| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
21. [Odyssey Feedback Request] Team Super Friends - Probe Scanning and You - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Yeah with the changes, its a good chance things will be even faster without the DSP. 8 probes are still pretty important for combat probing though. I don't understand the 7 probe limit other than as a direct nerf to scanning multiple targets.
- by XXSketchxx - at 2013.05.08 20:09:00
|
22. [Odyssey Feedback Request] Team Super Friends - Probe Scanning and You - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Jesus. No one is going to abandon probing because the precious DSP are gone. And we're not fully going back to "boring" probing, as these new formations will speed things up immensely. You'll have to probe just a little bit more, but its going t...
- by XXSketchxx - at 2013.05.08 19:53:00
|
23. [Odyssey Feedback Request] Team Super Friends - Probe Scanning and You - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Fonac wrote: XXSketchxx wrote: Fonac wrote: The removal of deep space probe make me extremely nervous this is in many ways a total destruction of exploration as we know it. Its not destruction of exploration at all you cry baby. Y...
- by XXSketchxx - at 2013.05.08 19:01:00
|
24. [Odyssey Feedback Request] Team Super Friends - Probe Scanning and You - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
So how bout that 8th probe?
- by XXSketchxx - at 2013.05.08 18:46:00
|
25. [Odyssey Feedback Request] Team Super Friends - Probe Scanning and You - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Fonac wrote: The removal of deep space probe make me extremely nervous this is in many ways a total destruction of exploration as we know it. Its not destruction of exploration at all you cry baby. You will just have to go back to probi...
- by XXSketchxx - at 2013.05.08 18:41:00
|
26. [Odyssey Feedback Request] Team Super Friends - Probe Scanning and You - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
CCP Paradox wrote: Honestly guys, I want feedback AFTER you have used the features. Not before! Singularity will be up shortly. I don't need to test it out. I can tell you right now that the removal of the 8th probe is stupid and screws over...
- by XXSketchxx - at 2013.05.08 18:10:00
|
27. [Odyssey Feedback Request] Team Super Friends - Probe Scanning and You - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Omnathious Deninard wrote: Deep Space Probe at the sun with the full system in its range, then 7 probes on the site or target. Lol. You've been doing it wrong buddy. You don't need to move a DSP and you certainly don't need 7 probes to scan...
- by XXSketchxx - at 2013.05.08 18:07:00
|
28. [Odyssey Feedback Request] Team Super Friends - Probe Scanning and You - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Omnathious Deninard wrote: XXSketchxx wrote: Why not 8 probes? Also, RIP Deep Space Probes. We had a good run. There is no real need to 8 probes with the removal of DSP. What does that have to do with DSP? I'm referring to the ability...
- by XXSketchxx - at 2013.05.08 18:04:00
|
29. [Odyssey Feedback Request] Team Super Friends - Probe Scanning and You - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Why not 8 probes? Also, RIP Deep Space Probes. We had a good run.
- by XXSketchxx - at 2013.05.08 18:00:00
|
30. Sticky:[Oddysey] Capital Rigs - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
mynnna wrote: XXSketchxx wrote: mynnna wrote: He's pointing out, probably incorrectly, that you won't be able to fit three T2 trimarks to a carrier. Large T2 trimarks are 75 calibration, though, and a carrier has 400. They'll be fine. A...
- by XXSketchxx - at 2013.04.23 17:21:00
|
31. Sticky:[Oddysey] Capital Rigs - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
mynnna wrote: He's pointing out, probably incorrectly, that you won't be able to fit three T2 trimarks to a carrier. Large T2 trimarks are 75 calibration, though, and a carrier has 400. They'll be fine. Also, seeing as best case for a Tech...
- by XXSketchxx - at 2013.04.23 17:02:00
|
32. Sticky:[Oddysey] Capital Rigs - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Llyona wrote: xXyoloxXxbroswagxXx420Xx wrote: Love it. Spend 1.3b on an Archon then 4.5b on T2 rigs. Good job CCP! Look at the tools posting like they know what's up. Let's all point and laugh at them! Seriously, if the MATERIAL price i...
- by XXSketchxx - at 2013.04.23 16:52:00
|
33. Sticky:[Oddysey] Capital Rigs - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
xXyoloxXxbroswagxXx420Xx wrote: Love it. Spend 1.3b on an Archon then 4.5b on T2 rigs. Good job CCP! Carriers should have their build cost increased 5x to account for this discrepancy.
- by XXSketchxx - at 2013.04.23 16:39:00
|
34. *** Scan Strength formula - Incarna version *** - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
CCP Veritas wrote: It gives me great joy that people are still trying to figure it out ;) One of the few things you guys did really well. When are we going to get another Apocrypha quality expansion?
- by XXSketchxx - at 2013.04.12 22:57:00
|
35. 0.0 bearing what to choose - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
zeyta102 wrote: Chimmy Full high of DCUs and lows of damage mods.
- by XXSketchxx - at 2013.02.04 19:59:00
|
36. Making money with exploration. - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Idiran Ambassador wrote: make 100mil to 2bil per hour. wolololololololololololololololololloollololololololololollololololololollololololololololo he said per hour in an exploration thread wololololololololololololololololllllllllllllll...
- by XXSketchxx - at 2013.02.04 19:35:00
|
37. Making money with exploration. - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
St Mio wrote: Because exploration gives random rewards, the most important thing is to be able to roll the dice as many times as possible, i.e., run as many sites in as short a period of time as possible. If you can find lots of sites in highse...
- by XXSketchxx - at 2013.02.04 19:34:00
|
38. Ded 5 Complexes in Hi-sec - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Information on a user-based wiki is wrong? Who knew?
- by XXSketchxx - at 2013.02.04 19:32:00
|
39. Smaller Alliances/Corps Need To Take Their Game Back - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I don't get it.
- by XXSketchxx - at 2013.01.28 23:35:00
|
40. Smaller Alliances/Corps Need To Take Their Game Back - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Why are you in test?
- by XXSketchxx - at 2013.01.28 23:35:00
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |