Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
361. Are Tachyons Really Oversized? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Wizzkidy on 26/01/2007 15:12:41 Originally by: LUKEC Originally by: Wizzkidy Originally by: Shadowsword Edited by: Shadowsword on 26/01/2007 15:02:49 Originally by: Kunming You're forgetting that...
- by Wizzkidy - at 2007.01.26 15:16:00
|
362. Amarr is NOT gimped - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: mallina people fit HP to omens?... you're better off with something like: 4x FMP 1x heavy launcher meds: whatever 2x heatsink II 800mm plate DCU small rep II but thats really besides the point isnt it. The fact that y...
- by Wizzkidy - at 2007.01.26 15:13:00
|
363. Are Tachyons Really Oversized? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Shadowsword Edited by: Shadowsword on 26/01/2007 15:02:49 Originally by: Kunming You're forgetting that mega/rokh have to fit 7/8 turrets while tempest 6, and amarr ships have tons of PG anyway. Doesn't cha...
- by Wizzkidy - at 2007.01.26 15:08:00
|
364. Imbalance ... the Nano-Inertial Battleships - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Kunming nerf NOS as its the core of the problem. Why do you bother not to read! NOS is NOT the problem, NOS is not the problem, Does having no NOS stop the issue of BS flying around like a ceptor NO Does nerfing NOS...
- by Wizzkidy - at 2007.01.26 15:07:00
|
365. Imbalance ... the Nano-Inertial Battleships - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Kagura Nikon And Istabs are ALREADY STACK NERFED FOR GOD'S SAKE! I'll think your find they are not on the mass side of things mate.
- by Wizzkidy - at 2007.01.26 14:11:00
|
366. Imbalance ... the Nano-Inertial Battleships - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Keitaro Baka the problem is the mass+mwd combo... hands off the rest please. Agreed. It's no use nerf'ing anything else bar this because this is the main problem, all those people saying nerf NOS etc are living in a fant...
- by Wizzkidy - at 2007.01.26 13:39:00
|
367. Only one change I want - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Ke Jung Originally by: Wizzkidy Umm, maybe you would like to form decent sentances for us to understand? Sorry, English not my first language. Sorry I didn't mean that in any mean way, apologies. I read it an...
- by Wizzkidy - at 2007.01.26 13:27:00
|
368. Vivox testing on Singularity - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
It's workign alright for me, although the UI is still VERY laggy and when I key up my speech bubble takes a couple of seconds to turn green. Also I don't see others turn green when they talk. Over all the volume and quality of it is very good but...
- by Wizzkidy - at 2007.01.26 13:25:00
|
369. Only one change I want - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Umm, maybe you would like to form decent sentances for us to understand? Anyway from what I can gather you don't want to get stuck on a station when you undock, well yes there has been an issue with SOME stations which we hope they will fix in ma...
- by Wizzkidy - at 2007.01.26 13:18:00
|
370. Imbalance ... the Nano-Inertial Battleships - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Solar Blade Stop Whining and Adapt to your advisaries. Please tell me why we have interceptors in the game if a BS can out do a ceptor? it makes little sence As far as I am concerned BS where never ment to travel this f...
- by Wizzkidy - at 2007.01.26 12:35:00
|
371. Khanid MkII - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Kel Dario Ah I tought this thread was locked and forgotten. I am pleased to see that was not the case. Hovewer, its been over a half year now since it was posted. Anyone dare guess when/if CCP will do a change to the craptas...
- by Wizzkidy - at 2007.01.26 10:46:00
|
372. Imbalance ... the Nano-Inertial Battleships - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I'll thought I would just add once again for the people that DONT read. You cannot catch a nano/istab ship with webbers cause there agility makes then more then capable of moving our of range with inercia! (hugins again have problems also) Battl...
- by Wizzkidy - at 2007.01.26 10:43:00
|
373. Will new graphics engine mean better character portraits? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Wizzkidy on 25/01/2007 22:20:38 Originally by: DarkMatter Edited by: DarkMatter on 25/01/2007 22:17:45 Since we are starting out "fresh", how about you clear the forum perma-bans for those who may have them... In the sp...
- by Wizzkidy - at 2007.01.25 22:24:00
|
374. Imbalance ... the Nano-Inertial Battleships - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Wizzkidy on 24/01/2007 10:04:21 I'll say it again, A BS going FAST is NOT a problem A BS going FAST and having the agility to out do a interceptor in turning is plain WRONG Having a battleship doing high speed is not the pro...
- by Wizzkidy - at 2007.01.24 10:08:00
|
375. Imbalance ... the Nano-Inertial Battleships - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Kristie It only takes 1 Huginn to ruin a nano BS's day...nope they are not that powerful. The only ships I ever see nanoBS kill are ships with a **** poor tank or ships who are not intending to pvp. I'll keep my double large...
- by Wizzkidy - at 2007.01.23 21:04:00
|
376. Petition query - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
augh, why do they bother sometimes They do mean well dude, just sometimes the GM's drink too much before coming to work
- by Wizzkidy - at 2007.01.23 14:46:00
|
377. Open Jove Space Now!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: TxShadow I feel that making Jovian ships playable by the public is a good idea and here is why (please read before insta-reply/flaming, or you'll just make yourself look stupid ). Yes, their ships would be the PWNMOBILES, ...
- by Wizzkidy - at 2007.01.23 14:43:00
|
378. Test server - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Wizzkidy on 23/01/2007 14:34:36 Originally by: atsushi YEA test sever sucks, could be like the hole game lol. lag lag and more lag. cant be ccp. no it is our prob. Erm what ARE you on about, the test server runs on 8 mac...
- by Wizzkidy - at 2007.01.23 14:38:00
|
379. Dissapointed in T2 webs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Monkey Spankah Edited by: Monkey Spankah on 23/01/2007 14:12:10 they got 10km range and 80% speed decrease. Hm, that does seem a little poor for a T2 Web when you can get a named one at 90% but then again how much a...
- by Wizzkidy - at 2007.01.23 14:17:00
|
380. Imbalance ... the Nano-Inertial Battleships - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
People, They will nerf i-stabs and nano's eventually its inevitable. BS should not be as agile as a ceptor simple as that (that does not mean they should not be able to go as fast as one, im talking about agility) which at the moment is way way w...
- by Wizzkidy - at 2007.01.23 14:14:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |