012.09.25 02:35:00
595. Sticky:[Winter] Missile Rebalance + Hurricane tweak - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] It should be obvious to a certain extent how BC will be modified. The tier one with the exception of the Cyclone only have 16 slots. The Cyclone has 17 but it's highs are in a weird 5/3 configuration. The devs have hinted that the tier ones will g... - by Zarnak Wulf - at 2012.09.24 20:35:00
596. Sticky:[Winter] Missile Rebalance + Hurricane tweak - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] If you're going to have TE and TC affect missiles ala turrets then why not go Full Monty and have short range ammo and long range ammo like the turrets as well? - by Zarnak Wulf - at 2012.09.24 17:46:00
597. Sticky:Testing ASB adjustments on Duality - in Test Server Feedback [original thread] In order for me to decide to use an ASB over a shield extender, it has to produce enough shield points not only to replace what the extender would have given me, but also the hitpoints that would have come from the higher regeneration rate that co... - by Zarnak Wulf - at 2012.09.23 07:53:00
598. Sticky:Existing destroyer rebalancing for winter - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] I was pleasantly surprised by the corm. It was much easier to fit. I could squeeze a light launcher next to a rack of 150mm rails. I also had alot more gank potential. The ship with two MFS pushes over 300 DPS to 23km. - by Zarnak Wulf - at 2012.09.23 00:56:00
599. Winter is coming... - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread] I'm very interested to see what they do with the Battlecruisers. The tier one BC all have 16 slots with the exception of the Cyclone (still a weird 5/3 high slot config). We've been told these will be buffed. All the tier two BC have 18 slots. It'... - by Zarnak Wulf - at 2012.09.23 00:28:00
600. Tracking disruptors everywhere is going to make solo PVP impossible. - in Ships and Modules [original thread] TotalRapeage wrote: Ya, because everybody uses missiles in pvp. its all the same Condors, Hookbils, and Hawks - oh my! They're pretty common in FW. At least with the current frigate crop they have very short lock ranges. My Destroyer set... - by Zarnak Wulf - at 2012.09.22 23:32:00
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 [30] 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.