EVE Search - Posts by Tobiaz

Search EVE-Online forums for:

Result 21-40 of 2665 for by author Tobiaz (0,19 seconds)

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
21. Why a high sec nerf is good for industrialists. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Jose Black wrote: Geligdio Khan wrote: Piracy is one of the most romantic professions in the game, and it is a great selling point for EVE. GÇ£Roam the stars and make a living as a marauderGÇ¥, who wouldnGÇÖt want to play that game? Are ... - by Tobiaz - at 2012.10.23 19:26:00
22. Why a high sec nerf is good for industrialists. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Silk daShocka wrote: Tobiaz wrote: Snip You seem to think your presenting the entire story of what would happen should your suggested changes be implemented, yet you dont' include all the negative effects that they would have. Snip So... - by Tobiaz - at 2012.10.23 19:07:00
23. Why a high sec nerf is good for industrialists. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Silk daShocka wrote: So, it benefits 2 groups of people from what I understand. Null sec alliances, and perhaps miners if they are making 100m isk/hour. I highly doubt the alliances would allow the miners to make this much, since the miners ... - by Tobiaz - at 2012.10.23 17:28:00
24. Why a high sec nerf is good for industrialists. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Kitty Bear wrote: Tobiaz wrote: My estimate is that the threshold at which point players in EVE start taking serious risks and/or cooperate heavily is currently around 100M ISK/hour. Confirming EVERYONE in hisec does topend Incursions in ... - by Tobiaz - at 2012.10.23 17:01:00
25. Why a high sec nerf is good for industrialists. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Geligdio Khan wrote: I think High sec is in effect the perfect storm, it's the safest, closest to the market hubs, has half the materials you need and has a vast number of manufacturing slots. There really is no reason to leave and a small c... - by Tobiaz - at 2012.10.23 16:06:00
26. Propopsed AI changes and their effect. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] How FFS is the new AI a problem for STEALTH bombers? Did the new AI took away your cloak or something? It's suddenly no longer possible to wait, invisible, until the target cleaned the field of NPC a bit and THEN jump him? - by Tobiaz - at 2012.10.23 14:39:00
27. Case Study: Ice Fields: High Sec vs Low Sec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] ICE is profitable. The amount of players sucking on ice cubes every day proves that. Problem though is that most of them they are AFK. It's not likely too many of them are bots, simply because that's not necessary if you only have to check in ever... - by Tobiaz - at 2012.10.23 14:04:00
28. Operation: WRITE DOWN ALL THE THINGS!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] --- UPDATE --- After me and Logix had a summer recess, we will be taking up working on the WDATT project again. We are currently also in the process of setting up a 3rd-party website for tracking the ideas&fixes proposed by the community. Ye... - by Tobiaz - at 2012.10.23 11:44:00
29. Want a Free War with Goonswarm Forever? - in Crime and Punishment [original thread] "We will crush you and drive you from EVE" Didn't that used to be BoB's line? So. actually wardeccing some small-time merc over some stupid towers in empire? Really? Huh, I guess messing around too much with your alt-bears in empire, you start ... - by Tobiaz - at 2012.10.22 22:50:00
30. Mining Bots - in Crime and Punishment [original thread] Shi Kishunuba wrote: I thought mining bots were against the rules in eve? I popped into Agal just now and found 89 "bots" in the ice field happily mining away. If only i had enough corp members to go gant them all, the mess would be fantastic ... - by Tobiaz - at 2012.10.22 22:07:00
31. Snowball Launchers. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Perhaps one day CCP will give us snowball launchers so we can make it snow on the dustbunnies below. - by Tobiaz - at 2012.10.22 17:04:00
32. npc corps in dire need of removal - in Crime and Punishment [original thread] -1 NPC alts are annoying, but forcing player out of NPC corporation (or god forbid, disband NPC corporations) is a horrible idea. What CCP could do however, is increasing the corp tax for older players. You'd get a lot of players fleeing in one... - by Tobiaz - at 2012.10.22 16:51:00
33. BUG/FEATURE? - wreck loot change - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Came here hoping CCP allowed tractoring yellow wrecks on SiSi Left dissappointed - by Tobiaz - at 2012.10.22 07:20:00
34. New Caldari Destroyer : DAS BOOT!!!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Xpaulusx wrote: Finally a hull design worthy of the Glorious Caldari Nation. It looks frikkin' Gallente - by Tobiaz - at 2012.10.22 07:16:00
35. dumbest thing you did in eve as a noob - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Here's my dumbest thing as a noob (and a history lesson for those interested). It's a long one, spanning well over a year. After some wandering around for the first few months after launch, I managed to join Techell, the biggest industrial corp b... - by Tobiaz - at 2012.10.21 21:13:00
36. Value of Ice - in Market Discussions [original thread] Ch3244 wrote: DarthNefarius wrote: I'm curious if Poetic Stanza's rumor thread in GD that the Goons are restarting the Gallente ice interdiction will push up that ICE price? yes it has already begun It must be nice, being able to make m... - by Tobiaz - at 2012.10.21 10:24:00
37. Raising mass awareness - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Riot Girl wrote: Bubanni wrote: (Drake is a dragon dude) It's a duck. It's more like a dragon and a duck had little 'drakelings'. - by Tobiaz - at 2012.10.21 09:33:00
38. Adhocracy statement on new POSes - in Wormholes [original thread] TheGunslinger42 wrote: As for limiting pos size/mods in smaller class wormholes: It's just a stupid, stupid idea. I agree. Such arbitrary measures are almost always bad. Instead of trying to restrict C-1 to C-3 fortification itself, much b... - by Tobiaz - at 2012.10.21 09:10:00
39. Adhocracy statement on new POSes - in Wormholes [original thread] Improving life in WH is a two-edged sword. Yes it will make life in WH easier, but at the same time, these days it's mostly the inconvenience of living in a WH what keeps it 'hardcore'. For instance better corp hangar management will result in le... - by Tobiaz - at 2012.10.21 09:04:00
40. Problem with AFK Cloaking? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Petrus Blackshell wrote: As title. I'm noticing a lot of people having problems with AFK cloaking, but it seems a bit silly to me to be scared of a ship that is both AFK and that takes serious penalties for equipping a cloak (or is a Recon, so ... - by Tobiaz - at 2012.10.20 17:34:00
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.